lo all,
i've been looking into clustering a couple dual-processor
openbsd boxen (both running 3.7-release and bsd.mp) and
haven't found very much documentation on the topic. i figured
that either MPICH2 or PVM would be a good route, but i tried
to compile MPICH2 from source and encountered errors.
greetz,
me and a C++ programmer i know have a C++ program that would
compile cleanly and run when using gcc 2.95.3 (from openbsd
3.6-release), but now that i've upgraded to 3.7-release, which
uses gcc 3.3.5, he gets errors on compilation. since neither
of us are very familiar with the details of u
heya,
i'm trying to get PVM 3.4.5 to compile from source on a
3.6-release system and have run into some problems. when i
first attempted this, i got the following error:
...
cc -DIMA_BSD386 -I../../include -I../../tracer -I../../src
-DSOCKADHASLEN -DNOREXEC -DRSHCOMMAND=\"/usr/bin/rsh\"
-DHASSTD
jay,
>I've got some time this weekend, and would like to upgrade my
3.6 box to
>3.7. I checked the upgrade instructions, but they are a bit
vague
>(deliberately?) wrt upgrading without cds. I seem to recall that
>upgrading via bsd.rd was pretty straightforward... does this
still work
>provided
gary,
Original message
>Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 12:13:32 -0700
>From: Gary Clemans-Gibbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Boot hanging following power out - it's worse
>Cc: OpenBSD misc-list
>
>I rebooted the box and now it is hanging with
>
>Automatic boot in progress: starting fi
alex,
>Hi, I actually use PVM on Linux...
>
>2005/8/20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> cc -DIMA_BSD386 -I../../include -I../../tracer -I../../src
>> -DSOCKADHASLEN -DNOREXEC -DRSHCOMMAND=\"/usr/bin/rsh\"
>> -DHASSTDLIB -DNEEDMENDIAN -DHASERRORVA
>> S -o pvm cons.o cmds.o job.o trc.o -
theo,
>We ask our users to help us uncover and fix more of these bugs in
>applications. Some will even be exploitable. Instead of
saying that
>OpenBSD is busted in this regard, please realize that the
software
>which is crashing is showing how shoddily it was written.
Then help
>us fix it. For
>> how does openbsd's RAID support stack up to the other *BSDs?
>
>on a scale of 1 to 10, it's an awesome.
>
>--
>And that's why your software sucks.
>
just how awesome is it?
when i read theo's anouncement i thought to myself "this is
missing something". your having mentioned how awesome it is
>> Mexico's greatest exports to the US are poverty and disease.
>
>You ignorant fool.
>
depends on how you measure "greatest". i think several of the
border states in the US declared a "state of emergency" about
the most profitable, and probably best known, mexican export. ;)
and no, it's not via
>> depends on how you measure "greatest". i think several of the
>> border states in the US declared a "state of emergency" about
>> the most profitable, and probably best known, mexican
export. ;)
>>
>> and no, it's not viagra.
>it's a big problem on both sides of the border.
>
>However, one is wo
i am relatively lazy and there are a number of configurations
(e.g. mailserver, backup server, etc.) which i would like to
generate shell scripts for. i have thought about making these
scripts for quite a while, but i have been reticent to invest
the time required to make the shell script by hand.
>Hi
>
>I have two harddisks:
>
>wd0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0:
>wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 12982MB, 26588016 sectors
>wd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mode 2
>wd1 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0:
>wd1: 16-sector PIO, LBA, 78533MB, 160836480 sectors
>wd1(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, DMA mo
marco,
>ehm... no.
>
>Replacing your power supply was a coincidence. The disk was
going
>bad and reallocated the bad areas. By the time you replaced
the
>power supply it was simply done.
>
i have had a lot of problems with this drive, and it
correlated very strongly with the hardware to whi
>> ...and when some idiot vendor changes chips without
changing product
>> code, what then?
>
>The virtual store is a half-baked idea, I know. I'm just
looking for
>additional ways to support OpenBSD. In the above case, I
return the
>product and inform the virtual store that the referral isn't
go
heya,
i'm interested in getting an 8-channel SATA RAID controller
that runs on the ami driver so i can use all the new neato
RAID functionality for my backup server. i haven't seen
anything in the archives about a known working controller like
i've described, but i did see the LSI MegaRAID SATA 30
>Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, bridge(4) doesn't
support
>pppoe(4) as a possible interface. I don't know why, but it
just
>rejects it. Anyone know of a workaround for this? I'm on a
100mb/s
>FTTH line so a userland pppoe is not an option.
>
>Kory T
i don't think you can filt
heya,
i'm interested in getting an AFS server setup, but openAFS
1.3.87 will not compile from source on 3.8-current (same as
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112867186930581&w=2).
i also noticed that ober had posted a "howto" for getting
openAFS working on openbsd 3.7 (see
http://ww
per,
>We can argue back and forth on the pros and cons of building
>1TB
>partitions or not, but the need for these giant allocations
are real
>enough and from a commen/broader view (small business) the
demand is
>also moving closer and closer. At work we have a disk-to-disk
backup
>server for
heya,
i got an LSI MegaRAID SATA 300-8X a couple weeks ago and i
noticed it was not quite "behaving". by this i mean that i had
a 200GB disk on which i had installed a 3.8 snapshot and i
plugged it into the RAID controller and booted the machine. it
loaded the kernel just fine, but when it came ti
jon and marco,
thx for the quick replies. this is more or less what i expected.
if you install through the RAID controller, shouldn't it
autodetect the number of actually available sectors (i.e. the
"full" size modulo that required for the RAID info)? that's
the thing that really surprised me.
i'm currently using bzip2-ed dumps to backup my machines and i
wonder if there is a better way to do it. by better i mean
more secure and more automated than adding cron jobs.
i am interested in encrypted backups, as i would prefer to
have non-hijackable backups. i did see
http://www.fluffy.co.uk/
>So there's no solution? I see now that the packet flow
doesn't support it,
>but logically it does make sense to want an IP from that
DHCP server
>to be given to the other interface, after all any systems
hanging off that
>interface *will* get an address from the DHCP server on the other
>side of
paul,
>when I purchsed 3 there were all kinds of problems with
loading on a laptop
>
>Now I purchsed 3.7 and it looks like this is the final end of
the road
>for openbsd and me
>
>I tolerated figuring out the wireless settings and even
though there is
>some reason for a huge time lag installing pa
since i've heard that the new ipsec.conf and ipsecctl command
simplify setting up vpns, i figured i would give the "old" way
of isakmpd.conf another pass to help me figure out the new
syntax. now that i have gone back and tried to setup isakmpd
as a tunnel between two machines on my home newtork us
oops, didn't realize my attachments would get stripped. here
are the "isakmpd -d -DA=10" and tcpdump outputs i mentioned in
the first message:
>i've included the outputs from each instance of isakmpd and a
>tcpdump from the host in between them as attachments.
isakmpd.peer-X.out:
085803.480596 D
heya,
i tried this setup with IPV4 addresses on the same subnet (10.0.3.1 and
10.0.3.2) and it worked fine, i.e. i "tcpdump -i enc0" and see encapsulated
packets. this leaves me wondering what it is about my prior setup that made it
not work.
i saw no appreciable difference in the outputs from e
heya,
i have fixed public IPs and i have ADSL using PPPoE. i would like to make things
very redundant, so that if any one piece of hardware craps out, there will be a
failover. i have conceived of a setup and am wondering if anyone can suggest
improvements or tell me if it just won't work. here it
i searched the archives for messages about skype, but i didn't find anything
that addressed whether the skype service is safe or not. i did a google for
"skype security" and one of the first links talks about a couple serious
exploits of skype and the "glowing" (a.k.a. sponsored) review from dr. be
Original message
>Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 11:14:22 +0800
>From: Lars Hansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: skype security?
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>Skype was brought to you by the same people who brought you
>Kazaa. Draw your own conclusions regarding ethics, security and
>openness
Original message
>Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:56:33 +0100
>From: Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: #define failure opportunity
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>The people who they are addressing are bussiness, and they think
>in terms of gaining money and loosing money.
>
>Open Sourc
Original message
>Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:24:50 -0800
>From: Sean Comeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: I have $300
>To: Bob Ababurko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: OpenBSD Misc
>
>On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:17:05PM -0800, Sean Comeau wrote:
>> try these:
>>
>> http://www.commell-sys
heya,
i've been grinding away to get a VPN setup where i can have win xp clients
connect to my openbsd firewall and access the network behind it. i have tried a
number of things, none of which have yet worked for all my users. i am very much
interested in hearing from other admins who have current
Original message
>Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:27:42 -0800
>From: Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Blowfish still good enough?
>To: Travers Buda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>
>Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> My concern is the strength of Blowfi
Original message
>Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 10:39:02 +0100
>From: Said Outgajjouft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Blowfish still good enough?
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>Travies all crypto is breakable. The only demand on crypto is how long
>in takes to break it. If it takes more than 5
heya,
i've established IPsec connections originating from several windows xp machines
with public IPs to my openbsd firewall that is running isakmpd. they are working
just fine. however, i have a windows machine here at home behind NAT that is
giving me grief when i try to establish an IPsec conne
heya,
i've got the postfix-2.2.5p0-sasl2 port on an openbsd 3.7-stable machine. the
setup has been working great thus far, but now that i'm trying to encrypt my
virtual mailbox directory (using vnconfig) i'm encountering problems that i
can't resolve myself.
i have everything working fine without
what do you guys think about this response i got on the postfix-users list?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 01:28:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> $ ls -al protected
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 204800 Jan 13 11:26 protected
>
> sudo vnconfig -ck -v /dev/svnd0c /home/protected
> sudo mount -o
based on my previous posts about trouble with svnd encryption having not
garnered any replies (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=113717720822507&w=2 ), i'm going
to rephrase my questions.
- what methods, if any, can be used to reliably encrypt my virtual mailboxes so
that they are
heya,
i am setting up a webstore and i want to have a good balance of security and
configurability for whatever software i settle on using. i've read on this list
that there are security issues with many scripting languages (php, python, perl,
etc.). since i don't have the time to script the store
Original message
>Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:35:31 + (GMT)
>From: Didier Wiroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: tutorial for securing wifi networks with ipsec and openbsd,
>somewhere?
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>hello,
>I've read man ipsec and vpn. Unfortunately I'm totally new to ipse
>> Backup MX is a relic and a legacy. It breaks almost all spam filters.
>> Modern mail infrastructure doesn't need it, except in rare cases.
me thinks this is spreading FUD. define "modern mail infrastructure". perhaps
the origin of the FUD is the M$ visual studio .net overexposure?
>OpenBSD Vista - Home Basic. (aka. Vista Home, Dave Fuestel)
>Same as Home - Premium, but has all the man pages deleted to save
>valuable space.
LOL! there could be a special mailing list for Vista users: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message
>Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 00:19:33 +0100
>From: Jean-Sibastien Bour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: what is next? 3.10 or 4.0???
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>Reid Nichol a icrit :
>> --- Jean-So?=bastien Bour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Matthias Kilian a icrit :
Original message
>Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:04:32 -0800 (PST)
>From: Reid Nichol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: what is next? 3.10 or 4.0???
>To: Matthew Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>
>I find it interesting that you didn't send this entirely condisending
>super
i saw a post just recently on bsdforums.org about getting the linux version of
skype running on freebsd, http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=39145
. i'm trying to get this working on openbsd, but when i run the static binary
with Qt compiled in, it tells me:
skype: error while loading
Original message
>Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 21:40:31 -0500
>From: "Barry, Christopher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: skype on openbsd?
>To:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Sunday, March 0
i made what i thought would be a fine backup of a freebsd-6.0 machine using
dump. more specifically i issued a
# dump -0f - /usr | ssh -o 'EscapeChar none' [EMAIL PROTECTED] "cat >
/usr/dumps/usr.fs"
this created usr.fs on my openbsd backup host. now that i'm trying to restore
the dump on my back
Original message
>Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 00:35:47 -0500
>From: Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: restore question: is my dump hosed?
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>Thus spake Joachim Schipper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20/03/06 00:34]:
>: Provided that you didn't do something strange
i'm putting a machine into production in the next week or two that uses binary
CGI "scripts". i want to add additional layers of security beyond having apache
chroot-ed in case the binaries decide to run amok. things that occur to me as a
good idea are systrace and sbox (see http://stein.cshl.org/s
i recently gave windows the heave-ho on my home desktop machine (hooray!), but
i'm having trouble regaining some of the functionality i had before when it
comes to setting up s-video out on an "ATI Radeon VE QY" video card. i have done
a bunch of searching for instructions on how to do this, none o
>The 10 people who are helping get it. They know that help is about
>action, and that if you stops at just words, it just plain isn't help.
the extent to which this thread has wasted time and not helped to draw any new
conclusions is astonishing. theo makes a good point when he accounts for the
t
having had a gander at the 3.9 song, which is quite amusing, i had an idea that
might be useful and i suspect it is ill-conceived. i have the utmost confidence
that readers of misc@ can quickly elucidate why it is a stupid idea.
if the integrity of closed-source binary blob drivers is questionable
i need to learn C++, but do not know where to begin with textbooks or online
docs. since, AFAICT, there are a great many skilled programmers on list, i would
appreciate any recommendations that can be made about introductory and
intermediate texts on C++.
my motivation for asking this is to avoid
Original message
>Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 02:37:48 +0200
>From: Martin Schrvder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: When would you NOT use OpenBSD?
>To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>On 2006-04-05 19:52:16 -0400, Nick Guenther wrote:
>> Slightly offtopic, but ironically a related-page that showed u
i have done some searching for ways to graph 2 and 3-d data using a C program on
openbsd and not found anything particularly satisfactory. perhaps i'm not using
the right keywords. i need to graph data from a C program and would prefer one
library or other program (preferably port) with a C API tha
Hi guys
Is there any way of configuring networks in sshd_config's AllowUsers?
You can put in user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no [EMAIL PROTECTED]/mask.
Having networks in AllowUsers would be extremely usefull.
Best regards,
--
Dick Visser
TERENA (IT Support Officer)
Singel 468D 1
y not giving back you're giving a strange signal.
>
> Gee, since you're demanding back anyway, you can use the GPL for your
> project and use my contribution. Problem solved.
>
> Oh, you want people to be free not to share? Freedom includes having the
> moral right to do some
5) 943-1983, cell: (647) 833-9377, (800) 555-9786 x56583
> bridge: (877) 385-4099 code: 506 9191#
Nah. Should be
GPL V-infinity
That way there won't be any more.
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.22.1 on an i686 machine (5588.29 BogoMips).
My book : http://www.AbominableFirebu
58 matches
Mail list logo
