> On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> [...]
> > So, perl.apache.org is just a VH at apache.org. You have almost no ability
> > to add components to the system, and of course no root access. Installing
> > mod_perl, mysql, modules is absolutely possible technically, but in
> > reality it i
On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
> So, perl.apache.org is just a VH at apache.org. You have almost no ability
> to add components to the system, and of course no root access. Installing
> mod_perl, mysql, modules is absolutely possible technically, but in
> reality it isn't, because
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anyway, let's stop talking about "you" and "we", we are all "we" :) No
>competition, only collaboration. James is working on this application,
>which is in pretty good stage (James?), why in the world would you want to
>write something else from scratch? Jam
> Aha, now I see much more clearly. I had thought about that, but had pushed
> it to the back of my brain as a problem that could be solved when time came
> to go live. I have a server myself, and though I probably couldn't get
> approval to open it to others I can do pretty much what I want as lo
At 10:41 19/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
>That makes sense. But you should understand my motives for moving to
>modperl.sourcegarden.org. Otherwise there was no reason not do everything
>at perl.apache.org.
>
>So, perl.apache.org is just a VH at apache.org. You have almost no ability
>to add
> At 09:12 19/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >> We were planning to put a good deal of the stuff into a db too I think. I
> >> guess it doesn't matter too much if we have duplicated content as long as
> >> it is in sync. We will have to take into account what you are doing so that
> >> we can
At 09:12 19/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
>> We were planning to put a good deal of the stuff into a db too I think. I
>> guess it doesn't matter too much if we have duplicated content as long as
>> it is in sync. We will have to take into account what you are doing so that
>> we can cross-lin
> >I'm very excited about you picking the flag and actually doing the
> >redesign. Since modperl.sourcegarden.org is a sister site of
> >perl.apache.org, the two will be tighlty reconnected. We are going to
> >absorb some of the pages from the current mod_perl site. I'm talking about
> >3rd party
At 22:00 16/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
>After reworking the initial design based on the comments I've received,
>the next version was release at SourceGarden see
>http://modperl.sourcegarden.org/ - it's being created by Site::Builder -
>you can retrieve it from the garden's Safari pet:
>
>h
> >BTW, if you remember that I've tried to create a new site about half a
> >year ago (the first snapshot is still there at stason.org/stas/modperl)
> >I've never made the second version :( It all went into
> >modperl.sourcegarden.org's design...
>
> Yes I remember, I would have helped back then
At 01:06 15/10/1999 +0200, Stas Bekman wrote:
>The list already exist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] or this one
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (it's an alias right? was it also
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ?)
Oh, that's good to know :-) Is it any/all of the above ? And if so, is it
running Majordomo or ezmlm (so that I can figu
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My personal comment on both of your previews, is that they are very cool!
> But while being flattered with having a Guide as part of the main menu,
> this is unfair to other folks who wrote an invaluable documentation
> (Vivek, Frank and other).
For my p
> At 19:02 12/10/1999 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> >> > - mod_perl news.
> >> > - mod_perl FAQs, developer's guides and documentation.
> >> > - mod_perl evangelism, quantitative and anecdotal comparison with similar
> >> > tools.
> >
> >We need a little crowd of people to keep especially t
At 19:02 12/10/1999 -0700, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
>> > - mod_perl news.
>> > - mod_perl FAQs, developer's guides and documentation.
>> > - mod_perl evangelism, quantitative and anecdotal comparison with similar
>> > tools.
>
>We need a little crowd of people to keep especially the news and ace
> >Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sez:
> >> As a side note, reading about that desert idea this morning triggered a
> >> neuron somehow, so I quickly modified an old template of mine that hadn't
> >> been used and uploaded it at http://www.knowscape.org/modperl/ ...
>
Adding my vote to this to
At 19:09 -0500 1999-10-12, Matt Arnold wrote:
> While
>art/layout issues are certainly subjective, I actually saw it as the area of
>least controversy, and that's why I tried to slip it through. :-)
Ha! Not likely. We've all sat through meetings where people agonized over
colors and passed over
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Matt Arnold wrote:
[...]
> some extent, I believe people are put off by what they find. The
> information isn't necessarily poor, it just isn't what they expect.
Indeed.
> > - mod_perl news.
> > - mod_perl FAQs, developer's guides and documentation.
> > - mod_perl evangel
I'm sorry for posting my "how 'bout this art" message without giving any
explanation of my intentions. I want to see a wholly redesigned mod_perl
site. But there's a lot of effort which needs to be spent before we achieve
perfection. And not everyone will agree on how to achieve this end. Whil
18 matches
Mail list logo