Terrence,
It sounds like the way you set it up should work.
It should work simply by setting X_MODE_0 = 1600x1200 though.
You might go into that XF86Config.ws001 file and grab the modeline
that is there for 1600x1200, and specify that for X_MODE_0.
I run 1800x1440, and this is how I do it:
X
I actually had this happen to me today when I was doing something similar. I
forgot to set the font path to the server.
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: Terrence Oblak
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/17/03 10:07 PM
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] Individual XF86Config files problem
I know this type
I know this type of question has been posted before, but I've searched the
archives, and haven't been able to find a resolution.
I want my workstation to run at 1600x1200 resolution. I put a 4 gig
harddrive into the workstation and installed Linux on it. I then ftp'd
the XF86Config file, which r
Yep this is all fully taken into account for. If you looked at the boot
image on the site I posted before you will notice that everything gets
loaded to memory. I don't even have any of it compressed on the disk and
still have around 10 MB free.
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: R P Herrold
I think I had at least 10MB still free but I could free up a few megs if I
got rid of vi, telnet, bash, X11 fonts which I am not even using anyhow.
Actually I think that it could be squeezed into a 16MB card if I worked at
it a little.
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: Rick Gatewood
To: Bae
Hi
> I work for a small company whose long-standing staff have long adopted an=20
> over-my-dead-body attitude towards change.
> LTSP would be a perfect, cost-effective replacement for this setup.
> and stable, and I have installed OpenOffice and Konqueror (KDE) which is=20
> pretty much all th
Hi
> XFree86 4 is not as good as its predecessors in supporting older
> monitors. You may have to download the appropriate drivers and force the
> use of them in lts.conf - e.g.:
>
> XSERVER = XF86_S3
>
> John
Can you justify this statement?
I think that I can config XF4 for any mo
On Friday 17 January 2003 03:38 pm, Baeseman, Cliff wrote:
> http://www.greenheck.com/cliff
>
> Here are some nice high res pics of the insides of the mini itx and it
> running peewee linux
> connecting to our terminal server.
>
Cool! Totally cool and solid state! Totally solid state! How much room
Jake,
Thanks. HorizSync fixed it. In retrospect it seems obvious.
My thanks also to Jim McQuillan and John McCreesh.
The server is only a K6-2 500mhz with 128 meg, so it won't win any races
unless the hare takes a nap. But it works.
Now, to get rdesktop working under LTSP!!!
Thanks agai
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 18:14, Werner Winter wrote:
> Hello,
> we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a new server
>hardware (about
> 15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok?
>
> Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?)
> 2GB RAM
> SCSI-HD 36GB
In my experience
We had to get rid of the K menu, we did not want the manufacturing floor
guys getting
hooked on Frozen Bubble... ;)
Cliff
-Original Message-
From: Jake Schroeder
To: Baeseman, Cliff
Sent: 1/17/03 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] More info on the mini-itx on compact flash
On Fri, Jan
Hi,
Glenn Arnold schrieb:
> I have dhcp running and installed. I did choose the jroot options when I installed
>dhcp for better security. I did use your script any Ideas?
>
> hsltsp01:/home/garnold # rpm -qa|grep dhcp
> dhcpcd-1.3.22pl1-114
> dhcp-base-3.0.1rc9-33
> dhcp-tools-1.2-212
> dhcp-
even more OT, but has anybody tried to load different fonts into qvwm to
make it prettier? also has anyone tried to get their windows key to bring
up the start menu?
-Jeff
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:45:59 +
> Louis Sabet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> My problem now is in findi
Has anyone had any luck getting glx h/w acceleration working on
their terminals? It appears as though DRI does not even support
this (yet), but I've heard that nvidia's own driver may support
this, and possible others? How much of a difference does it make
vs software accel?
--
Cameron Lerch <
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] over my dead body... [slightly OT]
From: "Jeff Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have to agree with John. I've been pleased with my switch from gnome
to qvwm. If you need to keep a conistent menu for different gro
Christoph,
I have dhcp running and installed. I did choose the jroot options when I installed
dhcp for better security. I did use your script any Ideas?
hsltsp01:/home/garnold # rpm -qa|grep dhcp
dhcpcd-1.3.22pl1-114
dhcp-base-3.0.1rc9-33
dhcp-tools-1.2-212
dhcp-server-3.0.1rc9-33
hsltsp01:/ho
I am running about 60 terminals on a machine half that size, it also runs
nfs
for our shop floor brake presses and a postgres server that gets really
hammered on.
KDE 2.1
I cannot say enough about ram, you need ram ram and more ram the processors
rarely hit
30% utilization.
Cliff
> On Frida
I have seen this on mandrake 9, and nobody ever
repplied, is its one of those misteries! 8)
When I see this I just turn the sw off and turn on
another one, or a reboot will do 8)
--- Jeff Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Original Message
> Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] XDMCP
http://www.greenheck.com/cliff
Here are some nice high res pics of the insides of the mini itx and it
running peewee linux
connecting to our terminal server.
I will keep feeding some more of this information to the list. I will be
putting together a
how-to document and the parts that I use to m
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:42:49 -0500 (EST)
Donald Cowart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO it is very user friendly though... Sun's SunRay terminals use smart
> card technology that handles the login/logout process. The user just has
> to worry about keeping a smart card on them. The terminal c
Sure, that would be neat - I mentioned that in a previous message. You
could write a script that waits for a USB drive to automount, then uses
a SSH private keyfile to authenticate to the server. You can skip the
display manager, and go right into the session. X11 forwarding will
handle most eve
Original Message
Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] XDMCP fatal error: Session declined maximum
From: "Jeff Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah I understand why the DisplaysPerHost defaults to one, and I dont
want to change that. I was just looking for a way to get
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:08:12AM -0800, pedro noticioso wrote:
> So make your life easyer by not deciding so much for
> them, let them in on some choice for a change.
That is a neat idea. Instead of forcing the desktop environment on
them, let them know that they can get to every program throug
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:45:59 +
Louis Sabet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> My problem now is in finding an appropriate GUI. These users are all
> trained for windows. We have no time for extensive retraining, and so I
> need to find something as close to the windows look-n-feel as possi
Id rather change the ammount of maximum sessions for
gdm 8)
/etc/X11/gdm/gdm.conf
[xdmcp]
MaxSessions=1
how to do it on kdm? beats me! hehee
--- Jake Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Jake Schroeder
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:54:4
I'm just testing my ability to send to my own darned mailing
list.
I've been getting rejections from the sourceforge mail servers, telling
me I can't talk to those servers because i'm on a broadband
connection and I should be sending my mail through the comcast
smtp server.
So, if you get this, i
If anybody makes xpde work propperly for multiuser on
linux please make a doc, I flunked that one on my rh
8)
--- "Baeseman, Cliff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have never tried this but take a look at this, it
> should be close
> enough
>
> I do not know how mature it is, or even if it
Would anyone like to comment on the number of older systems vs the
number of up-to-date systems being used for LTSP.?
Would anyone be interested in a survey ?...Build a histogram ?.
I'm sure the Jamin 125 (for example) is more than capable of running
local apps. For me, the reliability of newer
Jim,
Looking at your paper "LTSP - Linux Terminal Server Project (
http://pstl.linux.ccfne.ns.ca/download/plcda/instguid/lts-sf.html ) (v2.02
11 August 2000) the introduction mentions:
"This project was born out of the need to solve a problem for a customer who
needed a terminal that could commu
Peter Childs wrote:
On Friday 17 January 2003 18:14, Werner Winter wrote:
Hello,
we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a
new server hardware (about 15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok?
Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?)
2GB RAM
SCSI-HD 36GB
Wer
Hi,
> I think about that configuration, and I belive 2 processors
(P4 2.4GHz)
> with 2GB RAM can support 30 LTSP stations with KDE 3.
No I don't think so. I worked with 1GB and 15 terminals with and it
was s slow :-( - Of course kde3 needs ca 64MB per terminal and
64*15=960; there is no
Pentium [EMAIL PROTECTED] is just ok, my 1.5 is still quite fast
8)
2GB RAM is great, 800 bus is even better 8)
The price of a SCSI does not make it a worth while
investment because it will die anyway, Id rather buy 2
IDE 7200 speed or faster hard drives, use the first
hd for the sever and secon
well this means that it might be simple to only add
ssh X port dorwading and run gdm through it, s imple
solution with a big impact on security, right?
--- Jake Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:34:16AM -0800, pedro
> noticioso wrote:
> > btw, I serously doubt pss
We are currently serving about 25 desktops running qvwm with a dual p2-400
with 1gig of ram and an 18 gig scsi drive. we used redhat 8 for the install.
Our previous server, which was working fine, except I dont like editing
gnome menus for large groups, was a dual p2-300 with only 512 megs of ra
Ken Murchison wrote:
Chambard O wrote:
Just for information
I don't need X for one of my workstation
So I put in the host section in lts.conf
XSERVER = N
and I rectify rc.local to avoid unecessary action and save boot time
if [ "${XSERVER}" != "N" ]; then
...
fi
Maybe it will be useful for
more RAM on an 800 bus P4 and a faster ide hard disk
make more of a difference vs the processor speed, oh
and a ramdisk mounted /tmp helps too
--- Márcio_de_Sousa_Pessoa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think about that configuration, and I belive
> 2 processors (P4 2.4GHz)
> with
Make the wm you like the most as default and let your
users choose from all the options you mentioned at the
gdm login 8)
After a few months of use, you may ask them about
their favourites, I bet there will be different
opinions; some of my users even asked me to install
more window managers hehe
On Friday 17 January 2003 18:14, Werner Winter wrote:
> Hello,
> we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a
> new server hardware (about 15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok?
>
> Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?)
> 2GB RAM
> SCSI-HD 36GB
>
> Werner
>
Hello,
I think about that configuration, and I belive 2 processors (P4 2.4GHz)
with 2GB RAM can support 30 LTSP stations with KDE 3.
É isso aí...
Márcio de Sousa Pessoa
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Registred User # 280238
Visite: http://www.lc3.com.br/
- Original Message -
From: "Werne
Glenn Arnold schrieb:
> I got the LTSP core package installed on Suse 8.1, but when I tried to initialize
>the installation I got the following error.
>
> The Linux Terminal Server Project (http://www.LTSP.org)
>
> Doing the update
> Xaccess.tmpl
> Backup of old file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xacc
Hello,
we set up a test terminal server and it worked well. So we want to buy a new server
hardware (about
15 KDE-terminals). Is the following ok?
Pentium4 2,4GHz (or is a dual pentium better?)
2GB RAM
SCSI-HD 36GB
Werner
---
This SF.NET e
I got the LTSP core package installed on Suse 8.1, but when I tried to initialize the
installation I got the following error.
The Linux Terminal Server Project (http://www.LTSP.org)
Doing the update
Xaccess.tmpl
Backup of old file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xaccess as /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xdm/Xaccess.
Any one care to share a tip on getting the Win key to work on icewm?
I turned the option on in the preferences but don't know how to assign
the meta keys...
--
respectfully, Joseph - (606) 477-2355 x140
==
It seems that your trouble is with the differences between LTSP 3 and
the version you were using before. At the point you see the faiure, you
are having a problem with XFree86 (4.2.99?) being unconfigured for your
video or mouse. Please triplecheck your lts.conf to see how the
"X_SERVER" options
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:34:16AM -0800, pedro noticioso wrote:
> btw, I serously doubt psswords sent plain text across
> the network by Xdm|Gdm|Kdm, Id have to check that 8/
xdm/gdm/kdm never actually "send a password": they are running on the
same machine that is doing the authentication. But
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 03:21:11AM +0100, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote:
> CL> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:20:42PM +0200, Andres Toomsalu wrote:
>
> >> I have quite odd problem:
> [...] {kernel 2.4.9 good - kernel 2.4.19 bad; network related}
> >> Any ideas?
>
> Could be that it depends on the i
This is not an ltsp specific question, this is user
authentification related to any linux, BSD, windows or
any other system.
My first thoughts are using LDAP/MySQL authentication
or something similar on linux for the login, to issue
the ID cards, it is possible, and I have even
implemented somethi
I have successfully deployed a few LTS epos systems using Redhat 7.2 with
touchscreens.
I wish to replace office PCs with diskless terminals, but for other reasons I
wish to use Redhat 8. I have obtained the latest core/kernel/x_core rpms for
LTS3 and gone through the load procedure with which I a
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:00:28PM -0500, Jeff Nelson wrote:
> I have that installed, and
> finally figured out how to run the LTSP initialization script, but now I
> can't figure out how to get the terminals to boot from the server. I've
> tried to follow the instructions in the documentation for
Dear Louis,
I've been working with LTSP (in fact K12LTSP) for nearly a year now, and
couldn't resist checking your .co.uk web addresses. It turns out we're
less than 10 miles apart!
However, I don't have a magic answer to your question. I tend to take
the path of least resistance: if it ain't bro
Ok, I am currently running RH8 with ltsp 3, first of
all execute these commands as root:
rpm -qa | grep ltsp
rpm -qa | grep dhcp
rpm -qa | grep tftp
rpm -qa | grep nfs
rpm -qa | grep portmap
and tell me this:
how are you connected to the internet?
is all of the lan hardware already set up?
does y
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Donald Cowart wrote:
>
> IMHO it is very user friendly though... Sun's SunRay terminals use smart
> card technology that handles the login/logout process. The user just has
> to worry about keeping a smart card on them. The terminal can ALSO be
> accessed using password
Hi everybody,
I've been in Colombia for a week trying to install an LTSP lab at a
rural school, run by a foundation that I volunteer for.The server is
a Pentium 4 with two large drives and 512MB RAM. I brought six of
those Jammin 125 terminals from disklessworkstations.com to form the
basis o
Hi everybody,
I've been in Colombia for a week trying to install an LTSP lab at a
rural school, run by a foundation that I volunteer for.The server is
a Pentium 4 with two large drives and 512MB RAM. I brought six of
those Jammin 125 terminals from disklessworkstations.com to form the
basis o
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:41:18AM -0700, George Gambill wrote:
> Again (Running RedHat 8.0)
>
> I now get to the login screen except, I have a mostly light blue (a nice
> blue) background with 4 columns (plus 2 partial, one left and one right)
> with 4 login boxes (one in each column). Each colu
Thank you! I hadn't used mutt's mailing-list features yet. Hopefully I
will avoid double-posting to the list in the future :-P
- Jake
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:00:46AM -0600, Tom Hoover wrote:
> If you have mutt setup correctly, "r" replies to the author, "g" (group)
> replies to both the au
IMHO it is very user friendly though... Sun's SunRay terminals use smart
card technology that handles the login/logout process. The user just has
to worry about keeping a smart card on them. The terminal can ALSO be
accessed using passwords. I saw a demo of them once and was really
impress
Jim,
FYI (Re: TFTP Dots) setting user = root in /etc/xinetd.d/tftp did the
trick.
Again (Running RedHat 8.0)
I now get to the login screen except, I have a mostly light blue (a nice
blue) background with 4 columns (plus 2 partial, one left and one right)
with 4 login boxes (one in each column).
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:45:59 +
Louis Sabet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I work for a small company whose long-standing staff have long adopted
> an over-my-dead-body attitude towards change.
>
> At present our sales department is using windows on a daily basis, and
> has done so
=3Chtml=3E
=3Chead=3E
=3Ctitle=3EDo you remember me=3F=3C=2Ftitle=3E
=3Cmeta http-equiv=3D=22Content-Type=22 content=3D=22text=2Fhtml=3B
charset=3Dwindows-1252=22=3E
=3C=2Fhead=3E
=3Cbody bgcolor=3D=22#FF=22 text=3D=22#00=22=3E
=3Cfont size=3D=225=22=3E=3Ca
href=3D=22http=3A=2F=2Fwww=2El
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:55:00PM +0100, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> i do not want passwords any more, is here anybody who setuped a LTSP System with
>Login devices such as USB Sticks/token or smartcards?
>
> I want that the users can login on every Terminal, logout if they remove the media,
Denny,
possible or not, this is *very* insecure.
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Denny Schierz wrote:
> i do not want passwords any more, is here anybody who setuped a LTSP
> System with Login devices such as USB Sticks/token or smartcards?
>
> I want that the users can login on every Terminal, logo
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:55:00PM +0100, Denny Schierz wrote:
> hi,
>
> i do not want passwords any more, is here anybody who setuped a LTSP System with
>Login devices such as USB Sticks/token or smartcards?
>
> I want that the users can login on every Terminal, logout if they remove the media,
Louis,
the question carries its own answer. What you need is a dead body
or 2. Acceptance of oo and ltsp terminals went way up in my company after
the first layoffs in 80 years. julius
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Louis Sabet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I work for a small company whose long-standing sta
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:23:47AM -0600, Jake Schroeder wrote:
> Why does this list not have a "Reply-To:" header on the emails? I just
> noticed that when I respond to an email, my email client (mutt) is
> responding to the individual and not to the whole list. Is there a fix
> for Mutt, or a f
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 02:45:59PM +, Louis Sabet wrote:
> Alt-Tab - Fluxbox handles this nicely.
> Task-bar - KDE/GNOME have this, but are too bloated and would involve
icewm handles both of these nicely. Install the fake95 theme, and the
users will have to do a double-take to realize it's
hi,
i do not want passwords any more, is here anybody who setuped a LTSP System with Login
devices such as USB Sticks/token or smartcards?
I want that the users can login on every Terminal, logout if they remove the media,
and i want that they can put on this media
gnupg keys and other user/se
You should normally go for "Reply-to-all" - the netiquette theory is that
you may only want to reply to the user, rather than the list. Also, if you
only reply to the list, archive users would not get "real-time" answers.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jake Schroeder
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
FVWM95 when I did look at it was too like windows 95 for may
liking I think this is what they designed it for.
I don't partually like (black/flux)box I would like to have bigger
buttons, I think people like being able to spread icons all over there
desktop in windows and that st
I have never tried this but take a look at this, it should be close
enough
I do not know how mature it is, or even if it works but it does look about
as close
to xp as one can get.
http://www.xpde.com/modules.php?name=Screenshots
Cliff Baeseman
-Original Message-
From: Louis
Hi! I have an only-slightly-offtopic question:
Why does this list not have a "Reply-To:" header on the emails? I just
noticed that when I respond to an email, my email client (mutt) is
responding to the individual and not to the whole list. Is there a fix
for Mutt, or a fix for the list?
Thank
- Forwarded message from Jake Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:54:40 -0600
From: Jake Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: surleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] two connections
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:08:08AM +0100, surleau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is t
- Forwarded message from Jake Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:49:47 -0600
From: Jake Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Maneesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] IP Address from DHCP ...
It is possible to hand out IP addresses dynamically, but you pr
- Forwarded message from Jake Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:02:09 -0600
From: Jake Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Silly Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] PXE booting problem with VIA Epia M9000
I notice that in your "host ws001" block, nowhe
Title: unsubscribe
Tyler Dunphy
Network Administrator
Westbrook School Department
Title: unsubscribe
Tyler Dunphy
Network Administrator
Westbrook School Department
Hi all,
I work for a small company whose long-standing staff have long adopted an
over-my-dead-body attitude towards change.
At present our sales department is using windows on a daily basis, and has
done so for many many years. Our sales department only use IE, Word, Excel,
so having a dedica
Hi
I have downloaded latest packages for LTSP and installed in my system. I
trying to boot through Network card (PXE) on the VIA Mainboard Epia
M9000 (Via- RhineII - NIC). My client PC geting IP address sucessfully.
But when loading file it was saying:
"Intel UNDI, PXE 2.0 (build 082)"
"PXE - E11 A
Hi,
Is there a way to let one user to have only one connection in the same
time ? I have some users who open two sessions on two workstations, and
let someone else work on the second one :-(
Thanks.
Romain.
---
This SF.NET email is sponsore
Hi,
Is anyone tried How to get IP dynamically.
I dont want to map my Mac card address with the IP address. I want these
to assign automatically.
Thanks,
Maneesh
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Thawte.com
Understand how to protect you
ltsp-discuss´Ô~ ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä ^^
ltsp-discuss´ÔÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò([EMAIL PROTECTED])´Â ¿©±â¿¡¼ º¸°ÔµÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ¿øÇÏ½Ã¸é ¿©±â¸¦ Ŭ¸¯Çϱ⸸ Çϼ¼¿ä~
Àç¹Õ´Â »çÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¸ð¾Æ¼È¨ÆäÀÌÁö¸¦ ¸¸µé¾ú¾î¿ä.
http://www.hankyunglife.co.krÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±¸°æ¿À¼¼¿ä. ²ÀÀÌ¿ä
81 matches
Mail list logo
