On Thursday 16 October 2003 03:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In lyx-qt, greek letters are displayed only in 'TeX' form. That is, the
> Greek 'alpha', for example, is displayed on lyx-screen as
> red-colored "alpha".
>
> I have had this problem since lyx-3.2, and this is the reason why
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:02:11PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> I don't have a good traceback for this.
Can be reproduced by the using the UserGuide and searching for
'xx'.
The fix is to initialize LyXCursor::par to 0 instead of -1.
Maybe we should simply do that... Alfredo?
Andre'
--
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:26:42AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:02:11PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > I don't have a good traceback for this.
>
> Can be reproduced by the using the UserGuide and searching for
> 'xx'.
>
> The fix is to initialize LyXCursor::pa
This is Alfredo's old 'textcache removal' patch.
With it, buffer cycling between two copies of the UserGuide is
significantly faster than I can access the View->1/2 menu by mouse and
about as fast as I can type M-v 1 or M-v 2.
So even if this is a AMD 1700+ it should be usable on PIII 500.
If
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 09:26:42AM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:02:11PM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>> > I don't have a good traceback for this.
>>
>> Can be reproduced by the using the UserGuide and searching for
>> 'xx
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:21:20AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Or better: leave the -1 to trigger a message but interpret the -1 as 0
> | in getPar(). So we'd fix the crash and get the warning that something is
> | fishy.
>
> You already get that warning. It is called an assert. and call
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is Alfredo's old 'textcache removal' patch.
>
| With it, buffer cycling between two copies of the UserGuide is
| significantly faster than I can access the View->1/2 menu by mouse and
| about as fast as I can type M-v 1 or M-v 2.
>
| So even if thi
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:25:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Just comment out the textcache.add here and delete bv_->text and set
> it to 0.
What's the benefit of keeping dead code?
A text cahce revival would happen on a 'per paragraph list' base, so
even if keeping TextCache.[Ch] might
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:21:20AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Or better: leave the -1 to trigger a message but interpret the -1 as 0
>> | in getPar(). So we'd fix the crash and get the warning that something is
>> | fishy.
>>
>> You already
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:34:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | There is no need to repeat the 'assert on pos != size' story.
>
> But you are now allowing blantatly wrong cursors to just be trasformed
> into something valid.
But it enables people to use 1.4.0cvs and we were aiming for a
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is Alfredo's old 'textcache removal' patch.
>
| With it, buffer cycling between two copies of the UserGuide is
| significantly faster than I can access the View->1/2 menu by mouse and
| about as fast as I can type M-v 1 or M-v 2.
>
| So even if thi
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:25:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Just comment out the textcache.add here and delete bv_->text and set
>> it to 0.
>
| What's the benefit of keeping dead code?
When doing this testing it is not yet for sure that we
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:34:36AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | There is no need to repeat the 'assert on pos != size' story.
>>
>> But you are now allowing blantatly wrong cursors to just be trasformed
>> into something valid.
>
| But it enab
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:07:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is some results without the textcache removed.
>
> time ./src/lyx -x 'lyx-quit'
>
> real0m0.313s
> user0m0.150s
> sys 0m0.050s
>
>
> time ./src/lyx -x 'command-sequence file-open ../lyxdoc/UserGuide1.lyx
> ;
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:10:26AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:25:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Just comment out the textcache.add here and delete bv_->text and set
> >> it to 0.
> >
> | What's the ben
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:07:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> This is some results without the textcache removed.
>>
>> time ./src/lyx -x 'lyx-quit'
>>
>> real0m0.313s
>> user0m0.150s
>> sys 0m0.050s
>>
>>
>> time ./src/lyx -x '
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:14:31AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> So, dammit, 1.4.0 will not be released tomorror or the week after
> that. So a tiny effort to fix this would be nice.
These problems will vanish with a global cursor as there won't be
'unitialized' LyXCursor 'slices' left in Ly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:07:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> This is some results without the textcache removed.
>>>
>>> time ./src/lyx -x 'lyx-quit'
>>>
>>> real0m0.313s
>>> user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
| | Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
| | | On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:07:52AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This is some results without the textcache removed.
time .
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am trying to get a global cursor. This is more than a 'tiny effort' as
| far as I can tell.
Yes. Certainly. But is that the only possible way to fix this?
>> Will you act on every warning, not that you don't have to?
>
| Warnins annoy me sufficientl
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:34:55AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Not really. Rebreaking should be a bit faster nowadays, but this
> | exceeds my expectations.
>
> I have a feeling that something fishy is going on. Should the "no text
> in cache" message from BufferView::Pimpl::resizeCurren
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:46:20AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> (somehow debugstream is not workign with gcc 3.4 with maximum
> optimization, I will investigate.)
>
> I'd really like to know, how slow does a computer need to be before
> the buffer switch get unbearably slow. So some tests o
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:40:23AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I am trying to get a global cursor. This is more than a 'tiny effort' as
> | far as I can tell.
>
> Yes. Certainly. But is that the only possible way to fix this?
It is a way t
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd really like to know, how slow does a computer need to be before
> the buffer switch get unbearably slow. So some tests on P-III's and
> P-II's would be nice (slower than that I do not care too much about.)
I've got a 300MHz laptop, and I'll te
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:14:58PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > I'd really like to know, how slow does a computer need to be before
> > the buffer switch get unbearably slow. So some tests on P-III's and
> > P-II's would be nice (slowe
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:14:58PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> > I'd really like to know, how slow does a computer need to be before
>> > the buffer switch get unbearably slow. So some tes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> I actually thought I had a clean tree...
| | Yeh, yeh, yeh ;-)
This patch may be more to your liking.
? unknown-2.diff
Index: src/ChangeLog
===
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:04:09AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> > recent version of CJK-LyX-qt is CJK-LyX-qt-3.1(lyx-qt-3.1 is O.K.!).
>
> That is usally a symptom of latex-xft package missing. Get the rpm from ftp
> site and all should work well.
Not necessarily - in fact, unlikely. Qt will n
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Could we please stop going into politics every day? This costs me a lot
Perhaps you should stop accusing people of politics when they're making
valid technical points. Namely that we've had a history of passing
invalid cursor around
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:51:31PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Could we please stop going into politics every day? This costs me a lot
>
> Perhaps you should stop accusing people of politics when they're making
> valid technical
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:04:09AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> > recent version of CJK-LyX-qt is CJK-LyX-qt-3.1(lyx-qt-3.1 is
>> > O.K.!).
>>
>> That is usally a symptom of latex-xft package missing. Get the
>> rpm from ftp
>> site and all should work well.
>
> Not ne
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This patch may be more to your liking.
???
It is exactly what I posted back to you. Why not just apply it and
move on?
--
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> This patch may be more to your liking.
>
| ???
| It is exactly what I posted back to you. Why not just apply it and
| move on?
Just almost exactly the same.
Thanks for not just saying "yes" and reading your cvs mail.
--
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Note that he says it used to work fine with an earlier version of
> Qt-LyX. Has Qt's handling of such things changed since Qt 3.1?
I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twi
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:01:22PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> That's exactly what I am doing when initializing the cursor par with the
> 'invalid' value -1 and issue warnings if the cursor is accessed in such
> a state. The 'band aid' would be to set it to 0.
Sorry then.
john
--
Khendon's
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> This patch may be more to your liking.
>>
> | ???
> | It is exactly what I posted back to you. Why not just apply it and
> | move on?
>
> Just almost exactly the same.
How so? Cuttong and
I used these commands
rm -rf build-qt
cvs update -d
./autogen.sh
cd build-qt
../configure --with-version-suffix --prefix=$LYXPREFIX
--disable-libtool-lock --with-frontend=qt
make
and eventually got this error:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../src/mathed -I../../src
-I..
>From the changes :
"Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in locales such
as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a rawMode
load or not...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, th
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> and eventually got this error:
>
> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hpp:20:48: ostream: No such file or
> directory
> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hpp:21:50: streambuf: No such file or
> directory
John Levon wrote:
>
> From the changes :
>
> "Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
>
> This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in locales
> such
> as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a
> rawMode load or not...
Could you expand a little for the non-initi
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> How do I fix it?
Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
you and not for others...
--
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
This patch may be more to your liking.
>>>
>> | ???
>> | It is exactly what I posted back to you. Why not just apply it and
>> | move on?
>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > "Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
> >
> > This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in locales
> > such
> > as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a
> > rawMode load or not...
>
> Could you
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
> nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
> you and not for others...
It failed for me with gcc 2.96 on my IA64 box too
regards
john
--
Khendon's L
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I just tire of being at the receiving end. (mostly).
C'mon, guys! Lars is feeling got at. André is feeling got at. John
has been got at for bloody ages. It's crap and it's pissing us all
off.
Can we be civilised please?
--
Angus
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m
> wrote:
>
>> and eventually got this error:
>>
>> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hpp:20:48: ostream: No
>> such file or directory
>> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hpp:21:50: streambuf:
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> How do I fix it?
>
| Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
| nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
| you and not for others...
2.95.x does not have
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I used these commands
>
> rm -rf build-qt
> cvs update -d
> ./autogen.sh
> cd build-qt
> ../configure --with-version-suffix --prefix=$LYXPREFIX
>--disable-libtool-lock --with-frontend=qt
> make
>
> and eventual
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > How do I fix it?
>
> Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
> nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
> you and not for others...
It looks like the header is
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:44:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:40:08PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
> > nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
> > you and not for others...
>
> It fail
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I used these commands
> >
> > rm -rf build-qt
> > cvs update -d
> > ./autogen.sh
> > cd build-qt
> > ../configure --with-version-suffix --prefix=$LYXPREFIX
> > --disabl
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> I'll try with a later version of gcc to keep going.
Linking files might be faster...
Andre'
>
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jeffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| I just tire of being at the receiving end. (mostly).
I'll try to be more civil, and to not come with unwarranted
accusations.
--
Lgb
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:09:41PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> Note that he says it used to work fine with an earlier version of
>> Qt-LyX. Has Qt's handling of such things changed since Qt 3.1?
>
> I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
Incidentally, what is your
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:46:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | I just tire of being at the receiving end. (mostly).
>
> I'll try to be more civil, and to not come with unwarranted
> accusations.
Me too
Andre'
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > I'll try with a later version of gcc to keep going.
>
> Linking files might be faster...
Que? Anyway, I've already started the process using gcc 3.2.3
/Christian
--
Ph.D. Ch
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> > > I'll try with a later version of gcc to keep going.
> >
> > Linking files might be faster...
>
> Q
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:37:46PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I don't know, I've long since lost track ...
>
> Incidentally, what is your current interest level? I have the feeling
> that you're easing down to 'observer status'.
Well I hope I can put this without pissing anybody off in th
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:03:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Me too
AOL. I've already been cancelling a few "sends" recently, I'll try to do
so more often ;)
Apologies to anybody I've annoyed.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
>> and eventually got this error:
>>
>> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hpp:20:48: ostream: No such file or
>> directory
>> ../../../boost/boost/test/detail/nullstream.hp
John Levon wrote:
>> > "Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
>> >
>> > This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in
>> > locales such
>> > as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a
>> > rawMode load or not...
>>
>> Could you expand a little for the non-initiated
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So yeah, I am. I might get round to fixing change tracking if the tree
| recovers, though.
:-) so I won't remove the non-working cruft for some time yet then.
--
Lgb
John Levon wrote:
>> Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
>> nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
>> you and not for others...
>
> It failed for me with gcc 2.96 on my IA64 box too
I think it is all a function of the grossly non-standard stream
class
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:06:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Finally, I feel I'd be wasting my time on the CVS HEAD tree given the
> state it's in, and backporting stuff is tedious and distinctly un-fun
> work.
>
> So yeah, I am. I might get round to fixing change tracking if the tree
> recovers,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:55:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Were it to work as you suggest, would it also enable russians to type
> latin or greek also? That's the same problem isn't it?
Nope ! There are three things related to this :
1) entering the character. X has locale-specific compos
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:23:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The tree is in a state were such work won't get lost.
All the tough stuff has been lost already, I think - that is, the tricky
things concerning insets, cut and paste, tables, etc. are broken to the
extent they need re-doing altog
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:52:55PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I think it is all a function of the grossly non-standard stream
> classes shipped with gcc < 3. There are stream classes in support
> that I'd expect are there for just this reason. Do they help?
Maybe (sorry the box is down right
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferso
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Levon wrote:
>>> Add #include to debugstream.h before the #include
>>> nullstream call? Might be interesting to ascertain why it fails for
>>> you and not for others...
>>
>> It failed for me with gcc 2.96 on my IA64 box too
>
| I think it is all
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
>
| What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
Me. We are not doing that now. Let's wait for 1.5 with that.
--
Lgb
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:53:52PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>> > I'll try with a later version of gcc to keep going.
>>
>> Linking files might be faster...
>
| Que? Anyway, I've already
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
>
> What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
This is probably incomplete.
o moving chartype to the agreed upon (I think ?) 32-bit value
o deciding whether wstring is really
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | You have to update to gcc 3.x
>
> Or use STLport.
>
> Actually it is possible to get this working with gcc 2.95.x as well,
> but a lot of non-nice hacking must be done. And I really hoped that we
> could avoid that now.
>
Just a note. The REA
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| o the ability to read in and write out UTF-8 encoded .lyx files
I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
do first imho, especially since standard ASCII is utf
On Thursday 16 October 2003 14:41, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
> >
> > What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
>
> This is probably incomplete.
[...]
> o lyx2lyx support for snooping
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:36:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> >> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
> >
> | What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
>
> Me. W
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> | You have to update to gcc 3.x
>>
>> Or use STLport.
>>
>> Actually it is possible to get this working with gcc 2.95.x as well,
>> but a lot of non-nice hacking must be done. And I really ho
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
> should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
> do first imho, especially since standard ASCII is utf-8 good as any.
Any documents
Ok... I had another problem since QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt3-gcc2.96...
I have no idea where this variable is set though..., but I really
think the ./configure script should protest in this case. (It didn't
and I got loads of linking errors).
Here's the result of configuration (with QTDIR set):
Config
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
>> should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
>> do first imho, especially since standa
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> Ok... I had another problem since QTDIR=/usr/lib/qt3-gcc2.96...
>
> I have no idea where this variable is set though..., but I really
> think the ./configure script should protest in this case. (It didn't
> and I got loads
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> Shouldn't it say something after 'Qt Frontend' and 'Qt version' ?
Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the threa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| | On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:14:58PM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'd really like to know, how slow does a computer need to be befor
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't it say something after 'Qt Frontend' and 'Qt version' ?
>
> Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
>
It's better to get loads of errors when l
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't it say something after 'Qt Frontend' and 'Qt version' ?
>
| Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
But it should error at end of configure, and s
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:19:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
>
> But it should error at end of configure, and should disable the qt
> build.
I believe I informed you of this a while ago :)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If th
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:18:23PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is with a P-III 1000Mhz. (lot of memory, but a laptop so the
> io-subsystem is really bad..)
>
> time ./src/lyx -x 'lyx-quit ;'
>
> real0m0.853s
> user0m0.460s
> sys 0m0.020s
>
>
> time ./src/lyx -x 'command
Just before I rush off, here's the latest error :-)
echo timestamp > screen.lo
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link g++ -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -o
libfrontends.la Alert.lo Dialogs.lo LyXView.lo Painter.lo Timeout.lo
Toolbar.lo guiapi.lo screen.lo
mkdir .libs
rm -fr .libs/libfrontends.
On Thursday 16 October 2003 15:04, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | Any documents in a different encoding won't be in ASCII though :)
> |
> | But José said it was easy to handle, so...
>
> Hmm... but he has to read most of the lyx file header to find out what
> language is it written in and whet
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
World domination?
Andre'
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:19:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> | Nope, lars changed it so that it won't error at configure time.
>>
>> But it should error at end of configure, and should disable the qt
>> build.
>
| I believe I informed you of t
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
>
| Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
Your list?
qt support
--
Lgb
John Levon wrote:
>> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
> Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
Let's start the ball rolling then...
character styles?
--
Angus
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So the question is: ``do we really want to do that?''. What I mean is
> that nobody has complained yet that we lack an option to set alignment
> to default.
I should have complain, sorry ;-)
> What we do (or should be doing) currently is to cons
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Just before I rush off, here's the latest error :-)
>
| echo timestamp > screen.lo
| /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=link g++ -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -o
| libfrontends.la Alert.lo Dialogs.lo LyXView.lo Painter.lo Timeout.lo
| Toolbar.l
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Your list?
>
> qt support
Don't we already have that :)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> Your list?
>>
>> qt support
>
| Don't we already have that :)
I thought you crossed that one out, and am are now finished with your
tasks :-)
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:42:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> character styles?
You win ! With honorable mention to André for getting the underlyig
motivation correct.
Here's the full top ten (that I just made up).
1. Character styles
2. Unicode support
3. Outliner
4. Document .layout wizar
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | I believe I informed you of this a while ago :)
>
> And no complaints since then.
Because nobody is using 1.4cvs. Believe me, there will be complaints at
release time ;)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made t
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
