On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 01:27:17PM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote:
you need to specify EVERYTHING=1 or PERL_DIRECTIVE_HANDLERS=1 to enable
Apache::ModuleConfig, ie
perl Makefile.PL EVERYTHING=1
make
etc...
Which raises an interesting
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 12:00:45PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2000, Michael hall wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 01:36:33AM -0400, Jeff Stuart wrote:
Ok, follow up question if I may. :) Are any of you using it with DBI and
DBD::mysql? I see on the Mason list
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 01:36:33AM -0400, Jeff Stuart wrote:
Ok, follow up question if I may. :) Are any of you using it with DBI and
DBD::mysql? I see on the Mason list that people are using it with
HTML::Mason so that module is safe. :) Looks like I'm gonna have to pull
out that old
On Sun, May 07, 2000 at 08:20:34PM -0400, Jeff Stuart wrote:
[...rest of message deleted...]
Every language has it use, the truly knowledgeable understand when to
use each language:)
Sam
Amen to that!!! I think that this point and the point about writing GOOD
algorithms are VERY
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 07:08:00PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
The biggest hurdle I've faced until now is
that DBI won't build with this threaded perl. Hopefully DBI will be updated
since the latest version is from july 99.
it compiles with the patch below, not sure if it actually
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 01:32:29AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
Just tried it here and aside from some warnings it compiled and passed all
its tests. Can't say whether it works or not though as Msql-Mysql doesn't
compile, you got a patch hiding for that somewhere too :-)
sure :)
I'm more of a perl end user and plead ignorance in actually understanding
what goes on behind the scenes. In the process of considering upgrading to
perl 5.6 and according to a recent message I see its going to be required
for mod_perl 2.x anyways so I guess its a good time to start migrating in
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 11:59:58AM +0200, Eric Cholet wrote:
though. Can anybody in the know, shed some light on this, just trying to
save some work down the road as I'd like to upgrade to the perl 5.6 stuff
now and use it with my existing mod_perl (I already use the CVS version
and I
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 12:28:41AM +0300, Stas Bekman wrote:
I like the mod_proxy module in reverse httpd accel mode, but
am interested in having some nicer failure capabilities. I have
hacked in this kind of stuff before but was wondering if anyone
had any official patch for
On Tue, Apr 11, 2000 at 11:52:44PM -0700, John S. Evans wrote:
I saw (in the code) that there's one open file per uploaded file. That
should be fine. I just need to find out if they're getting closed
correctly.
What is "lsof"?
'LiSt Open Files', its really a handy tool for diagnosing.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 05:18:00PM -0800, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
From my quick look at Registry.pm it looks like there's no way to disable
the feature where a script will be re-compiled if it changes on disk.
Is this correct?
This is a problem if I update both the main script, and
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 04:25:39PM +0200, Terje Malmedal wrote:
Inside a Perl section I want to configure mod_rewrite dynamically,
this works:
$RewriteRule = "/cgi-bin/printenv /cgi-bin/slave.pl [PT]";
If I do this:
$RewriteRule = "/cgi-bin/printenv /cgi-bin/slave.pl [PT]";
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Cliff Rayman wrote:
I've never used perl sections, but unless $RewriteRule is some magic variable,
the second assignment simply overwrites the first one.
Sorry for my previous post, I see the problem now after re-reading things.
At first glance I
13 matches
Mail list logo
