Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Samstag, 27. Februar 2016 um 01:35:41, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:31:43PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2016-02-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:50:19AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > >> Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar

Re: 11 ctests fail after TL update

On 2016-02-26, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 um 19:08:33, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-02-26, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> >> I've updated TL for the first time in a while and now the following 11 >> >> >> tests fail for me: >> ... >> The common

Re: 11 ctests fail after TL update

> > OK. As this is a long existing polyglossia problem, it may be rather be a > > font update or some other chagne in your setup or the test setup not > > related to the TL update. I was careful to do the following, and nothing in-between: clean build ctest tlmgr update clean build ctest Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 01:31:43PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-02-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:50:19AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 um 23:44:17, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at

Re: 11 ctests fail after TL update

t; This is why I argue in > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8035#comment:7 > to ignore the polyglossia error: LyX's check for missing characters is more > accurate and fully sufficient. And this one was with font change. > >> Also, the version of polyglossia/gloss-russian.ldf

Re: 11 ctests fail after TL update

sufficient. >> Also, the version of polyglossia/gloss-russian.ldf and the polyglossia >> changelog might give a hint. > It is always the newest available for TL15. OK. As this is a long existing polyglossia problem, it may be rather be a font update or some other chagne in your setup or the test setup not related to the TL update. Günter

Re: 11 ctests fail after TL update

Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 um 13:26:43, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-26, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] > > > Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 um 01:15:52, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> I've updated TL for the

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-26, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:50:19AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 um 23:44:17, schrieb Scott Kostyshak >> >> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:51:12PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > > Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar

Re: 11 ctests fail after TL update

On 2016-02-26, Kornel Benko wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] > Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 um 01:15:52, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> I've updated TL for the first time in a while and now the following 11 >> tests fail for me: >> ctest -R >>

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 um 03:14:10, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:50:19AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 um 23:44:17, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:51:12PM +0100,

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:50:19AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 um 23:44:17, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:51:12PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 20:20:10, schrieb Guenter Milde > > >

Re: 11 ctests fail after TL update

Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 um 01:15:52, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > I've updated TL for the first time in a while and now the following 11 > tests fail for me: > > ctest -R > "MANUALS_export/doc/ru/Intro_dvi3_systemF|MANUALS_export/doc/ru/Intro_pdf5_systemF| confirmed >

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 um 23:44:17, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:51:12PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 20:20:10, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > > > > BTW: my version of the "system font" is

11 ctests fail after TL update

I've updated TL for the first time in a while and now the following 11 tests fail for me: ctest -R

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:51:12PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 20:20:10, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > BTW: my version of the "system font" is > > > > Paket: fonts-font-awesome > > Zustand: Installiert > > Automatisch installiert: ja > >

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 20:20:10, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-24, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] > > > Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 15:52:48, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > >> On 2016-02-24, Kornel

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-24, Kornel Benko wrote: > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 7bit --] > Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 15:52:48, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-02-24, Kornel Benko wrote: > ... >> > But you have a point, libreoffice doesn't show characters above U+F195 >> >

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 15:52:48, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-24, Kornel Benko wrote: ... > > But you have a point, libreoffice doesn't show characters above U+F195 > > in private area. > > This may be a limitation of libreoffice, not the font. Maybe some

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-24, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 09:49:34, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-02-23, Kornel Benko wrote: >> > Am Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 um 20:06:05, schrieb Guenter Milde >> > >> >> On 2016-02-20, Guenter Milde

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2016 um 09:49:34, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-23, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 um 20:06:05, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > >> On 2016-02-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> > On 2016-02-20, Kornel Benko

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-23, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 um 20:06:05, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-02-20, Guenter Milde wrote: >> > On 2016-02-20, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 16:34:50, schrieb Guenter Milde >> >>

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 um 20:06:05, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > > On 2016-02-20, Kornel Benko wrote: > >> Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 16:34:50, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> > > Dear Kornel, > > I hope to have

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-20, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-02-20, Kornel Benko wrote: >> Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 16:34:50, schrieb Guenter Milde >> Dear Kornel, I hope to have solved the "XeTeX + Awesome" mystery: >>> >> >> Strange: It works here, both "per hand" and via

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Montag, 22. Februar 2016 um 23:20:21, schrieb Kornel Benko > > Did you try? It fails here. (Cf. lyx test file below.) > > > > I tried the lyx file you sent. Luatex has no problem with deactivated 1st > branch. > I.e. if '${a}_{\mbox{a}}$' is active. > Outch. I had overseen

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Montag, 22. Februar 2016 um 21:17:44, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 um 16:07:20, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > >> On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: > > >> >> I investigated a little. Trying

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 um 16:07:20, schrieb Guenter Milde > >> On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> I investigated a little. Trying to compile manually (export as luatex, >> >> use bibtex, use lualatex) I found what is causing

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 um 16:07:20, schrieb Guenter Milde > On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: > > >> I investigated a little. Trying to compile manually (export as luatex, > >> use bibtex, use lualatex) I found what is causing lualatex/bibtex to > >> misbehave. > >

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-21, Kornel Benko wrote: >> I investigated a little. Trying to compile manually (export as luatex, >> use bibtex, use lualatex) I found what is causing lualatex/bibtex to >> misbehave. >> 1.) bibtex does not like the string 'jacsat' (biblioExample.bib:61, >> entry Arduengo1994).

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Sonntag, 21. Februar 2016 um 13:24:02, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 20:52:23, schrieb Guenter Milde > > > > > OTOH, I am pretty sure this has something to do with some of the used > > LaTeX packages not beeing fit for Xe/LuaTeX.

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016 um 20:52:23, schrieb Guenter Milde > > OTOH, I am pretty sure this has something to do with some of the used > LaTeX packages not beeing fit for Xe/LuaTeX. Maybe you can bisect or we > need to compare the complete list of included packages and

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

rent modernCV version because of a babel issue > with Spanish. We found now a solution (the preamble line) and could > update the file. OK, then this would be the more accurate description. I am glad you found a way to clean up the document. >> Now 2 more testcases fail. >> 6

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> >> > Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2016 um 02:16:42, schrieb Uwe Stöhr >> >> >> > <uwesto...@lyx.org> >> >> >> >> commit ba28f504b5b674debe137b45301ced2edc5eeb33 >> >> >> >> A

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

; <uwesto...@lyx.org> > >> >> >> commit ba28f504b5b674debe137b45301ced2edc5eeb33 > >> >> >> Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> > >> >> >> Date: Fri Feb 19 02:16:36 2016 +0100 > > >> >> >> Span

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

t; >> >> On 2016-02-19, Kornel Benko wrote: >> >> > Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2016 um 02:16:42, schrieb Uwe Stöhr >> >> > <uwesto...@lyx.org> >> >> >> commit ba28f504b5b674debe137b45301ced2edc5eeb33 >> >> >> Au

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> > >> >> Date: Fri Feb 19 02:16:36 2016 +0100 > > >> >> Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable > > >> > This comment seems misleading. With pdflatex it was compilable also > >> &

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

m 02:16:42, schrieb Uwe Stöhr >> > <uwesto...@lyx.org> >> >> commit ba28f504b5b674debe137b45301ced2edc5eeb33 >> >> Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> >> >> Date: Fri Feb 19 02:16:36 2016 +0100 >> >> Spanish modernCV.lyx: update t

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

. We found now a solution (the preamble line) and could update the file. Now 2 more testcases fail. 6/7 Test #3357: EXAMPLES_export/examples/es/modernCV_pdf4_systemF ..***Failed 61.93 sec 7/7 Test #3356: EXAMPLES_export/examples/es/modernCV_pdf4_texF

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

eeb33 > >> Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> > >> Date: Fri Feb 19 02:16:36 2016 +0100 > > >> Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable > > > This comment seems misleading. With pdflatex it was compilable also > > before

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

t; <uwesto...@lyx.org> > > >> commit ba28f504b5b674debe137b45301ced2edc5eeb33 > > >> Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> > > >> Date: Fri Feb 19 02:16:36 2016 +0100 > > > > >> Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

eeb33 > >> Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> > >> Date: Fri Feb 19 02:16:36 2016 +0100 > > >> Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable > > > This comment seems misleading. With pdflatex it was compilable also > >

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

On 2016-02-19, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2016 um 02:16:42, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > <uwesto...@lyx.org> >> commit ba28f504b5b674debe137b45301ced2edc5eeb33 >> Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> >> Date: Fri Feb 19 02:16:36 2016 +0100

Re: [LyX/master] Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make it compilable

Am Freitag, 19. Februar 2016 um 02:16:42, schrieb Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> > commit ba28f504b5b674debe137b45301ced2edc5eeb33 > Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> > Date: Fri Feb 19 02:16:36 2016 +0100 > > Spanish modernCV.lyx: update the file and make

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

to git a final review, and Georg also is > trying to look into an issue that Stephan has reported. After beta I do > not think developers are planning many non-trivial commits so whether we > achieve end of February for a final release will depend on what issues > our beta testers find and on

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/02/2016 19:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> diff --git a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> index ff4068a..fae083f 100644 >> --- a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> +++ b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx >> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ The \SpecialChar LyX >> \end_layout >> >>

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 08:49:57PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 09/02/2016 19:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> diff --git a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >> index ff4068a..fae083f 100644 > >> --- a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >> +++ b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >>

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:53:04PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> commit 360742c515fcb74e6b8b5383f2e3002edb2d00cf >> Author: Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> >> Date: Wed Jan 27 18:35:10 2016 +0100 >> >> New LFUN tabular-fea

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

t;> Date: Wed Jan 27 18:35:10 2016 +0100 > >> > >> New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs > >> > >> Simply run updatedocs.py > >> > >> diff --git a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx > >> index a529a0a..ff4068

Re: [LyX/master] Win installer: update language files

Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016 um 23:29:55, schrieb Uwe Stöhr > diff --git a/development/Win32/packaging/installer/lang/slovak.nsh > b/development/Win32/packaging/installer/lang/slovak.nsh > index 64a2879..abfef3e 100644 > ---

Re: [LyX/master] Win installer: update language files

Am 12.02.2016 um 01:03 schrieb Kornel Benko: -#-*-coding: windows-1250;-*- May I ask, why did you remove this line? This should not happen. I reverted this now. thanks and regards Uwe

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

Le 09/02/2016 19:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : diff --git a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx index ff4068a..fae083f 100644 --- a/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx +++ b/lib/doc/LFUNs.lyx @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ The \SpecialChar LyX \end_layout \begin_layout Date -2016-01-27 +2016-02-09 \end_layout We

Re: [LyX/master] New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 06:53:04PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > commit 360742c515fcb74e6b8b5383f2e3002edb2d00cf > Author: Guillaume Munch <g...@lyx.org> > Date: Wed Jan 27 18:35:10 2016 +0100 > > New LFUN tabular-feature: update docs > > Simply run up

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 29.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum: > >> Does anybody give a +1 subsequently for the ACM layout update? If yes, we >> should update the version numbers of the tex2lyx tests. If not, I propose >> that Uwe reverts the layout file changes an

Re: Final round: Request to update docs for LyX 2.2.0

Hi Uwe, I attach the screenshot to this mail. It seems there is no corresponding strings included in .nsh files. Best regards, Koji On 2016年01月28日 08:26, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 27.01.2016 um 09:29 schrieb Koji Yokota: > >> I browsed the Windows installer for 2.2 alpha a little bit and found the

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

fixed already in master, so I cherry-picked the commits (see attached). So what shall I do with this patch? In my view it improves the situation. The only reason for not pushing it would be if we revert the boost update patch. I did not reply since the original code is from me, so I am obviously

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

Am 29.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum: So what are we going to do now? The tex2lyx tests are currently failing because of wrong versions (I guess because Guillaume did resolve them with git and did not regenerate them after merging his patches with the ACM layout update). I don't

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

that tex2lyx gets broken for other files. I now re-run the tex2lyx tests and it tells me that ALL tests fail. In fact this is wrong because Guillaume only forgot to update the fileformat of the tex2lyx test files. Since tex2lyx itself works fine I doubt that the tex2lyx tests are that useful

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

ussed in the other thread, you are correct. > > So what are we going to do now? > > The tex2lyx tests are currently failing because of wrong versions (I guess > because Guillaume did resolve them with git and did not regenerate them > after merging his patches with the

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

are currently failing because of wrong versions (I guess because Guillaume did resolve them with git and did not regenerate them after merging his patches with the ACM layout update). Does anybody give a +1 subsequently for the ACM layout update? If yes, we should update the version numbers

Re: Final round: Request to update docs for LyX 2.2.0

Am 27.01.2016 um 09:29 schrieb Koji Yokota: I browsed the Windows installer for 2.2 alpha a little bit and found the pane titled "Choose Users" is not translated yet. Hi Koji, I cannot find this. Could you please send me a screenshot? You find the translations for the installer in this Git

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : > >commit c1e0b24304e67ede19f30c2ee7498386bfcf6808 > >Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> > >Date: Wed Jan 27 01:58:13 2016 +0100 > > > > ac

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : @@ -2239,10 +2343,12 @@ convert = [ [501, [convert_fontsettings]], [502, []], [503, []], - [504, [convert_save_props]] + [504, [convert_save_props]], + [505, [convert_ACM_siggraph]]

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

Am 27.01.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Guillaume Munch: Uwe, I am worried about this duplicate application of revert_save_props. Thanks, I fixed this now. Please, apply the doc updates in a separate commit because they prevent us from reading the commit log and spotting such errors. OK. regards

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

was it such a problem for you? Isn't it just to update the fileformat number and then run the 2 scripts to update the docs and the tex2lyx files? (Takes here 5 minutes.) I am nevertheless sorry that I disturbed your work. This was not my plan. I was simply not following the thread of your patch. Nevertheless

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : commit c1e0b24304e67ede19f30c2ee7498386bfcf6808 Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> Date: Wed Jan 27 01:58:13 2016 +0100 acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92 fileformat change: update fileformat for all files diff

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 25/01/2016 10:58, Kornel Benko a écrit : >> Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 10:43:15, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >> >>> Le 22/01/2016 17:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : >> Even with this patch, I could not compile src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

xed already in master, so I >> cherry-picked the commits (see attached). > > So what shall I do with this patch? In my view it improves the > situation. The only reason for not pushing it would be if we revert the > boost update patch. I did not reply since the original code is from me,

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 22/01/2016 22:55, Georg Baum a écrit : C++11 does not matter for 2.1 IMHO. Compilers will support C++98 much longer than 2.1 will be relevant, and even if that means to enable it by special command line options users can pass them to configure. I guess the TR1 support is finally biting us

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 22/01/2016 17:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : Even with this patch, I could not compile src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp with gcc-4.8.4. This is in C++11 mode, right? Yes, it is set by checking if the compiler is able to use this mode. With autotools we let C++11 mode be disabled by default in

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 10:43:15, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 22/01/2016 17:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >>> Even with this patch, I could not compile src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp > >>> with gcc-4.8.4. > >> > >> This is in C++11 mode, right? > > > > Yes, it is set

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 21/01/2016 15:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 14/01/2016 19:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 09/01/2016 00:50, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/08/2016 05:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Currently we use boost 1.53 in 2.1 branch. Would it be a good move to update it to 1.60? I

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 25/01/2016 10:58, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Montag, 25. Januar 2016 um 10:43:15, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Le 22/01/2016 17:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : Even with this patch, I could not compile src/support/ForkedCalls.cpp with gcc-4.8.4. This is in C++11 mode,

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 um 11:27:02, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 21/01/2016 22:40, Richard Heck a écrit : > > On 01/21/2016 04:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> I guess it also depends how much space for error we have... > >> Richard, do you plan to release one

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > This is in C++11 mode, right? By default (c++98) it should just work > IMO. I do not think that we have firm plans of making lyx 2.1 compile in > C++11 mode. C++11 does not matter for 2.1 IMHO. Compilers will support C++98 much longer than 2.1 will be relevant, and

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 21/01/2016 22:40, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/21/2016 04:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: I guess it also depends how much space for error we have... Richard, do you plan to release one intermediate 2.1.x or you just waiting for the final one? How far out do we realistically think 2.2.0 is? I

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 22/01/2016 16:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 um 11:27:02, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Le 21/01/2016 22:40, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/21/2016 04:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: I guess it also depends how much space for error we have... Richard,

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 um 17:01:11, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 22/01/2016 16:15, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 um 11:27:02, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > > > >> Le 21/01/2016 22:40, Richard Heck a écrit : > >>> On

[PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 14/01/2016 19:12, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Le 09/01/2016 00:50, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/08/2016 05:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Currently we use boost 1.53 in 2.1 branch. Would it be a good move to update it to 1.60? I am getting loads of warnings with gcc 5.1. Fine

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

On 01/21/2016 04:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> So is it a problem that compiling in C++11 mode is broken with gcc 4.6? I >> would guess not. > I guess it also depends how much space for error we have... > Richard, do you plan to release one intermediate 2.1.x or you

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:40:56PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 01/21/2016 04:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> So is it a problem that compiling in C++11 mode is broken with gcc 4.6? I > >> would guess not. > > I guess it also depends how much space for error we

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So is it a problem that compiling in C++11 mode is broken with gcc 4.6? I > would guess not. I guess it also depends how much space for error we have... Richard, do you plan to release one intermediate 2.1.x or you just waiting for the final one? Pavel

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

Le 16/01/16 12:48, Guenter Milde a écrit : Or we remove this generated file from git (my preference). This creates problems of its own, since now there are files in /lib. JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

Le 16/01/2016 10:12, Georg Baum a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: I believe as well that we should not extend the already long checklist for format changes. Updatedocs could take care of running gen_lfuns and then update it to the latest format. Good idea. I added the generation of LFUNs.lyx

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

Guillaume Munch wrote: > I believe as well that we should not extend the already long checklist > for format changes. Updatedocs could take care of running gen_lfuns and > then update it to the latest format. Good idea. I added the generation of LFUNs.lyx, the version updating did exis

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

On 2016-01-16, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: >> I believe as well that we should not extend the already long checklist >> for format changes. Updatedocs could take care of running gen_lfuns and >> then update it to the latest format. > Good idea. I added the

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

Le 15/01/2016 20:32, Georg Baum a écrit : commit 4c3b8bf7c7205e26b28b6562be11105558ec3250 Author: Georg Baum <b...@lyx.org> Date: Fri Jan 15 21:31:57 2016 +0100 Update LFUNs.lyx to current format diff --git a/development/tools/gen_lfuns.py b/development/tools/gen_lfuns.py index 8

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

Guillaume Munch wrote: > Is a step in Development.lyx missing? IIRC we did not decide that yet. IMHO it is not required to update these files for each format change, but some time ago we decided that for a release all files should be up to date, and it is in the release checklist. Georg

Re: [LyX/master] Update LFUNs.lyx to current format

Le 15/01/2016 20:50, Georg Baum a écrit : Guillaume Munch wrote: Is a step in Development.lyx missing? IIRC we did not decide that yet. IMHO it is not required to update these files for each format change, but some time ago we decided that for a release all files should be up to date

Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 09/01/2016 00:50, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/08/2016 05:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Currently we use boost 1.53 in 2.1 branch. Would it be a good move to update it to 1.60? I am getting loads of warnings with gcc 5.1. Fine with me, and I see the same warnings. OK, I pushed

Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 11/01/2016 20:53, Georg Baum a écrit : The few times I did run that script it worked fine. If you look at a few files in the diff and see no peculiar change I'd say it is safe to commit. One thing we should keep in mind is that this would also produce a 3 MB 2.1.4->2.1.5 patch. Richard, is

Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Le 09/01/2016 00:50, Richard Heck a écrit : On 01/08/2016 05:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Currently we use boost 1.53 in 2.1 branch. Would it be a good move to update it to 1.60? I am getting loads of warnings with gcc 5.1. Fine with me, and I see the same warnings. I ran

Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I ran the extract.sh script, and have a 3MB commit. Is that to be > expected? It compiles without warning (using a small additional fix). > > Shall I just push it? Does someone want to see it or have a go at it? The few times I did run that script it worked fine.

Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

On 01/08/2016 05:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Currently we use boost 1.53 in 2.1 branch. Would it be a good move to > update it to 1.60? I am getting loads of warnings with gcc 5.1. Fine with me, and I see the same warnings. Richard

Update boost in 2.1 branch?

Currently we use boost 1.53 in 2.1 branch. Would it be a good move to update it to 1.60? I am getting loads of warnings with gcc 5.1. JMarc

Re: ctests update: TL update fixes a test

(in fact we would be happy to have unit > > > >> tests that abstract away from these issues), our tests caught a > > > >> regression in l3kernel. I reported the issue here > > > >> http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2016-January/037586.html > > >

ctests update: TL update fixes a test

a regression in l3kernel. I reported the issue here http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2016-January/037586.html after updating to TL 2015 caused a test to go from passing to failing. Yesterday or today's update fixed the regression. The test is: EXAMPLES_export/examples/colored-boxes_pdf5_texF Scott

Re: ctests update: TL update fixes a test

.org/pipermail/tex-live/2016-January/037586.html >> after updating to TL 2015 caused a test to go from passing to failing. >> Yesterday or today's update fixed the regression. >> The test is: >> EXAMPLES_export/examples/colored-boxes_pdf5_texF > Just checked. Fa

Re: ctests update: TL update fixes a test

o failing. > Yesterday or today's update fixed the regression. > > The test is: > EXAMPLES_export/examples/colored-boxes_pdf5_texF Just checked. Failed. Updated TL Check. Passed. That is nice. > Scott Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [LyX/master] Explain why we do not update the local layout

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:41:37AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 12/08/2015 01:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 07:39:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >> + The root reason for this is that we do support converting layouts to > >> older > > The

Re: [LyX/master] Explain why we do not update the local layout

On 12/08/2015 01:57 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 07:39:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > >> + The root reason for this is that we do support converting layouts to older > The root reason for this is that we do *not* support converting layouts to >

Re: [LyX/master] Explain why we do not update the local layout

Am Dienstag, 8. Dezember 2015 um 07:39:50, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > + The root reason for this is that we do support converting layouts to older The root reason for this is that we do *not* support converting layouts to older > + layout formats, as we do for the .lyx file

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >