On Friday, June 10, 2011 11:25:29 PM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> >> Thanks for all your support and ideas LTSPers,
> >
> > IMHO SuSE with it's curses based yast is the nicest remote-admin distro
> > that exists.
>
> James,
>
> It is easy to see that LTSP is an elegant so
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 03:28:12 AM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I am a teacher at a secondary school in Germany and I am responsible for
> the IT.
> I just set up an edubuntu (11.04) with LTSP to test if this would be an
> alternative to the existing infrastructure. So
On Thursday, June 09, 2011 03:28:12 AM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Thanks for all your support and ideas LTSPers,
>
> LTSP seems out of reach for me at this time. It will be hard to support
> it remotely while I'm learning it myself. Bypassing a terminal server by
> flas
On Friday, June 03, 2011 08:51:56 AM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> It feels hard to admit this, but LTSP may NOT be a solution for a Kenyan
> hospital and 62 thin clients. I've been unsuccessful in building a test
> system for the last week or so. During any of the dozen OS
On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 09:41:30 PM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Hi
> the dev list has been dormant for some while ...
>
> I wanted to do stuff like this in lts.conf
>
> MODULE_01="hampshire minX=390 maxX=3750 minY=588 maxY=3644"
> RCFILE_01="/bin/setserial /dev/t
Hi
the dev list has been dormant for some while ...
I wanted to do stuff like this in lts.conf
MODULE_01="hampshire minX=390 maxX=3750 minY=588 maxY=3644"
RCFILE_01="/bin/setserial /dev/ttyS0 port 0x238 irq 12 uart 16550A"
RCFILE_02="/bin/setserial /dev/ttyS1 port 0x208 irq 5 uart 165
Hi
has anybody tried to invoke RCFILE_NN with parameters?
I can't see why exec 'echo 12 2 3 >/tmp/ans' would not work.
(that's what happens to RCFILE_NN="this_or_that")
Any experiences?
The mechanism for modules may need to be implimented
ie
MODULE_01="something*argument=bla*arg=blabla"
Thanks fo
Hi
when I fire off netcat in listen daemon mode as one of the RCFILE_xx in
lts.conf then netcat dies as it is (presumably) too early for nc.
After booting I can
sh -xv /etc/init.d/netcat
and it works perfectly.
Is there any 'proper way' of launching the daemon later in the boot process or
shal
Oli
in one of the forums you said
just keep the name and use the update-initramfs and ltsp-update-kernels
scripts as described above, keep a backup of a working copy of the
script so you are not screwed if the clients dont boot anymore and can
roll back :)
I've read ltsp-update-kernel and I don
On Thursday, May 05, 2011 11:32:09 PM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > >> I cannot use the nfs route as I need to run if the server dies!
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hang on a minute!
> >
> >
> >
> > > If you need the clients to run without a server you are in the wrong
> > > place.
>> I cannot use the nfs route as I need to run if the server dies!
> Hang on a minute!
> If you need the clients to run without a server you are in the wrong
> place. Standalone fat clients are your only option if that is your
> requirement.
This dump is for all the kind and well intentioned a
Hi
my ltsp setup 'just works' so it is a bit of a shock when things go wrong:
my lts.conf file: (/tftpboot/lts/i386/lts.conf)
[00:a0:a4:14:2b:57]
SERVER = "192.168.5.31"
X_CONF = "elotouch.conf"
RCFILE_01 = '/etc/init.d/microws5'
and just to be certain: (logged in to the TC)
root@stm
>> It resisted
>> ubuntu/suse/centos/rhel6 install but it sweetly runs a
>> 10.04 chroot ltsp.
>> For the morbid: http://www.micros.com/Products/HardwareSolutions/point-
sale-
>> hardware.htm (WS5)
>
>> How can I do exactly the same as ltsp but not with a nbd
>> root but a hard disk root.
>f yo
G'day
I hope that some clever person can say a few wise words:
I have some utterly utterly horrid hadware that I need to tame. It resisted
ubuntu/suse/centos/rhel6 install but it sweetly runs a 10.04 chroot ltsp.
For the morbid: http://www.micros.com/Products/HardwareSolutions/point-sale-
hardwa
Hi
I have a geode box, using a 10.04 chroot it boots and runs fine (as a TC).
It has TWO windbond 83627 (HG and G) chips.
The first is detected and all works. The second is not probed. It has
/dev/ttyS5 on it which runs the ELO touch screen.
So to use the touch I need to enable the UART on the s
On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 12:44:57 AM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I'm trying to set up LTSP to ThinCan thin clients (AMD geode 266Mhz,
> 64mb ram). The problem seems to be that default kernel is too big for
> thin client to load (.nbi image is ~13MB). It just starts lo
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 05:47:04 AM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > The benchmarks are quite the wrong sort of benchmarks to test an LTSP
> > server, so I opine that 64 bit servers are significantly better.
>
> Which would be appropriate do you think?
Actually I've not
On Monday, April 04, 2011 10:46:57 PM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > In general I would say avoid 64 bit unless you know you want it. In
> > general make your servers 64 bit.
>
> There have not been many published benchmarks of what sort of
> improvements you are likely t
On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 12:21:27 AM ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > The ubuntu version of ltsp that I use is packaged as i386 but it is i686
> > as ubuntu host is.
> > I need to build an i386 version. Is the easiest way to build every
> > package in the 686 version for 3
Hi
The ubuntu version of ltsp that I use is packaged as i386 but it is i686 as
ubuntu host is.
I need to build an i386 version. Is the easiest way to build every package in
the 686 version for 386.
Any suggestions.
[the problem] I have geode (i586) clients, but they wont boot a 686
distribution
On Sunday 09 January 2011 07:31:29 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> But if you have some (thin) clients that see the internet and some (fat)
> others that don't, then it's likely that your server settings are fine
> and it's your fat clients that need tweaking. You could try o
to an address on
Conceptually a fat client is a stand alone machine.
You've not told us the detail that is needed to answer
Your Machine [anymachine, but in this case your fat client]
Needs to have a gateway (route shows it and
eg command route add default gw 192.168.5.1])
It needs a DNS se
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 10:58:41 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> For starters, I have a DHCP server which is working fine when serving ltsp
> clients (all my clients have the same hardware configuration). I'm using
> K12 Linux (FC10). My clients have two 'on-board' NIC
On Saturday 11 December 2010 05:15:59 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Hi,
> I have one question. I seen many of tutorials, pages ... that describe
> configuration of ltsp. Problem is all of them based on DHCP. I would like
> to run it without DHCP, booted from one USB memory.
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 22:30:46 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > >> My goal is to have the students work individually on one and the same
> > >> (LTSP-)server without means of communication or file-sharing, just as
> > >> if they were working on individual machines with
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 08:31:03 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I would like to use LTSP specifically for exam settings in an introductory
> computer science class. The students have learned some basic system
> administration and programming under Linux on their person
On Saturday 12 December 2009 11:38:33 you wrote:
> G'day Guys
>
> If anybody can save me the time looking for the fault I'd appreciate it.
> I've done this lots, the basic setup works, I give detail just to be
> complate. I wanted to try the latest karmic ltsp so ...
>
> I setup karmic in a VM
>
G'day all
I would like to have my own spash image (product branding)
karmic's xsplash is easy (to understand and to change). ltsp looks much more
complex. All the reading I can find is about *changing* to another splash but
not about usplash artwork.so
and how to do that.
Can anybody point me at
> Hi
> on my last ltsp5 server I hacked ldm.c to get autologing working.
> I have just installed karmic and all is good except no attempt to auto-login
> From what I've read this should be all that is needed. Help!
> /tftboot/ltsp/i386/lts.conf
> [default]
> LDM_SERVER = 192.168.5.7
Hi
on my last ltsp5 server I hacked ldm.c to get autologing working.
I have just installed karmic and all is good except no attempt to auto-login
>From what I've read this should be all that is needed. Help!
/tftboot/ltsp/i386/lts.conf
[default]
LDM_SERVER = 192.168.5.74
LDM_DIR
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 00:17:09 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > Honestly, the desktop version of karmic is all I could get to run on
> > this server. ?older versions would not even boot after installation due
> > to some weird server incompatibilities.
>
> The desktop v
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 00:17:09 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I'm running 32. You may be correct, there.
>
> jam wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 December 2009 02:23:49 ltsp-discuss-
> >
> > requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> >>
On Sunday 13 December 2009 20:59:12 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> Ok, still reading and learning about ltsp. Perhaps I should backup and
> ask what the best direction is before I get too far.
>
> I have 3 Neoware clients, two are Geode based, like 128MB ram, but could
> b
On Saturday 12 December 2009 11:38:33 you wrote:
> G'day Guys
>
> If anybody can save me the time looking for the fault I'd appreciate it.
> I've done this lots, the basic setup works, I give detail just to be
> complate. I wanted to try the latest karmic ltsp so ...
>
> I setup karmic in a VM
>
G'day Guys
If anybody can save me the time looking for the fault I'd appreciate it.
I've done this lots, the basic setup works, I give detail just to be complate.
I wanted to try the latest karmic ltsp so ...
I setup karmic in a VM
Followed https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/LTSPQuickIn
On Saturday 12 December 2009 02:23:49 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> New guy here, be gentle. So where does one get the source for LTSP5?
>
> I'm trying to put together a server using Arch as my preferred distro.
> It's different enough that I can't just lift code from Ubunt
On Saturday 12 December 2009 02:23:49 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I've just started moving people here over to my new LTSP server. the
> only one was a graduated desktop machine. this new one is a legit
> server with 16 gigs of ran and a 2.33 quad core processor.
>
> S
Oli sorry for the typo
James
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applic
On Friday 09 October 2009 03:15:35 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> > ~/.profile
> > ~/.bashrc
> > /usr/share/autostart/
> >
> > This is WM stuff, not LTSP
> > .bashrc .profile etc will NOT work as they execute WHEN a terminal is
> > launched.
> >
> > For gnome see the system->s
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 22:51:21 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
[snip]
> The private key, however, stays on the server (and is not even in the
> client NBD or NFS image), and when the admin try to connect, it is used by
> ssh in an encrypted form.
[snip]
The SERVER in this ca
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 22:51:21 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> > Since it's already possible to autologin a specific user via lts.conf I'm
> > wondering how hard it would be to autostart applications after X server
> > is started. For example I would like to open firefox t
On Saturday 03 October 2009 04:09:36 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I've installed ltsp via the ubuntu alternate 64 bits CD on a HP dc5100 (one
> network interface, 4G of RAM)
>
> Installation was OK. When booting the clients (also 64 bits), dhcp is ok
> (client is getting IP
On Thursday 01 October 2009 19:24:54 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> >>> CUPS server broadcasts the 'I'm here'
> >>> You can't broadcast across subnets
> >>> so LTSP at 192.168.0.0 network will never see CUPS server at
> >>> 192.168.1.0 network THE END.
> >>> James
> >>
> >> So
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 21:20:20 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > The cups logs did not offer any hints either.
>
> I think I found something.
>
> ubuntu-studio 192.168.1.101
> ubuntu-ltsp5 192.168.192.168.1Z1.102
> ltsp22 192.168.0.22
[snip]
Indeed you did.
C
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 02:32:29 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > PS: Personally, I know very little about CentOS and prefer Ubuntu/debian
> > and I would say most of the folks in #ltsp these days have similar
> > inclinations, so if you plan to get most of your help fr
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 04:51:17 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > I use Gnome from various clients simultaneously all the time. So far I
> > really only ran into Firefox and friends to cause trouble.
>
> Wonder who these friends are.
Open office ... kmail ... amarok ...
On Wednesday 19 August 2009 04:51:17 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Alok Mahendroo
wrote:
> > > Does the Server for LTSP have to be standalone or is it possible for
> > > one to work on both the client and server using the same program
> > >
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 06:15:03 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> Whoops!! Yes, only i386 server kernel is needed if you have > 3gb,
> sorry. For many other tasks, however, such as many people logged into
> the system at once.. maybe someone else can chime in and give some ins
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 08:54:15 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> I am using Ubuntu Server 8.04 + Xubuntu on Sun Fire X4150 Server. and my
> lts.conf is below
>
> [default]
> X_COLOR_DEPTH=16
> LOCALDEV=True
> SOUND=True
> NBD_SWAP=True
> SYSLOG_HOST=server
>
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 15:53:20 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> The hardware of my clients is very poor : PII 200 mhz + 64 mb.
> They works quite well, but during my tests i saw that booting time and
> performances are proportionally at dimension of chroot image
> (/opt/lts
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 15:53:20 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> > I would propose a "temporary" user of sorts that pulls from the
> > "skel/template" you created, does a pam makehomedir or whatever it is,
> > and removes it upon logout. This way, you have separate user acco
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 03:04:17 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
[snip]
>
> For simplicity and ease of
> user management (the school has no permanent IT personnel to handle
> day-to-day maintenance), we only use one shared account for all students.
>
> The implications of this
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 03:04:17 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> Hi, do you know how to create a small chroot environment for ltsp clients?
> I have created the default one with ltsp-build-client but the i386.img
> became 186 mb with xubuntu 9.04 and 150mb with ubuntu 8.04.
On Thursday 02 April 2009 08:14:26 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> I am trying to setup a "hybrid" client -- in my case a netbook -- that
> can work in both fat and thin modes:
>
> "Fat mode" client:
>
> When disconnected from the network the client runs like a normal "fat"
> L
On Monday 16 February 2009 21:17:42 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> > My CentOS and SuSE clients are a Hardy chroot. In fact my VIA EPIA
> > clients do run on that, but in later chroots the graphics chokes. So in
> > general WHY NOT. The chroot has nothing to do with the host
>
On Monday 16 February 2009 21:17:42 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> > > I'm using "ltsp-build-client --kiosk". This is the last thing showing
> > > up in the log from the client:
> > >
> > > kernel: [ 36.796787] metacity[3558]: segfault at 0 ip 080abab3 sp
> > > bf969700 erro
On Thursday 12 February 2009 01:42:25 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/UpdatingChroot
> > https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/ (Main Ubuntu/LTSP wiki
> > home)
> >
> > AFAIK you shouldn't/can't run Ibex/Jaunty chroots on a
On Monday 09 February 2009 22:28:53 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> > > > Still I do not understand the NBD-related error. Since in a different
> > > > test set-up (Intel Xeon server, Dell Optiplex GX1 Pentium III
> > > > clients), the thin clients seem to get hung over that er
On Saturday 07 February 2009 07:56:27 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > Still I do not understand the NBD-related error. Since in a different
> > test set-up (Intel Xeon server, Dell Optiplex GX1 Pentium III clients),
> > the thin clients seem to get hung over that error. The e
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 04:09:08 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> In the Gutsy or so days I took the whole chroot for ltsp, wrapped it with
> the tools in a rpm and have been using it ever since on CentOS for
> customers and SuSE for me.
>
> It has a single irritating 'featu
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 04:09:08 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
[snip]
> If you were using a very small set of plugins for Eclipse, you may be able
> to drive down memory costs, but that goes back to the questions about what
> types of development you're doing.
You folk do
Hi
In the Gutsy or so days I took the whole chroot for ltsp, wrapped it with the
tools in a rpm and have been using it ever since on CentOS for customers and
SuSE for me.
It has a single irritating 'feature' logout with autologin set is immediate
relogin.
Curiosity, features and fixes led me
On Friday 30 January 2009 07:42:22 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> posted this question on the Ubuntu forum earlier, no reply.
>
> How would I configure/build LTSP client if the boot server is not the
> same as LTSP server?
>
> Given a 64-bit computer (host) which runs several
On Sunday 25 January 2009 03:30:58 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> We are running an Ubuntu Hardy-LTSP thin client set up at our school. I
> have pre-school kids and it is a real challenge to have to log in every day
> to 26 clients at a time. I need a way to login to one clien
On Sunday 25 January 2009 03:30:58 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> Just wanted to point out a couple of new HOWTOs I've created (Ubuntu
> specific, feel free to copy and modify for your distro and/or distro
> independent instructions/docs). Please feel free to correct any mista
On Saturday 24 January 2009 04:49:18 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> Have you tried "nosplash" in default file?
>
> - Jordan
>
> Patrick Rady wrote:
> > We have upgraded to LTSP 64-bit Ubuntu 8.04 and I have noticed a few
> > oddities that I am hoping for feedback
On Friday 23 January 2009 05:30:32 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> I'm hoping this works (I've been unable to post to this list in ages)
>
> Is there anyway to get ldm to look the same as gdm or kdm,
>
> Background
>
> We are looking at upgrading our current thin clients to new
On Friday 23 January 2009 05:30:32 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> I have set up a Kubuntu 8.04 LTSP server as a virtual machine at a VMware
> Server 2.0. The underlying operating system is an Ubuntu server 8.04.
>
> I have installed the ltsp-server package not the ltsp-server-
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 07:54:39 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> - On a non-productive system I can produce (with the kind help of -J.) a
> boot-cd using "kiwi-ltsp-setup -cd" and so. This works.
>
> - what I'd like to was to avoid the CD altogether and have a PXE-boot
> i
On Sunday 11 January 2009 00:29:41 ltsp-discuss-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
> I'm just posting my experience in case anybody else is fighting the same
> battle I just fought...
>
> I just spent a lot of time troubleshooting some video resolution issues.
> No matter what I did, I couldn't
On Thursday 25 December 2008 02:09:02 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > It seems I need a different 'pxelinux.cfg/default' for nfs mounting,
> > currently it is for using nbd-server. Please help me to change to nfs.
>
> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuLTSP/LTSPWithoutN
Hi
My TCs are VIA EPIA boards.
I installed the Ibex LTSP client suit.
Boot fails with the openchrome graphics drivers saying "BusIDs needed with fb
devices"
I took my /opt/ltsp harking back to Gutsy ??, kept the current kernel and
initfs (added the /lib/modules for the current kernel) and all i
On Thursday 18 December 2008 23:20:51 ltsp-discuss-
requ...@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I need to use Ltsp linux clients, but they tftp server, dhcp server
> and nfs server are hosted on a Windows XP machine. Can I have the
> pxelinux.0 ,ltsp kernel and file system Image on an XP machine? I read
Hi
Despite the hard work of all involved, and with apologies, I do not like the
SuSE TC implementation
1) When I tried, my VIA EPIA TCs would not boot
2) They make an aweful mess in the tftpboot directory
I have made rpm for a CentOS install (based on a bog standard ubuntu install)
so I install
On Saturday 06 December 2008 08:45:57 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm using a ltsp-5 default instalation in Ubuntu 8.10.
> >
> > The clients are old machines: k6-2 500 Mhz with 64 Mb
> >
> > When the boot ocurs and the client receives all the nbi.img kernel it
> > hangs,
> > after ab
On Saturday 06 December 2008 01:12:29 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anybody out there get a Wyse S10 to work with Edubuntu 8.04?
>
> I managed to get thin clients to work perfectly with Intel P4 PCs with 512K
> ram with no issues, but with the Wyse S10, I get 8 of the 10 progress bars
>
On Friday 28 November 2008 11:08:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I'm using a LTSP Server installed via the Ubuntu 8.10 "Alternate
> Installation CD" within a fairly complex network with a already existing
> DHCP server.
>
> I would now like to set up the following scenario:
>
> Server 1 (Our exist
On Friday 28 November 2008 11:08:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > I have installed Centos 5.2 on our new server and would like to install
> > ltsp5 on it. I had searched for some suitable documentation on how to
> > install on Centos 5.2 but did not get much luck.
>
> I'm afraid that is impossible
On Wednesday 26 November 2008 03:16:31 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Recently, I had some trouble working with ltsp:
>
> I logged in on one of the ldm-servers I specified. Then I changed the user
> and tried to open a program:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/amnt/home/Peter.Stein$ su ripley*
> *P
On Thursday 20 November 2008 04:27:31 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Will do, but Im just annoyed by the individual ROM generation from
> > > ROM-o-matic. My refurbished units all have different lan cards and I
> > > was hoping for a universal diskette bootrom.
> > >
> > > Any help? :
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 07:32:19 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone here have ever got a Dell Optiplex GX110 running on SXGA
> (1280x1024) with LTSP 4.2?
>
> I have tried a lot of modelines and combinations of parameters like
> refresh rates and video RAM, but to no avail. If
On Saturday 15 November 2008 07:31:56 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ere is my case: I have installed LTSP5 on a HP Proliant ML110 (Pentium
> Xenon) server with Ubuntu 8.10. The clients I am using for testing purposes
> is an old Pentium III machine and a less old Pentium M Laptop.
>
> Af
On Thursday 13 November 2008 07:20:41 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have installed Ubuntu-8.04.
> > I want to setup ltsp-server.
> >
> > apt-get showed me the following packages :
> > ltsp-client
> > ltsp-client - core
> > ltspfs
> > ltspfsd
> > ltsp - manager
> > ltsp - server
> > l
On Saturday 08 November 2008 14:12:20 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have the following problem: the size of the fonts of certain web
> pages is too small in firefox... setting the default fontsize to a larger
> value does not help because the appearance of such pages are controlled
> v
On Thursday 06 November 2008 02:55:34 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At each location I plan to put a flat screen (wall mounted or on
> adjustable arm), a bluetooth or IR single unit keyboard/mouse and as
> small and power miserly a thin-ish client box as possible. The system
> needs to
On Thursday 06 November 2008 02:55:34 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We are running LTSP Fat Client on Ubuntu Version 8. We are having a
> problem that user processes remain running when the user logs out.
> Hence when another user logs into the same machine they have less RAM
> available
On Saturday 01 November 2008 07:55:29 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings All
> Have just installed ubuntu 7.10 and 8.04 ltsp.
> I am unable to login using a client on both systems
> On 8.04 I get unauthorized.
> Help appreiciated
You're doing it wrong
See how useful no informatio
On Saturday 01 November 2008 07:55:29 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I set up some LTSP clients with autologin but I need to even to
> poweroff clients when users finish working but with this configuration
> it seems to be not possible at all.
> If user logout then client log in again
On Friday 31 October 2008 23:53:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> About Swap, when using a fat client setup, when the user opens several
> applications (OpenOffice, Terminal Server Client, Thunderbird, Firefox,
> et al) all those process are executing in the client's memory, so
> without swap when you
On Friday 17 October 2008 21:10:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > No it simply means YOU don't know how to do it. Making LTSP more
> > complicated to solve THAT problem is silly.
> > My previous mail shows 2 ways to achieve bog-standard-ltsp AND
> > administrator access without passwd access from th
On Friday 17 October 2008 05:01:51 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[snip]
> As I've pointed out, ltsp is an alternate use of ssh, and as Rob
> pointed out, ltsp requires that ssh be configured in a way that is
> simply unacceptable for traditional use, i.e., remote (open) access.
[snip]
No it simply mea
On Friday 17 October 2008 01:47:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I have installed Ubuntu 8.04.01 in a WMware environment and made the
> automatically installation from LTSP.
> After the installation i booted the client but the resolution isn't what
> i want.
>
> here my lts.conf file
> **
On Friday 17 October 2008 01:47:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Security through complexity is dumb and ends up biting you:
>
> Security by obscurity will probably work against brute force ssh worms, but
> is less likely to work where there is a determined attack.
>
> > My server is on a 192.168.
On Friday 17 October 2008 01:47:37 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > > Personally I don't see the benefit to have an additional SSH server
> > > > by default running... if your network isn't firewalled, you've got a
> > > > lot more to worry about than an open SSH port. It's common network
> > > > ad
On Thursday 16 October 2008 07:19:04 ltsp-discuss-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Personally I don't see the benefit to have an additional SSH server by
> > default running... if your network isn't firewalled, you've got a lot
> > more to worry about than an open SSH port. It's common network
> > adm
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 23:21:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> LTSP won't work over wireless.
> >>>
> >>> Not quiet, won't BOOT over wireless (can't boot: no network card before
> >>> you boot and you need network card to boot)
> >>
> >> I do have a network card that is capable of network boo
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 23:21:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > I have a LTSP5 environment running on Ubuntu 8.04 (64bit,
> > clients
> > 32bit). I'd like to add a indepentent computer to this
> > LAN, which has
> > its own hard drive, which boots up and then on starting X
> > it would
> > connec
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 18:42:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > LTSP won't work over wireless.
> >
> > Not quiet, won't BOOT over wireless (can't boot: no network card before
> > you boot and you need network card to boot)
>
> I do have a network card that is capable of network booting.
>
> Wha
On Friday 10 October 2008 03:05:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> A couple things:
>
> LTSP won't work over wireless.
Not quiet, won't BOOT over wireless (can't boot: no network card before you
boot and you need network card to boot)
>
> You must only have 1 DHCP server available to the thin client
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 18:51:09
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
> Is is possible to setup the lts.conf to have different dns servers based
> on the client? I need to limit certain clients to only use what is
> listed in the /etc/hosts file. I have tried using the DNS_SERVER =
> 111
1 - 100 of 2156 matches
Mail list logo
