Here's another.
Is misc@ really the right place for silly patches like these?
Graham
--- ugen.4.orig Sat May 13 16:57:59 2006
+++ ugen.4 Sat May 13 16:58:23 2006
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@
.Fa interface_desc-*(GtbNumEndpoints .
The
.Fa config_index
-should set to
+should be set to
.Dv
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 05:02:16PM +0930, Graham Gower wrote:
Here's another.
Is misc@ really the right place for silly patches like these?
you can post doc fixes to bugs@, or mail them directly to me.
--- ugen.4.orig Sat May 13 16:57:59 2006
+++ ugen.4 Sat May 13 16:58:23 2006
Hi all,
Dispite this silly object, I'm interesting in porting some iptables
conn_track listed here :
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO//netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-5.html.
I'm mostly interested in the pptp conntrack, which I need for my
nat-box. I'd like an advise : what's the most
Just adding some more info to the topic...
I've had some problems while running Firefox (tried on elightenment
and fvwm) on OpenBSD 3.8-release and OpenBSD 3.9-snapshot from around
february-2006. It was painfully slow, and switching between tabs was
like watching a turtle trying to run.
However,
On 13/05/06, Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:44:41AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 03:00]:
Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier
this week?
no.
Can I ask why his patch
My goal with the bridge is to filter all traffic coming in from the
outside world, while allowing servers my servers behind the bridge
to connect freely even if their traffic has to travel out to the
router and back(keep state?).
My point of confusion is whether or not to turn on
you used the excellent tools as google and
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com I guess...
I made some searching for you, here you go
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=114345514930017w=2
http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/
http://www.unix-tutorials.com/go.php?id=280
/bkw
On
Hello misc,
I spent two days to read man and how-tos, but today I don't succeed
again to make raid 1 to work.
I want to install openbsd 3.9 on two ide disks (wd0,wd1) of 10 gb with
raidframe raid 1.
Following the main steps that I have executed:
1. regular installation of openbsd 3.9 on wd0
2.
On 2006-05-12 14:37:07 -0700, News Collector wrote:
Nick Holland wrote:
Thanks Nick I should have said I checked all the usual suspects. Sorry.
News Collector wrote:
Hello:
Where (what) is the canonical site (or book) for PF.
documentation-wise?
Yeah
that would be the OpenBSD man
Hi list,
hy rules:
pass in quick on $extif ...
pass in quick on $extif ...
pass out quick on $extif ...
an so on about 100 rules
the order of the rules is optimized
the first rules are the rules with the most
traffic
now a want to do accouting with labels
after this rules i place
pass in
Dear Steve,
At the moment, I have forwarding and pf turned off and allowing packets
to flow freely until I can figure out the multiple subnet issue.
The router that handles our subnets is outside of our
network. Somehow the server cannot communicate freely when they
have to
It seems XFree people disagree...
Marc Aurele La France: Contrary to what too many security pundits think,
limiting root's power doesn't solve anything. Like bugs, security issues
will forever be uncovered, whether they be in setuid applications like an X
server or in a kernel itself. The
* Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 05:17]:
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:44:41AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-13 03:00]:
Will it include the leap second patch Thorsten Glaser posted earlier
this week?
no.
Can I ask why his
Problems with the 2200BG continue...
I changed to OpenBSD 3.9. The interface looks like this on the box:
# ifconfig iwi0
iwi0: flags=8803UP,BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
lladdr ***
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect ibss (autoselect adhoc)
status: no network
On 5/13/06, Leonardo Rodrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, I find it funny that firefox, being open-source and all
that, initializes slower on Unix machines than on WindowsXP for
example...
hey, it even has *different* menu option placements for unix and for
windows! Edit -
Hi all,
looking at /var/log/daemon, it seems that hostapd syslog timestamp
does not take care of local timezone :
May 13 16:49:12 puffy test_syslog[6582]: This is just a test for my c studies
May 13 16:49:18 puffy hostapd[18915]: ural0: (rate: 100/8 sec)
00:0d:0b:c3:cb:bb 00:0d:93:ed:ee:2b,
If you install a new 3.9 system, and enable X windows
(The only package I installed was emacs)
Create a new userid with ksh as its shell
and sign on though X.
~/.profile does not get executed
Nor does ~/.profile get executed then a
new xterm is created using the left click
menu in the
I found this practical blog entry by Amy Hoy on her blog,
slash7.com http://www.slash7.com/pages/vampires.In the post Amy
describes how to identify Help Vampires how to reform yourself if you are one,
and how to quit enabling them if they show up in your community. She writes:
It's so regular
On 2006/05/13 13:16, Peter Fraser wrote:
Create a new userid with ksh as its shell
and sign on though X.
~/.profile does not get executed
Nor does ~/.profile get executed then a
new xterm is created using the left click
menu in the background.
that's normal; see xterm(1) about -ls
On Sat 2006.05.13 at 13:16 -0400, Peter Fraser wrote:
If you install a new 3.9 system, and enable X windows
(The only package I installed was emacs)
Create a new userid with ksh as its shell
and sign on though X.
~/.profile does not get executed
Nor does ~/.profile get executed then a
Peter Fraser wrote:
If you install a new 3.9 system, and enable X windows
(The only package I installed was emacs)
Create a new userid with ksh as its shell
and sign on though X.
~/.profile does not get executed
Nor does ~/.profile get executed then a
new xterm is created using the left click
My apologies, for not noticing that faq entry. But is
is not a solution in general.
I had a menu entry for emacs, The effect I got
was the shell inside emacs didn't have ENV set,
and by that time ksh is not going to look at
.profile. I tried to come up with a simple
example of the problem.
Why
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:56:20PM +0400, Bruno Carnazzi wrote:
Hi all,
looking at /var/log/daemon, it seems that hostapd syslog timestamp
does not take care of local timezone :
thanks, just commited the fix using tzset()
reyk
May 13 16:49:12 puffy test_syslog[6582]: This is just a
Interesting article but hardly applicable to most of the people I see
posting to the @ lists. I don't believe in such entities but even were
it the case energy vampires truly exist and in some natural or
supernatural way suck the psychic force of others you'll note that they
feed on the weak.
And they are looking for input from the user community:
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=41225
hi.
I'm working on a openbsd kernel and an image for
an AMD Geode SC1200UHF-266.
I got a cpu-module and the eval-board. The manufactor
is kontor.
I configured a kernel similar to my wrap-boxe
and changed some entries for the network and console.
The kernel will be loaded and after the loading
Marc Aurele La France: Contrary to what too many security pundits think,
limiting root's power doesn't solve anything. Like bugs, security issues
will forever be uncovered, whether they be in setuid applications like an X
server or in a kernel itself. The trick, it seems, is to
Dear Theo de Raadt and Richard Stallman,
Thank you for visiting ATI.COM !
This is an AUTOMATIC RESPONSE which confirms that your request has been
successfully received by our server and will be processed.
Please do not reply to this message, any replies to this email will not
be responded to or
Thus spake Jeff Quast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11/05/06 09:22]:
: On 5/11/06, Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I'm not interested in bandwidth limitations, so it looks like priq is
: likely my best bet.
: [...]
: Then I create a queue with a bandwidth limit of 700Kbps.
:
: The man page is a
Damian Gerow wrote:
Thus spake Jeff Quast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11/05/06 09:22]:
On 5/11/06, Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not interested in bandwidth limitations, so it looks like
priq is likely my best bet.
Then I create a queue with a bandwidth limit of 700Kbps.
Thus spake Melameth, Daniel D. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/05/06 20:06]:
: It would seem altq wants a bandwidth declaration. However, from man 5
: pf.conf:
:
: If bandwidth is not specified, the interface bandwidth is used.
And OpenBSD complains bitterly when not defining the bandwidth on a
31 matches
Mail list logo
