Stewart hector wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm using Mozilla (.98) under Linux. How can I make it so when I click on
> an email link, Mozilla brings up another email program (in my case, KMail)?
>
> If this has not been implemented, I suggest that it is. Not everyone
> wants to use the emailer in Mozil
Has anyone noticed NS6 is quirky with flash moviesmouse over a
button, and you get the finger until you mouse out of the entire
embedded flash movie. Does anyone know a fix to this?
Is there a way to get Mozilla 0.9.1 to auto disconnect when I close the
browser??
Thanks in advance.
gt;prefered method.
>
>I remember reading about this in some magazines and on some websites dealing
>with internet issues.
>
>Brian wrote:
>
>>Is there a way to get Mozilla 0.9.1 to auto disconnect when I close the
>>browser??
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>
How can I get Moz to stop importing IE favs?? Can it be done??
Thanks
Martin Poirier wrote:
> yes, use a recent build, that prob is fixed (I'm pretty sure that all
> builds newer than june 15 are fixed for this)
>
> Brian wrote:
>
>> How can I get Moz to stop importing IE favs?? Can it be done??
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
Th
real smooth tits.
http://metrecrest.com/ppc06.html
You are about to learn the most effective penile enlargement & enhancement techniques
http://beep.20fr.com/pelrg.html
See u,
Brian
Unsubscribe Information
This email was sent to the owner of the following Account/Username: maxuse
Carlfish wrote:
>On Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:30:44 -0400, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> somehow managed to type:
>
>>Thank you, now I have another problem... How do I know if my build was
>>after June 15??
>>(In the title bar it says Build ID: 2001060703)
Guitar Dude,
Have you ever looked for a group called netscape.public.mozilla.mac?
Cuz if you had, you might have found it.
If you looked even harder, you might even find one called
netscape.public.mozilla.macosx
Brian!
The Timinator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:&
Hey, when I saw this, my first thought was "how will this affect
Mozilla?" Does anyone know?
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6944064.html?tag=mn_hd
Brian!
, so I thought I'd share.
http://groups.google.com
Brian!
I noticed the same thing after installing build 2001090408 for MacOS
9. Pretty funny.
JTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
ation if this made it into the milestone
release.
Brian!
ne I have seen on the
Mac is stability. The Mozilla 0.9.3 milestone release was not stable
at all for me. Netscape 6.1 is. I hope that 0.9.4 is better. The
interim builds seem to be improved. Also, there is no spell checker
in Mozilla, and Netscape has one. That is important to me.
Brian!
It could broaden the use of the browser
by quite a bit. Netscape is just too slow in pushing out new
features/technologies that make it into Mozilla and not into Netscape
until their next major release. As soon as the Mozilla API's freeze,
I think there should be a 1.0 release (with a spell checker!).
Brian!
to Win2k seems to solve it
> (most of the times, anyway).
Also be sure to try installing it *without* turbo mode enabled. This
is the newest (and possibly buggiest) major feature in Mozilla for
Windows.
Brian!
Jason.
WFM. This site also works for me while using this userpref. Using
Build 2001091311 on MacOS 9.1. No crashes. No pop-ups either.
Brian!
by decrease our percent of profits. Just
click the link below to set up an appointment with one of my sales
representatives today!
Just point your browser at www.inetwindows2k.com
Brian Elias
President
Hansons Windows & Siding
P. S. This a one time email offer only good for the next
illa project, but I think it should be considered. It is
possible to do this with IE without significant programming resources.
I would think that it could be done even easier and better with
Mozilla, as it is much more flexible.
OK, I am done ranting on this subject. I promise.
Brian!
27;s anything wrong with that).
Again, IMHO, we won't see a spell checker in Mozilla until A) Somebody
outside of Netscape funds development for it or B) Some other
non-Netscape group decides to take this on.
Brian!
l
Netscape and Mozilla are relicensing most all of their files under an
NPL/GPL/LGPL "triple license".
Brian!
#x27;t run on anyway.
I suggest getting an older iMac. That way you could run MacOS 9.1 on
it and really test Mozilla in a useful way. eBay is a good source for
used computers.
Brian!
Sometimes I have a lot of text
to put into a little, scrollable, HTML form box. Sometimes it will
disappear, and I have to start over because I don't know if my text is
really in there or not.
And FYI: This happens for me on 0.9.5 on Win2k.
Brian!
n for the worse
> recently. Any idea on when the patches for this are going to hit?
>
> Steve
I noticed that I have a "disappearing text" problem sometimes when
filling out an HTML form. Sometimes text just disappears. Very
annoying. I have seen it many times on 0.9.5 on Win2k.
Brian!
minds want to know.
Brian!
Neil,
Nice! You should look into getting information about this into
games.mozdev.org.
- Brian
Neil wrote:
> I wrote an XUL game http://www.nrr.co.uk/xulmine/xulmine.xul but on my
> 133MHz 32MB notebook I needed (amongst other tweaks) to jar the file to
> get acceptable pe
d on their UserAgent string? Or, is the real
UserAgent string something else, and this is just what they wrote in
"About" page.
Brian!
my profile. Once I installed the useragent toolbar
in Netscape 6.2 and changed it back to "original", it showed the
correct Mozilla/5.0 user agent string.
Brian!
PROTECTED], as I don't have much opportunity to
follow newsgroups.
Thanks,
Brian Seppanen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We need more input on Bug 63712. Bug 22775
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22775 talks about
autoscroll/panning. If you want to help, please skim that bug and then read
63712 http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63712 and give your
opinion on how to activate autoscroll/panning o
Is spell check implemented in current nightly builds? If so I am unable
to use it, is there something I can download. If it is not can someome
give be a bug #.
Thanks
Is there a way to set the font size to 120% in a mozilla config file
instead of defaulting to 100%? The function is from the View/Text Zoom
feature.
Brian
iners and their content. Is this
from the 098 release or from a nightly?
Try changing the following Prefs:
Edit->Preferences->Debug ... debug window, debug XUL boxes
They should be off by default.
- Brian
then why is it named NETSCAPE.public.mozilla.general
Garth Wallace wrote:
> You might try actually *sending* this to Netscape's CEO,
> instead of to a group I guarantee you he does not read.
> Hell, this isn't even really a Netscape group! It's for the
> Mozilla project.
>
t will not conflict with existing Mozilla builds. A
version of Komodo released in at some point in the near future will have
this change. Sorry for the inconvenience caused.
- Brian
--
Brian King
Developer, ActiveState
http://www.ActiveState.com
zilla brings up a 'could not be found' dialog for
every banner it couldn't load on the page, which is even more annoying than
the original ads themselves!
--
|\/| Brian Kendig
\ /\ / ..__. brian at enchanter netYou are in a maze of t
eholder page for *all* unloadable pages, not just for
>frames).
Thank you for the tip! How do I vote for a bug, though? I've seen bug
advocacy mentioned before, but I can't find anywhere on mozilla.org that
would let me cast a vote.
--
|\/| Brian Kendig
s. Sorry for jumping too quickly to a conclusion!
I see that bug 45131 has been marked as a duplicate of bug 28586, so I'll
vote for the latter. Thank you very much for your help!
--
____|\/| Brian Kendig
\ /\ / ..__. brian at enchanter netYou are in a ma
hen I
paste it into a text editor I have hit Delete to get rid of that spurious
linebreak.
Has anyone else seen this problem; does it happen on any other OS'es?
--
|\/| Brian Kendig
\ /\ / ..__. brian at enchanter netYou are in a maze
is this a known Mozilla bug, and should I just
delete the preferences file?
--
|\/| Brian Kendig
\ /\ / ..__. brian at enchanter netYou are in a maze of twisty
\/ \__\ _/http://www.enchanter.net/ little passages, all alike.
\__ __ \_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Brian Kendig wrote:
>> Is there any way to force Mozilla to remember my current window size
>> and position as the default?
>
>Yes, put this line in your prefs.js file:
>user_pref("mozilla.magically.fix_all_the_bugs", "true&quo
http://www.mozilla.org/unix/debugging-faq.html
However, I am not quite familiar enough with the code to know where to
look from here, so any tips, workarounds, or information regarding
how to further diagnose or debug this situation would be much
appreciated.
Thanks!
Brian Cameron
27;m just curious how it works. :)
--
|\/| Brian Kendig
\ /\ / ..__. brian at enchanter netYou are in a maze of twisty
\/ \__\ _/http://www.enchanter.net/ little passages, all alike.
\__ __ \_ Be insatiably curious.
\\___\Ask "why" a lot.
there any sort of roadmap for dealing with these sorts of problems?
I am thinking that we are likely not the first people with this sort of
issue, and would be interested in hearing how others are dealing with
this problem.
Thanks much!
Brian Cameron
Sun Gnome Team
at them in script:
JS
var one = window.arguments[0];
var two = window.arguments[1];
// ...
- Brian
Daniel Howe wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I need to pass a variable to a modal window, so that when it opens some
> of the user prefs are pre-filled. A similar example is the CookieViewer
> window - if I n
multiple windows (I don't know if this is the case), but any help
you have would be GREATLY appreciated for some research that's coming
due.. :)
Thanks,
Brian
working with the Netscape brower (Navigator and/or Communicator). I am
sorry to bother this newsgroup, it's just that I haven't found any help
anywhere else.
Thanks!
-Brian Utt
oesn't do proxy authentication, something I asked for when
talkback first appeared in the 4.x days. Please can someone implement
this simple addition sometime?
Best Regards,
Brian
y
JRE I've had on my machine, just with the JDK.
Yet, from the user end, it makes no sense to have to download the JDK
just to get Java applets to run.
Not sure that's of much help; just letting you know what my experience was.
â Brian
alling the
J2SDK gives a path of C:\j2sdk*\jre\bin\ . . . and the necessary .dll.
NPOJI600.dll doesn't do the trick, I'm afraid. At least it didn't for me.
â Brian
ad the full JDK.
I realise that this shouldn't be the case, but it is . . . or, at
least, that was my specific experience.
I really wish someone who knows just what's going on with this would
post a response clarifying this matter.
— Brian
nobody really wrote:
> Is there a special trick to getting the new Windows system tray mail
> alert in 0.9.9 working?
>
Statements made elsewhere suggest that it works on pretty much any OS
/except/ Win '98 (which, of course, is what I'm running).
— Brian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have been getting a lot of questions about Mozilla lately from my
> computer user group. I use it on my machine with is the one usually
> hooked up to the projector for our meetings. They seem to think it's
> IE with a skin. I would like to do a full on 20 min talk
ing the
J2SDK 1.4.0, much to my annoyance. If you can confirm this for me, I'll
have a look at the JRE again. (And Bundy's right, if memory serves: NS
6.2.1 /doesn't/ require that particular .dll to be copied; Moz does.)
— Brian
>> Netscape 6.2.1 requires zero file trans
e [insert favourite denigrating
term here] who're still using NN 4.x and wondering why pages don't
display correctly, &c. And, slowly, there seem to be more and more
sites that use valid mark-up, which seems to me to be a good thing.
â Brian
--
âWe have seen the enemy and he is usâ â Walt Kellyâs Pogo
Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Brian Heinrich wrote:
>
>> Christian Biesinger wrote:
>
> [java plugin for windows]
>
>>> NPOJI610.DLL
>>>
>>
>> And you've found that file just using the JRE?
>
>
> $ ls /mnt/c/Programme/Ja
Bundy wrote:
> Brian Heinrich typed:
>
>> Bundy wrote:
>>
>>> Karl typed:
>>>
>>>> Mozilla 0.9.9 doesn't display www.drudgereport.com correctly. One of
>>>> the most popular Web sites.
>>>>
>>>>
thankfully)),
so I tend to use Alt + more than the Back button, but I've
experienced something similar as well: there are times where I can't go
back by using the keyboard shortcut but /have/ to use the Back button.
It's an occasional problem, however, and I have yet to try to see
ing to a Web
Mail account. . . .
— Brian
--
‘We have seen the enemy and he is us’ — Walt Kelly’s Pogo
Chris Charabaruk wrote:
> I'm not American either, they just dictate our policies. Merely for the
> fact that they are our neighbours to the south. As far as I consider it,
> Ottawa is merely a puppet of D.C., which is a puppet itself to filty money.
>
> Chris
>
>
> Bamm Gabriana wrote:
>
>>
tching those missing close-quote and right
angle-brackets).
BTW, is there still a FrontPage Express? Didn't that kind of die after
IE 4, or did I miss something along the way?
--- Brian
--
?We have seen the enemy and he is us? ? Walt Kelly?s Pogo
;
>>According to the bug report, it's ABOVE the message.
>>That's definitely a problem.
>>
>>--
>>}:-) Christopher Jahn
>>{:-( Dionysian Reveler
>>
>>Yield to temptation; it may not pass your way again.
>>
>>To re
ns that defy such clichés
about Americans always seem more refreshing than shocking, as in the
case of the (American) wife of a friend of mine, who knows more about
both the American and Canadian political systems than anyone I have ever
encountered, and who is quite pointed in her criticisms of both, but
especially of the former.
> I enjoy a nice rant in the morning. ;
'Tis mid-afternoon as I write this, however. . . .
-- Brian
--
?We have seen the enemy and he is us? ? Walt Kelly?s Pogo
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. wrote:
> Brian Heinrich wrote:
> -snip-
>
>> From what I can gather, most professional web designers (a) use Macs
>>and (b) use BBEdit. I'm not a pro by any stretch (just taught myself
>>[X]
'em to
pixels. . . .
Hard numbers ('absolute lengths', as the W3C would have it), except for
very specific purposes (such as my padding example), are just a disaster
in the making when it comes to the web.
If you've come out of print media, it can be a very awkward adjustment
to make, 'cos you just naturally assume you have that kind of control
over appearance and tend to neglect all the complicating factors . . .
which still doesn't excuse the tendency to persist in such practices.
Brian
ing at the crash data) know what kind of permissions a given user
might have.
What seems /most/ to bother jukola is transmitting the computer name
along with the crash data. My knowledge is largely limited to Windows
95/98 (with past MacOS experience), where the name of the machine is
largely irrelevant; I don't know how this might be on other OSs.
Perhaps a clearer explanation of why these two specific bits of data are
transmitted by TalkBack would help clarify matters?
Brian
' several posters did state that the link you'd provided was 404.
If that's /not/ the case, then perhaps you should, in all fairness to
everyone here, explain why you feel so certain that the Mozilla project
is going to crash and why you 'don't want to read the news when 1.0 be
released.'
Brian
; All i know right now, i am going to laugh if mozilla 1.0 is what i think is
> going to be. An evil laugh by the way...
That would, at the very least, be petty . . . and quite possibly vindictive.
Brian
> BLACKBOX.
>
>
> "Ben Bucksch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote i
100% support for CSS1.
IE 6/Win *still* has some major problems with CSS box-model properties;
Moz/NS 6.2.1 don't; all three seem to handle float all right.
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore | We're all as mad as hatters here
I've fallen for a tawny moor | Took off to
Graham wrote:
> On Sunday 17 March 2002 4:27 am, Brian Heinrich wrote:
>
>
>>The one thing that seems constantly to come up in jukola's postings
>>has to do with why the /name/ of his computer is being transmitted
>>/via/ TalkBack. On a couple of occasions, he
play by those rules,
then perhaps it is best that you just pack up your toys and go home.
Again, I apologise for the harshness of tone of the foregoing, but I'm
finding it *awfully* hard to feel even a scintilla of sympathy for you
at the moment. . . .
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore |
in allowing IE to 'be' or 'define' the
'standard' is that you end up marking up around the quirks of the
browser (that is, the lapses with its standards compliance), and the
moment a newer version of IE, say, implements standards better, or a
more standards-compliant bro
Netscape Basher wrote:
> Brian Heinrich typed:
>
>> Netscape Basher wrote:
>>
>>> Jonas Jørgensen typed:
>>>
>>>> blackbox wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ¿What make them qualify to be categorized and be named 'standards
-Linux, MS hating folks.
>
Then, as good, anti-Linux, M$-loving folk, shouldn't you be using IE 6?
After all, you're the one who keeps wanting to insist that /it/ is the
standard.
Here's an experiment: Go to the M$ site, and find the IE home page
(it's http://www.micr
ons.
>
Given the line breaks in the foregoing, I'd already added 'Nixon' before
my eye shifted to the beginning of the next line and read 'Stallman'. . . .
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore | We're all as mad as hatters here
I've fallen for a tawny mo
nies to make sure their products are compatible
> with one another.
>
> The following are the members of the World Wide Web Consortium,
> as of today. You judge if this group is credible or not.
*Hallelujah*! Thank-you, Bamm; thank-you.
Brian
>* Abysal Syst
l, I hope /some/one else couldn't help laughing upon reading that
(and this even though I know /absolutely nothing/ about Jay Garcia).
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore | We're all as mad as hatters here
I've fallen for a tawny moor | Took off to the land of Nod
Drank with all the
e world? Where are Marx,
Nietzsche, Freud, Lacan, Einstein, Newton, Galileo? Why no
Michaelangelo or Frank Lloyd Wright? What about Samuel Becket? or
Picasso? Kadinsky?
I have no idea what weird messianic egomaniacal power trip you're on,
but if you think you're going to cow people into
Chris Hoess wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brian Heinrich wrote:
>
>>Chris Hoess wrote:
>>
>>>I salute your pioneering work in advancing the field of ignorance,
>>>grasshopper. I look forward to hearing more of your wonderful tidbits of
&g
is meds, or MIT is letting
> chimpanzees access the web again.
>
> I'm leaning towards the meds, though.
>
Ditto. You may be joking; I'm not.
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore | We're all as mad as hatters here
I've fallen for a tawny moor | Took off to t
lot of sense
>>if only they were more informed. Lancers are deluded souls.
>>
>
>
> I agree. He's loud, but ignorant.
> The others are loud, but stupid.
> And Lancer's off his meds, which makes him just a waste of
> bandwidth.
>
>
[See Christophe
ur thoughts and ideas clearly makes life *so*
much easier for all involved.
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore | We're all as mad as hatters here
I've fallen for a tawny moor | Took off to the land of Nod
Drank with all the Chinamen | Walked the sewers of Paris
I danced along a co
blackbox wrote:
> "Brian Heinrich"
>
>>Umm . . . wouldn't the more appropriate question be: What on God's good
>>green earth does Euclidean geometry have to do with with HTML or CSS?
>>
>
>
> I have understood, you call standards to html,
off the mark, but it is impossible to tell from his postings,
since it can be *very* difficult to try to glean any coherent meaning
from what he has written.
I would perhaps have done better to give him the same advice I so often
gave to students I was tutoring and told him to keep his gramm
se latest nightly. Rgds,
> Nigel L
>
I tried to install both, but they wouldn't take. The info sez that they
work with 0.9.9, but it *also* gives 1.0 as the version. (I'm using
2002031104.) Which probably doesn't answer your question. . . .
Brian
--
We sail tonig
-- and it doesn't seem to
handle relative length units (ems, percentages) in an appropriate
manner. Most annoying, I must say. . . .
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore | We're all as mad as hatters here
I've fallen for a tawny moor | Took off to the land of Nod
Drank wi
SS rendering, but I haven't
looked at the others. . . .)
Brian
>
> "Till" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> a748qh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a748qh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>>"Netscape Basher" Moronically (look up the meaning) wrote...
>
Jonas Jørgensen wrote:
> Brian Heinrich wrote:
>
>> I don't think you /can/ validate for the XHTML 1.1 modules
>
>
> You can. The validator accepts /any/ page with a DOCTYPE declaration
> containing a URL to a DTD file.
>
> /Jonas
>
I realise htt
t W3C-standards-compliant browser in the
world, they can't possibly be referring to IE 6. So much for truth in
advertising, eh?
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore | We're all as mad as hatters here
I've fallen for a tawny moor | Took off to the land of Nod
Drank with al
inking a little further, I decided
> that according to most beliefs something did exist before Man. So
> maybe it is "Heaven and Earth/0.1 (public draft -- the first day)".
>
>
Yes, but Lancer *does* specify 'the first standard in *human* history'.
Brian
--
We sa
> Good and Evil" -- God, paraphrased, Genesis 3.
>
> Gerv
>
LOL
Brian
--
We sail tonight for Singapore | We're all as mad as hatters here
I've fallen for a tawny moor | Took off to the land of Nod
Drank with all the Chinamen | Walked the sewers of Paris
I danced along a
Nigel L wrote:
> Nigel L responds:
> Brian Heinrich wrote:
>
>> Nigel L wrote:
>>
>>> www.xulplanet.com added GreyModern and Pinball themes for Mozilla
>>> 0.9.9 on March 17. Latter adds pleasing splashes of color atop
>>> Navigator (only).
f
> this fact. I use this in the office alternately with Mozilla.
>
>
I've not used IE 5/Mac myself, but I have been given to understand that
it's a very different animal than IE 6/Win. I was merely commenting on
IE 6/Win. No offense intended.
Brian
--
Westron wind, wh
A read date
> data.
>
>
> Glenn Miller
>
If it makes you feel any better, I'm Canadian and therefore never
entirely sure whether 070101 means 7 January 2001 or July 1, 2001.
I tend to use the dd.mm.yy convention, substituting a Roman numeral for
the month (e.g., for July 1,
-standard way of writing the date.
>
>
> Glenn Miller
>
To point to my confused state as a Canadian again: If I walk into a pub
and order a pint of beer, I /expect/ a proper, 20-oz. Imperial pint (569
mL, I believe), not the short-order, 16-oz American version (473 mL).
I
or your search word. Use as many as you wish
>>
>> g i hate netscape and gecko
>> will search google for all those words just like entering them in the
>> site!!!
>>
>> DMOZ
>> http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/search?search=%s
>> shortcut: dmoz
>&g
presentant for Magnusia, I would be happy to take Britney
> off your hands. Please contact me for the arrangement of those matters.
>
>
Which /has/ to make me wonder what, precisely, your plans are for said,
um, commodity. . . .
Brian
--
Wes
inated Canadian part of me speaking.
Never mind. . . .
Brian
--
Westron wind, when will thou blow?
The small rain down can rain:
Christ, if my love were in my arms
And I in my bed again!
-- Anonymous lyric, early 16th c.
gt; of civilization in those countries that still have some left after more
> than 50 years of US domination.
>
> Regards,
> HP
>
I believe the technical term is *cultural hegemony*. . . .
Brian
--
Westron wind, when will thou blow?
Matt Williams wrote:
> Brian Heinrich wrote:
>
>> Matt Williams wrote:
>>
>>> alpha wrote:
>>>
>>>> [This followup was posted to netscape.public.mozilla.general and a
>>>> copy was sent to the cited author.]
>>>>
>>&g
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo