Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What about shipping a default-autotoolbars.ui file which make auto
toolbars active?
That still requires users to manually set a different UI file, which is
not a very obvious thing to do when you want to have the toolbars visible.
Why not put the auto toolbars in
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2006 07:48 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 07:10:42PM -0400, Timothy Reaves wrote:
In my Navigate menu, the chapters are listed. I have 8. So there
is Chapter 1, Chapter 2,... Except that beside (to the right) of the
chapter number is a
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2006 01:03 schrieb Timothy Reaves:
When I click on my documents TOC button, it immediately crashes with
this:
/usr/include/c++/4.0.0/debug/safe_iterator.h:127:error: attempt to copy-
construct an iterator from a singular iterator.
Could you post a backtrace?
Joost == Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joost Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What about shipping a default-autotoolbars.ui file which make auto
toolbars active?
Joost That still requires users to manually set a different UI file,
Joost which is not a very obvious thing to do when you
Timothy == Timothy Reaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Timothy When I click on my documents TOC button, it immediately
Timothy crashes with this:
Can you get a backtrace?
JMarc
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Hello, As the title says. I've been testing this patch for
Abdelrazak some days and I didn't see any side effect. The contrary
Abdelrazak would be surprising as the changes are pretty simple.
Abdelrazak Will commit tomorrow if
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think I'd prefer something like
+x_ += theFontMetrics(font).width(str[0], str.size());
Going 'optically' through four layers is not adding clarity.
I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Because I think there will be as many people annoyed by auto toolbars
then people who like them. Personally, having toolbars which flash in
and out when I do pageup/down annoys me.
Not having auto toolbars makes them very difficult to use, because
you'll have to
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:17:52PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Well, I've made it faster in the past with Bennett's help.
Abdelrazak I am quite confident that we'll find
John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:55:35PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
As the title says. I've been testing this patch for some days and I
didn't see any side effect. The contrary would be surprising as the
changes are pretty simple.
Is font metrics any faster these days?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Hello, As the title says. I've been testing this patch for
Abdelrazak some days and I didn't see any side effect. The contrary
Abdelrazak would be surprising as the changes are pretty simple.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:59:35AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Joost == Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joost Why not put the auto toolbars in default and create a
Joost default-noautotoolbars?
Because I think there will be as many people annoyed by auto toolbars
then
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Because I think there will be as many people annoyed by auto toolbars
then people who like them. Personally, having toolbars which flash in
and out when I do pageup/down annoys me.
Not having auto
andrzej,
1) does it help to add
SET OUTPUT_CHARSET=cp-1250
into lyx.bat ?
if so, does it help to replace it by
SET OUTPUT_CHARSET=nonsense
2) are there correct dialogs labels ? i.e. open preferences
and look whether there are only polish strings not mixed
with english strings.
If
Hi,
I am having a hard time installing a new class in LyX. I read the help
documentation (Customization.lyx, Section 5) and created a .layout
file.
The problem is that I am unable to get Lyx to recognize the .cls
file.LyX lists the new text class as unavailable and warns me that the
TeX class
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
As the title says. I've been testing this patch for some days and I
didn't see any side effect. The contrary would be surprising as the
changes are pretty simple.
Will commit tomorrow if there's no objection.
done.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:18:09AM -0400, Sarjoun Skaff wrote:
I am using windows and I added the class file to
C:\texmf\tex\latex\base. I did this because the classes used by
default are all in this directory. I do not know how to get the system
to recognize that I added the class.
Using
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Oct 9, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
If you can find a sponsor that send me a Mac Powerbook for free, I
sure will make it as fast as hell ;-)
You're winking, but let me take you seriously.
I was not very serious indeed...
In the US, I can get a 400 MHz
Any suggestions?
Bennett
---
if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++-4 -
DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -
DQT_GENUINE_STR -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_KEYWORDS -I../../../src -
I../../../src/frontends -I../../../images -I/Users/bennett/lyx/
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2882
The cause of the bug is the following:
When you press backspace in an empty paragraph (which is equivalent to
pressing delete in the lastpos of the paragraph above), LyXText::backspacePos0
just moves the cursor to the left and lets
Bennett Helm wrote:
Any suggestions?
It's fixed now.
Abdel.
Enrico == Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Enrico Another idea is using a toolbar which always is context
Enrico sensitive. I mean it does not appear or disappear but only
Enrico shows buttons having a meaning for that context. When you
Enrico change context, the buttons change
Joost == Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joost Not having auto toolbars makes them very difficult to use,
Joost because you'll have to reopen them again every time you start
Joost LyX (unless you know how to hack the ui files, you can't expect
Joost that from a normal Windows user). The
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
As the title says. I've been testing this patch for some days and I
didn't see any side effect. The contrary would be surprising as the
changes are pretty simple.
Will commit tomorrow if
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Another idea is using a toolbar which always is context sensitive.
I mean it does not appear or disappear but only shows buttons having
a meaning for that context. When you change context, the buttons
change accordingly.
Microsoft Office 2007 will have a very nice user
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In retrospect, I think it was an error to have the on/off/auto and
top/bottom settings for toolbars in the ui files themselves. They
would be easier to handle if they were in the prefs.
Yes, that is the main problem. Why not correct this mistake?
Joost
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
As the title says. I've been testing this patch for some days and I
didn't see any side effect. The contrary would be surprising as the
changes are pretty simple.
Joost Verburg wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In retrospect, I think it was an error to have the on/off/auto and
top/bottom settings for toolbars in the ui files themselves. They
would be easier to handle if they were in the prefs.
Yes, that is the main problem. Why not correct this
Joost Verburg wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Another idea is using a toolbar which always is context sensitive.
I mean it does not appear or disappear but only shows buttons having
a meaning for that context. When you change context, the buttons
change accordingly.
Microsoft Office 2007 will
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In retrospect, I think it was an error to have the on/off/auto and
top/bottom settings for toolbars in the ui files themselves. They
would be easier to handle if they were in the prefs.
Why not both, with preferences being the
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Joost Verburg wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In retrospect, I think it was an error to have the on/off/auto and
top/bottom settings for toolbars in the ui files themselves. They
would be easier to handle if they were in
Joost == Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joost Microsoft Office 2007 will have a very nice user interface with
Joost a context-sensitive ribbon:
Joost http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/jensenh/images/547376/original.aspx
Joost This way you won't have a separate menu and toolbar anymore but
On Oct 10, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
Any suggestions?
It's fixed now.
That does it -- thanks.
Bennett
José Matos wrote:
Why not both, with preferences being the preferred and the toolbar settings
being the default?
It seems perfect to me: :-)
I totally agree.
If users can configure the toolbars from the preferences window, it will
also become possible to add additional toolbars (like
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:06:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The trick to circumvent this for keepEmpty layouts in LyXText::backspacePos0
cannot be expanded easily for paragraphs in ERT, because isFreeSpacing() and
allowEmpty() always return true if code == InsetBase::ERT_CODE (see
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Have a function 'Inset***::backspaceShouldDeleteEmptyLines()' and be done.
I don't understand. Backspace should _always_ delete empty lines AFAICS. The
problem is that backspace is lazy and passes the job to dEPM, which doesn't
have a clue whether an empty par is there
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
If I see a patch, I will be able to tell whether it is unintrusive
enough to go in 1.4.x. Otherwise, it could go in 1.5.
I guess that this is a rather simple task. But before you ask: no, I do
not have time at the moment :-(
Michael
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2006 20:05 schrieb Joost Verburg:
One of the main reasons why Uwe keeps creating his own unofficial
Windows installers instead of joining the official installer project, is
that he want to bundle unofficial ui files with auto math/table toolbars
and view buttons.
Georg Baum wrote:
If the effort invested into the unofficial installer would have been
invested in this feature we would already have it.
I know. I already tried many times to convince Uwe to join the official
installer project and to integrate his modifications with the official
LyX in a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Timothy == Timothy Reaves [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Timothy When I click on my documents TOC button, it immediately
Timothy crashes with this:
Can you get a backtrace?
JMarc
One is not printed anywhere that I can find. Can one be forced out to
a log?
Joost wrote:
I know. I already tried many times to convince Uwe to join the
official installer project and to integrate his modifications with the
official LyX in a good way. This is a lot more effective compared to
maintaining a fork and it makes his ideas available for all users
instead
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Maybe my email sound a bit grumpy but what are you talking about? I am
working together with you to improve the installer (...)
I really appreciate your help.
Here I'm talking about having one official Windows installer instead of
both official and unofficial versions.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What about shipping a default-autotoolbars.ui file which make auto
toolbars active?
That still requires users to manually set a different UI file, which is
not a very obvious thing to do when you want to have the toolbars visible.
Why not put the auto toolbars in
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2006 07:48 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 07:10:42PM -0400, Timothy Reaves wrote:
> > In my Navigate menu, the chapters are listed. I have 8. So there
> > is Chapter 1, Chapter 2,... Except that beside (to the right) of the
> > chapter number
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2006 01:03 schrieb Timothy Reaves:
> When I click on my documents TOC button, it immediately crashes with
this:
>
> /usr/include/c++/4.0.0/debug/safe_iterator.h:127:error: attempt to copy-
> construct an iterator from a singular iterator.
Could you post a
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What about shipping a default-autotoolbars.ui file which make auto
>> toolbars active?
Joost> That still requires users to manually set a different UI file,
Joost> which is not a very obvious thing
> "Timothy" == Timothy Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Timothy> When I click on my documents TOC button, it immediately
Timothy> crashes with this:
Can you get a backtrace?
JMarc
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hello, As the title says. I've been testing this patch for
Abdelrazak> some days and I didn't see any side effect. The contrary
Abdelrazak> would be surprising as the changes are pretty simple.
Abdelrazak> Will
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 06:07:26PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think I'd prefer something like
+x_ += theFontMetrics(font).width([0], str.size());
Going 'optically' through four layers is not adding clarity.
I can
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Because I think there will be as many people annoyed by auto toolbars
then people who like them. Personally, having toolbars which flash in
and out when I do pageup/down annoys me.
Not having auto toolbars makes them very difficult to use, because
you'll have to
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:17:52PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Well, I've made it faster in the past with Bennett's help.
Abdelrazak> I am quite confident that we'll
John Levon wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:55:35PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
As the title says. I've been testing this patch for some days and I
didn't see any side effect. The contrary would be surprising as the
changes are pretty simple.
Is font metrics any faster these days?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Hello, As the title says. I've been testing this patch for
Abdelrazak> some days and I didn't see any side effect. The contrary
Abdelrazak> would be surprising as the changes are pretty
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:59:35AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joost> Why not put the auto toolbars in default and create a
> Joost> default-noautotoolbars?
>
> Because I think there will be as many people annoyed by auto
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Joost Verburg wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >Because I think there will be as many people annoyed by auto toolbars
> >then people who like them. Personally, having toolbars which flash in
> >and out when I do pageup/down annoys me.
>
> Not having
andrzej,
1) does it help to add
SET OUTPUT_CHARSET=cp-1250
into lyx.bat ?
if so, does it help to replace it by
SET OUTPUT_CHARSET=nonsense
2) are there correct dialogs labels ? i.e. open preferences
and look whether there are only polish strings not mixed
with english strings.
If
Hi,
I am having a hard time installing a new class in LyX. I read the help
documentation (Customization.lyx, Section 5) and created a .layout
file.
The problem is that I am unable to get Lyx to recognize the .cls
file.LyX lists the new text class as unavailable and warns me that the
TeX class
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
As the title says. I've been testing this patch for some days and I
didn't see any side effect. The contrary would be surprising as the
changes are pretty simple.
Will commit tomorrow if there's no objection.
done.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 09:18:09AM -0400, Sarjoun Skaff wrote:
> I am using windows and I added the class file to
> C:\texmf\tex\latex\base. I did this because the classes used by
> default are all in this directory. I do not know how to get the system
> to recognize that I added the class.
Bennett Helm wrote:
On Oct 9, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
If you can find a sponsor that send me a Mac Powerbook for free, I
sure will make it as fast as hell ;-)
You're winking, but let me take you seriously.
I was not very serious indeed...
In the US, I can get a 400 MHz
Any suggestions?
Bennett
---
if /bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++-4 -
DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../src -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -
DQT_GENUINE_STR -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_KEYWORDS -I../../../src -
I../../../src/frontends -I../../../images -I/Users/bennett/lyx/
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2882
The cause of the bug is the following:
When you press backspace in an empty paragraph (which is equivalent to
pressing delete in the lastpos of the paragraph above), LyXText::backspacePos0
just moves the cursor to the left and lets
Bennett Helm wrote:
Any suggestions?
It's fixed now.
Abdel.
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> Another idea is using a toolbar which always is context
Enrico> sensitive. I mean it does not appear or disappear but only
Enrico> shows buttons having a meaning for that context. When you
Enrico> change context, the buttons
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Not having auto toolbars makes them very difficult to use,
Joost> because you'll have to reopen them again every time you start
Joost> LyX (unless you know how to hack the ui files, you can't expect
Joost> that from a normal
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> As the title says. I've been testing this patch for some days and I
>> didn't see any side effect. The contrary would be surprising as the
>> changes are pretty simple.
>>
>>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Another idea is using a toolbar which always is context sensitive.
I mean it does not appear or disappear but only shows buttons having
a meaning for that context. When you change context, the buttons
change accordingly.
Microsoft Office 2007 will have a very nice user
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In retrospect, I think it was an error to have the on/off/auto and
top/bottom settings for toolbars in the ui files themselves. They
would be easier to handle if they were in the prefs.
Yes, that is the main problem. Why not correct this mistake?
Joost
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Hello,
As the title says. I've been testing this patch for some days and I
didn't see any side effect. The contrary would be surprising as the
changes are pretty
Joost Verburg wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
In retrospect, I think it was an error to have the on/off/auto and
top/bottom settings for toolbars in the ui files themselves. They
would be easier to handle if they were in the prefs.
Yes, that is the main problem. Why not correct this
Joost Verburg wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Another idea is using a toolbar which always is context sensitive.
I mean it does not appear or disappear but only shows buttons having
a meaning for that context. When you change context, the buttons
change accordingly.
Microsoft Office 2007 will
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 17:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> In retrospect, I think it was an error to have the on/off/auto and
> top/bottom settings for toolbars in the ui files themselves. They
> would be easier to handle if they were in the prefs.
Why not both, with preferences being the
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Joost Verburg wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> In retrospect, I think it was an error to have the on/off/auto and
>>> top/bottom settings for toolbars in the ui files themselves. They
>>> would be easier to
> "Joost" == Joost Verburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joost> Microsoft Office 2007 will have a very nice user interface with
Joost> a context-sensitive ribbon:
Joost> http://blogs.msdn.com/photos/jensenh/images/547376/original.aspx
Joost> This way you won't have a separate menu and toolbar
On Oct 10, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
Any suggestions?
It's fixed now.
That does it -- thanks.
Bennett
José Matos wrote:
Why not both, with preferences being the preferred and the toolbar settings
being the default?
It seems perfect to me: :-)
I totally agree.
If users can configure the toolbars from the preferences window, it will
also become possible to add additional toolbars (like
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:06:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The trick to circumvent this for keepEmpty layouts in LyXText::backspacePos0
> cannot be expanded easily for paragraphs in ERT, because isFreeSpacing() and
> allowEmpty() always return true if code == InsetBase::ERT_CODE (see
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Have a function 'Inset***::backspaceShouldDeleteEmptyLines()' and be done.
I don't understand. Backspace should _always_ delete empty lines AFAICS. The
problem is that backspace is lazy and passes the job to dEPM, which doesn't
have a clue whether an empty par is there
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
If I see a patch, I will be able to tell whether it is unintrusive
enough to go in 1.4.x. Otherwise, it could go in 1.5.
I guess that this is a rather simple task. But before you ask: no, I do
not have time at the moment :-(
Michael
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2006 20:05 schrieb Joost Verburg:
> One of the main reasons why Uwe keeps creating his own unofficial
> Windows installers instead of joining the official installer project, is
> that he want to bundle unofficial ui files with auto math/table toolbars
> and view
Georg Baum wrote:
If the effort invested into the unofficial installer would have been
invested in this feature we would already have it.
I know. I already tried many times to convince Uwe to join the official
installer project and to integrate his modifications with the official
LyX in a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Timothy" == Timothy Reaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Timothy> When I click on my documents TOC button, it immediately
Timothy> crashes with this:
Can you get a backtrace?
JMarc
One is not printed anywhere that I can find. Can one be forced out to
a log?
Joost wrote:
> I know. I already tried many times to convince Uwe to join the
> official installer project and to integrate his modifications with the
> official LyX in a good way. This is a lot more effective compared to
> maintaining a "fork" and it makes his ideas available for all users
>
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Maybe my email sound a bit grumpy but what are you talking about? I am
working together with you to improve the installer (...)
I really appreciate your help.
Here I'm talking about having one official Windows installer instead of
both official and unofficial versions.
84 matches
Mail list logo
