I was just going to send him a set of strings. It'll be long lasting,
weather-proof, not so beautiful but utterly practical in any environment
carbon, so if any of you want to send him something else so he has a choice,
that might be a good idea. He keeps sending me his cd's for reviews in our
Stewart McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
2) Chromatic fingering. Guitarists are taught to have one finger per
fret - to use the 1st finger for the 1st fret, the 2nd finger for
the 2nd fret,
I'm generalising, of course, but my experience is that lute players
tend to use their little finger
At 11:20 PM 12/4/03 -0600, Michael Thames wrote:
As we have witnessed, a moral case could be made either way. I for one,
am in favor of all facsimiles in the public domain to be copyright free. As
far as everything else is concerned I really don't care.
As I understand it, at least in the
Dear Mathias,
What you say is extremely interesting - not a third finger in sight.
This is what I think of as double bass fingering, where semitones
are fingered with only the 1st, 2nd, and 4th fingers. The 3rd finger
may be used to support the 4th finger, but doesn't have a note in
its own right
Dear lutenists,
Just as I had removed myself from the list for the holidays I
received a copy of this message from Professor Thierry Favier at the
University of Dijon seeking identification of the poem below. If I
any of you know the source, would you mind passing the information on
to
Excellent, David,
Well done.
There is another lutenist to adopt (actually 2, father and son).
They share a smallish lute of ca.60cm.
Nikolay Makarenko
Kommunarov, 115, room 7,
35, Krasnodar,
RUSSIA
phone: (8612) 65-11-89
RT
I was just going to send him a set of strings. It'll be long
Barring obvious cases of tyranny, law should
reflect the social norms of a society.
Since when tyranny does not reflect the social norms of a society???
There is a maxim: Every people deserves its government.
If you feel they do not, strive to
change them through proper channels in favor of
For your perusal and delectation:
I have just posted a TEMPO DI MINUETTO by Georg Christoph Wagenseil
at
http://polyhymnion.org/swv/opus-2.html
It differs in some minor [editorial] details from its facsimile that may be
found at
http://polyhymnion.org/swv/facs.html
Enjoy,
RT
__
Roman
At 09:20 AM 12/5/03 -0500, Roman Turovsky wrote:
If you feel they do not, strive to
change them through proper channels in favor of breaking them. I don't
believe allowing the production and sale of lute tablatures is quite
enough to justify a label of tyranny.
Production is not
At 11:20 PM 12/4/03 -0600, Michael Thames wrote:
As we have witnessed, a moral case could be made either way. I for
one,
am in favor of all facsimiles in the public domain to be copyright free.
As
far as everything else is concerned I really don't care.
As I understand it, at least in the
At 09:20 AM 12/5/03 -0500, Roman Turovsky wrote:
If you feel they do not, strive to
change them through proper channels in favor of breaking them. I don't
believe allowing the production and sale of lute tablatures is quite
enough to justify a label of tyranny.
Production is not questioned
I contributed what little I know of this topic very early on and in very
short order grew mighty tired of all the scatological nonsense and
inappropriate misidentification of hominids to follow (as a professional
biologist, this latter offense was particularly troubling).
Actually I took an
A helpful resource in understanding public domain and copyright law (USA
only) is Stanford University's Library site and can be found at
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/
-jdh
--
I'll ask Sasha Batov about this.
RT
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02059.html
lute
-- Chronological --
Find
-- Thread --
Re: Recent discoveries (Facsimeles etc.)
For example, many years ago, I photographed in Leningrad., when it was
still Leningrad, a lute
Well, there are some potential linguistic pitfalls, stemming from the
differences between American and British versions of English, as well
as considerable differences in thinking patterns: people tend to be A
BIT more elliptical in Midlands than in Iowa, and a direct statement
American style
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Matanya Ophee wrote:
Quite the contrary. Sky writing, ..., have a very secure business model
where the
I simply meant (with some poetic license required, perhaps) that you can't
sell tickets to a sky-writing show.
... the street beggars in the swampy slums of Bangladesh
At 09:20 AM 12/5/2003 -0500, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you feel they do not, strive to
change them through proper channels in favor of breaking them. I don't
believe allowing the production and sale of lute tablatures is quite
enough to justify a label of tyranny.
Dear Stewart,
It is the falce and unperfect aspect of modern editions, which
make me want to look at facsimiles. I want to get as close as
possible to the original text to learn as much as I can about the
music. It's an academic thing, I suppose.
It is also admirably professional, and that
At 12:24 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll ask Sasha Batov about this.
RT
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02059.html
Good idea. I hope you have better luck getting hold of him than I did last
August. Batov was working in the Leningrad Museum of
At 11:43 AM 12/5/2003 -0600, Herbert Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Matanya Ophee wrote:
Quite the contrary. Sky writing, ..., have a very secure business model
where the
I simply meant (with some poetic license required, perhaps) that you can't
sell tickets to a
Put another way, and taking the gamut of the list which runs from the
professional to the rank amateur, how people see the facsimile is going to
be very different, and maybe it would not be a bad idea for the publishers
(seeing as two of them are on the list) to explain their market (and I
An additional reason to share facsimilia (from CG list):
From: Matanya Ophee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was able to remove from the market an
edition of PD material by another publisher, which was based on my
edition of the same piece. I have made a few editorial changes to the
original, and also
At 07:02 PM 12/5/2003 +0100, Tony Chalkley wrote:
maybe it would not be a bad idea for the publishers
(seeing as two of them are on the list) to explain their market (and I don't
mean by this justify their prices). What a print run on the average
facsimile is, who buys it, etc.
Justifying the
[1]Don't Waste Your Time at the Doctor#3= 9;s Office!
RX Medication= s Delivered Right to Your Door in 24 Hours!
[2]Pay LESS for your drugs get MORE for= your $$$!
Join the millions of peo= ple who are tired of the hassle with the
insurance companies and doctors!
We
At 02:01 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An additional reason to share facsimilia (from CG list):
From: Matanya Ophee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was able to remove from the market an
edition of PD material by another publisher, which was based on my
edition of the
but the distribution
scheme in place is comprised of the publishermain distributorsubsidiary
distributorsdealers. They all get a cut.
The cost per copy is $32.- Applying the rule, the list price should be
$224. As you can tell from my on line catalogue, the suggested list price
for this
Another benefit to using non-adjacent fingers on a string: it
leaves appropriate fingers available to play a moving line elsewhere, above
or below the string in question. E.g., by using 1 and 3 together on an
upper course, 2 and 4 are available to play counterpoint (or whatever) on a
At 04:26 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but the distribution
scheme in place is comprised of the publishermain distributorsubsidiary
distributorsdealers. They all get a cut.
The cost per copy is $32.- Applying the rule, the list price should be
$224. As you
Distributors and dealers get their discounts off the official suggested
list price.
MO, we are not children here, and we know that this suggested list price
is a myth designed to make palatable eventual NICE PRICE!!! 20% OFF!!!
label. Moreover, it is determined by marketing research. If the
So a publisher that does nothing but facsimiles, like Minkoff for example,
is using facsimiles to promotes facsimiles?
Madam Minkoff produces NOT facsimilia, BUT replicas of antique books of
various sorts, not necessarily with artistic content, for a totally
different and much larger market.
However the publishers produce facsimiles not to make money. The facsimiles
make their OTHER books look trustworthy and sellable. In other words the
facsimiles are promotional material to a large degree.
RT
You do have a way with words, well said !!!
Indeed he does. Every demagogue who
At 06:03 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Distributors and dealers get their discounts off the official suggested
list price.
MO, we are not children here,
When I see grown men drawn into silly displays of foolish indulgence in
areas they know nothing about for the
bothered. But once I started, the only way to limit the costs was to drop
the project. The costs were mainly imposed on me by the library.
Whopping 2 bottles of cognac
RT
__
Roman M. Turovsky
http://turovsky.org
http://polyhymnion.org
Dear Roland,
you asked:
I am tired of deleting all the messages on this subject. Why don't you
who wish to pursue it go off line?
Well the same with me! I sincerely wish that the theoretical
copyright thinkers choose to change to private e-mail communication!
All the best... ;-)
Arto
well said!
Don't you get tired of that - how do you call it? Dog fights?
There is no sense discussing with Mantanya - he is an ignorant person
mixing truth and lie at his will. And as a scientist ... better don't
try to decrease on his level of discussion.
Actually I don't believe TREE for
At 06:21 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd rather be a professional socialist, than an amateur
capitalist
I have no idea what is a professional socialist, but I do know something
about capitalism. I am glad you acknowledge the fact that I am only an
amateur in
At 08:35 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to admit that I don't follow the discussion closely and just by
accident jumped into this thread (MO's messages are immediatly deleted)
Likewise, a couple of dozen list messages never reached me, so I went to
check
MO, there is a Paul Revere Trophy for the unsurpassed excellence in e-mail
in the snail-mail for you. It is yours to keep forever. We are just non
interested anymore.
RT
__
Roman M. Turovsky
http://turovsky.org
http://polyhymnion.org
I have to admit that I don't follow the
the temporary
solution! A sporting goods store had fishing line of 20lb test and .017in
(.43mm). I didn't want to spend $8 US for 330 yards, so the store gave me 10
yards of it from a spare reel without charge. It works! It is holding pitch
as it stretches just as well as the nylgut Aquila's on
Michael Stitt wrote:
I'm at astage where my fretgut on my 14 course swan neck are so
frayed that buzzing is serious. I survived two years on my old
supply but forgot what size I need. I have two requests. The first
is short term. What diameter fretgut should I order? I recall 0.9,
0.8,
At 09:37 PM 12/5/2003 -0500, Roman Turovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MO, there is a Paul Revere Trophy for the unsurpassed excellence in e-mail
in the snail-mail for you. It is yours to keep forever. We are just non
interested anymore.
Best news I heard all day! Just keep this non-interest in my
42 matches
Mail list logo
