Mmm, this is getting rather OT for LTSP. Could you guys take this to
some other forum please? My take on the situation is that there are
heaps of alternatives to RH, and the GPLed source remains GPL, so it's
not a monopoly situation.
---
This SF
Hi Daniel,
Your actual problem was that you did not know what you
are looking at . When I first visited the website I knew what it was
all about.
You needed to have learned a little more about linux and diskless nodes.
The website may not be the best site but I had no problem at all.
O
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Timothy Legge wrote:
> Scott
>
> Maybe. Where did you leave it? What works? What doesn't? What do you
> want to work...
Well... there is a checksum in the BIOS of the T1510 that checks the
kernel being loaded via tftp. So I managed to get compaq to come off of
an iso imag
> Well... there is a checksum in the BIOS of the T1510 that checks the
> kernel being loaded via tftp. So I managed to get compaq to come off
of
> an iso image of the original disk that came with the T1510, which has
the
> necessary kernel on it(2.0.35). I found a HOWTO on the T1500, very
> simil
hazzmat wrote:
Not that anyone should care what I think, but the longer I'm in this
game, the more I respect the ability and accomplishments of the Debian
Project. Most proprietary Linux distros have done something in last 4
or 5 years to unsettle their previously loyal users. Some have turned
Scott
Maybe. Where did you leave it? What works? What doesn't? What do you
want to work...
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: shogunx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 9:29 PM
> To: Timothy Legge
> Cc: > Subject: RE: [Ltsp-discuss] (no subject)
>
> Timothy,
>
Timothy,
Still interested in taking a crack at the Compaq T151
Scott
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Timothy Legge wrote:
> > the terms are rebranded wyse 3360se's documentation available.
> > terminalnow loads kernel via tftp, but refuses to execute citing: read
> > image checksum doesn't match expected
Kent,
I just got the HDS machines in. Any tips on config?
Scott
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Kent Schumacher wrote:
> Is anyone using the LTSP Term 150 diskless linux LTSP workstation available
> from Diskless Workstations?
>
> Any comments? I'm looking to use these to replace about 50 HDS viewstati
Is there any more information about this?
The offer for the server and any other necessary hardware from us is
still on the table. We're in New Rochelle, NY, which is just north of
the city. We can easily bring as much as is needed.
Cheers,
-Gideon
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 13:51, [EMAIL PROTEC
tcpdump -E tcp udp 68 will show bootps traffic from the server to the
ws001, if such traffic is being sent out.
we know the request comes in --but then what?
If the image is not being sent out, I can't imagine wtf is causing it to
not happen unless somehow the subnet is not yet allowed by tcpwra
> The embedded nics are the worse. Sending some one a $20 NIC is one
> thing, a pc is quite another. I normally don't work on any drivers
that
> I don't have a NIC for so unless I buy an ASUS board (unlikely) or
> someone else writes the driver you are out of luck.
>
> The existence of the drive
Any RHCE out there want to give your view on how all this affects those
of us with RedHat certification?
Would you recommend that others (who're interested in certification)
look to RedHat, or wait and see what develops with Novell/SUSE ?
Not that anyone should care what I think, but the longer
WOW. I could not put it better than the subject above.
I have been a RedHat linux supporter for about 5 years now. Until this
morning
With the announcement by RedHat to discontinue their retail product past
the 9.0 version, I have been patiently waiting to see what shakes out of
the mess.
Jeff-
what does syslog show?
Evan
Jeff Self wrote:
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 10:14, hazzmat wrote:
LTSP scripts modify /etc/hosts.allow to expose portmap and tftp to your
ltsp network but it may only be allowing your first segment 10.5.112.
and blocking the 10.5.107. segment.
Sounds like DHCP is w
Does anyone have experience with running Xandros as an LTSP server?
tim
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:03:36 +1000
Philip Immoos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has any one had some experance with sound. As I am unable to get the
> sound to work in a windows session under WIN4LIN. The LTSP client has
> sound untill I start the WIN4LIN nnaudio. Then I loose all gnome
> sounds. XM
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:52:56 -0800
Brook Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 14 November 2003 11:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Fedora is (Redhat quote) 'bleeding edge, not for production use'.
> > My week of testing gave me 3 bugs compared with 0 over 5 years.
> Not sure what ver
I'm mystified too, but I'm pretty easily mystified.
Can you tell if the request is being received by tftpd and the image is
actually being sent out?
tcpdump -E tcp udp 69
should capture the tftp request - I'm not sure about the sending of the
image. You may have to do it again for ports 68 and 6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An annual fee of $379 per machine to run Linux ???
Try Gentoo Linux (http://www.gentoo.org). It comes at the cost of
downloading two ISOs and roasting them onto a CD-R. After that you
install and upgrade packages whenever you feel like it over the
Internet.
Mind you, the
Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Friday 14 November 2003 06:07 pm, Brandon Mercer wrote:
mandrake is a great starter distro... they are not well suited
for production environments.
Brandon
There are allot of us using mandrkae for servers that could very easily prove
you wrong.
Take a look at ne
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 10:14, hazzmat wrote:
> LTSP scripts modify /etc/hosts.allow to expose portmap and tftp to your
> ltsp network but it may only be allowing your first segment 10.5.112.
> and blocking the 10.5.107. segment.
>
> Sounds like DHCP is working --after all it assigns server gateway
It will work fine. Follow the same instructions that are found for Mandrake
8.1:
http://ltsp.org/documentation/mandrake_ltsp.html
Fred Aswad
- Original Message -
From: "Varun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 5:13 AM
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] LTS
Ken,
I know for certain that they are using LTSP at the telecentros.
Last I heard, they have 72 centers with 20 workstations in each.
I met several of the poeple involved with Telecentros when I was
in Brazil back in June.
Jim.
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Ken Yap wrote:
> http://apnews.excite.com/a
hazzmat wrote:
LTSP scripts modify /etc/hosts.allow to expose portmap and tftp to
your ltsp network but it may only be allowing your first segment
10.5.112.
and blocking the 10.5.107. segment.
Oops I meant the other way around: Blocking the 10.5.112. segment.
-
LTSP scripts modify /etc/hosts.allow to expose portmap and tftp to your
ltsp network but it may only be allowing your first segment 10.5.112.
and blocking the 10.5.107. segment.
Sounds like DHCP is working --after all it assigns server gateway and
eth0 settings to the workstation. But the proces
http://apnews.excite.com/article/20031116/D7URSKHO0.html
I have a hunch those Telecentros in São Paulo are running LTSP.
Certainly a search of "telecentro LTSP" on Google turned up hits about
Porto Alegre and I recalled Jim did some proselyting there. Can a
Paulistano reader confirm if those termi
I've successfully got LTSP working on one of my servers. I can connect a
PC to the same switch and boot up with either a boot disk or using PXE.
But I am unable to get a thin client to work that is sitting on another
network segment. I've put a dhrelay on a PC on the other network
segment. When I t
Hello,
I have just got Mandrake 9.2. Will ltsp 3. install ?
Howto configure ltsp on Mandrake 9.2 ?
Thanks
Varun
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer fro
grendel wrote:
Is it possible to have Machintosh clients for in a LTSP structure?
Thanks,
Enrico
I only know about 68k macs - the "real old" stuff. AFAIK, in Germany
macintoshes
are not as popular as in US, so I only got some old ones.
They will run linux (some of them), and even X is claimed to
Peter Rundle wrote:
Now I'm asking for some ideas to further "automate" this process.
It would be really cool to be able to control whether the PC boots
local or net from the server end rather than at the PC. I guess some
configuring in dhcp or tftp might be the answer? Any suggestions?
There
Has any one had some experance with sound. As I am unable to get the
sound to work in a windows session under WIN4LIN. The LTSP client has
sound untill I start the WIN4LIN nnaudio. Then I loose all gnome sounds.
XMMS still works though??
---
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
any Web browser or wireless device. Click here to Try it Free!
https://www.gotomypc.com/tr/OSDN/AW/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=m
G'day,
Following up from Kent's posting about accessing the local hard disk and
his desire to be able to restore his classroom PC's using LTSP, I've had
a bit of a play around and have managed to get LTSP to do this. It's so
simple yet if any Sys admins out there have ever had the (dis)pleasure
> Eh he he, the "card" is on-board my new Dell inspiron, so you want me
to
> send you the card? Hmmm, well after considering it for a nano second
or
> two.. nah I don't think so, might hang onto my new toy for a while
> just the same thanks. But hey, I do understand your position re your
> los
Hello Stephane,
Here's what happens:
The server has an X server of its own. It is its
config that you find in /etc/X11.
The /opt/ltsp/i386/etc tree doesn't have a ready-made
XF86Config-4 file. It would prevent usage of different
hardware in one system. Instead, a new XF86Config-4 is
generated ea
Is it possible to have Machintosh clients for in a LTSP structure?
Thanks,
Enrico
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
any Web browser or wireless device. Click h
> Now, a couple of questions:
>
> 1. What kind of hardware do I need at the workstation end?
>
> As I said, we have Sparc's. If we have to replace them by PC's we won't
> save as much. I guess we will still save because we'll be able to go for
> low-end PCs.
>
> Can etherboot work on a Spar
Hi,
I didn't get any answer, but I see that the personal mail address I putted was
wrong.
Were there any answer?
I apologize for troubles...
Thank you very much.
PS: It is curious that when I hit Reply to a message the "To:" field isn't
list address.
It would be better don't you think?
--
St
Otherwise I'd put a ltsp (/opt/ltsp/i386) install on the HD (150 odd Mb) and
grub/lilo from that when needed.
Eh, Oh ok kinda didn't follow what you meant there but now I got it.
That's not a bad idea, kinda like a Claytons diskless workstation.
Doesn't really boot from the network but is still c
If there is enough interest in this card it could be supported in
Etherboot. These days (after spending a small fortune on NICs) I define
enough interest as someone willing to send me a card).
Eh he he, the "card" is on-board my new Dell inspiron, so you want me to
send you the card? Hmmm, well
40 matches
Mail list logo
