On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Ektor Wetterstr?m wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
What are the unsurpassable real world weaknesses in OpenBSD, that you
know of?
Lack of proper SMP support, inefficient threading (old
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:53:09 +0200
Ektor WetterstrC6m ektw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
What are the unsurpassable real world weaknesses in OpenBSD, that you
know of?
Lack of proper SMP support, inefficient threading (old
OpenBSD pleases me every day, Linux annoys me half the time.
The number of mass casualty events avoided is the true metric
by which operating systems should be measured.
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:08:34 +0100
Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Would you run X on your linux server, because it's easier. I wouldn't
trade PF for better threading any day and you can always use multiple
systems, whilst wasting very little power these days, if you try. It's
far
facinating number of posts like this recently, all from gmail users
we've never seen before...
Yes, it's troll year.
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 11:16:37 Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:53:09PM +0200, Ektor Wetterstr?m wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
What are the unsurpassable real world weaknesses in OpenBSD, that you
know of?
) What is the best possible way how to setup my penetration lab? I
used Virtualbox in Archlinux, but I am new to BDS so I want to ask you
what is different here in virtualization. Is it better to test
everything in Windows 7 via Virtualbox. Or is it better to test
everything via Qemu in OpenBSD
Hi,
I ve done theses tests :
inter...@work (OpenBSD PF)(ip fixe) (dynamic ip) Home (A mac)
I mounted vpn on mac to Work with third software : VPN Tracker
VPN is OK, i can ping my openbsd gateway and ping my Windows 7 Workstation.
But i cant access any ressource except pings. Why ? Enc0 is
test
This seems a good post to followup to with another handy scsi(8) trick.
On 2009-11-15, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
# scsi -f /dev/rsd0c -c 03 00 00 00 fc 00 00 -i 0xfc - | hexdump -C
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |p...|
0010 00 00 00
On 16/11/2009, at 3:36 AM, Denise H. G. wrote:
On 2009/11/15 at 13:29, Mark Hellewell mark.hellew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Please can anybody tell me how to correctly run a SMART offline test
using
atactl? I read through the atactl man page but am not sure how to go
about
actually
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:41:38PM +1100, Mark Hellewell wrote:
On 16/11/2009, at 3:13 AM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
# scsi -f /dev/rsd0c -c 03 00 00 00 fc 00 00 -i 0xfc - | hexdump -C
70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
|p...|
0010 00 00 00 00 00 00
On 2009/11/15 at 13:29, Mark Hellewell mark.hellew...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Please can anybody tell me how to correctly run a SMART offline test
using
atactl? I read through the atactl man page but am not sure how to go
about
actually executing the self test and gathering the results
Hello,
Please can anybody tell me how to correctly run a SMART offline test using
atactl? I read through the atactl man page but am not sure how to go about
actually executing the self test and gathering the results. After having
turned on SMART support for my device using
atactl /dev/sd0c
2009/11/15 Mark Hellewell mark.hellew...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Please can anybody tell me how to correctly run a SMART offline test using
atactl? I read through the atactl man page but am not sure how to go about
actually executing the self test and gathering the results. After having
turned
Hi,
at www.uniqueBidWin.com. auction prices go down. lowest unique bid
wins..not like at ebay ...
get free credits to win nice stuff http://iphonesale.yolasite.com/
Walter
Sorry for the noise. My messages don't seem to be getting to the list.
--
One of the main causes of the fall of the roman empire was that, lacking
zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
programs.
On 2009-06-01, Ted Walther t...@enumera.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:51:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-06-01, Ted Walther t...@enumera.com wrote:
I'm preparing a port of newLISP. Is there a simple test I can run to
find out if the host platform is 64bit? A #define has
I'm preparing a port of newLISP. Is there a simple test I can run to
find out if the host platform is 64bit? A #define has to be set in the
code according to whether the platform is 64bit or not.
Am I right in assuming that OpenBSD only supports 32bit and 64bit
platforms at the moment?
Ted
On 2009-06-01, Ted Walther t...@enumera.com wrote:
I'm preparing a port of newLISP. Is there a simple test I can run to
find out if the host platform is 64bit? A #define has to be set in the
code according to whether the platform is 64bit or not.
We set _LP64 and __LP64__ variables on 64-bit
We set _LP64 and __LP64__ variables on 64-bit arch.
$ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep LP64
#define _LP64 1
#define __LP64__ 1
It should also be ok to (ab)use LONG_BIT from limits.h, depending
on how the code is 64 bit specific.
Ciao,
Kili
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
You're right, we only support 32- and 64-bit platforms.
What?! No 128 bit support?! Oh my god, the sky is falling, how can
you secure stuff in only 64 bit, the sky is falling, etc etc! :)
Actually, what I want is
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:51:31PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2009-06-01, Ted Walther t...@enumera.com wrote:
I'm preparing a port of newLISP. Is there a simple test I can run to
find out if the host platform is 64bit? A #define has to be set in the
code according to whether
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 07:50:59PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
We set _LP64 and __LP64__ variables on 64-bit arch.
$ cpp -dM /dev/null | grep LP64
#define _LP64 1
#define __LP64__ 1
It should also be ok to (ab)use LONG_BIT from limits.h, depending
on how the code is 64 bit specific.
Wow, I appreciate your insights.
Yudhvir
===
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Jason Dixon ja...@dixongroup.net wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:52:03PM +0200, I?igo Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2009-05-19, Iqigo
* mehma sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com [2009-05-19 07:29]:
Otto, Henning and Stuart to-the-point answers. Thanks guys. I have taken
the post over to FreeBSD list. However, Henning, I am curious why you call
pf on anything but OpenBSD a starter drug? Is the performance difference
that huge? pf
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its
really interesting IMHO:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2007/11/01/whats-new-in-bsd-42.html
Hope it helps you feel the need of trying pf _at home_ :)
On 2009-05-19, Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina tarom...@gmail.com wrote:
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its
really interesting IMHO:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2009-05-19, Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina tarom...@gmail.com wrote:
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
achieved it, in this article. You can go through all of it as its
really
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:52:03PM +0200, I?igo Ortiz de Urbina wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2009-05-19, Iqigo Ortiz de Urbina tarom...@gmail.com wrote:
Mehma,
You can find more info on the performance boost, and how developers
Why come to an OpenBSD list asking about FreeBSD pf? I note that you
didn't come to ask about getting OpenBSD running on your new hardware.
(It might have been quite a simple thing to fix).
You'd be better off asking on a FreeBSD list or the general pf
list. Most of us here don't know FreeBSD pf.
* mehma sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com [2009-05-17 19:43]:
I want to test two pf firewalls in-line - an old openBSD (3.7 #50, i386) is
on the 'outside' and a new FreeBSD (7.2 #0 amd64) is on the 'inside.'
OpenBSD 3.7 and FreeBSD 7 are probably en par for pf.
pf in a recent OpenBSD however is more
* mehma sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com [2009-05-18 03:28]:
Thanks Ingo for your thoughts. Let me ask a simpler question, is there
something wrong with the following line on a FreeBSD 7.2 pf?
pass in log quick on em0 inet proto tcp from any to 121.209.23.121 port =
imaps flags S/SA modulate state
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 02:51:34PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* mehma sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com [2009-05-18 03:28]:
Thanks Ingo for your thoughts. Let me ask a simpler question, is there
something wrong with the following line on a FreeBSD 7.2 pf?
pass in log quick on em0 inet proto
Otto, Henning and Stuart to-the-point answers. Thanks guys. I have taken
the post over to FreeBSD list. However, Henning, I am curious why you call
pf on anything but OpenBSD a starter drug? Is the performance difference
that huge? pf on FreeBSD 7.2 is version 4.1.
You have piqued my interest
Otto, Henning and Stuart to-the-point answers. Thanks guys. I have taken
the post over to FreeBSD list. However, Henning, I am curious why you call
pf on anything but OpenBSD a starter drug? Is the performance difference
that huge? pf on FreeBSD 7.2 is version 4.1.
The people you are
I want to test two pf firewalls in-line - an old openBSD (3.7 #50, i386) is
on the 'outside' and a new FreeBSD (7.2 #0 amd64) is on the 'inside.' Here
is the setup
INTERNET ===[outside port bridged to inside port OLD pf] === [outside port
bridged to inside port NEW pf] === LAN
I took the old
mehma sarja wrote on Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:35:27AM -0700:
I want to test two pf firewalls in-line - an old openBSD (3.7 #50,
That makes absolutely no sense. Don't run real servers with historical
software. Run 4.5.
i386) is on the 'outside' and a new FreeBSD (7.2 #0 amd64
was inconvenient on the hardware we have, so the new firewall is
implemented on FreeBSD. I copied most stuff over and tested it within our
network - which is not a complete test.
c. So, one test is to put these two firewalls in tandem - just for testing.
The idea being that the inside firewall will catch
, so the new firewall is
implemented on FreeBSD. I copied most stuff over and tested it within our
network - which is not a complete test.
Usually, you first define your problem, then choose apropriate software,
then apropriate hardware to run the software. Getting stuck with weird
hardware
Ingo and the rest of OpenBSD pf-ers,
Thanks Ingo for your thoughts. Let me ask a simpler question, is there
something wrong with the following line on a FreeBSD 7.2 pf?
pass in log quick on em0 inet proto tcp from any to 121.209.23.121 port =
imaps flags S/SA modulate state
Yudhvir
Ingo et all,
I suspect modulate state may be the culprit. Here is what the manual says:
modulate state - works only with TCP. PF will generate strong Initial
Sequence Numbers (ISNs) for packets matching this rule.
So we have 2 machines generating ISNs for the same connection. Could this be
the
all people who enable ntfs support in generic please test this
diff. It changes ntfs over from the deprecated lockmgr to the shiny
new(er) rwlock. It cleans things up a bit and lets us remove some stuff
elsewhere, may speed things up a little bit. So please test it and let
me know how it works
Hi,
Could all people who enable ntfs support in generic please test this
diff. It changes ntfs over from the deprecated lockmgr to the shiny
new(er) rwlock. It cleans things up a bit and lets us remove some stuff
elsewhere, may speed things up a little bit. So please test it and let
me know how
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Maxime DERCHE max...@mouet-mouet.net wrote:
[snip]
The European Parliament already refused this concept twice but, as you
might already know, we have a president that seems to think he is
Superman, and that he is just wright in everything he does.
umm... could
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:31:18AM +0100, ropers wrote:
2009/3/17 Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org:
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
So... what's the black-out stuff all about?
I'm not up to date, it appears, and I don't understand French, and
what I saw in the HTML source does not exist
and started using it as a backend
for your mua; or if you could set it up on some test box where
you receive mail (with a secondary MX) as a destination MX.
PLEASE do not run this in production, it is NOT ready. Really,
don't do it, you will be unhappy and I will point my finger at
you and laugh
; or if you could set it up on some test box where
you receive mail (with a secondary MX) as a destination MX.
PLEASE do not run this in production, it is NOT ready. Really,
don't do it, you will be unhappy and I will point my finger at
you and laugh. Really ... don't.
To test it, you must follow
2009/3/17 Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org:
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
So... what's the black-out stuff all about?
I'm not up to date, it appears, and I don't understand French, and
what I saw in the HTML source does not exist in the English Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HADOPI,
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:31:18 +0100
ropers rop...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/17 Gilles Chehade gil...@openbsd.org:
http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
So... what's the black-out stuff all about?
I'm not up to date, it appears, and I don't understand French, and
what I saw in the HTML source
Including MCP65, MCP67, MCP73, MCP77 and MCP79 families.
If you see something like this in your dmesg:
pciide1 at pci0 dev 9 function 0 NVIDIA MCP77 AHCI rev 0xa2: \
DMA (unsupported)
please make sure you've switched your SATA controller to the native
(or AHCI mode) in the BIOS.
Christopher Linn wrote:
very sorry, mangled my reply and didn't catch it.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:15:27AM -0400, Christopher Linn wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:59:00AM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make
-code-to-test-tp20060609p20067491.html
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
new_guy schrieb:
Tobias Weingartner-2 wrote:
make cpuid ./cpuid | mail -s 'cpuid output' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps this is implied by 'make', but for the sake of clarity, I did it
like this:
gcc cpuid.c -o cpuid | ...
And it worked OK.
make already knows how to compile C files, no
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make already knows how to compile C files, no need to call the
compiler yourself ;)
My bad... I was using make incorrectly. I'll stick to gcc by hand :)
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make already knows how to compile C files, no need to call the
compiler yourself ;)
On 4.4 i386 make does this:
$ make cpuid.c ./cpuid
`cpuid.c' is up to date.
ksh: ./cpuid: not found
It does not produce a cpuid
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Brad Tilley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make already knows how to compile C files, no need to call the
compiler yourself ;)
On 4.4 i386 make does this:
$ make cpuid.c ./cpuid
`cpuid.c' is
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:01:37AM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make already knows how to compile C files, no need to call the
compiler yourself ;)
My bad... I was using make incorrectly. I'll stick to gcc by hand :)
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:59:00AM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make already knows how to compile C files, no need to call the
compiler yourself ;)
On 4.4 i386 make does this:
$ make cpuid.c ./cpuid
`cpuid.c' is up to
very sorry, mangled my reply and didn't catch it.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:15:27AM -0400, Christopher Linn wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:59:00AM -0400, Brad Tilley wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Julian Leyh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make already knows how to compile C files,
Hello all,
I'd love to get another round of cpuid testing done (i386/amd64).
The code is available at: http://www.tepid.org/~weingart/cpuid.c
I'd appreciate it if people could do something like the following
on their i386 and amd64 boxes:
make cpuid ./cpuid | mail -s 'cpuid output' [EMAIL
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:18:58PM +0300, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have two important diffs to azalia(4) audio driver.
1. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=122365193510743w=2
2. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=122381492825141w=2
If you just have no regressions
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have two important diffs to azalia(4) audio driver.
1. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=122365193510743w=2
(If you mixerctl output shows to many items, you definitely
should try this one and report to us).
2. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=122381492825141w=2
I just installed OpenBSD 4.4-current from yesterday on my latitude
e6400, everything went fine.
The ethernet and wireless is not yet supported thought.
Brightness are controlled by hardware, so it works fine.
X works fine too.
Here are dmesg, audiotcl, mixerctl and hw.sensors.
OpenBSD
Hi.
I've now tested GENERIC and GENERIC.MP on amd64 with bigmem enabled.
src/sys was updated yesterday from CVS. With bigmem=0 both GENERIC [1]
and GENERIC.MP [4] works fine (I am using GENERIC.MP on a daily basis).
With bigmem=1 and the BIOS Memory Remap Feature _disabled_, both
GENERIC and
Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Reyk Floeter wrote:
I just committed the 2nd version of the patch to -current but I still
need more test reports on devices that used to work.
- Please update to -current (for example ar5212.c 1.44) or use the patch
that I sent to this list if your AnonCVS
Works for me but only 11b (the AP is 11b/g, 11g works in Linux in the
same position.)
ath0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 Atheros AR5212 (IBM MiniPCI) rev 0x01: irq 11
ath0: AR5213A 5.9 phy 4.3 rf5112a 3.6, WOR2W, address 00:16:cf:43:50:5d
# ifconfig ath0
ath0:
Reyk Floeter wrote:
I just committed the 2nd version of the patch to -current but I still
need more test reports on devices that used to work.
- Please update to -current (for example ar5212.c 1.44) or use the patch
that I sent to this list if your AnonCVS is not updated yet.
- Test
If anyone has one of these CD drives:
MATSHITA CR-574
MATSHITA CR-574
SANYO CRD-256P
SANYO CRD-254P
SANYO CRD-S54P
CD-ROM CDR-S1
CD-ROM CDR-N16
I'd very very interested in hearing about it. They represent the devices
that currently use a quirk (ADEV_NOCAPACITY) in the SCSI code. No device
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Kenneth R Westerback
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone has one of these CD drives:
MATSHITA CR-574
MATSHITA CR-574
is this a repeat?
SANYO CRD-256P
SANYO CRD-254P
SANYO CRD-S54P
CD-ROM CDR-S1
CD-ROM CDR-N16
-jf
--
In the meantime, here is
On 14/03/2008, at 8:31 PM, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 14/03/2008, at 8:15 PM, Erwin van Maanen wrote:
if [ X${dhcpd_flags} != XNO -a -f /etc/dhcpd.conf ]; then
Now i have no clue what -a -f does (anyone care to point me to
the right
manual?)
[cut]
man test
-f file True
-Misc Misc
Subject: Re: [ and test (was dhcpd rc bug?)
On 14/03/2008, at 8:31 PM, Richard Toohey wrote:
On 14/03/2008, at 8:15 PM, Erwin van Maanen wrote:
if [ X${dhcpd_flags} != XNO -a -f /etc/dhcpd.conf ]; then Now i
have no clue what -a -f does (anyone care to point me to the
right
to the
right
manual?)
[cut]
man test
-f file True if file exists and is a regular file.
expression1 -a expression2
True if both expression1 and expression2 are true.
Apologies to all who know this already - but I wondered about that [ file
for ages until I
(anyone care to point me to the
right
manual?)
[cut]
man test
-f file True if file exists and is a regular file.
expression1 -a expression2
True if both expression1 and expression2 are true.
Apologies to all who know this already - but I wondered about that [ file
Hi,
The output of pfctl -t ... -T show goes to stdout by default.
But the output of pfctl -t ... -T test goes to stderr. Is there
a particular reason for this?
I am trying to write a perl script that in some moment tests
if an IP address is already whitelisted and I have not many
skills
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 09:15:39AM -0500, Jose Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
The output of pfctl -t ... -T show goes to stdout by default.
But the output of pfctl -t ... -T test goes to stderr. Is there
a particular reason for this?
I am trying to write a perl script that in some moment tests
On Jan 29, 2008 9:20 PM, ropers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/01/2008, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filter is a fast learner.
by marking the first test emails spam, i haven't seen the other posts.
I've always just clicked Delete instead
Marc Balmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That has the quality to go into fortune (where we already have
some limericks)
yes, fortune may be more appropriate. it does deserve some sort of
prominent display, though :)
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Marc Balmer sez:
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
That one needs to be included in the faq somewhere, urgently
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:40:06AM -0600, Denny White wrote:
Though warned not to test on the list,
The rascal just couldn't resist.
If you mean me - thanks, Danny; I love you too.
1. Any test messages, which I've sent, reached the list several hours (some
even more than 24) after submission
On Jan 29, 2008 11:38 AM, Zbigniew Baniewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. It's really a pity, that *all* (?) of you prefer to see my difficulties
as some kind of bad will or list abuse; and nowhere could I see a
message like: perhaps he needs some help?. I don't want to believe, this
is usual
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
Just out of curiosity: what really a difference can you see between my tests
- and this, for example, thread, whish is just about nothing (limericks)?
I can see at least one: I *had* to make some tests, I was in contact with
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
That's the second - and last - explaining from my side. I want to
add, that such (over)reaction of several persons is very
disappointing to me.
there once was a Pole without humor
uptight as if he had tumors
again he sent mail
in spite of
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:22:24PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
Please restart humord(1) before reading this list or you will continue
to be very disappointed. (;
Well, OK - let's get over it... ;)
--
pozdrawiam / regards
is a fast learner.
by marking the first test emails spam, i haven't seen the other posts.
Yep,
On Jan 29, 2008 2:06 AM, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
Someone had to say it.
--
Best Regards
Edd
http
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:22:24PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Zbigniew Baniewski wrote:
That's the second - and last - explaining from my side. I want to
add, that such (over)reaction of several persons is very
disappointing to me.
there once was a Pole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:38:59PM +0100, Zbigniew Baniewski sez:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:40:06AM -0600, Denny White wrote:
Though warned not to test on the list,
The rascal just couldn't resist.
If you mean me - thanks, Danny; I love you
On 30/01/2008, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
awesome. just discovered that gmail's spam filter is a fast learner.
by marking the first test emails spam, i haven't seen the other posts.
I've always just clicked Delete instead. I don't acutally know
Gmail's spam filter algorithm, but I've
Just testing; sorry for inconvenience.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
Just testing, sorry...
test
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
--
Darrin Chandler| Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://phxbug.org/ | http
Do *NOT* send test emails to the list. If you think that you're not
getting emails, or your posts aren't making it to the list, follow
this friendly advice.
1) Check the archives. If there's nothing there, that should tell you
the lists are a) under maintenance, b) having problems
Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There once was a message to test
Repeated unto being a pest
While marked to ignore
It was seen more and more
Until other begged, Give it a rest!
That one needs to be included in the faq somewhere, urgently.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen
Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if you
see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
If you see this panic or something similar:
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SLIC HPET APIC MCFG TCPA SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT
SSDT
wrong setbufint type
2ca8 Called: \\_SB_.C003.C098.C155
arg0
Is this for -current only, or you need testing on 4.2 too?
Marco Peereboom P=P0P?P8QP0:
Please test this on all acpi capable machines and send me a dmesg if you
see this in the dmesg: store from field!!
If you see this panic or something similar:
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SLIC HPET APIC MCFG
201 - 300 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
