Stu,
You don't need mod_perl to run PERL programs with Apache
It's not clear what the problem is, but it sounds like you can get PERL
programs to run if they are called .cgi but not .pl
If so, try adding this line to httpd.conf
AddHandler cgi-script .pl
regards
John
stu seven [EMAIL
Thank you very much...worked like a charm
Pierre Phaneuf wrote:
Medi Montaseri wrote:
Can I somehow influence this behavior such that the user
will indeed see something like MyFile.txt.returned or
MyFile.txt.processed in the dialog box.
Add a Content-Disposition header like this:
Robert - that's along the lines of what I'm after. My nuance is that I might
have several different configurations for the server - since there are
several
different containers that have different PerlSetVar directives.
In my example below a call to /test is going to have a different config
to a
Hi all,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Joe Brenner wrote:
Spend only $4 more, and you too can show your disgust for
software patents.
And while you're doing that, think how lucky you are to have the luxury.
73,
Ged.
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Joe Brenner wrote:
Spend only $4 more, and you too can show your disgust for
software patents.
Patents are bad. But don't forget that Amazon has also engaged in
union-busting, which is several orders of magnitude worse, IMO.
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
we
Hi Stu,
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, stu seven wrote:
1) Is installing mod_perl necessary to running perl scripts
No, but there are good reasons for using mod_perl to do it.
2) [snip]can I add the PerlSendHeader On to Apache without
running mod_perl ?
No, it will cause Apache to grumble about
Hi there,
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, J S wrote:
Apache compiles OK, but during make there are a lot of the following
messages:
..
..
ld: 0711-319 WARNING: Exported symbol not defined: Perl_yyrule
ld: 0711-319 WARNING: Exported symbol not defined: cast_i32
[snip]
..
..
and so on
My
Joe Brenner wrote:
Spend only $4 more, and you too can show your disgust for
software patents.
Worth every penny.
And Barnes and Noble deserves its fair share of disgust for filing counter
patent-infringement suits. And since BN now own Fatbrain, so BookPool is my
vendor of choice
Hi folks,
Another newbie question: Does it make sense to create a Location directive
with a Perl Handler for each and every web transaction? I suppose more
information about what the pages are doing would be helpful but I'm really
just looking for some rules of thumb.
I've created a site which
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:03:09AM -0600, Mike808 wrote:
Joe Brenner wrote:
Spend only $4 more, and you too can show your disgust for
software patents.
Worth every penny.
I'm against frivolous patents myself. It harms the industry and could
even be detrimental to mod_perl or Apache
On 2/1/02 10:39 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Rick Frankel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The following patch, while probably not correct (and probably the cause
of the silent failure), covers it.
[...]
I've incorporated your patch and uploaded it to the website.
Hopefully other OS X'ers will be able
Hi,
I thought that some of you might find this graph interesting:
http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200201/apachemods.html?mod=cGVybA==
For some reason, in December, it would seem that modperl just jumped ahead in
market share (from 13% to nearly 20%). So given that people here
Hello,
I have a problem, and I have a poor solution; I would like to see if I
can do even better. My problem is that I have a set of scripts and
modules that are duplicated on the same Apache server setup. One tree is
for debugging and developing, the other is the main release site. These
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, John Heitmann wrote:
Here is what I had to do to force correct module loading (mostly stolen
from the great mod_perl guide):
%INC = (); # Possibly unnecessary
do 'FindBin.pm';
unshift @INC, $FindBin::Bin; # There are also modules in the same dir
as the script
unshift
Hi there,
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, eCap wrote:
Does it make sense to create a Location directive
with a Perl Handler for each and every web transaction?
Well of course it all depends on what the transactions are, but as a
rule I'd say probably not. A mod_perl process can consume quite a lot
of
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Paul Lindner wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 10:03:09AM -0600, Mike808 wrote:
Joe Brenner wrote:
Spend only $4 more, and you too can show your disgust for
software patents.
Worth every penny.
I'm against frivolous patents myself. It harms the industry and
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Robin Berjon wrote:
Hi,
I thought that some of you might find this graph interesting:
http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/man.200201/apachemods.html?mod=cGVybA==
For some reason, in December, it would seem that modperl just jumped ahead in
market share (from
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wow, bizarre. Not sure why but the AxKit list has seen a massive spurt in
traffic lately too. Perhaps due to the migration to xml.apache.org (well,
just a link at the moment), but perhaps due to the above?
However I'm always skeptical of such massive
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However I'm always skeptical of such massive changes - perhaps more likely
is a change in SecuritySpace's methodology?
Don't Netcraft keep numbers?
--
Dave Hodgkinson, Wizard for Hire http://www.davehodgkinson.com
Editor-in-chief, The Highway
At 20:54 -0200 2/2/02, Jorge Godoy wrote:
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wow, bizarre. Not sure why but the AxKit list has seen a massive spurt in
traffic lately too. Perhaps due to the migration to xml.apache.org (well,
just a link at the moment), but perhaps due to the above?
Folks, please don't send attachments, esp. with no explanation, it looks
just like these deliberate virus attacks to me and I refuse to open any
attachments unless I am personally familiar with the sender and know they
know what they're doing. If it's plain text please embed it in the email,
else
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 10:21:32AM +1100, Rod Butcher wrote:
Folks, please don't send attachments, esp. with no explanation, it looks
just like these deliberate virus attacks to me and I refuse to open any
attachments unless I am personally familiar with the sender and know they
know what
I'm currently using a PerlHandler to handle all *.html files through the use
of Template Toolkit, all working, no probs.
I wanted to also use TT to handle the ErrorDocument directives, and I was
also hoping to be able to create the error pages containing stuff like
Your GET request from 1.2.3.4
Rod Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Folks, please don't send attachments, esp. with no explanation, it looks
just like these deliberate virus attacks to me and I refuse to open any
attachments unless I am personally familiar with the sender and know they
know what they're doing. If it's
Since Balmer and Gates consider open anything to be a threat to corporate
intellectual property it's not likely that they will do this. If you ask
nicely, though, they will steal it and call it ActivePGP - then sell it back
to you.
Rod Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sorry, but it was a
Guys, in light of recent messages, can you suggest a secure full-function
Win32 email reader (including optional HTML) with a brain that I can migrate
all my Outlook Express stuff to and so escape the Virus nightmare and deal
with PGP, GPG etc and hence use electronic communication the way it's
:: I'm sorry, but it was a GPG (a free PGP) signed message.
::
:: Outlook is really lost when it sees that and, since you've
:: bought it from Microsoft, I think you should send them a
:: request for them to implement OpenPGP standards in their
:: mail reader.
Er, that's not strictly true.
Rod Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guys, in light of recent messages, can you suggest a secure full-function
Win32 email reader (including optional HTML) with a brain that I can migrate
all my Outlook Express stuff to and so escape the Virus nightmare and deal
with PGP, GPG etc and hence
John Heitmann wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem, and I have a poor solution; I would like to see if I
can do even better. My problem is that I have a set of scripts and
modules that are duplicated on the same Apache server setup. One tree is
for debugging and developing, the other is the
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
Er, that's not strictly true. Outlook handles encrypted and/or signed
email as well as any other client. Outlook displays the signed email
with a unique icon to identify it as such. The attachment contains the
actual PGP info (in case you want
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
I think the best solution is to run your staging server on a different
port and use a front-end proxy to rewrite to the right server based on
the Host: name. Alternatively put 2 NICs with 2 IPs, that will work if
you don't hardcode the server name in
At 01:27 AM 2/3/2002 -0200, Jorge Godoy wrote:
Rod Butcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guys, in light of recent messages, can you suggest a secure full-function
Win32 email reader (including optional HTML) with a brain that I can
migrate
all my Outlook Express stuff to and so escape the
Jonathan M. Hollin wrote:
Er, that's not strictly true. Outlook handles encrypted and/or signed
email as well as any other client. Outlook displays the signed email
with a unique icon to identify it as such. The attachment contains the
actual PGP info (in case you want to see it). I think
33 matches
Mail list logo
