On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 17:43 +0100, Jose Quesada wrote:
btw, to those jabref users eyeing zotero for the fast ref capture who would
not use it because you had to export to bib first... the new FF addon LyZ
makes this on the fly. It's a killer feature, two clicks and you are done.
And your lib
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 17:43 +0100, Jose Quesada wrote:
btw, to those jabref users eyeing zotero for the fast ref capture who would
not use it because you had to export to bib first... the new FF addon LyZ
makes this on the fly. It's a killer feature, two clicks and you are done.
And your lib
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 17:43 +0100, Jose Quesada wrote:
> btw, to those jabref users eyeing zotero for the fast ref capture who would
> not use it because you had to export to bib first... the new FF addon LyZ
> makes this on the fly. It's a killer feature, two clicks and you are done.
> And your
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enterfile 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
From
http://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/texdirflatten.html
Collect files related to a LaTeX job in a single directory.
The Perl script parses a
On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enterfile 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
From
http://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/texdirflatten.html
Collect files related to a LaTeX
Am Saturday 03 April 2010 15:13:22 schrieb rgheck:
On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enterfile 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
From
On 04/03/2010 11:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Saturday 03 April 2010 15:13:22 schrieb rgheck:
On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enterfile 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enterfile 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
From
http://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/texdirflatten.html
Collect files related to a LaTeX job in a single directory.
The Perl script parses a
On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enterfile 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
From
http://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/texdirflatten.html
Collect files related to a LaTeX
Am Saturday 03 April 2010 15:13:22 schrieb rgheck:
On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enterfile 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
From
On 04/03/2010 11:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Saturday 03 April 2010 15:13:22 schrieb rgheck:
On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enterfile 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enter>file> 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
From
http://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/texdirflatten.html
Collect files related to a LaTeX job in a single directory.
The Perl script parses a
On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enter>file> 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
From
http://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/help/Catalogue/entries/texdirflatten.html
Collect files related to a LaTeX
Am Saturday 03 April 2010 15:13:22 schrieb rgheck:
> On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > Just wondering:
> >
> > Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
> > enter>file> 'external material' ?
> >
> > Wolfgang
> >
> > From
> >
On 04/03/2010 11:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Am Saturday 03 April 2010 15:13:22 schrieb rgheck:
On 04/03/2010 02:27 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Just wondering:
Would the following be difficult to implement in Lyx or to use it via
enter>file> 'external material' ?
Wolfgang
On 2010-03-23, rgheck wrote:
On 03/23/2010 05:22 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
As he said, this is highly non-trivial. And the better the website, the
harder it is, since a good website will use semantic markup that is
styled by CSS. Then what do you do?
Of course
On 2010-03-23, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
would be nice to have
On 2010-03-23, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
I'm thinking the best way to address the difficulty of new environments and
character styles might be to start a public
On 03/25/2010 06:14 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-23, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is
On 03/25/2010 06:20 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-23, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Littsl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
I'm thinking the best way to address the difficulty of new
Jose Quesada wrote:
Hi all,
In no special order, things that I miss in lyx...
1. incremental search
That'd be nice, sure.
2. sentence autocapitalization
Can you specify a way to do this *correctly*, without having the
computer make lots of mistakes?
Word has botched this completely
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
editor, though I
On 2010-03-23, rgheck wrote:
On 03/23/2010 05:22 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
As he said, this is highly non-trivial. And the better the website, the
harder it is, since a good website will use semantic markup that is
styled by CSS. Then what do you do?
Of course
On 2010-03-23, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
would be nice to have
On 2010-03-23, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
I'm thinking the best way to address the difficulty of new environments and
character styles might be to start a public
On 03/25/2010 06:14 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-23, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is
On 03/25/2010 06:20 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-23, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Littsl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
I'm thinking the best way to address the difficulty of new
Jose Quesada wrote:
Hi all,
In no special order, things that I miss in lyx...
1. incremental search
That'd be nice, sure.
2. sentence autocapitalization
Can you specify a way to do this *correctly*, without having the
computer make lots of mistakes?
Word has botched this completely
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
editor, though I
On 2010-03-23, rgheck wrote:
> On 03/23/2010 05:22 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
>>> As he said, this is highly non-trivial. And the better the website, the
>>> harder it is, since a good website will use semantic markup that is
>>> styled by CSS. Then what do you do?
On 2010-03-23, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
> through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
> which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
> would be nice to
On 2010-03-23, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
>> On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
>> I'm thinking the best way to address the difficulty of new environments and
>> character styles might be to start a
On 03/25/2010 06:14 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-23, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is
On 03/25/2010 06:20 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-23, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
I'm thinking the best way to address the difficulty of new
Jose Quesada wrote:
Hi all,
In no special order, things that I miss in lyx...
1. incremental search
That'd be nice, sure.
2. sentence autocapitalization
Can you specify a way to do this *correctly*, without having the
computer make lots of mistakes?
Word has botched this completely
Steve Litt wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
editor, though I
Guenter Milde wrote:
Actuall, I prefer the current default of losing formatting. The whole
point of LyX is that you focus on structure and content and have LaTeX
take
care of formatting. The rest of the world operates on a fundamentally
braindead paradigm and if I wanted to use that
Sorry, but HTML has (or can be used for) a semantic markup in a quite
comparable way. So, keeping sections, links, emphasized text, quotes,
... as an option would be an enhancement.
What we could do is implement some extended paste option that runs a
converter
(HTML-LaTeX-LyX in that
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
Oh Gawd no! That is if I understand you to mean that it will check my
spelling as I type, and interrupt my creative flow to inform me that it
thinks I misspelled something. {or even worse silently replacing
btw, a chrome extension that does the copy url thing...
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/bijpdibkloghppkbmhcklkogpjaenfkg
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada
On
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:15:08 +0100, Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yup, this is what I think, but when you have several coworkers working
on collaborative papers in several different LaTeX classes, they
finally have the last laugh. This is why a layout editor would do
wonders to
On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
On 03/22/2010 05:30 AM, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Jose Quesadaques...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try to motivate this feature.
1- It's trivial to implement it, and then make it optional.
NO:
And your regex hits things that are *not*
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Trevor Jenkins bslwann...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com
wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to
On 03/22/2010 10:52 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
It would appear that on Mar 22, Julio Rojas did say:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
Don't know much about that... I just use LyX,
On 03/23/2010 05:22 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
As he said, this is highly non-trivial. And the better the website, the
harder it is, since a good website will use semantic markup that is
styled by CSS. Then what do you do?
Of course transform semantic
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
would be nice to have a feature (or an external prg) checking for
On 03/23/2010 09:43 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
would be nice to
btw, to those jabref users eyeing zotero for the fast ref capture who would
not use it because you had to export to bib first... the new FF addon LyZ
makes this on the fly. It's a killer feature, two clicks and you are done.
And your lib is on the cloud for free...
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Steve Litt wrote:
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
editor, though I tried. If I'd been able to specify one, I'd have either
note that we did some specification already - year or two ago, just the coder
was not found ;) look on the archive if you want
Guenter Milde wrote:
Actuall, I prefer the current default of losing formatting. The whole
point of LyX is that you focus on structure and content and have LaTeX
take
care of formatting. The rest of the world operates on a fundamentally
braindead paradigm and if I wanted to use that
Sorry, but HTML has (or can be used for) a semantic markup in a quite
comparable way. So, keeping sections, links, emphasized text, quotes,
... as an option would be an enhancement.
What we could do is implement some extended paste option that runs a
converter
(HTML-LaTeX-LyX in that
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook jtw...@ttlc.net wrote:
Oh Gawd no! That is if I understand you to mean that it will check my
spelling as I type, and interrupt my creative flow to inform me that it
thinks I misspelled something. {or even worse silently replacing
btw, a chrome extension that does the copy url thing...
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/bijpdibkloghppkbmhcklkogpjaenfkg
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada
On
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:15:08 +0100, Julio Rojas jcredbe...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yup, this is what I think, but when you have several coworkers working
on collaborative papers in several different LaTeX classes, they
finally have the last laugh. This is why a layout editor would do
wonders to
On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
On 03/22/2010 05:30 AM, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Jose Quesadaques...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try to motivate this feature.
1- It's trivial to implement it, and then make it optional.
NO:
And your regex hits things that are *not*
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Trevor Jenkins bslwann...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt sl...@troubleshooters.com
wrote:
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to
On 03/22/2010 10:52 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
It would appear that on Mar 22, Julio Rojas did say:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
Don't know much about that... I just use LyX,
On 03/23/2010 05:22 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
As he said, this is highly non-trivial. And the better the website, the
harder it is, since a good website will use semantic markup that is
styled by CSS. Then what do you do?
Of course transform semantic
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
would be nice to have a feature (or an external prg) checking for
On 03/23/2010 09:43 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
would be nice to
btw, to those jabref users eyeing zotero for the fast ref capture who would
not use it because you had to export to bib first... the new FF addon LyZ
makes this on the fly. It's a killer feature, two clicks and you are done.
And your lib is on the cloud for free...
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Steve Litt wrote:
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
editor, though I tried. If I'd been able to specify one, I'd have either
note that we did some specification already - year or two ago, just the coder
was not found ;) look on the archive if you want
Guenter Milde wrote:
> > Actuall, I prefer the current default of losing formatting. The whole
> > point of LyX is that you focus on structure and content and have LaTeX
> > take
> > care of formatting. The rest of the world operates on a fundamentally
> > braindead paradigm and if I wanted to use
>
> > Sorry, but HTML has (or can be used for) a semantic markup in a quite
> > comparable way. So, keeping sections, links, emphasized text, quotes,
> > ... as an option would be an enhancement.
>
> What we could do is implement some extended paste option that runs a
> converter
>
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
> Oh Gawd no! That is if I understand you to mean that it will check my
> spelling as I type, and interrupt my creative flow to inform me that it
> thinks I misspelled something. {or even worse silently replacing
>
btw, a chrome extension that does the copy url thing...
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/bijpdibkloghppkbmhcklkogpjaenfkg
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada
On
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:15:08 +0100, Julio Rojas
wrote:
> Yup, this is what I think, but when you have several coworkers working
> on collaborative papers in several different LaTeX classes, they
> finally have the last laugh. This is why a layout editor would do
> wonders
On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 05:30 AM, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
>>> Let me try to motivate this feature.
>>> 1- It's trivial to implement it, and then make it optional.
NO:
>> And your regex hits things
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
>> The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
>> would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
>
> It's hard Julio. It's
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Steve Litt
> wrote:
> > On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
> >> The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
> >>
On 03/22/2010 10:52 PM, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote:
It would appear that on Mar 22, Julio Rojas did say:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
Don't know much about that... I just use LyX,
On 03/23/2010 05:22 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
On 2010-03-22, rgheck wrote:
As he said, this is highly non-trivial. And the better the website, the
harder it is, since a good website will use semantic markup that is
styled by CSS. Then what do you do?
Of course transform semantic
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
would be nice to have a feature (or an external prg) checking for
On 03/23/2010 09:43 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Considering the amount of time I had to spend in documents which did not run
through LyX smoothly it had to do with references containing some characters
which bothered the program. I realize that this is not Lyx's fault, but it
would be nice to
btw, to those jabref users eyeing zotero for the fast ref capture who would
not use it because you had to export to bib first... the new FF addon LyZ
makes this on the fly. It's a killer feature, two clicks and you are done.
And your lib is on the cloud for free...
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Steve Litt wrote:
> It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
> editor, though I tried. If I'd been able to specify one, I'd have either
note that we did some specification already - year or two ago, just the coder
was not found ;) look on the archive if you want
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:28 AM, rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
On 03/20/2010 09:23 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
1. incremental search
Do you mean F3?
no, I mean that as you type in the search box things that match
Jose Quesada wrote:
Hi all,
In no special order, things that I miss in lyx...
Hi,
There are 2 points in your list for which our tastes diverge (and
according to the thread, I'm not the only one).
2. sentence autocapitalization
I hate that. One of the first things I switch off in MS
On 03/22/2010 05:30 AM, Trevor Jenkins wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Jose Quesadaques...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try to motivate this feature.
1- It's trivial to implement it, and then make it optional.
2- The only way to check whether you have missed a capital is by loading all
On 03/21/2010 10:14 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 21.03.2010 22:12, schrieb Jose Quesada:
2. sentence autocapitalization
Hmm. Most of us hate that.
Let me try to motivate this feature.
1- It's trivial to implement it, and then make it optional.
Indeed, we should let the users decide. Please
On 03/22/2010 06:50 AM, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Jose Quesada wrote:
7. the rest of the world operates on rich text/html. LyX doesn't
(clipboard
integration is poor, copy-pasting from/to web loses formatting)
That is the most annoying feature I've seen appearing in 10 years.
When using
Hi Uwe, all,
say section is bold, subsection is not. Or colored backgrounds (level1 is
darker, level 6 is lighter... etc).
I'd love to assign colors to sections to be able to track them visually.
For this purpose we have layout files. Dependent on the document class,
you can there define
Maria Gouskova wrote:
If this is implemented, I hope it is set to *off* by default--it's
for sure
pavel
Original Message
Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
From: Walter van Holst walter.van.ho...@xs4all.nl
To: Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all
On 03/22/2010 01:20 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
I want the cursor to jump to last edits (say at least 10) without having to
undo things.
That is, the functionality of the red arrow, but for all previous edits, not
only the last one. This works in mostly any text editor worth its salt.
I agree it
On 03/22/2010 12:35 PM, rgheck wrote:
On 03/22/2010 06:50 AM, Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Jose Quesada wrote:
7. the rest of the world operates on rich text/html. LyX doesn't
(clipboard
integration is poor, copy-pasting from/to web loses formatting)
That is the most annoying feature I've seen
Jose Quesada schrieb:
This not a matter of altering the layout. I want the sidebar to change
color/font, not the text in the edit area.
OK, this is a different feature. You can add a further enhancement
request but I fear that no developer will implement this soon.
I don't think layouts
Jose
Yes, as described above, I wanted something that would add the url to the
clipboard contents. That ff plugin does it. I wish it existed for chromium,
though, and that urls pasted became clickable...
Have you googled for a chromium extension? A quick google here
suggested a several
Graham,
I couldn't find anything. Can you post your findings here?
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Max Planck Institute,
Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition,
Berlin
http://www.josequesada.name/
http://twitter.com/Quesada
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Graham Smith
Jose
I couldn't find anything. Can you post your findings here?
Mmmm, not really as I'm not especially interested and didn't keep any
records, but the add ons for Chrome searched from within Chrome came up
with something called multiclip, plus a couple of others
And Clipboard manager and
On 2010-03-22, Walter van Holst wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com
wrote:
7. the rest of the world operates on rich text/html. LyX doesn't
(clipboard integration is poor, copy-pasting from/to web loses
formatting)
Actuall, I prefer the current
On Monday 22 March 2010 08:51:55 Walter van Holst wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
From: Walter van Holst walter.van.ho...@xs4all.nl
To: Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100
:
On Monday 22 March 2010 08:51:55 Walter van Holst wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
From: Walter van Holst walter.van.ho...@xs4all.nl
To: Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:23:34 +0100, Jose
On 03/22/2010 05:43 PM, Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
This has been discussed often, and I don't know how hard it would be,
either. I actually suspect that getting
Am 22.03.2010 18:36, schrieb Steve Litt:
On Monday 22 March 2010 08:51:55 Walter van Holst wrote:
Original Message
Subject: Re: things that I miss in lyx
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:51:24 +0100
From: Walter van Holstwalter.van.ho...@xs4all.nl
To: Jose Quesadaques...@gmail.com
It would appear that on Mar 22, Julio Rojas did say:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
Don't know much about that... I just use LyX, I don't really understand it
very well, so I'm not grasping the
On Monday 22 March 2010 17:43:10 Julio Rojas wrote:
The only feature I miss is a layout editor. I don't know how easy
would it be to program one, but that would be one good addition.
It's hard Julio. It's hard enough that I couldn't even *specify* a layout
editor, though I tried. If I'd been
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Jose Quesada ques...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 3:28 AM, rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com wrote:
On 03/20/2010 09:23 PM, Jose Quesada wrote:
1. incremental search
Do you mean F3?
no, I mean that as you type in the search box things that match
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo