Justin H. wrote:
> Actually, there was absolutely *nothing* on the MS site that said that
> the download was a new build. The information he posted was timely and
> correctfor once. ;-)
But it was posted to a newsgroup where it was completely inappropriate.
There's nothing stopping pe
Peter Lairo wrote:
> You seem to cleverly mask your disruptive activities as seemingly real
> discussion or information (I was fooled by one of your posts). But after
> reading more of your posts, I have realized that your intention is not
> to help make a better browser, but to disrupt and di
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard jesus X say these
> wise words:
>
>
>>And the rendering engine is getting very long in the tooth. NS kept
>>beating on the dead horse that was their old rendering engine for years
>>too long, and IE is following suit
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Greg Miller say these
> wise words:
>
>
>>Memory efficiency is likewise good enough that it doesn't affect me. I
>>don't care whether I have 20MB of wasted RAM or 50MB wasted.
>>
>
> Somehow, I doubt if a person wi
JTK wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlfish says...
>>While he's ranting, Java becomes a raging success.
>>
>
> BAHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
>
> That happened when again? Was that around the time the JavaWordperfect project
> was mercifully killed?
Java has some severe limitation
Jay Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I got some real, live stories about clients and the "My Computer" and
>the "any key" thing but nobody would believe 'em. Hey look, I've had to
>make an emergency service call to plug the power cord back in the wall
>socket so the computer will "turn on" .
hello, all. i am developing an application that hopefully will be able
to place cookies in mozilla (and other browsers). it will be a client
side (local) application, and have 2 questions:
1: is it possible to place cookies in mozilla from outside the
program? i don't see why not, but want to mak
hello, all.
i have various locally-stored files of saved email, and want to
re-send them to my current IMAP account, to manage them all from that
one place. basically, 'un-archive' my emails.
i want to keep subject, original sender, and especially date intact,
but am fine with the re-sending pro
Greg Miller wrote:
> JTK wrote:
>
>> It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
>> world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
>> controls inside the lines.
>>
>
> With another hundred or so of these, maybe they'll catch up to Mozilla?
> Forward pr
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 04:49:48 GMT, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>Jay Garcia wrote:
>
>> Then why not go one step further by allowing the "Pro" to name it
>> something more in line with their particular taste as well as giving
>> the option to the "Kids" to name it somet
Here's the chronology of events, and the situation I encountered. It may
be that it's totally unrelated to the Mozilla install, but Agent
launched perfectly before installing Mozilla clean:
I installed Mozilla 2001062218 last night, after trashing my existing
installation by attempting to inst
Jay Garcia wrote:
> Then why not go one step further by allowing the "Pro" to name it
> something more in line with their particular taste as well as giving
> the option to the "Kids" to name it something stupid and silly at
> their descretion ?? I'll never know what YOU named yours and
> vic
Carlfish wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:41:19 GMT, Mike Koenecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> somehow managed to type:
>
>>Agreed. I'm afraid that all that Microsoft "My Pictures," "My Files,"
>>"My Documents," ad nauseum makes me want to puke. I keep my data in a
>>directory called "Data".
>>
>
Mike Koenecke wrote:
> Agreed. I'm afraid that all that Microsoft "My Pictures," "My Files,"
> "My Documents," ad nauseum makes me want to puke. I keep my data in a
> directory called "Data".
>
> On or about Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:03 GMT, Mark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> allegedly wrote:
>
>
>>Alber
Mark wrote:
> Albert wrote:
>
>> What exactly is the problem with calling it My Sidebar? Sounds just
>> fine here, if not a tad commercialized. Besides, the endusers get
>> that warm n fuzzy feeling :)
>
>
> First, thanks for the update Gervase. It doesn't make much difference to
> me eit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Lairo) wrote:
>I *disagree* that having sigs *always* at the bottom is better.
>
>Most business communications *require* that the original text be quoted,
>no matter how long it is (I've had communications where a mail went back
>and forth about 20 times and the quoted
Mike Koenecke wrote:
> Agreed. I'm afraid that all that Microsoft "My Pictures," "My Files,"
> "My Documents," ad nauseum makes me want to puke. I keep my data in a
> directory called "Data".
>
> On or about Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:03 GMT, Mark
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> allegedly wrote:
>
>
>>Alber
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:41:19 GMT, Mike Koenecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>Agreed. I'm afraid that all that Microsoft "My Pictures," "My Files,"
>"My Documents," ad nauseum makes me want to puke. I keep my data in a
>directory called "Data".
Wow, that's organised. I curre
Agreed. I'm afraid that all that Microsoft "My Pictures," "My Files,"
"My Documents," ad nauseum makes me want to puke. I keep my data in a
directory called "Data".
On or about Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:03 GMT, Mark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> allegedly wrote:
>Albert wrote:
>
>> What exactly is the proble
Albert wrote:
>
> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I don't want to put anything in [the sidebar]. Well, "History", but
> > > >I'm sure that's RSN, right?
> > >
> > > As was mentioned multiple
Is there a way to get Mozilla 0.9.1 to auto disconnect when I close the
browser??
Thanks in advance.
Albert wrote:
> What exactly is the problem with calling it My Sidebar? Sounds just
> fine here, if not a tad commercialized. Besides, the endusers get
> that warm n fuzzy feeling :)
First, thanks for the update Gervase. It doesn't make much difference to
me either way, but I am getting a l
Gervase Markham wrote:
>>I remember reading a thread in which the name of "My Sidebar" was
>>discussed. I thought the intention was to go with simply "Sidebar".
>> How did that ever turn out. I see at the moment, it's still mine. :)
>>
>
> Should hopefully happen by 0.9.3. I'm going to make it
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Greg Miller say these
> wise words:
>
>
>>Memory efficiency is likewise good enough that it doesn't affect me. I
>>don't care whether I have 20MB of wasted RAM or 50MB wasted.
>>
>
> Somehow, I doubt if a person wi
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
>
>
> > Ian Hickson wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, JTK wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't want to put anything in [the sidebar]. Well, "History", but
> > >I'm sure that's RSN, right?
> >
> > As was mentioned multiple times by multiple people when you LAST
Hmm...disregard the following, I guess. I did a little detective work
and found it was an updatedb/find job that went *Wildly* out of control
(to the tune of 147mb worth of swap out of control). I'm going to go ask
about this on the slackware forum.
At the time of this writing, I'm 4mb into my s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (HeadTechnican @ Mathco.com) writes:
> I have a question. I run slackware 7.1 and i have
> the following problem.
>
> Has anyone gotten RealPlayer 8
> to work with the latest Mozilla release?
yes :)
> I have Mozilla installed under /usr/local/Mozilla
> and RealPlayer 8 instal
Ashant wrote:
> Jay Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>* wrote:
>>
>
>
And it is truly well-deserved, though admittedly I have been gentle on
it (haven't gone to any java-oriented sites 'cos I dont understand how
to setup java for mozilla...will make another post about that.)
>
>>Ma
> I remember reading a thread in which the name of "My Sidebar" was
> discussed. I thought the intention was to go with simply "Sidebar".
> How did that ever turn out. I see at the moment, it's still mine. :)
Should hopefully happen by 0.9.3. I'm going to make it happen now Netscape
have branc
> Any idea what is causing this problem?.
Use of the non-standard "document.all" DOM thingie. Check the Javascript
Console to see. You need to get the owner to fix their page. File a bug in
Bugzilla under the Evangelism component.
Gerv
Peter Lairo wrote:
>
> > No sir, just wanted to help Mr. Lag et al, who were having some
> > trouble finding the competition. That's just the kind of
> > "reprehensible" "slimeball" I am.
> >
> ANYONE here is quite cabable of finding M$ IE quite easily without your
> "help". M$ has made sure
DeMoN_LaG wrote:
>
> JTK wrote:
>
> >
> > No sir, just wanted to help Mr. Lag et al, who were having some trouble finding
> > the competition. That's just the kind of "reprehensible" "slimeball" I am.
> >
>
> Speaking of which... What is different about the new version?
>
> Still crashes as
I remember reading a thread in which the name of "My Sidebar" was
discussed. I thought the intention was to go with simply "Sidebar".
How did that ever turn out. I see at the moment, it's still mine. :)
--
-=< Mark >=-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
> Mind due, "if it aint broke, don't fix it!" is a pretty good maxim.
> After all, why re-invent the wheel every year or so?
I'm not talking about reinventing the wheel, but to extend your metaphor, ever
see a train with wooden wheels?
--
jesus X [ Booze-fueled paragon o
Greg Miller wrote:
> I see nothing particularly pathetic or juvenile about parody. It wasn't
> an especially good parody, but it clearly wasn't intended as a serious
> attempt to impersonate JTK.
To me it came across as a sincere attempt, but so poorly done as to be pathetic.
As parody, it doesn'
JTK wrote:
> No, like I said, Java died, so I largely stopped beating that dead horse's
> owner, and found a dying horse who's owner I could perhaps beat some sense
> into before it was too late.
But all the times I've asked, you've yet to reply. What is your TRUE purpose for
being here? You've s
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
>
> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard jesus X say these
> wise words:
>
> > And the rendering engine is getting very long in the tooth. NS kept
> > beating on the dead horse that was their old rendering engine for years
> > too long, and IE is following
Holger Metzger wrote:
>Your profile folder shouldn'T be affected... just uninstall Mozilla and
>then reinstall.
>
Thanks Holger, that did the trick. The "AIM" specific components were
all that remained, and I deleted those as well before doing the
re-install. Live and learn, eh? :)
--
-=< M
Mama Cass Elliot wrote:
> In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Greg Miller say these
> wise words:
>
>
>>Memory efficiency is likewise good enough that it doesn't affect me. I
>>don't care whether I have 20MB of wasted RAM or 50MB wasted.
>>
>
> Somehow, I doubt if a person wi
JTK wrote:
>
> >You're either being paid by Microsoft
>
> Yeah that's the first time I've been accused of that by a religious zealot.
Uh, in the defense of the rest of we "religious zealot"s (your words,
not mine), Peter Lairo does not speak for us. :)
Anyone know if there is anyway to make multiple colums in the
bookmarks??? or if it will be added to the program? I hate this one
colum thingy (in windows as well, but that has a fix)
It also does not work in SuSE 7.1. There is another url that
does not work with Mozilla:
http://www.murciainnova.com
to the left of the screen there should be 7 links under the names:
presentacion, el proyecto, actividades, publicaciones, enlaces,
unidad de gestion, foro virtual, tu opinion
Non
Peter Lairo wrote:
> Gervase Markham wrote:
>
>>> my oppinion of you just took a 180 - you are obviously a slimeball.
>>>
>>
>> That was one of JTK's more polite, coherent posts. Please do not do
>> anything to disturb this tendency.
>>
>> I was hoping that more mature members of this conference
Andre Manuel Rocha Lourenco wrote:
> hi!
>
> i use mozilla 0.9.1 with linux (kernel2.4 xfree4.0.3 kde)
> and i have some gif display problems:
>
> at this page: http://andyrock.no.sapo.pt
>
> there should exist 5 lateral gifs saying:
>
> FEUP
>
> RENEGADOS
>
> TRIG-XOTA
>
> LINUX
>
> VISI
Does anyone know if there is a Gtk frontend to Mozilla Mail in the same way
that Galeon is such a frontend for the browser ?
I did find something about a Grendel project being announced but have seen
nothing since :(
Douglas
--
- Douglas McIntosh, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To see a World in a Grain of
*Please Note*: JTK is known to post misrepresentations of truth and of
deliberatly disrupting this newsgroup. Please either ignore his posts or
make sure you confirm the so-called "facts" he is posting.
JTK wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Lairo says...
>
>> my oppinion of you
ANYONE here is quite cabable of finding M$ IE quite easily without your
"help". M$ has made sure that its product is easily locatable and
downloadable.
Please Note: JTK is known to post misrepresentations of truth and of
deliberatly disrupting this newsgroup. Please either ignore his posts or
Gervase Markham wrote:
>>my oppinion of you just took a 180 - you are obviously a slimeball.
>>
>
> That was one of JTK's more polite, coherent posts. Please do not do
> anything to disturb this tendency.
>
> I was hoping that more mature members of this conference wouldn't descend
> to petty n
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 07:02:11 -0400, Bill Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>URL please?
Disclaimer:
The markup does suck from a semantic point of view - the page was halfway
through the transition between machine-generated markup and
human-generated when it became clear the
Carlfish wrote:
> On 23 Jun 2001 03:11:55 GMT, Carlfish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> somehow managed to type:
>
>>On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:23:08 -0400, DeMoN_LaG
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> somehow managed to type:
>>
>>>You must not use Mozilla. It visibly renders the same speed as IE on my
>>>sys
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 07:55:52 GMT, Peter Moscatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>G'Day Charles yea, I have been wondering about that, but am not game to
>as I did install 0.9 a few months back and had trouble with the PC
>shutdown, where there was a problem with the un-mou
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:00:01 GMT, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
somehow managed to type:
>And it was pretty funny actually, watching Java and the Javapologists
>self-destruct (yeah, I got a slightly sick sense of humor).
You've obviously been asleep for the last three years.
>Um, yeah, that pre
Thanks Greg yes, you do have a point. I will do some experimenting -
that's if I don't upgrade.
Pete
Greg Miller wrote:
> Peter Moscatt wrote:
>
>> I am using Mozilla 0.8 for both my browser and e-mail client. Originally
>> the speed was fine but I have noticed in tha past few days tha
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlfish says...
>
>On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 05:51:27 GMT, JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> somehow managed to type:
>
>>Ah yes, looks like what's left of Sun Microsystems, Peter van der Linden, and
>>the Gang Of Fourteen are getting so lonely for me over in the Java group
On 6/24/01 8:32 AM, Mark wrote:
> After discovering that I could use the Netscape spellchk.xpi with
> Mozilla, I got brave (or just plain crazy), and decided to try the IM
> component. Mozilla didn't like that. I'm 99% recovered, but am still
> getting some entry point error at startup. Basi
On 6/24/01 9:38 AM, Oliver Eichhorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with the Mail client in Mozilla 0.9 and 0.9.1 on Win32:
> The Inbox folder doesn't display any mails anymore. After I press "Get Msg",
> my new mails are downloaded, but they don't appear anywhere.
>
> What can I do?
>
> Tha
Gervase Markham wrote:
> I've also noticed several "Mozilla crashes when I do X. How do I stop
> it?/Please send me the fix." It just amazes me that people can think that
> "It crashes" is a bug report - like some developer is going to say "Doh!
> Of course it does! I'll sort that out right away!
Peter Moscatt wrote:
> I am using Mozilla 0.8 for both my browser and e-mail client. Originally
> the speed was fine but I have noticed in tha past few days that it takes a
> while not to run.
>
> I click the icon and seem to have to wait a good 30 seconds or so before it
> pops up.
>
> Any
Peter Moscatt wrote:
> G'Day Charles yea, I have been wondering about that, but am not game to
> as I did install 0.9 a few months back and had trouble with the PC
> shutdown, where there was a problem with the un-mount process which was
> caused by this install. Apparently my problems we
JTK wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Miller says...
>
>>JTK wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It's looking pretty polished folks, I suggest you take a look. The
>>>world ain't standing still while Maozilla figues out how to draw
>>>controls inside the lines.
>>>
>>>
>>With another hundred or so of t
jesus X wrote:
> JTK wrote:
>
>>Ah yes, looks like what's left of Sun Microsystems, Peter van der Linden, and
>>the Gang Of Fourteen are getting so lonely for me over in the Java groups that
>>they're willing to illegally impersonate me here.
>>
>
> While I think that tactics is pathetic and ju
Gervase Markham wrote:
> A web designer should have installed, and test on, all common browsers -
> IE 4 and 5, NS 4, and Opera at a minimum.
I'll have you know I do NOT have Opera Installed. Since they try so hard to
follow IE (but really lag behind), I figure anyone who uses Opera knows that
so
G'Day Charles yea, I have been wondering about that, but am not game to
as I did install 0.9 a few months back and had trouble with the PC
shutdown, where there was a problem with the un-mount process which was
caused by this install. Apparently my problems were not isolated - it was
a co
JTK wrote:
> Ah yes, looks like what's left of Sun Microsystems, Peter van der Linden, and
> the Gang Of Fourteen are getting so lonely for me over in the Java groups that
> they're willing to illegally impersonate me here.
While I think that tactics is pathetic and juvenile, it's hardly illegal.
JTK wrote:
> Speed, memory efficiency, and market share seem to be missing with Maozilla.
> Who needs to catch up to whom here?
IE is going to need to catch up. Mozilla's speed is improving every day.
Mozilla's memory use is already at or below that of IE if you count everything
IE uses. Personal
G'Day Gerv,
Yep I think it's just us :-)
Pete
PS: Stilly thing about it that was fine till a few days back - from what I
can figure I haven't done too much other than install JaveSDK I wonder
!!
Gervase Markham wrote:
> (Peter, this is not getting at you at all.)
>
>> I click the
JTK wrote:
> I don't want to put anything in it. Well, "History", but I'm sure that's RSN,
> right?
No, it's Been There, Done That, Got the T-Shirt. There's already a history
sidebar now.
> Yay. Tell me Savior, how much XUL or Javascript or whatever do I have to
> write to put something in the
(Peter, this is not getting at you at all.)
> I click the icon and seem to have to wait a good 30 seconds or so before it
> pops up.
I've noticed a few people posting messages like this (usually using old
builds.) I wonder if people post to other software's newsgroups asking
questions like "You
This is not a Netscape newsgroup. You need snews://secnews.netscape.com .
> These instructions work fine in Internet Explorer, but I understand that
> this is not the case with Netscape, according to two friends of mine who
> use Netscape at work. What happens is the "index.htm" file is retrieved
Hi,
I have a problem with the Mail client in Mozilla 0.9 and 0.9.1 on Win32:
The Inbox folder doesn't display any mails anymore. After I press "Get Msg",
my new mails are downloaded, but they don't appear anywhere.
What can I do?
Thanks, Oliver
__
> my oppinion of you just took a 180 - you are obviously a slimeball.
That was one of JTK's more polite, coherent posts. Please do not do
anything to disturb this tendency.
I was hoping that more mature members of this conference wouldn't descend
to petty name calling, but it seems I was wrong.
71 matches
Mail list logo
