Re: mod_perl 2 and file upload how-to

2003-06-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Alejandro Galue wrote: Hello, I need help in file uploading with mod_perl 2. Apache::Request is not compatible with mod_perl 2, and I want to know how can I upload file widthout using CGI.pm Please send me an example if possible. Simply copy the relevant code from CGI.pm. Alternatively if you

Re: Mod_Perl 2?

2003-05-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Ryan Farrington wrote: Ok here is the error I get when using the all-in-one install for mod_perl 2.0 Can't locate object method server_root_relative via package Apache at e:/Per l/site/lib/Apache/compat.pm line 69. Compilation failed in require at startup.pl line 13. BEGIN

RE: Mod_Perl 2?

2003-05-30 Thread Ryan Farrington
(); use XML::LibXSLT(); 1; :: END CODE :: that is it... still compiles with an error =( -Original Message- From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:10 PM To: Ryan Farrington Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mod_Perl 2? Ryan Farrington wrote: Ok here

Re: Mod_Perl 2?

2003-05-30 Thread Stas Bekman
Ryan Farrington wrote: Here is what the Command_Line_Lookups tells me: to use method 'server_root_relative' add: use Apache::ServerUtil (); [...] that is it... still compiles with an error =( right, the API change. Here is the correct URL:

Re: Mod_Perl 2?

2003-05-30 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Ryan Farrington wrote: Ok here is the error I get when using the all-in-one install for mod_perl 2.0 Can't locate object method server_root_relative via package Apache at e:/Perl/site/lib/Apache/compat.pm line 69. Compilation failed in require at startup.pl line 13.

RE: mod_perl 2 apache::session and or die

2003-02-21 Thread Chris Faust
To: Chris Faust Cc: Modperl Subject: Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and or die Chris Faust wrote: All works well except when there is any kind of problem in the script where the condition will die.. [...] When this happens everything to do with that script is unresponsive - I know

Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and or die

2003-02-19 Thread Perrin Harkins
Chris Faust wrote: All works well except when there is any kind of problem in the script where the condition will die.. [...] When this happens everything to do with that script is unresponsive - I know that is a little vague but that is the best way I can describe it. What happens is the error

Re: mod_perl 2 apache::session and or die

2003-02-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Perrin Harkins wrote: Chris Faust wrote: All works well except when there is any kind of problem in the script where the condition will die.. [...] When this happens everything to do with that script is unresponsive - I know that is a little vague but that is the best way I can describe

Re: mod_perl 2 APache 2.0 MPM

2003-01-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Sinclair, Alan (CORP, GEAccess) wrote: All, Starting to strike the first blows with Apache 2.0. I am now wondering about thread safety with mod_perl 2. Will mod_perl support a threaded MPM Apache config ? Why using the future tense, it does support the threaded mpm pretty much from the very

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-27 Thread Terra Info
Sounds good. Thanks for the help. I will patch my copy. Will all MP1 functionality be migrating over to MP2? In particular the PerlHandler Apache::Status functionality. Thanks, Tom Stas Bekman wrote: Terra Info wrote: PS: I forgot to let you know if it works on MP1. I do not have that

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-27 Thread Stas Bekman
Terra Info wrote: Sounds good. Thanks for the help. I will patch my copy. Or just grab the latest cvs. Will all MP1 functionality be migrating over to MP2? Pretty much yes. In particular the PerlHandler Apache::Status functionality. Doug mentioned that most of its functionality works

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-23 Thread Terra Info
Thanks for the help. Below is all the info you requested. I have also attached the test script (code below for those attachement challenged, et al;) and an example can be seen at http://dev.terranovum.com/some-bad-link/. To see what it should be doing call it directly at

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-23 Thread Terra Info
PS: I forgot to let you know if it works on MP1. I do not have that installed on any machines so if someone out there on the list could check that out and post back I would appreciate it. Everything you need is below. Tom Terra Info wrote: Thanks for the help. Below is all the info you

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-23 Thread Stas Bekman
Terra Info wrote: PS: I forgot to let you know if it works on MP1. I do not have that installed on any machines so if someone out there on the list could check that out and post back I would appreciate it. Everything you need is below. Here is the fix, I've messed up this part while porting.

Re: mod_perl 2 and problems w/ ErrorDocument Directive

2002-12-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Terra Info wrote: I have a script that provides custom error messages that I set up using the ErrorDocument directive (ie; ErrorDocument 400 /cgi-global/error.pl?error=400useXML=1). When run under typical mod_cgi all works as planned and it outputs the proper stuff. When run under mod_perl it

RE: mod_perl-2 configuration problem

2002-12-19 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi - Some thoughts from a relative newbie who just recently got ap2/mp2 up and running... 1) How does is fail? Seg fault? 2) Did you add modules to Apache2 during the ap2 ./configure setp? If so, you may want to re-install it 'naked': ./configure --with-mpm=worker (-or- prefork) After you

Re: mod_perl-2 configuration problem

2002-12-19 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Carl Holm wrote: Hello, After adding 'LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so' and / or 'PerlRequire C:/Apache2/conf/extra.pl' to httpd.conf , my Apache (2.0.43) HTTP server fails. I am using mod_perl 1.99_08-dev. Any thought s would be greatly

Re: default Content-Length calculation has been removed in 2.0 (was Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks)

2002-11-29 Thread Issac Goldstand
Issac Goldstand wrote: I think I got it... I was under the understanding that each fireman could only hande 1 bucket at a time, but there could be up to as many buckets as firemen on the stack at any given time... Do you know why it's like that? a limitation of the current mpms, there

Re: default Content-Length calculation has been removed in 2.0 (was Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks)

2002-11-28 Thread Issac Goldstand
- Original Message - From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ask Bjoern Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 11:07 AM Subject: default Content-Length calculation has been removed in 2.0 (was Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks) Actually

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-20 Thread Frank Wiles
.--[ Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote (2002/09/19 at 01:47:39) ]-- | | On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Josh Chamas wrote: | | [...] | So I run it again with ServerTokens Min, and get the same results. :) | Still something different on the mod_perl headers, looks like mod_perl | 2.x is

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-19 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Josh Chamas wrote: [...] So I run it again with ServerTokens Min, and get the same results. :) Still something different on the mod_perl headers, looks like mod_perl 2.x is setting Content-Length where it didn't use to. The details evade me, but I recall something about

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-19 Thread siberian
On the Apache 2.0 note, 2.0 breaks terribly when it has to proxy chunked data. It strips the chunk length and does not replace it with a Content-Length. Bug is filed but no one in the Apache group seems to want to play with it :( Just a warning for those of you who may potentially be doing

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-18 Thread Perrin Harkins
Josh Chamas wrote: I just did a benchmarks to compare mod_perl + apache versions 1 2. Cool. Any idea why bytes/hit is lower on apache 2? Are some headers being omitted? - Perrin

Re: mod_perl 2.x vs. mod_perl 1.x benchmarks

2002-09-18 Thread Josh Chamas
Perrin Harkins wrote: Josh Chamas wrote: I just did a benchmarks to compare mod_perl + apache versions 1 2. Cool. Any idea why bytes/hit is lower on apache 2? Are some headers being omitted? Looks like its the Server tokens, see below. 32 bytes! Maybe on a benchmark this small,

Re: mod_perl 2 apache 2?

2001-10-16 Thread Stas Bekman
Michael Wojcikiewicz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone tried getting mod_perl to work in Apache v2 (the latest beta?)... Just a quick try resulted in mod_perl2 trying to compile against apache 1.3.20... Wasnt mod_perl v2 supposed to be for Apache v2?...

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-26 Thread Michael hall
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 07:08:00PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: The biggest hurdle I've faced until now is that DBI won't build with this threaded perl. Hopefully DBI will be updated since the latest version is from july 99. it compiles with the patch below, not sure if it actually

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-26 Thread Michael hall
On Wed, Apr 26, 2000 at 01:32:29AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote: Just tried it here and aside from some warnings it compiled and passed all its tests. Can't say whether it works or not though as Msql-Mysql doesn't compile, you got a patch hiding for that somewhere too :-) sure :)

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-25 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Leslie Mikesell wrote: So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? no, -Dusethreads with 5.6.0 makes the Perl runtime (aka PerlInterpreter), re-entrant. all of Perl's internal globals (symbol table, stacks, etc.)

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-25 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: I agree... but to some degree I hope this has been done for many of the major modules and the major DBI modules (eg DBD sybase)... as they ended up having to work on ActiveState's PerlEx which uses a similar model. In a way, PerlEx's model

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-25 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Eric Cholet wrote: mod_perl-2.0 requires perl 5.6 to be build with -Dusethreads, which turns on threading and multiplicity. just to be clear, as you mention below, -Dusetheads isn't required for mod_perl-2.0, but strongly suggested if you use an mpm other than prefork :)

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-23 Thread Gerald Richter
So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache thread. So the Perl modules itself need not to be thread safe. Perl 5.6 has some nice features to clone a Perl interpreter

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-23 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 02:51 PM 4/23/00 +0200, Gerald Richter wrote: So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache thread. So the Perl modules itself need not to be thread safe. Perl

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-23 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache thread. So the Perl modules itself need not to be thread safe. Perl 5.6

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-23 Thread Gunther Birznieks
At 09:59 AM 4/23/00 -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: So, does that still leave mod_perl serializing access until everything is rewritten to be thread-safe? No, mod_perl 2.0 assign a "full" Perl interpreter to every Apache thread. So

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Leslie Mikesell
According to Eric Cholet: This is for using Apache 2.0's pthread MPM, of course you can build perl 5.6 non threaded and use apache 2.0's prefork model but then it's not as exciting :-) Does apache 2.0 let you run a prefork model under NT? Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Eric Cholet
This is for using Apache 2.0's pthread MPM, of course you can build perl 5.6 non threaded and use apache 2.0's prefork model but then it's not as exciting :-) Does apache 2.0 let you run a prefork model under NT? NT has it's own MPM which is threaded prefork ... Multi Process

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Michael hall
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 11:59:58AM +0200, Eric Cholet wrote: though. Can anybody in the know, shed some light on this, just trying to save some work down the road as I'd like to upgrade to the perl 5.6 stuff now and use it with my existing mod_perl (I already use the CVS version and I

Re: mod_perl 2.x/perl 5.6.x ?

2000-04-22 Thread Leslie Mikesell
According to Eric Cholet: Does apache 2.0 let you run a prefork model under NT? NT has it's own MPM which is threaded prefork ... Multi Process Model with Preforking (Apache 1.3) dexter Multi Process Model with Threading via Pthreads Constant