[REBOL] Rebol Tech, please answer. Two questions. Re:(6)

2000-09-27 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Tech, please answer. Two questions. Re:(5) > they're found in FORTH, the reason for their use is based on > their posi

[REBOL] OT: c#

2000-08-07 Thread robert . muench
Hi, for all those interested in programming languages, have a look at this interesting interview about c#: http://windows.oreilly.com/news/hejlsberg_0800.html Robert M. Muench, Karlsruhe, Germany ==> please use PGP <== When do you want to reboot today? use the free portable GUI lib

[REBOL] Find Speed/Database Re:(3)

2000-08-02 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 6:15 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Find Speed/Database Re:(2) > - how fast is ODBC connectivity in comparison to native one? Hi, what I have seen so far it's not t

[REBOL] Find Speed/Database Re:(2)

2000-08-02 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 9:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Find Speed/Database > If Command had MySQL support out of the box, I could put it > to work on paying projects the day it ships

[REBOL] that XML outliner example again Re:(3)

2000-07-27 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 1:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] that XML outliner example again Re:(2) > what about Web Dialect project - will XML be supported? Hi, it is supported! Ok not comple

[REBOL] that XML outliner example again Re:

2000-07-27 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 12:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] that XML outliner example again > appended to a block with names like: arMenu1_1_4_3_3_2, Hi, I have written a JavaScript based hi

[REBOL] Over 70 REBOL Experimental Binaries Available Re:

2000-07-27 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 2:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Over 70 REBOL Experimental Binaries Available > In order to improve our testing process, we have > developed (using REBOL of course)

[REBOL] Outlines (was where are all the components?) Re:

2000-07-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 11:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Outlines (was where are all the components?) > Parsing xml with rebol is easy if you want a quick and dirty job, > but have not be

[REBOL] to-file & none?

2000-07-10 Thread robert . muench
Hi, IIRC we had this issue some time ago, however: to-file ["test" none] >> %test/none ?? I would have expected just %test. I have this problem at a point, where I have an optional function input parameter (which is an extension) and I only want to include it if the parameter was given. How do I

[REBOL] An experiment with RTF Re:(2)

2000-07-07 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 4:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] An experiment with RTF Re: Hi, still in development but perhaps you can have a look at OpenWeb (www.openip.org). At the moment this

[REBOL] RFF: copy/pick

2000-07-04 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I have a request for feature (RFF) concerning 'copy and/or 'pick. It would be nice to be able to use one of the following to extract a series of binary values from an other binary series: pick/range series start end copy/range series start end Where 'start and 'end are numeric absolute posit

[REBOL] Ping Tool Re:

2000-06-22 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 9:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Ping Tool > 1 Q. How can i ping via TCP/IP with REBOL? Hi, I wouldn't go with ping, as needs admin access on some systems. Robert

[REBOL] Good Article in July-2000 Dr.Dobbs Journal by Carl S. Re:

2000-06-01 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 7:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Good Article in July-2000 Dr.Dobbs Journal by Carl S. > Carl, you keep talking about "Dialects" > as being the greatest feature of

[REBOL] Good Article in July-2000 Dr.Dobbs Journal by Carl S. Re:(2)

2000-06-01 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 7:34 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Good Article in July-2000 Dr.Dobbs Journal by Carl S. > Re: > does anyone know how to get that article over here in Germany??? Hi,

[REBOL] Website & Direction Re:

2000-05-25 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 9:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Website & Direction > Besides, it gives all us REBOL folks, both you and me, the > ability to now live off of our favorite hobby.

[REBOL] list test... Re:(3)

2000-05-08 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 4:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] list test... Re:(2) > Yes, I sent reply to Rebert's post on /Command ml and got an > answer from @rebol.net. Some strange kind of redir

[REBOL] hash Re:

2000-04-15 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 11:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] hash > is there anybody who can explain me hash value. > what it is used for, how it works etc. Hi, as I understand it, the datatyp

[REBOL] XML and REBOL: anyone use it? Re:

2000-03-16 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 2:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] XML and REBOL: anyone use it? > Can someone tell me how to get > information from XML into variables? Because it doesn't seem > ver

[REBOL] "{" in strings - workarounds? Re:

2000-03-13 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 9:47 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] "{" in strings - workarounds? > Caused by some emails which contained > unpaired "{". > they are stored in a

[REBOL] Run commands in NT's REBOL Re:

2000-03-09 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 2:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Run commands in NT's REBOL > Everyone know somethig about run commands in NT inside a > REBOL s

[REBOL] New? programming construct Re:

2000-02-17 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2000 4:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] New? programming construct > Those interested in new and unusual programming constructs, > take a look at R++ from AT&T, where B

[REBOL] XML-RPC Re:(3)

2000-02-13 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 11:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: XML-RPC Re: > As I see it, XML is a set of rules for generating data files. It is a > bit more ambitious than just "a file fo

[REBOL] What about Rebol/Command? Re:(2)

2000-02-12 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2000 1:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] What about Rebol/Command? Re: > I am using my RValue class to convert C++ values to/from > REBOL. This has > been completely re

[REBOL] using environment variables Re:

2000-02-12 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 4:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] using environment variables > does anyone know if or how it's possible to use (get and SET) > OS environment variables from within

[REBOL] [Rebol_New] symbol manipulation Re:(5)

2000-02-08 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 4:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] [Rebol_New] symbol manipulation Re:(4) > As Carl stated, something like: > > first [value | value1 | value2] > > or > > thru

[REBOL] [Rebol_New] symbol manipulation Re:(3)

2000-02-08 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 2:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] [Rebol_New] symbol manipulation Re:(2) > How do you link up the BNF definition with the parse statement? > I can't seem to find a

[REBOL] Re:

2000-01-29 Thread robert . muench
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 1:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [REBOL]   In all honesty i use mBED for gui's because mBED ROCKS!  I know Dream weaver may be a little more standard but m

[REBOL] Polymorphic Re:

2000-01-25 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2000 5:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Polymorphic > I do like this kind of polymorphism. It can be observed only when > using the prefix binary operators. > > OTOH, I t

[REBOL] Rebol Web Server Re:(7)

2000-01-24 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2000 8:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Rebol Web Server Re:(5) > What platforms are supported by Xitami? Hi, puh I think most you can think of... here is the readme

[REBOL] Rebol Web Server Re:(7)

2000-01-23 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2000 3:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Web Server Re:(6) > I am. I've been using Xitami for a bit of in-house prototyping, and > am using REBOL for CGI underneat

[REBOL] RE: Rebol Crashes

2000-01-22 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 8:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: > Also, if you think it is a garbage collector problem, you can > use > > recycle/off > > and see if the problem still occurs. Hi, tha

[REBOL] REBOL Product set questoins... Re:(4)

2000-01-22 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2000 7:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: REBOL Product set questoins... Re:(2) > >From what little someone told me about DLLs, I hope not! > (unless that's the > only

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(6)

2000-01-22 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 9:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(5) > we use CA-Visual Objects here (ClipperNG :-), so I work with similar > environment, although VO's

[REBOL] Rebol Web Server Re:(5)

2000-01-22 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 8:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Web Server Re:(4) > OK, let's say my app uses dlls in Windows. When I start two > instances of my > apps - are those dlls loa

[REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(9)

2000-01-21 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I have further played around with the Rebol crashes. It seems that is has something to do with internal limits. Does Rebol has internal limits for things likes: number of nested-blocks, string length, number of parts in a block etc.? Because I can comment a line in my script and it works, unco

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(11)

2000-01-21 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 7:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(10) > We'll have it to you soon via email distribution for all > those that asked for it (after they

[REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(9)

2000-01-21 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 8:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(8) > Yes, /view is built on /core which will be re-released > shortly with some improvements and

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(9)

2000-01-21 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 11:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(8) > As for jb and other's demand for Command and web application > needs, they are also valid and n

[REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(7)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 1:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(6) > REBOL script using the new parse block capability. Hi, will this feature make it into /Core

[REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(3)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 10:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(2) > 2. There was no massive outburst of complaints, as November > and December went by. Hi, as

[REBOL] OpenSource REBOL Re:(10)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 8:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] OpenSource REBOL Re:(9) > One last thought: it's all about the market, not about technology. I totally agree here! (Looks like

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(2)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 7:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re: > my priorities are a little different. No problem. > 1. With the exception of a few minor glitch

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 10:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(3) > I would really be interested in knowing > how many people interested in Rebol > are *truly* in

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 9:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(2) > > It is surely platform-independent, as long as you use Windows and > InternetExplorer. >

[REBOL] Wishlist (was Openletter to Rebol HQ.) Re:(3)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 10:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Wishlist (was Openletter to Rebol HQ.) Re:(2) > > (7) Big-ass kit of Web gizmos > Also a good candidate for OpenSource advoca

[REBOL] local vars - did I miss something?? Re:(2)

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 9:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] local vars - did I miss something?? Re: Thanks to all for clarifying things up! My Rebol inbox is approaching 10.000 postings an

[REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:

2000-01-20 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 8:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? > something that doesn't fit in my mind all that smoothly: Hi, than let's see if I can explain ;-)

[REBOL] REBOL Product set questoins... Re:(2)

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 3:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] REBOL Product set questoins... Re: Hi, as nobody did explained it yet, here it is: > (1)REBOL/Core That's the 'core' Rebol ver

[REBOL] local vars - did I miss something??

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
Hi, very strange behavior for local vars... is this a bug or a feature? If it's a feature what's the rule? Rebol [ test: func [ input [block!]] [ localvar: "" foreach item input [ localvar: append localvar to-string item ] retu

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4)

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 1:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(3) > > that the source-code is about 50K to 100K LOC, which is handle able. > > Hmmm.. this is an i

[REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(7)

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 10:27 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(6) > Perhaps this helps the Rebol team to find the problem and > that someone can have a look at it. Bec

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(2)

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 10:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re: > Just another thought, re: platform development, resources, and general > conquer-the-world strate

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(2)

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 9:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re: > My $0.02, based on my understanding of /Core, /Command, /View > strategy... I agree with Robert:

[REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(6)

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 9:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(5) > I hope someone comes up with a nice solution ;-)). Hi, I know answering my own posting isn't that good

[REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(5)

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 7:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(4) > as much as I'd like to help you with your problem, as long as > I don't have access to the critical section

[REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ.

2000-01-19 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 12:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] [REBOL] Palm port? Re:(2) > Similar to Palm, we have decided to commit those > resources to REBOL/View, demos and projects for no

[REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(3)

2000-01-18 Thread robert . muench
I made some further tests on BeOS, same there... Rebol crashes too. But there I do get an error: CRASH (should not happen): Corrupt datatype 65 :-(( The bad thing is, that I'm completely stuck now and I don't want to play around with the codes until Rebol accepts them. Hopefully a patch/update w

[REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re:(2)

2000-01-18 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2000 11:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Rebol Crashes Re: > Hi, Robert, what's the script? Hi, it's my new dialecting script... seems to be quite tricky for Rebol. Robe

[REBOL] Rebol Crashes

2000-01-18 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I already filed a feedback on the problem but would like to hear how long it will take to get this fixed? The project I'm currently developing is quite big and it's way frustrating to have Rebol crash on every run... I only can run my script once, than I have to exit Rebol and start again :-((

[REBOL] how to create a hidden or encrypted script? Re:(7)

2000-01-14 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2000 1:22 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] how to create a hidden or encrypted script? Re:(6) > I believe the proposal I offered would be able to deal with your > concern, as

[REBOL] line-numbers & error messages Re:(2)

2000-01-14 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] line-numbers & error messages Re: > That sounds sort of useful, but quite limited. For example, what > meaning does "line number

[REBOL] Literate path problems

2000-01-13 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I have the follwoing: HS: make object! [ pre: [] post: [] ] HSA: make object! [ H1S: make HS [level: 1] H2S: make HS [level: 2] [H3S: make HS [level: 3]] [H4S: make HS [level: 4]] [H5S: make HS [level: 5]] [H6S: make

[REBOL] line-numbers & error messages

2000-01-13 Thread robert . muench
Hi, would it be possible to return line-numbers when an error-message is given? The where: ... is not always so clear, especially in huge scripts. Robert M. Muench, Karlsruhe, Germany ==> ask for PGP public-key <== When do you want to reboot today? Use the free portable GUI Library OpenAm

[REBOL] Dialecting improvement?

2000-01-10 Thread robert . muench
Hi, > Carl Sassenrath wrote: > Over the last week I've added the parse block capability necessary to > make dialects easier to write, and the first GUI dialect is now > up and drawing screens. when will these parse block capabilities be available? Would it be possible to show us how dialects wil

[REBOL] Rebol/Command?

2000-01-10 Thread robert . muench
Hi, is it possible that the Rebol-HQ can give some information about the Rebol/Command state? It's announced for some time now but nothing has happened. Robert M. Muench, Karlsruhe, Germany ==> ask for PGP public-key <== When do you want to reboot today? Use the free portable GUI Library

[REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re:(2)

2000-01-03 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 03, 2000 6:53 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] What's next for REBOL... Re: > Surprise, surprise :-) Thanks Carl! Nice to hear /View is knocking > the door soon :-) Concerning /

[REBOL] Web Gui - Was Console GUI functions? Re:(5)

1999-12-14 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, December 12, 1999 5:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Web Gui - Was Console GUI functions? Re:(4) > Thanks for the invitation, Robert. > So, what's "New project coming soon: Web-Develo

[REBOL] Web Gui - Was Console GUI functions? Re:(2)

1999-12-11 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 10, 1999 10:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Web Gui - Was Re: Console GUI functions? > We could throw together a rebol web-server and the html dialect, > the gui could be bu

[REBOL] Web Gui - Was Console GUI functions? Re:(3)

1999-12-11 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 2:26 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Web Gui - Was Console GUI functions? Re:(2) > Is anyone else interested in a REBOL/epub project? Hi, you should join our OpenWe

[REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:(5)

1999-12-10 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 10:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:(4) > I'm even more late, I once thought about it, too but didn't > come to the point where I could s

[REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:(5)

1999-12-10 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 10:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:(4) > Might this be something you could do in a browser via CGI? Hi, I thought about this too (to us

[REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re:(2)

1999-12-09 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 3:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks Re: > empty? is kind of confusing, since it's just a synonym for > tail? and doesn't really tell you if t

[REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:(3)

1999-12-09 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 09, 1999 3:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:(2) > Sorry for being late, I did some job in this field. Hi, I would be interested in it ;-)) > REB

[REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:(3)

1999-12-09 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 6:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:(2) > 1. I think you will need to use a virtual console > representation. What I mean > is you have

[REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks

1999-12-08 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I would like to propose that empty? should be useable with blocks and return true if the block doesn't contain an element. Robert M. Muench, Karlsruhe, Germany ==> ask for PGP public-key <== When do you want to reboot today? Use the free portable GUI Library OpenAmulet from http://www

[REBOL] Console GUI functions? Re:

1999-12-08 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Console GUI functions? > Hi, I would like to use Rebol and the cool console feature to develop > interactive applications. For

[REBOL] Console GUI functions?

1999-12-02 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I would like to use Rebol and the cool console feature to develop interactive applications. For this I would like to split the screen in different output sections, support scrolling in these sections etc. With Rebol we would bring back the good old days of simple, fast and lean text-interface

[REBOL] Change console size? Re:(4)

1999-12-01 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 9:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Change console size? Re:(3) > But I had to assume a worst case computer/display combination. Well, my application users have t

[REBOL] Change console size? Re:(2)

1999-11-30 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 6:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Change console size? Re: > I wonder if it's possible to force a user's console to a > specific size? I have assumed it's at leas

[REBOL] Change console size?

1999-11-30 Thread robert . muench
Hi, is it possible to change the size of the console window from a script? I would like to ensure that the console window has a specific size. Robert M. Muench, Karlsruhe, Germany ==> ask for PGP public-key <== When do you want to reboot today? Use the free portable GUI Library OpenAmulet

[REBOL] 2.2 preliminary docs??? Re:

1999-11-26 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 1999 4:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] 2.2 preliminary docs??? > http://www.rebol.com/manual/ BTW: Would it be possible for the Rebol team to create an archive Rebol

[REBOL] FTP problem

1999-11-20 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I once more tried to use the ftp stuff from Rebol. I'm using a dialup connection. For this I connected to the internet and tried to read the root directory of my ftp server, which gave the following error: >> read ftp://openip.org connecting to: openip.org ** User Error: Server error: tcp 500

[REBOL] Enhancement - Reading and writing compressed files Re:

1999-11-17 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 1:56 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Enhancement - Reading and writing compressed files > REBOL Enhancement request: > > read/

[REBOL] (De)Compress function source Re:(2)

1999-11-17 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 1999 8:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] (De)Compress function source Re: > Hey, a great script idea that I've been wanting to do for > some time is write the code to par

[REBOL] (De)Compress function source

1999-11-16 Thread robert . muench
Hi Rebol-HQ, how about releasing the decompress code for the Rebol compress function? This would make it possible to use Rebol to create archives but although to distribute those archives to people not having Rebol running (or knowing what to do). I know they should download Rebol but anyway... I

[REBOL] compose?? Re:(2)

1999-11-13 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 12, 1999 4:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: compose?? > ## a: 1 > == 1 > ## compose [(a + 1) [(a + 2)]] > == [2 [(a + 2)]] > ## compose/deep [(a + 1) [(a + 2)]] > == [2 [

[REBOL] compose?? Re:(2)

1999-11-12 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 12, 1999 4:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] compose?? Re: > Almost there, you're just using square brackets"[" instead of > parens "(" > > test: "Hi" > == "Hi" > >> bla: "Th

[REBOL] compose??

1999-11-12 Thread robert . muench
Hi, just playing around with 'compose. I thought it would be a cool thing to use, to flatten nested blocks into one level. So I tried: >> help compose Selectively evaluates a block of expressions, only evaluating paren expressions and returns the result as a block. Arguments: value -- Block t

[REBOL] real powerful hypertext creation!? Re:(2)

1999-10-23 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 1999 12:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] real powerful hypertext creation!? Re: > Hi, Martin, I'm sure that Robert Muench: > [E

[REBOL] Command Sneak Preview Re:(3)

1999-10-22 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 6:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Command Sneak Preview Re:(2) > I'm already using REBOL for CGI under Xitami. Are you referring to > tighter coupling than that? (

[REBOL] Command Sneak Preview Re:

1999-10-22 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 8:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Command Sneak Preview > and ability to call dynamically loadable libraries > (DLLs, etc.) Hi, this would be great! Our newest Op

[REBOL] Command Sneak Preview Re:

1999-10-22 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 8:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Command Sneak Preview > We're also planning to add a plug-in for Apache > shortly after the Command release. Hi, please have a l

[REBOL] [REBOL] How to get rid of Selma numbering? Re:(3)

1999-10-12 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 8:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] [REBOL] How to get rid of Selma numbering? Re:(2) > Perhaps an X-header could be used to track reply counts? > Just a thought.

[REBOL] system call? how? Re:(6)

1999-10-12 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 9:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] system call? how? Re:(5) > Robert, do you think it could be merged with XML-RPC/SOAP? Hi, yes of course. I even think it's the bes

[REBOL] Can one Selma process handle >1 mailing lists? Re:(2)

1999-10-12 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 1:13 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Can one Selma process handle >1 mailing lists? Re: > In it's current setup, no, it cannot. However, it can be > re-written (and yo

[REBOL] Can one Selma process handle >1 mailing lists?

1999-10-11 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I would like to setup several mailing lists but I would like to avoid to run one Rebol/Selma process for each mailing list. Can Selma be altered to handle more than one mailing list, has someone already done this? Robert M. Muench, Karlsruhe, Germany ==> ask for PGP public-key <== When

[REBOL] How to get rid of Selma numbering? Re:(2)

1999-10-09 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 8:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] How to get rid of Selma numbering? Re: > Try the function re-post. Hi Jeff, thanks for the hint. Here is the code: Repost: func

[REBOL] How to get rid of Selma numbering?

1999-10-08 Thread robert . muench
Hi, I'm going to use Selma for a mailing list and want to get rid of the automatic number added on the subject, as this avoids thread sorting on many e-mail clients. Can someone point me to the right source part? Robert M. Muench, Karlsruhe, Germany ==> ask for PGP public-key <== When do y

[REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(10)

1999-10-05 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 1999 6:21 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(9) > Of course 'a is 'a and 'b is 'b. Is that the difference you > mean when you point out that these w

[REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(8)

1999-10-05 Thread robert . muench
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 9:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Constructor semantics? Re:(7) > 1) Constructing a value > a: make block! [1 2 3] > > 2) Assigning a value > b: make block! [] > ins

  1   2   >