Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-20 Thread Stas Bekman
> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Stas Bekman wrote: > > [...] > > So, perl.apache.org is just a VH at apache.org. You have almost no ability > > to add components to the system, and of course no root access. Installing > > mod_perl, mysql, modules is absolutely possible technically, but in > > reality it i

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-20 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Stas Bekman wrote: [...] > So, perl.apache.org is just a VH at apache.org. You have almost no ability > to add components to the system, and of course no root access. Installing > mod_perl, mysql, modules is absolutely possible technically, but in > reality it isn't, because

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-19 Thread James G Smith
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Anyway, let's stop talking about "you" and "we", we are all "we" :) No >competition, only collaboration. James is working on this application, >which is in pretty good stage (James?), why in the world would you want to >write something else from scratch? Jam

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-19 Thread Stas Bekman
> Aha, now I see much more clearly. I had thought about that, but had pushed > it to the back of my brain as a problem that could be solved when time came > to go live. I have a server myself, and though I probably couldn't get > approval to open it to others I can do pretty much what I want as lo

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-19 Thread Robin Berjon
At 10:41 19/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: >That makes sense. But you should understand my motives for moving to >modperl.sourcegarden.org. Otherwise there was no reason not do everything >at perl.apache.org. > >So, perl.apache.org is just a VH at apache.org. You have almost no ability >to add

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-19 Thread Stas Bekman
> At 09:12 19/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: > >> We were planning to put a good deal of the stuff into a db too I think. I > >> guess it doesn't matter too much if we have duplicated content as long as > >> it is in sync. We will have to take into account what you are doing so that > >> we can

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-19 Thread Robin Berjon
At 09:12 19/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: >> We were planning to put a good deal of the stuff into a db too I think. I >> guess it doesn't matter too much if we have duplicated content as long as >> it is in sync. We will have to take into account what you are doing so that >> we can cross-lin

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-18 Thread Stas Bekman
> >I'm very excited about you picking the flag and actually doing the > >redesign. Since modperl.sourcegarden.org is a sister site of > >perl.apache.org, the two will be tighlty reconnected. We are going to > >absorb some of the pages from the current mod_perl site. I'm talking about > >3rd party

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-18 Thread Robin Berjon
At 22:00 16/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: >After reworking the initial design based on the comments I've received, >the next version was release at SourceGarden see >http://modperl.sourcegarden.org/ - it's being created by Site::Builder - >you can retrieve it from the garden's Safari pet: > >h

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-16 Thread Stas Bekman
> >BTW, if you remember that I've tried to create a new site about half a > >year ago (the first snapshot is still there at stason.org/stas/modperl) > >I've never made the second version :( It all went into > >modperl.sourcegarden.org's design... > > Yes I remember, I would have helped back then

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-15 Thread Robin Berjon
At 01:06 15/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote: >The list already exist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] or this one >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (it's an alias right? was it also >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?) Oh, that's good to know :-) Is it any/all of the above ? And if so, is it running Majordomo or ezmlm (so that I can figu

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-15 Thread Frank D. Cringle
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My personal comment on both of your previews, is that they are very cool! > But while being flattered with having a Guide as part of the main menu, > this is unfair to other folks who wrote an invaluable documentation > (Vivek, Frank and other). For my p

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-14 Thread Stas Bekman
> At 19:02 12/10/1999 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: > >> > - mod_perl news. > >> > - mod_perl FAQs, developer's guides and documentation. > >> > - mod_perl evangelism, quantitative and anecdotal comparison with similar > >> > tools. > > > >We need a little crowd of people to keep especially t

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-14 Thread Robin Berjon
At 19:02 12/10/1999 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote: >> > - mod_perl news. >> > - mod_perl FAQs, developer's guides and documentation. >> > - mod_perl evangelism, quantitative and anecdotal comparison with similar >> > tools. > >We need a little crowd of people to keep especially the news and ace

RE: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-14 Thread Eric Cholet
> >Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sez: > >> As a side note, reading about that desert idea this morning triggered a > >> neuron somehow, so I quickly modified an old template of mine that hadn't > >> been used and uploaded it at http://www.knowscape.org/modperl/ ... > Adding my vote to this to

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-13 Thread Neil Kandalgaonkar
At 19:09 -0500 1999-10-12, Matt Arnold wrote: > While >art/layout issues are certainly subjective, I actually saw it as the area of >least controversy, and that's why I tried to slip it through. :-) Ha! Not likely. We've all sat through meetings where people agonized over colors and passed over

Re: [SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-12 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Matt Arnold wrote: [...] > some extent, I believe people are put off by what they find. The > information isn't necessarily poor, it just isn't what they expect. Indeed. > > - mod_perl news. > > - mod_perl FAQs, developer's guides and documentation. > > - mod_perl evangel

[SITE] the great redesign of 1999

1999-10-12 Thread Matt Arnold
I'm sorry for posting my "how 'bout this art" message without giving any explanation of my intentions. I want to see a wholly redesigned mod_perl site. But there's a lot of effort which needs to be spent before we achieve perfection. And not everyone will agree on how to achieve this end. Whil