Been done already. Forces coming back have found all sorts of manner
to get side arms there or back.
On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 06:28 AM, John Ervine wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW I heard our forces in Iraq are trading their 9mm to 45's on their
own dime.
U, no. Do you know
http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/31883.html
New Mexico hero
On Tuesday, August 30, 2005, at 06:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW I heard our forces in Iraq are trading their 9mm to 45's on their
own dime.
-- Original message --
> If you really want to second gu
no wonder we can't end the war!
At 09:28 AM 8/30/2005, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW I heard our forces in Iraq are trading their 9mm to 45's on their
> own dime.
U, no. Do you know how much hell a soldier would catch for trying to
smuggle a personal weapon from here to overse
i would too, especially as the military is forced to shoot FMJ
At 09:14 AM 8/30/2005, you wrote:
BTW I heard our forces in Iraq are trading their 9mm to 45's on their own
dime.
-- Original message --
> If you really want to second guess the power of a .45 just ask any
got ya
Harry M. wrote:
The Desert Eagle comes in .475 caliber and .50 as well. I think it may come in
smaller cal but not to sure. They do have a website if I'm not mistaken.
"Kaleb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, OK
89 560SEL, 87 300SDL, 87 300SDL
Oh I know the power of a .45
Harry M. wrote:
If you really want to second guess the power of a .45 just ask any ex-vietnam vet.
"Kaleb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im not buying the story about the 9mm has more stopping power than the
.45.
--
Kaleb C. Striplin/Claremore, O
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW I heard our forces in Iraq are trading their 9mm to 45's on their
own dime.
U, no. Do you know how much hell a soldier would catch for trying to
smuggle a personal weapon from here to overseas? And when he runs out of
ammunition, what then? It's not like th
BTW I heard our forces in Iraq are trading their 9mm to 45's on their own dime.
-- Original message --
> If you really want to second guess the power of a .45 just ask any ex-vietnam
> vet.
>
>
>
> "Kaleb C. Striplin" wrote:
>
> >Im not buying the story about the 9
started making pistol sized
>AP rounds I don't know about.
>
>My cousins have shot plenty of deer with nothing more than a .22 revolver and
>a flashlight. *Grin*
>
>-Curt
>
>Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:37:18 -0400
>From: "RAH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
The company is called Magnum Research
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harry M.)) wrote:
>The Desert Eagle comes in .475 caliber and .50 as well. I think it may come in
>smaller cal but not to sure. They do have a website if I'm not mistaken.
>
>"Kaleb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Is that wha
If you really want to second guess the power of a .45 just ask any ex-vietnam
vet.
"Kaleb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Im not buying the story about the 9mm has more stopping power than the
>.45.
>
>Curt Raymond wrote:
>
>> The .45 is like the lottery, a tax on people who are bad
The Desert Eagle comes in .475 caliber and .50 as well. I think it may come in
smaller cal but not to sure. They do have a website if I'm not mistaken.
"Kaleb C. Striplin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is that what the desert eagle is? I was thinking it was a .50. But
>yes, you are correct, the
he shoulder & arm's
>>
>> > gone and he's laying on the ground.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Tom Hargrave
>> > 256-656-1924
>> > www.kegkits.com <http://www.kegkits.com/>
>> >
>> > -Original Mes
om>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:31 PM
To: Mercedes mailing list
Subject: Re: [MBZ] g
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:31 PM
> To: Mercedes mailing list
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
>
> Im not buying the story about the 9mm has more stopping power than the
> .45.
&g
---
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
> > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:31 PM
> > To: Mercedes mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
> >
> > Im not buying the st
ulder & arm's
> gone and he's laying on the ground.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tom Hargrave
> 256-656-1924
> www.kegkits.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
> Sent: Mo
Thanks,
Tom Hargrave
256-656-1924
www.kegkits.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kaleb C. Striplin
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:31 PM
To: Mercedes mailing list
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
Im not buying the stor
Is that what the desert eagle is? I was thinking it was a .50. But
yes, you are correct, they are scary looking. Friend of mine had one.
Harry M. wrote:
Try a .475 Desert Eagle, even the looks with scare the crap out of anyone
JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
9mm is for euro girl
Im not buying the story about the 9mm has more stopping power than the
.45.
Curt Raymond wrote:
The .45 is like the lottery, a tax on people who are bad at math.
Force is mass times the square of velocity. The 9mm is MUCH higher
velocity than the .45 with insignificantly less mass. The 9mm si
With my 44 mag with 8" barrel I can pretty much hit any target Im aiming at.
redghost wrote:
Having tried to hit stuff with both a .45 Colt side arm and a nickel
plate Hadji 9mm, I much prefer the 9mm. The .45 was mostly on the
outside of the target, while the 9mm was able to stay centered fo
> >
> >
> >
> >-Curt
> >
> >Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:04:54 -0400
> >From: JabbaHursty
>
><<http://us.f328.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[EMAIL
>PROTECTED]&YY=2422&order=down&sort=date&pos=0>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sub
good point on overpenetration. 5.56 very infrequently
overpenetrates (to talk about rifles) becuase of it's
quick yaw and snapping along the cannelure. Totally
different ball game than small and fast in handguns.
Christopher
--- RAH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Curt wrote:
> >Actually it reads
have shot plenty of deer with nothing more than a .22 revolver and a
flashlight. *Grin*
-Curt
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:37:18 -0400
From: "RAH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTE
and standardizing handguns...congrssional inquiry
found that over 100 types of handgun ammo had to be
kept for all the array of pistols...but mainly the
first reason.
Christopher
--- Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JabbaHursty wrote:
> >
> > i can't really fully grasp why the military
Funny - Glocks ARE ugly and I would never bby the S&W
P99 - appreciate your input...I have eyed the .40 p99
for a while.
Christopher
--- JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've had one. it's ok. i got rid of it and got
> the glock to be more "mainstream". the glock is
> no better to s
Harry " M.)"
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 3:17 AM
To: Mercedes mailing list
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
I won't argue that any firearm has the capabilty to kill, but my experience
lies with what I learned in the service. As far as I am concerned I would
rathe
I won't argue that any firearm has the capabilty to kill, but my experience
lies with what I learned in the service. As far as I am concerned I would
rather bet my life on the bigger is better theory. Its like the difference
between throwing a pebble or a brick at a window. And speaking of range
the benefits of high velocity rounds outweight the cons--or at least
our military (which is #1) seems to think so. If slow heavy rounds are
the future, we would still be using muskets or that type of heavy
round. It is true that slow and heavy does rip jagged holes in flesh
but they are also a bitc
>Curt wrote:
>Actually it reads more like small and slow vs. big and slow. I like >shooting
>a .38, there are many well balanced comfortable .38s but >they've got zip for
>stopping power even compared to the 9mm.
Yes they were having poor results with the .38 colt. (I don't know how it
compares
28, 2005 10:10 PM
To: 'Mercedes mailing list'
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
I prefer to carry the HK P7 squeeze cocker although the SIGs are my close
second choice (especially the P220). Don't care for the Glocks much.
-Scott
-Original Me
rday, August 27, 2005 5:19 PM
To: Mercedes mailing list
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
My sig .40 is my favorite, even my wife can handle it
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pretty sure he carries the 9mm Walther P99 now.
>Wouldn;t mind have a .40cal
You guys are so into "mine is bigger than yours."
On 8/26/05, JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ok, it will be hard to believe, but i am this shallow -- Kleb has a
> .44 magnum, so i went out and got a .454 casull so i can have the
> biggest handgun in the kingdom
>
> pretty sick, huh?
This discussion is just about as exciting as a robust debate regarding
which menstral pad feels the freshest...take it outside boyz
Jez sittn here on the front porch with muh Stevens .22 single shot
"plinker" across muh knee--watch them sudden moves!
On 8/27/05, Steve MacSween <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ubject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Curt Raymond wrote:
>> >The .45 is like the lottery, a tax on people who are bad at math.
>> >Force
7;t really
an issue.
Lets also remember that 9mm is not so much smaller than .380 in diameter...
-Curt
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:21:39 -0400
From: JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
To: Mercedes mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message
Tom Hargrave wrote:
> It was a political move designed to more align is with out NATO allies. The
> same allies who for the most part, sat back & and watched us invade Iraq.
Maybe they smelled the bullshit when Colin Powell told them why we were
invading. Gotta admit, he had me fooled, though.
it may be something as they are sold cheaply in bulk to law enforcement
At 07:01 AM 8/28/2005, you wrote:
Never understood what was so great about the
glock. just because it has a polymer frame and
it can shoot under water. So can my sig
JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>yeah, i regre
Curt Raymond wrote:
>> >The .45 is like the lottery, a tax on people who are bad at math.
>> >Force is mass times the square of velocity. The 9mm is MUCH higher
>> velocity than the .45 with insignificantly less mass. The 9mm
>> simply has more stopping power with less recoil and weight than th
inal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mitch Haley
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 9:50 AM
To: Mercedes mailing list
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
JabbaHursty wrote:
>
> i can't really fully grasp why the military chan
JabbaHursty wrote:
>
> i can't really fully grasp why the military changed from such a
> completely proven and effective weapon as the 1911. i'm told it was
> cost savings. i also suspect that the influx of women into the
> military also has something to do with it (not that a woman could not
>
The FBI, DEA, US Marshal and certain other federal agencies carry sig or glock
in .40 or .45 It seems the 9mm wasn't enough knock down power for them.
Considering the M1911 carried us through 2 world wars including Korea and
Viet-Nam. Why mess with a good thing, they say it was because the M9 wa
of stopping power, more than the .50 IIRC but
>> it also has PLENTY of recoil unless you've got a heavy gun or some
>> sort of recoil reducing device.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >-Curt
>> >
>> >Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:04:54 -0400
>
exactly!
JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>federal
>hydrashok
>230grain
>
>one of the deadliest and very reasonably priced
>
>
>At 06:16 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
>>Thats cause he didn't know to use a .45 hollowpoint. Works everytime
>>
>>
>>Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
Never understood what was so great about the glock. just because it has a
polymer frame and it can shoot under water. So can my sig
JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>yeah, i regret getting the glock instead of a sig for my .40
>
>At 06:19 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
>>My sig .40 is my favorit
Well that would lead to a very dry day in the mercedes list. I think
other than the gun thread, we have six postings.
The rest of you get off your duff, unless you are hiding from the
hurricane, and write
On Saturday, August 27, 2005, at 06:52 PM, Chuck Landenberger wrote:
Is anybody else
i don't go to banned anymore
At 09:55 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is anybody else tired of deleting this "gun post" thread
YEAH
I thought this is what Banned was for?
Mac
___
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscr
I sure am! damn gun nuts
At 09:52 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
Is anybody else tired of deleting this "gun post" thread
Chuck
On Aug 27, 2005, at 6:49 PM, JabbaHursty wrote:
> federal
> hydrashok
> 230grain
___
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To U
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is anybody else tired of deleting this "gun post" thread
YEAH
I thought this is what Banned was for?
Mac
Is anybody else tired of deleting this "gun post" thread
Chuck
On Aug 27, 2005, at 6:49 PM, JabbaHursty wrote:
federal
hydrashok
230grain
yeah, i regret getting the glock instead of a sig for my .40
At 06:19 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
My sig .40 is my favorite, even my wife can handle it
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pretty sure he carries the 9mm Walther P99 now.
>Wouldn;t mind have a .40cal P99.
>
>--- OK Don <
federal
hydrashok
230grain
one of the deadliest and very reasonably priced
At 06:16 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
Thats cause he didn't know to use a .45 hollowpoint. Works everytime
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>when putting down cows, you;re supposed to use a .22
>between the
i've had one. it's ok. i got rid of it and got
the glock to be more "mainstream". the glock is
no better to shoot and a lot uglier. i'm just
hoping it doesn't explode in my hand
the S&W version of the P99 has had a lot of
troubles, but i think the P99 is a good and vastly underrated gun
walther P99 in 9mm
At 06:09 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
But now believe it or not he carries a Heckler&Koch 9mm
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You are correct. Bond nearly got killed and M referred
>to it (.25 ACP), as an Italian ladies gun. Then he got
>the PPK. I have a PPK/S
it's referred to as 7.62MM though in the movies, so it would have to be a .32
At 06:02 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
NOPE. It was a .25 ACP Beretta that was replaced with
a 9mmKurz/.380 (same thing) PPK. Sure of it.
Christopher
--- Harry M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you sure it was a .32 and
> 256-656-1924
> www.kegkits.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Sunil Hari
> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 7:40 AM
> To: Mercedes mailing list
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
>
> "Im
g has PLENTY of stopping power, more than the .50 IIRC but
it also has
> PLENTY of recoil unless you've got a heavy gun or some sort of recoil
> reducing device.
>
>
>
> -Curt
>
> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:04:54 -0400
> From: JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
avy gun or some
sort of recoil reducing device.
>
>
>
>-Curt
>
>Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:04:54 -0400
>From: JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
>To: Mercedes mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Message-ID: <[EM
i can't really fully grasp why the military changed from such a
completely proven and effective weapon as the 1911. i'm told it was
cost savings. i also suspect that the influx of women into the
military also has something to do with it (not that a woman could not
be trained in the use of th
reducing device.
-Curt
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:04:54 -0400
From: JabbaHursty
<<http://us.f328.mail.yahoo.com/ym/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&YY=2422&order=down&sort=date&pos=0>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
To: Mercedes mailing list
<<
he started with a .25 beretta and then went to 7.62. 7.62mm is .32
ACP. .380 is 9mm, but shorter than the more popular 9mm luger
At 04:20 PM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
you sure it was a .32 and not a .380 ? won't swear to it, but I
remember it being a .380 beretta then he had the 7.62 Walther PP
My sig .40 is my favorite, even my wife can handle it
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pretty sure he carries the 9mm Walther P99 now.
>Wouldn;t mind have a .40cal P99.
>
>--- OK Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The 7.65 Walther PPK is 32 Auto -- --
>>
>> On 8/27/05, Harry M.)
his last movie, Die Another Day I could have swore I say HK on the pistol he
carried but they do look alike
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>thought it was the walther p99 9mm?
>
>Christopher
>
>--- Harry M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> But now believe it or not he carries a
could be, they do look so much alike
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>thought it was the walther p99 9mm?
>
>Christopher
>
>--- Harry M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> But now believe it or not he carries a Heckler&Koch
>> 9mm
>>
>>
>> Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Thats cause he didn't know to use a .45 hollowpoint. Works everytime
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>when putting down cows, you;re supposed to use a .22
>between the eyes and above a bit. My freind throught
>he'd be smart and use a .45. Cow fell down and got
>back up and stared a
gt;
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tom Hargrave
>> 256-656-1924
>> www.kegkits.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of Sunil Hari
>> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 7:40 AM
>> To: Mercede
when putting down cows, you;re supposed to use a .22
between the eyes and above a bit. My freind throught
he'd be smart and use a .45. Cow fell down and got
back up and stared at him. Used a .22, down it went,
and down it stayed.
.45 round is SLOW.
Christopher
--- JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thought it was the walther p99 9mm?
Christopher
--- Harry M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But now believe it or not he carries a Heckler&Koch
> 9mm
>
>
> Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >You are correct. Bond nearly got killed and M
> referred
> >to it (.25 ACP), as an Ita
Pretty sure he carries the 9mm Walther P99 now.
Wouldn;t mind have a .40cal P99.
--- OK Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 7.65 Walther PPK is 32 Auto -- --
>
> On 8/27/05, Harry M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you sure it was a .32 and not a .380 ? won't swear
> to it, but I remember it
But now believe it or not he carries a Heckler&Koch 9mm
Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You are correct. Bond nearly got killed and M referred
>to it (.25 ACP), as an Italian ladies gun. Then he got
>the PPK. I have a PPK/S in 9mmKurz and I REALLY REALLY
>like it. Very easy to poi
I WAS WRONG:
The .25ACP Beretta was replaced with a .32ACP Walther
PPK. .380/9mmKurz PPK came out later.
SORRY!
Christopher
--- Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NOPE. It was a .25 ACP Beretta that was replaced
> with
> a 9mmKurz/.380 (same thing) PPK. Sure of it.
>
> Christophe
P.S. The Walther was .32ACP...didn't come out in
9mmkurz/.380 till much later
Christopher
--- Christopher McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are correct. Bond nearly got killed and M
> referred
> to it (.25 ACP), as an Italian ladies gun. Then he
> got
> the PPK. I have a PPK/S in 9mmKurz a
NOPE. It was a .25 ACP Beretta that was replaced with
a 9mmKurz/.380 (same thing) PPK. Sure of it.
Christopher
--- Harry M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you sure it was a .32 and not a .380 ? won't swear
> to it, but I remember it being a .380 beretta then
> he had the 7.62 Walther PPK
>
>
You are correct. Bond nearly got killed and M referred
to it (.25 ACP), as an Italian ladies gun. Then he got
the PPK. I have a PPK/S in 9mmKurz and I REALLY REALLY
like it. Very easy to point and shoot (and hit the
target) quick follow up shots. EASY to conceal.
Stainless steel that WILL NOT rust.
iency elsewhere.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Tom Hargrave
> 256-656-1924
> www.kegkits.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Sunil Hari
> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 7:40 AM
> To: Mercedes mai
worked for Hitler.
--- JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can you believe that bond carried a .32?
>
> disgusting!
>
>
> At 11:05 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
> >If I ever get throughbuying MBs and parts for them
> long enough, I'll
> >be looking for a .45 -- - need one to balance out
> the
kindred spirits - I've got a PPK/S...goes with the car
:-). I literally can hit anything with it. POA (Point
of aim) is dead on...which is good for an SD (self
defense) situation.
Christopher
--- OK Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I ever get throughbuying MBs and parts for them
> long enough
x27;ve got a heavy gun or some sort of recoil
> reducing device.
>
>
>
> -Curt
>
> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:04:54 -0400
> From: JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
> To: Mercedes mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Try a .475 Desert Eagle, even the looks with scare the crap out of anyone
JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>9mm is for euro girlie men. .45 for real americans
>
>
>At 10:51 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
>>Having tried to hit stuff with both a .45 Colt side arm and a nickel
>>plate Hadji 9mm, I
Correction, I was wrong it was the beretta .25 but he switched to the PPK
because it snagged with the silencer. And you are right it was a 7.65 walther
OK Don <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The 7.65 Walther PPK is 32 Auto -- --
>
>On 8/27/05, Harry M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> you sure it w
t, 27 Aug 2005 02:04:54 -0400
>From: JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
>To: Mercedes mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Content-Type: text/plain;
The 7.65 Walther PPK is 32 Auto -- --
On 8/27/05, Harry M.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you sure it was a .32 and not a .380 ? won't swear to it, but I remember it
> being a .380 beretta then he had the 7.62 Walther PPK
>
>
> Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >JabbaHursty wrote:
>
I have to agree with you there Gary, I was in the army in the 80's when they
switched to the M9 Beretta from the M1911 45. The only good thing about the M9
was capacity and weight. No knock down power and random problems with broken
slides and jamming. You get hit by a .45 slug, you darn well k
stopping power, more than the .50 IIRC but it also has
PLENTY of recoil unless you've got a heavy gun or some sort of recoil reducing
device.
-Curt
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:04:54 -0400
From: JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
To: Merce
you sure it was a .32 and not a .380 ? won't swear to it, but I remember it
being a .380 beretta then he had the 7.62 Walther PPK
Mitch Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>JabbaHursty wrote:
>>
>> can you believe that bond carried a .32?
>
>In the books, M confiscated his Beretta (I think it was
Maybe. I guess I should hit the gun club and work out with some cannons
On Friday, August 26, 2005, at 11:04 PM, JabbaHursty wrote:
9mm is for euro girlie men. .45 for real americans
At 10:51 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
Having tried to hit stuff with both a .45 Colt side arm and a nickel
pla
It's all in theaim (and range) - a 22 can be lethal.
On 8/27/05, JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can you believe that bond carried a .32?
>
> disgusting!
>
--
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
'87 300SDL
'81 240D
'78 450SLC
The FSM created the Diesel Benz
http://www.venganza.org/
JabbaHursty wrote:
>
> can you believe that bond carried a .32?
In the books, M confiscated his Beretta (I think it was .25ACP) and gave him a
PPK.
I think he had to do it more than once, James liked those little Italian things.
: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
and so? what is wrong with that?
At 08:49 AM 8/27/2005, you wrote:
>Probably means impotent - I heard one time that guys who carry a big
>gun are making up for a deficiency elsewhere.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Tom Hargrave
>256-
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Sunil Hari
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 7:40 AM
To: Mercedes mailing list
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
"Impotant" - does that mean important or impotent?
Or is it some sort of fun new hybrid?
On 8/27/05, JabbaHurs
, August 27, 2005 7:40 AM
To: Mercedes mailing list
Subject: Re: [MBZ] gun post (car only guys delete)
"Impotant" - does that mean important or impotent?
Or is it some sort of fun new hybrid?
On 8/27/05, JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> exactly. which means i have the
"Impotant" - does that mean important or impotent?
Or is it some sort of fun new hybrid?
On 8/27/05, JabbaHursty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> exactly. which means i have the biggest gun in the kingdom. which
> makes me impotant
>
>
> At 07:54 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
> >JabbaHursty wrote:
>
the whole hi-point/beemiller business is hard to fathom. they are
junk gun priced, but really aren't junk guns
I'm told (granted, by a glock hater) that a $500+ glock costs $46 to
produce, so maybe it is possible to sell a decent gun for $100
At 11:22 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
I currently o
can you believe that bond carried a .32?
disgusting!
At 11:05 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
If I ever get throughbuying MBs and parts for them long enough, I'll
be looking for a .45 -- - need one to balance out the PPK.
On 8/26/05, redghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having tried to hit stuff wi
9mm is for euro girlie men. .45 for real americans
At 10:51 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
Having tried to hit stuff with both a .45 Colt side arm and a nickel
plate Hadji 9mm, I much prefer the 9mm. The .45 was mostly on the
outside of the target, while the 9mm was able to stay centered for most
o
casull casull
jabba jabba
jabba jabba jabba
At 08:28 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
I forgot to mention the reason for getting more guns, I had been
downsizing my colletion for the last year or so while I have been broke.
Used to have at least 10 hand guns and shotguns around the house but
have b
exactly. which means i have the biggest gun in the kingdom. which
makes me impotant
At 07:54 PM 8/26/2005, you wrote:
JabbaHursty wrote:
>
> ok, it will be hard to believe, but i am this shallow -- Kleb has a
> .44 magnum, so i went out and got a .454 casull so i can have the
> biggest hand
I currently own a Hi-Point 9mm - laugh all you want, but it was $100
brand-new, carries a lifetime warranty, and was made in Ohio about an
hour north of me. Never jammed once, and I've put about 600 rounds
through it. Next chance I get, I think I'll buy their .40 ACP and/or
their .45.
On 8/26/05
If I ever get throughbuying MBs and parts for them long enough, I'll
be looking for a .45 -- - need one to balance out the PPK.
On 8/26/05, redghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Having tried to hit stuff with both a .45 Colt side arm and a nickel
> plate Hadji 9mm, I much prefer the 9mm. The .45
Having tried to hit stuff with both a .45 Colt side arm and a nickel
plate Hadji 9mm, I much prefer the 9mm. The .45 was mostly on the
outside of the target, while the 9mm was able to stay centered for most
of the clip. Then again, if there were a bear getting within 50 yards,
I think I would
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
