HI,
I am trying to get SDL perl working on the Mac (sdl.perl.org). We have a
slightly working version. Please test it (see below for getting it).
use local::lib
You will need X11 headers (from XCode) to compile from scratch
cpan Alien::SDL
wget http://github.com/kthakore/SDL_perl/tarball
Hi Noah,
I am not able to get CPAN to reload an index. I cant seem to
figure out why I cant reload the CPAN index? Even after updating
the CPAN URL list - I am still unable to fetch things from servers.
The output you showed (in all its glory!) might result from not
having FTP_PASSIVE
ternal ftp command '/usr/bin/ftp'
to get '/var/root/.cpan/sources/authors/01mailrc.txt.gz.tmp27938'.
Doing so often leads to problems that are hard to diagnose.
If you're victim of such problems, please consider unsetting the ftp
config variable with
o conf ftp
On 2005-04-11 various people addressed the question:
>>> Does anyone know when Tiger itself will be shipping?
Will those suffering from can't-wait-for-the-next thing please not
infect this list?
Thanks,
- Bruce
__bruce__van_allen__santa_cruz__ca__
they are way past my level of competence.
thanks,
S. M. Harris
Now why'd you look?
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 12:07:33PM -0600, Lorin Rivers wrote:
>
> Talking about PERL, folks.
No, that would be Perl or perl. See perlfaq1
Although, now that I think of it, does Inline::PERL work on OS X?
;-) <---given the length and nature of this thread PLEASE NOTE SMILEY.
dha, al
artin Neimoller, reflecting on Germany’s fall to
the Nazis
Maybe that will help you reconsider if the reprimand was justified.
YES! The Nazi Reference! YAY! We've now proven one of the rules of a
flame war, please continue!
Talking about PERL, folks.
Everyone, please take a very deep breath, an
Charlie Root wrote:
>
> On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 06:52 PM, Lou Moran wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Mike Schienle wrote:
>> Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
>>
>> "In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn?t speak up
>> beca
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Mike Schienle wrote:
Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
"In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up
because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I
didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a J
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:13 PM, Nathan Torkington wrote:
And if anyone's wondering "What Would Tim Do?", I think Tim would
want this thread to end so we can get back doing actual work with
Perl on Mac OS X.
yes, please.
And since I started this sordid saga, indulge m
At 2:34 PM -0500 16/3/03, Trey Harris wrote:
In a message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Puneet Kishor writes:
5. I made the original posting on the list, not to any one person
privately. All responses to that should be made to the list.
This is an interpretation of netiquette I've never heard of, and I
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 06:52 PM, Lou Moran wrote:
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 04:56 PM, Mike Schienle wrote:
Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
"In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up
because I wasn’t a Communist. Then they came f
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 03:11 PM, Geoffrey F. Green wrote:
On 3/16/03 4:56 PM, "Mike Schienle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Protestant minister Martin Neimoller, reflecting on Germany’s fall to
the Nazis
Maybe that will help you reconsider if the reprimand was justified.
Now I'm offended. J
y's fall
to the Nazis
IIRC, a reference to Nazis is a definitive reason for closing a thread.
Please consider Reply-To: misc.test as set.
This is getting ridiculous guys.
Kay
At 2:56 PM -0700 3/16/03, Mike Schienle wrote:
Perhaps this quote will help you understand Randal's response.
"In Germany they came first for the Communists, ..."
Protestant minister Martin Neimoller, reflecting on Germany's fall
to the Nazis
IIRC, a reference to Nazis is a definitive reason for
eflecting on Germany¹s fall to
> the Nazis
>
> Maybe that will help you reconsider if the reprimand was justified.
Now I'm offended. Jews subjugated by the Nazis. Tim O'Reilly called "Tim O
Really." Not equivalent in my mind.
Now, if there is some history to Tim O&
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, at 11:05 AM, Puneet Kishor wrote:
2. I did not mean any disrespect to Tim. Now I realize that some can
be offended by it, however, I would feel justifiably reprimanded
_only_ if the reprimand came from Tim. Many folks on this list had
harsh words for me, directly or
Trey Harris wrote:
> In a message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Puneet Kishor writes:
>> 5. I made the original posting on the list, not to any one person
>> privately. All responses to that should be made to the list.
>
> This is an interpretation of netiquette I've never heard of, and I've been
> on
In a message dated Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Puneet Kishor writes:
> 5. I made the original posting on the list, not to any one person
> privately. All responses to that should be made to the list.
This is an interpretation of netiquette I've never heard of, and I've been
on the net for well over a decade
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 05:13 PM, Nathan Torkington wrote:
And if anyone's wondering "What Would Tim Do?", I think Tim would
want this thread to end so we can get back doing actual work with
Perl on Mac OS X.
yes, please.
And since I started this sordid saga, indulge m
Thanks for the reply.
The perl and mod_perl versions I'm using are those that came installed on my ibook
(OSX 10.1.5, apache 1.3.26, mod_perl 1.26).
I don't see anything wrong with either Dynaloader or Posix - Of course, I don't really
know what I'm looking for either :-) The modules have not
On Friday, Feb 28, 2003, at 14:18 US/Pacific, Warren Pollans wrote:
[..]
I'm trying to work through recipe 9.16 in the cookbook - using
Apache::DB - although I'm not trying to use Apache::DB yet - just
trying to see how my stuff works when I start apache with "httpd -X -f
path-to-configfile". T
Could someone help me with this please? I had sent this to the mod_perl list - where
it was suggested that I try here instead.
Who is responsible for putting dl_install_.al in place. The DynaLoader module is
installed.
Thanks,
Warren
Begin forwarded message:
Hello,
I'm trying to
At 2:05 pm -0800 25/11/02, Chuck Taylor wrote:
After doing some debugging this is what I thought the Perl script
should look like.
#!/usr/bin/perl
/System/Library/CoreServices/Classic
Startup.app/Contents/Resources/';./cdTruBlueEnvironment&;
I made sure it was executable using chmod +X but ea
e it a Terminal
command?
Thanks
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Troy Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Chuck Taylor
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Perl Help Please
Hi Chuck,
Try this:
---
#!/usr/bin/perl
my $status = `open -a /System/Library/C
Hi Chuck,
Try this:
---
#!/usr/bin/perl
my $status = `open -a /System/Library/CoreServices/"Classic Startup.app"`;
---
I don't know what this means, though:
../cdTruBlueEnvironment&;
Are you trying to cd into that dir?
Cheers,
Troy
This Perl newbie needs a little advanced help. I'm trying
This Perl newbie needs a little advanced help. I'm trying a new
Login Hook to start classic, I made the Perl script out of an
Applescript. However, and probably not surprising to you, it did not
work.
It does work in the Applescript but I would prefer to make Perl for use
in a hook.
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The version of MacPerl lagged behind the current release of Perl - I was
> constantly porting stuff and finding out that modules like HTML::Table
> wouldn't work because it required capabilities not in the MacPerl release.
> To someone
, 2002 4:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MacPerl Capabilities on OS X (was Please Don't)
>
> In article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > In the interest of stopping what looks to be a potential flame war:
>
> I d
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the interest of stopping what looks to be a potential flame war:
I don't think there's any flamewar brewing. Perhaps I was a bit too
curt -- it was a long week -- but I just wanted to emphasize that
MacPerl is a first-class Perl
y 25, 2002 10:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Please DON'T
>
> In article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory Cranz) wrote:
>
> > > Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
> >
> > IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap th
At 13:42 -0500 1/25/2002, Chris Nandor wrote:
>In article
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory Cranz) wrote:
>
> > > Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
> >
> > IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we'v
In article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory Cranz) wrote:
> > Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
>
> IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got
> OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with.
Do you mean the purpose of the ex
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 10:17 AM, Cranz, Gregory wrote:
> I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
> debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
I don't think anybody sane would advocate creating a whole new
installation of perl just so that we c
On 1/24/02 11:43 AM, "Dan Kogai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2002.01.25, at 01:17, Cranz, Gregory wrote:
>>> Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
>>
>> I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
>> deb
On 2002.01.25, at 01:17, Cranz, Gregory wrote:
>> Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
>
> I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
> debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
>
> IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in
> Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
I shudder to think of having to differentiate between both versions when
debugging or having a conversation on this thread.
IMHO, MacPerl was a stopgap that kept the Mac in the game until we've got
OS/X i.e. Un*x to work with. It was wonde
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ken McGlothlen) wrote:
> John Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Just curious: Why?
>
> Well, I don't know about the other guy, but I miss having droplets, plus all
> the MacOS glue that makes working with creators and types easier.
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 1/23/02 at 1:19a:
> Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
Just curious: Why?
--
John Gruber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please, pretty please, carbonize MacPerl.
Spikey
At 10:07 + 2001.04.26, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Chris Nandor wrote:
>
>> >Public service announcement: the development branch of Perl now
>> >builds [1] out of the box in Mac OS X, with just Configure -de.
>
>Erm, except doing -de with a development edition doesn't work
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Chris Nandor wrote:
> >Public service announcement: the development branch of Perl now
> >builds [1] out of the box in Mac OS X, with just Configure -de.
Erm, except doing -de with a development edition doesn't work because
it realises it is a development edition and the def
>Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:34:42 -0500
>From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: perl 5.7.1+ fine(ish) on mac os x (please fwd)
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Public service announcement: the development branch of Perl now
>builds
45 matches
Mail list logo
