On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> i am trying to set a process as the session leader of its own. I wrote
> a simple program that handles that. It is working when i call it from
> my shell command line:
>
> $ sux -s -e -E \
> PATH==/home/grios/.bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr
Hey folks,
i am trying to set a process as the session leader of its own. I wrote
a simple program that handles that. It is working when i call it from
my shell command line:
$ sux -s -e -E \
PATH==/home/grios/.bin:/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 11:21:43PM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
> There are no useful answers for idiots.
> Remember this is the same idiot who started the USB keyboard
> encryption BS thread. His tinfoil cap is on too tight.
> --
> Eric Furman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Tinfoil is useless for any p
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:39:48 +0200, "Peter Philipp"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:15:06PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
> > > This is just the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. You are creating
> > > a whole bunch of unneccessary problems for yourself.
> >
> > It's pret
Well, here i am again.
I was expecting that the granted ticket always hold the address to
which it is valid. After obtaining a ticket by means of kinit, i got
the following:
$ kinit
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s Password:
$ klist -v
Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_1000
Principal: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hey folks,
i have jsut setted keberos for my openbsd 3.8 server. It is working
well, but during configuration i could see that some directives stated
in krb5.conf(5) was not valid. kdc insisted in complaining on them:
/appdefaults/x no valid.
For instance, kdc did not accept direcive encrypt
Ok, so I'd like to run some freebsd binaries on open, since I can't get
serveral packages to build openbsd native. However, anytime I run a
freebsd binary I get:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: mmap of entire address space
failed: Invalid argument
I'm running 3.9-R w/ GENERIC o
On 7/15/06, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:40:04AM +0300, Soner Tari wrote:
> However, if you agree with me, I get the feeling that all of these are
> inelegant workarounds compared to the ideal solution: time support in pf
> (similar to perhaps iptables). I
On 7/15/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 04:03:52PM -0700, smith wrote:
> If I'm going to provide my customers internet access I better keep track of
> the traffic that my customers' dsl modems generate. This is to protect me
> from lawsuits and abuse of the s
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:40:04AM +0300, Soner Tari wrote:
> However, if you agree with me, I get the feeling that all of these are
> inelegant workarounds compared to the ideal solution: time support in pf
> (similar to perhaps iptables). I've read the replies from developers to
> a similar quest
Thanks jared and others for your replies. I'll try all of your
suggestions.
However, if you agree with me, I get the feeling that all of these are
inelegant workarounds compared to the ideal solution: time support in pf
(similar to perhaps iptables). I've read the replies from developers to
a simi
On 7/15/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I should send them an apology note for hurting the authentication
servers feelings?
You don't have a clue!
Look up "MAC address" and get yourself a clue. I've only been on this
list a couple of years, but you definitely win the "mos
thus Peter Philipp spake:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 04:03:52PM -0700, smith wrote:
If I'm going to provide my customers internet access I better keep track of
the traffic that my customers' dsl modems generate. This is to protect me
from lawsuits and abuse of the services I provide. Hmmm. Looki
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 04:03:52PM -0700, smith wrote:
> If I'm going to provide my customers internet access I better keep track of
> the traffic that my customers' dsl modems generate. This is to protect me
> from lawsuits and abuse of the services I provide. Hmmm. Looking through the
I guess
Peter if you want to be anonymous look up tor.
I'm not trying to call you names or anything and I'm no security expert either
but I'm sure this scenario is likely from the point of view of your ISP:
If I'm going to provide my customers internet access I better keep track of
the traffic that my cu
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 04:58:35PM -0500, Eric Pancer wrote:
> Jesus you're a fucking idiot. I mean, seriously: this thread has got to be
> one of the more idiotic things I've ever read here.
Ok I'm about to fucking blow a fuse! What's your fucking problem!
You're a shark! Nasty, bloodthirsty
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 11:49:34PM +0200, RedShift wrote:
> Computers aren't almighty. Why the hell am I even replying to you? If
> you don't want to authenticate, don't use PPPoE then. What you are
> trying to do is idiotic. This topic is by far the most ridiculous I have
> ever read. What's th
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 11:34:33PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> >It's not a DDoS.
>
> sure it is.
Your own customers aren't DDoS'ing you when they try to authenticate. A
Distributed Denial of Service by definition is a computer crime with intent
to disable your services with malice, which thi
On 2006/07/15 23:16, Peter Philipp wrote:
> And it's this service that people pay for anyhow.
So you want everyone else using your ISP to subsidise your
fairly extreme use of the auth/accounting infrastructure (radius,
ldap, db, whatever..)?
Ah well, you'll be worst-affected if it becomes heavily
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 22:39:48 +0200, Peter Philipp wrote...
> Illegal activities? Naw man! I just like moving like a Mack truck. See,
> I'm already gone! Once I was upset that they didn't give everyone static
> IP's, and then I thought about the words Vint Cerf said, and I got
> enlightene
On 7/15/06, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OpenBSD 3.9. I took my xterm, did "su -" and then typed "reboot". The xterm
window disappeared, but the machine froze. You could still see the X Window
System background and the mouse was not moving. ctrl-alt-del didn't work. I had
to turn the
Peter Philipp wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 11:09:13PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
if there were some more guys like you authenticating every minute,
there'd be no chance to get authenticated in a decent amount of time.
you'd be offline due do a self caused DDoS, rendering the RADIUS
machines
thus Peter Philipp spake:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 11:09:13PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
if there were some more guys like you authenticating every minute,
there'd be no chance to get authenticated in a decent amount of time.
you'd be offline due do a self caused DDoS, rendering the RADIUS
mac
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 11:09:13PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote:
> if there were some more guys like you authenticating every minute,
> there'd be no chance to get authenticated in a decent amount of time.
> you'd be offline due do a self caused DDoS, rendering the RADIUS
> machines (or whatever t
thus Peter Philipp spake:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:15:06PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
This is just the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. You are creating
a whole bunch of unneccessary problems for yourself.
It's pretty obvious he's trying to hide his true identity because of these mp3
a
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:15:06PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
> > This is just the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. You are creating
> > a whole bunch of unneccessary problems for yourself.
>
> It's pretty obvious he's trying to hide his true identity because of these
> mp3
> activities o
Hi,
On Saturday, 15. July 2006 21:24, z0mbix wrote:
> On 7/15/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi misc@,
> >
> > I have a an original setup at home. I crontab logging on and off the
> > Internet on a minutely basis, so that I aquire a new IP every minute. I
> > do this for person
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:24:04PM +0100, z0mbix wrote:
> This is just the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. You are creating
> a whole bunch of unneccessary problems for yourself.
I don't operate in a box that's made for me. I go further. Stop the
namecalling and reconsider if you don't have
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:27:32PM +0300, Soner Tari wrote:
> > Have your cron job copy the current anchor rules to pf-current.conf,
> > then add pfctl -f pf-current.conf to rc.local.
>
> Thank you for the reply (and Gaby too). But I am not sure if this would
> be an elegant workaround. Because by
On 7/15/06, Peter Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi misc@,
I have a an original setup at home. I crontab logging on and off the Internet
on a minutely basis, so that I aquire a new IP every minute. I do this for
personal reasons and I like it this way.
This is just the most idiotic thing
Hi misc@,
I have a an original setup at home. I crontab logging on and off the Internet
on a minutely basis, so that I aquire a new IP every minute. I do this for
personal reasons and I like it this way. At the same time I also stream
mp3's from a radio station in Toronto. Since my IP changes
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 08:27:32PM +0300, Soner Tari wrote:
> > Have your cron job copy the current anchor rules to pf-current.conf,
> > then add pfctl -f pf-current.conf to rc.local.
>
> Thank you for the reply (and Gaby too). But I am not sure if this would
> be an elegant workaround. Because by
Hello
OpenBSD 3.9. I took my xterm, did "su -" and then typed "reboot". The xterm
window disappeared, but the machine froze. You could still see the X Window
System background and the mouse was not moving. ctrl-alt-del didn't work. I had
to turn the machine off.
The X Window is installed from Ope
On 7/15/06, sonjaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dear all
basic question :
i here current my network :
internet--adsl--lan01
i want change like this :
internet--adsl+router--lan01-lan2
lan01( openbsd , squid )
lan02(internet cafe)
Easy. Plug in lan02 to lan01 and run `sysctl set net.ip.for
On 7/15/06, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 06:16:42PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> On Saturday 15 July 2006 18:02, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > But gdbm is in ports. I don't understand why the binding was taken out of
> > Perl.
>
> And how would the base system build
> Have your cron job copy the current anchor rules to pf-current.conf,
> then add pfctl -f pf-current.conf to rc.local.
Thank you for the reply (and Gaby too). But I am not sure if this would
be an elegant workaround. Because by chance there may be cron jobs
scheduled to run exactly during downtim
I found this too funny not to share. A little Perl script processing of
my spamd log revealed a spammer from China had made 138 attempts to
deliver spam with a cumulative time of ~15 hours. 15 hours! You can't
make this stuff up!
I like to think those 15 hours of tar pit torment just made the I
On 15 Jul 2006, at 15:48, Soner Tari wrote:
> I have time-based pf rules using cron and anchors (such as to restrict
> HTTP access after hours). But as you can guess, they do not survive a
> reboot. Is there any solution?
Create a script that works out what the rules should be at any given
time
Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nick Shank wrote:
> > And, while I know it's a very different animal, it's still a Compaq
> > server... I get the same error on a Proliant ML370 when using
> > bsd.mp.
>
> I've got 3.9 running on a DL380 without trouble (GENERIC.MP), and that
> should
(This might belong on ports, but it's not specific really)
There are quite a few software packages not in the ports tree that I've
managed to wrestle into running on my system, and I keep noticing the
same thing: they all have trouble with libintl and libiconv. But it's
always different things: so
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:48:06PM +0300, Soner Tari wrote:
>
> I have time-based pf rules using cron and anchors (such as to restrict
> HTTP access after hours). But as you can guess, they do not survive a
> reboot. Is there any solution?
There are probably a lot of solutions...
Have your cron
Hi All,
I have time-based pf rules using cron and anchors (such as to restrict
HTTP access after hours). But as you can guess, they do not survive a
reboot. Is there any solution?
Thanks,
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:00:18 +0200, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
>Does anyone succeed with any SIP phone actually on OpenBSD, behind a NAT?
>I tried various clients on Linux (ekiga, kphone, minisip, lilnphone, twinkle)
>and there was always some little bit that was missing to functionality.
Yes. The serv
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 06:16:42PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
> On Saturday 15 July 2006 18:02, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > But gdbm is in ports. I don't understand why the binding was taken out of
> > Perl.
>
> And how would the base system build the gdbm module if gdbm itself is in
> ports?
Is th
On 15/07/06, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just turned it on and date shows the same as on my radio clock!
How different from Linux where I didn't know which ntp implementation to use,
so I tried installing various ones and it didn't work so I tweaked
the configuration somehow accor
On 7/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does the dhcpd that is shipped with OpenBSD 3.7 support the ability
to update bind?
No, it does not.
Does the dhcpd that is shipped with OpenBSD 3.9 support this?
IIRC, it does not support it either.
If not, is the recommended app
I just turned it on and date shows the same as on my radio clock!
How different from Linux where I didn't know which ntp implementation to use,
so I tried installing various ones and it didn't work so I tweaked
the configuration somehow according to the (usually ambiguous) documentation
and it did
What is wrong with having two separate Perl installations, the base
one (untouched), and your own one (in e.g. /opt or /usr/opt or
wherever you'd like)?
Andreas
On 15/07/06, Karel Kulhavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it OK to download perl 5.8.6 (the same that is in OpenBSD 3.9)
then compile i
Is it OK to download perl 5.8.6 (the same that is in OpenBSD 3.9)
then compile it using supplied hints/openbsd.sh and install over the
existing perl? I want GDBM_File and GDBM_File is in perl 5.8.6.
- will the perl still work (at least pkg_add and pkg_delete)?
- will GDBM_File start working?
I tr
On Saturday 15 July 2006 18:02, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> But gdbm is in ports. I don't understand why the binding was taken out of
> Perl.
And how would the base system build the gdbm module if gdbm itself is in
ports?
You could always try creating a port of it though.
---
Lars Hansson
Andreas Kahari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a firewall blocking the requests in either direction? Does
> networki routing etc. work apart from this?
Yes, networking works as it should. The problem was that ntpd did not
get synced because I had hacked it to settimeofday() every time the sen
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 07:03:11PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 12:12:58PM +0200, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> > ello
> >
> > How can I install GDBM::File into the stock Perl in OpenBSD? I don't
> > understand why it's not there when it comes automatically with Perl.
> > Was
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 09:11:12AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> >Why would you need voice chat in the base install? There isn't even IM
> >in the base install.
> >
>
> good point about the IM. i see voice as pretty important since the gross
> majority of ppl have a phone (whether VOIP or othe
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> Original message
> >Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200
> >From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Encrypting e-mails
> >To: misc@openbsd.org
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >I have been looking into encrypting my e-mail
dear all
basic question :
i here current my network :
internet--adsl--lan01
i want change like this :
internet--adsl+router--lan01-lan2
lan01( openbsd , squid )
lan02(internet cafe)
so i want share my internet access to lan2.
sory my question very basic
ps: my modem adsl no support bridge co
Is there a firewall blocking the requests in either direction? Does
networki routing etc. work apart from this?
Andreas
On 15/07/06, Bo Granlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem with ntpd. I have a number of openbsd machines
here and one of them is connected to a gps receiver w
56 matches
Mail list logo
