On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote:
Enrico, Georg, Liviu, Kornel: warning/error + PDF
OK, looks like this is the most popular. I implemented the
warning/error + PDF in cd8be655. I applied the patches sent in this
thread with a few minor changes (e.g. I took out
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Enrico, Georg, Liviu, Kornel: warning/error + PDF
OK, looks like this is the most popular. I implemented the
warning/error + PDF in cd8be655. I applied the patches sent in this
thread with a few minor changes (e.g. I took
Am Dienstag, 10. März 2015 um 23:54:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
skost...@lyx.org
So far I interpret the following opinions:
Enrico, Georg, Liviu: warning/error + PDF
Helge: Keep the current behavior (error and no PDF)
I do not know if Andrew was supporting a certain behavior or just
Am Dienstag, 10. März 2015 um 23:54:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> So far I interpret the following opinions:
>
> Enrico, Georg, Liviu: warning/error + PDF
> Helge: Keep the current behavior (error and no PDF)
>
> I do not know if Andrew was supporting a certain behavior or
So far I interpret the following opinions:
Enrico, Georg, Liviu: warning/error + PDF
Helge: Keep the current behavior (error and no PDF)
I do not know if Andrew was supporting a certain behavior or just
giving his idea of what is currently happening.
Does anyone else have an opinion on this? I
So far I interpret the following opinions:
Enrico, Georg, Liviu: warning/error + PDF
Helge: Keep the current behavior (error and no PDF)
I do not know if Andrew was supporting a certain behavior or just
giving his idea of what is currently happening.
Does anyone else have an opinion on this? I
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no wrote:
In my opinion, the current (released) behaviour is fine. LyX do not bring up
a PDF when something went wrong. But if you have a viewer open, that viewer
might decide on its own to reload the changed pdf from disk.
We
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
> In my opinion, the current (released) behaviour is fine. LyX do not bring up
> a PDF when something went wrong. But if you have a viewer open, that viewer
> might decide on its own to reload the changed pdf from disk.
>
Den 27. feb. 2015 22:31, skrev Scott Kostyshak:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:14 PM, aparsloe apars...@clear.net.nz wrote:
I've noticed that although LyX may report LaTeX errors and not display a
pdf, nonetheless one is still produced in the temporary directory and can be
displayed by double
Den 27. feb. 2015 22:31, skrev Scott Kostyshak:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:14 PM, aparsloe wrote:
I've noticed that although LyX may report LaTeX errors and not display a
pdf, nonetheless one is still produced in the temporary directory and can be
displayed by double
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
If latex produces an output, that output has to be shown, IMO.
Having the possibility of looking at
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
If latex produces
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Georg Baum
> wrote:
>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>
>>> My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
>>> If latex produces an output, that output has to be shown, IMO.
>>> Having the
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Georg Baum
>> wrote:
>>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>>
My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
If latex produces an output, that output has to be shown, IMO.
Having the possibility of looking at the output may be of
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
>> My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
>> If latex produces an output, that output has to be shown, IMO.
>> Having the possibility of looking at the output may
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote:
My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
If latex
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak
On 28/02/2015 6:22 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
as somewhat often I get errors but
a PDF does output (sometimes with useful clues on what really went
wrong, and pointers on how to fix it).
LaTeX errors? Strange, for
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
If latex produces an output, that output has to be shown, IMO.
Having the possibility of looking at the output may be of great
help to pinpoint problems.
This is a good argument actually. Then we should
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:14 PM, aparsloe apars...@clear.net.nz wrote:
On 28/02/2015 6:22 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com
wrote:
as somewhat often I get errors but
a PDF does output (sometimes with useful clues on what
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Wed,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>> My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Liviu Andronic
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic
On 28/02/2015 6:22 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
as somewhat often I get errors but
a PDF does output (sometimes with useful clues on what really went
wrong, and pointers on how to fix it).
LaTeX errors? Strange,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:14 PM, aparsloe wrote:
> On 28/02/2015 6:22 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Liviu Andronic
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> as somewhat often I get errors but
>>> a PDF does output (sometimes with
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> My vote is for a warning and an output produced in any case.
> If latex produces an output, that output has to be shown, IMO.
> Having the possibility of looking at the output may be of great
> help to pinpoint problems.
This is a good argument actually. Then we should
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
IMHO it can be made an error right away.
I would be OK with making it an error right away. The argument for
first making it a warning is that from the user perspective, the
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
IMHO it can be made an error right away.
I would be OK with making it an error right away. The argument
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
IMHO it can be made an error right
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
>> IMHO it can be made an error right away.
>
> I would be OK with making it an error right away. The argument for
> first making it a warning is that from the user
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
>
> >> IMHO it can be made an error right away.
> >
> > I would be OK with making it an error right away.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
>>
>> >> IMHO it can be made
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0005-Check-exit-code-of-LaTeX-process-in-LaTeX-run.patch
- To see why this patch is useful, open New New from Template
ACM-sigplan.lyx and compile. It says that compilation was successful
and shows the PDF. However, there was an error that was missed in
parsing (the
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0005-Check-exit-code-of-LaTeX-process-in-LaTeX-run.patch
- To see why this patch is useful, open New New from Template
ACM-sigplan.lyx and compile. It says that compilation was
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> 0005-Check-exit-code-of-LaTeX-process-in-LaTeX-run.patch
> - To see why this patch is useful, open New > New from Template >
> ACM-sigplan.lyx and compile. It says that compilation was successful
> and shows the PDF. However, there was an error that was missed in
>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
>> 0005-Check-exit-code-of-LaTeX-process-in-LaTeX-run.patch
>> - To see why this patch is useful, open New > New from Template >
>> ACM-sigplan.lyx and compile. It says that compilation
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 02/24/2015 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
-
On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
- This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
!buffer.isClone() caused the condition to always fail so the alerts
were never shown. Is that conditioning still needed? I
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
- This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
!buffer.isClone() caused the condition to always fail
On 02/24/2015 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
- This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
- This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
!buffer.isClone() caused the condition to always fail so the alerts
were never shown. Is that conditioning still needed? I
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> 0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
>> - This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
>> !buffer.isClone() caused the condition to
On 02/24/2015 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
0004-Allow-cloned-buffers-to-give-alerts-in-runLaTeX.patch
- This is the patch I am least confident about. Conditioning on
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/22/2015 03:45 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:32 PM, aparsloe apars...@clear.net.nz wrote:
On 23/02/2015 9:45 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Attached are a sequence of patches addressing issues related to LyX's
error reporting and log parsing.
Dear Scott,
Not strictly on topic, but for one giddy moment I
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 11:32 PM, aparsloe wrote:
>
> On 23/02/2015 9:45 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>
>> Attached are a sequence of patches addressing issues related to LyX's
>> error reporting and log parsing.
>
> Dear Scott,
>
> Not strictly on topic, but for one giddy
Attached are a sequence of patches addressing issues related to LyX's
error reporting and log parsing. I give more detailed descriptions of
them in the actual commit messages of the attached patches, but below
I list important points as well as a couple of questions. I have
brought up a couple of
On 23/02/2015 9:45 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Attached are a sequence of patches addressing issues related to LyX's
error reporting and log parsing.
Dear Scott,
Not strictly on topic, but for one giddy moment I thought there might
have been some attention paid to #9211. Alas no. (Instant
Attached are a sequence of patches addressing issues related to LyX's
error reporting and log parsing. I give more detailed descriptions of
them in the actual commit messages of the attached patches, but below
I list important points as well as a couple of questions. I have
brought up a couple of
On 23/02/2015 9:45 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Attached are a sequence of patches addressing issues related to LyX's
error reporting and log parsing.
Dear Scott,
Not strictly on topic, but for one giddy moment I thought there might
have been some attention paid to #9211. Alas no. (Instant
56 matches
Mail list logo