On Mar 22, 2010, at 1:53 PM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> ext Jeremiah Foster writes:
>
>> On Mar 22, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>>
>>> In my view, MeeGo is a development effort, not a standardization
>>> effort.
>>
>> I am not convinced that this is true. It looks like MeeGo is going
ext Jeremiah Foster writes:
> On Mar 22, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
>
>> In my view, MeeGo is a development effort, not a standardization
>> effort.
>
> I am not convinced that this is true. It looks like MeeGo is going to
> track upstream closely with few customizations. It is going
On Mar 22, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> "Stoppa Igor (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" writes:
>
>> No at all: it's about standardization. The device must support a certain
>> set of features and provide well defined APIs.
>>
>> So if a device is MeeGo compliant, it will be advertised as such.
"Stoppa Igor (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" writes:
> No at all: it's about standardization. The device must support a certain
> set of features and provide well defined APIs.
>
> So if a device is MeeGo compliant, it will be advertised as such.
In my view, MeeGo is a development effort, not a standardiza
On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:15 PM, wrote:
> From: ext Ryan Abel [rabe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 20 March 2010 00:06
>
>> Well, in Harmattans case, because it aint MeeGo at all. For anything else,
>> well, I don't know. Until we know exactly how much of the platform is
>> actually "MeeGo" it's impossible
From: ext Ryan Abel [rabe...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 March 2010 00:06
> Well, in Harmattans case, because it aint MeeGo at all. For anything else,
> well, I don't know. Until we know exactly how much of the platform is
> actually "MeeGo" it's impossible to say. But judging by the amount of
> differ
On Mar 19, 2010, at 5:50 PM,
wrote:
> From: ext Ryan Abel [rabe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 19 March 2010 23:43
>
>> Will it be advertised as such? Wording I've seen so far leads me to believe
>> it'll be advertised as "MeeGo" not "MeeGo-compliant". I guess we'll have to
>> wait and see.
>
> Anyw
From: ext Ryan Abel [rabe...@gmail.com]
Sent: 19 March 2010 23:43
> Will it be advertised as such? Wording I've seen so far leads me to believe
> it'll be advertised as "MeeGo" not "MeeGo-compliant". I guess we'll have to
> wait and see.
The N900 box you might have states that it is certified
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> ext Ryan Abel wrote:
>
>> Well, except for the part where Nokia ends up marketing it as "MeeGo". Oh,
>> and Harmattan's, apparently, MeeGo, too, and it definitely has closed stuff
>> at the platform level.
>>
>> Yeah . . . not confusing at all.
ext Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
It was already said that Nokia devices running Nokia provided MeeGo based
system will contain closed source components.
So far no one told what base meego system contains and how useful it is.
It depends on your intent and goals. I cannot comment on what Mee
Dnia piątek, 19 marca 2010 o 12:42:17 Igor Stoppa napisał(a):
> ext Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > Dnia czwartek, 18 marca 2010 o 19:59:25 Samir Faci (Dev) napisał(a):
> >> Hmm.. any one know if meego will be completely open source?.
> >> Or is it too early to know for sure at this point.
> > It w
ext Ryan Abel wrote:
Well, except for the part where Nokia ends up marketing it as "MeeGo". Oh, and
Harmattan's, apparently, MeeGo, too, and it definitely has closed stuff at the platform
level.
Yeah . . . not confusing at all. ;)
No at all: it's about standardization. The device must supp
On Mar 19, 2010, at 7:42 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> ext Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
>> Dnia czwartek, 18 marca 2010 o 19:59:25 Samir Faci (Dev) napisał(a):
>>
>>> Hmm.. any one know if meego will be completely open source?.
>>>
>>> Or is it too early to know for sure at this point.
>>>
>>
>
ext Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia czwartek, 18 marca 2010 o 19:59:25 Samir Faci (Dev) napisał(a):
Hmm.. any one know if meego will be completely open source?.
Or is it too early to know for sure at this point.
It was already said that Nokia devices running MeeGo will contain closed
Dnia czwartek, 18 marca 2010 o 19:59:25 Samir Faci (Dev) napisał(a):
> Hmm.. any one know if meego will be completely open source?.
>
> Or is it too early to know for sure at this point.
It was already said that Nokia devices running MeeGo will contain closed
source components. So answer to your
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 13:32 -0500, Samir Faci wrote:
> Hmm.. any one know if meego will be completely open source?.
>
There's the usual frustration with a lot of press release
marketing-speak going around but the short version is that there will be
at least a base version of Meego which will be
Hmm.. any one know if meego will be completely open source?.
Or is it too early to know for sure at this point.
--
Samir Faci
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Joseph Charpak
wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 12:37 -0500, Samir Faci (Dev) wrote:
>> I was wondering if anyone has gone through the pro
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 12:37 -0500, Samir Faci (Dev) wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has gone through the process of building the
> entire maemo
> operating system from source and if this has been documented anywhere?
>
> Basically, I'm looking for something that allows me to build the
> entire
I was wondering if anyone has gone through the process of building the
entire maemo
operating system from source and if this has been documented anywhere?
Basically, I'm looking for something that allows me to build the
entire thing, make minor modifications... and be able
to re-flash it to my pho
19 matches
Mail list logo
