n 5.3 it would have been much more
> > effective as they make use of 5.3 only features. Money is what money is but
> > the Stat and App watch product is nice at what it does. I know the guy who
> > had his actual hads on it was tickled "pink" about using it
ce at what it does. I know the guy who> had his actual hads on it was tickled "pink" about using
it.>> my two cents> bee-oh-dubble-bee-dubble-egh>>> >From: peter d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >To: [EMAIL PR
;
> my two cents
> bee-oh-dubble-bee-dubble-egh
>
>
> >From: peter d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Message Tracking
> &g
quot; about using it.
my two cents
bee-oh-dubble-bee-dubble-egh
From: peter d <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 10:55
Roger, I was purposely avoiding any "sales pitch", sorry it seemed otherwise
to you. After reading perhaps 50 responses to your topic, I merely wanted
to make sure the effort of building good message tracking solutions wasn't
minimized or underestimated. There were some great r
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I could probably list 4 tools that do it all but you missed the point
> of the 'zero' budget (almost zero) statement.
>
> What I proposed to my client was
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Lacroix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 1:17 AM
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I could probably list 4 tools that do it all but you missed the point
> of the 'zero'
WOW..DejaVoo
From: Roger Lacroix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 23:59:56 -0400
Hi,
You are reading too much into my statement. I never stated that my boss or
VP or the oth
bee-oh-dubble-bee-dubble-egh
From: "Awerbuch, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 09:49:38 -0400
Management Speak: bobbee provides
ee how Roger might differentiate his exit product from the others.
>
> -- T.Rob
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Message Tracking
>
>
>
I think the big difference here would be, as Michael and Roger pointed out,
the cost.
Good luck to Roger!
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wyatt,
T. Rob
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
:-) This is slowly evolving into a reinventing of Bristol's Transaction
Vision.
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 7:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
I come from MANY years of transactional financial system. I know how loud
the screaming can get when your program drops the ball because you didn't
understand the programming conce
or capacity limiters built in... at an
affordable
rate for MQAdmins (not developers... ha...)
4. If any of the above comes
true we all will be a lot happier...
So let's wait and see which of
the 3 happens first... (my bet is on Roger...)
Michael
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van
ll you
store all the data? Will there be a GUI to correlate it all?
:-) This is slowly evolving into a reinventing of Bristol's Transaction
Vision.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Hi,
I'm a little behind on my emails, so I have not read other peoples
responses yet but the 2 biggest problems currently being experienced by my
client's JMS / Java programmers are not real problems but more of 'newbie'
problems.
Here they are:
(1) Having a WebLogic domain with 4 actives nodes and
e cannot be lost. Works at my current site. AND THAT'S
GOVERNMENT!!
bobbee
From: "Adiraju, Rao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:31:12 +1200
Hi R
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Hi,
So the difference in the data between calls 'before get' and 'after get'
would
be the data conversion (if the app did a get with convert) ?
Or would the be just for timestamping how long the get call took? i.e.
because
'
Hi,
Yes, I could probably list 4 tools that do it all but you missed the point
of the 'zero' budget (almost zero) statement.
What I proposed to my client was a very simple API Exit to log messages: 2
days to code. Plus a very simple Perl script or Java program to parse the
log for matches: 1-2 day
Series Subject: Message Tracking
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C.AT>
04/28/2004 11:48 PM
Please respond to
MQSeries List
All,
I have tried to talk my curre
nyway, and I will be looking for somewhere else before it
is too late.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 April 2004 6:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Hi,
I would love to do that but it won't fly. They are already confu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
All,
I'll correct myself. :))
'Api Crossing Exit' is the 'Api Exit' that I am referring to. Here is a
quick
explanation about it from IBM:
http://www.mqug.org.uk/anonftp/021131%20-%20MQUTIL.pdf
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
416-566-730
transactional control was the first order of business.
bobbee
From: John Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:36:04 +0100
To put this as a problems and not
The problem with conversations with IBM about needs is they tend to get put
on a queue non-persistently. Then the RE-BOOT.
From: Glen Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:2
good lenthy lecture on the aspects of MQ. Ask anyone who has met me
bobbee
From: "Kelly, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 11:07:32 -0400
So let's wait and see which of the 3 happens first... (my bet is on Roger...)
Michael
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-Van: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Namens Kelly, SteveVerzonden: Friday, April 30, 2004 10:16 PMAan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Onderwerp: Re: Message Tracking
J
miters built in... at an
affordable rate for MQAdmins (not developers...
ha...)
4. If
any of the above comes true we all will be a lot happier...
So
let's wait and see which of the 3 happens first... (my bet is on
Roger...)
Michael
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-Van: MQSeries
Title: Message
John,
I think this discussion has gone around in a circle. If
your developer asks "where's my message - MQ lost it" then you
do have a way to prove otherwise - some message tracking software e.g.
Bristol's TransactionVision amongst others. Isn'
f the bit in the
middle anyway.
Sorry,
Steve.
From: Michael Dag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 April 2004 18:35To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: Message
Tracking
Del,
this
whole discussion started with "we have no money... "
maybe
you as a designer can talk to the sales
to functionality, no
one will argue the difference between "development" fee
versus
"production" fees...
my 2
cents...
Michael
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-Van: MQSeries List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Namens DelVerzonden: Friday,
April 30, 2004 7:31 PMAan:
[EMAIL
Title: Message
To put
this as a problems and not a suggestion or solution as James requested, I
think a fundamental problem is that it is difficult to track messages once
they have been removed from a queue. Thus if an
application puts a message on a local queue and another one has been left
rea
yes, but what about non-persistent messages?...
I know that companies such as Cressida offer log recovery products, but I still like our solution best (as the designer, of course I am totally biased...)
-- I also agree very much with education of the LOB developers suggested by Bobbee and oth
PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
I am going to offer another opinion about message tracking.
IBM logs message activity within its own logs for recovery purposes. I just
think the exit you propose is a duplication of the internal MQ logging. IBM
made use of the MQ logs in th
I am going to offer another opinion about message tracking.
IBM logs message activity within its own logs for recovery purposes. I just
think the exit you propose is a duplication of the internal MQ logging. IBM
made use of the MQ logs in the creation of the MO12 (MQSeries for OS/390 -
Log
ns of what they are coding re. things
like persistence, expiry, msgid, correlid, syncpoints etc.
Steve.
-Original Message-
From: James Kingdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 April 2004 14:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
I'd be interested to hear what
: Friday, April 30, 2004 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
I'd be interested to hear what the most common scenarios are that lead to
developers believing that MQ lost their message, particularly when using the
JMS API. As has been mentioned in this thread, this isn'
shed when the
person you are calling is not home to answer the phone?
-Original Message-
From: James Kingdon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
I'd be interested to hear what the most common scen
I'd be interested to hear what the most common scenarios are that lead
to developers believing that MQ lost their message, particularly when
using the JMS API. As has been mentioned in this thread, this isn't the
sort of complaint that you hear raised against ftp or databases, but
does seem to occu
current site. AND THAT'S
GOVERNMENT!!
bobbee
From: "Adiraju, Rao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 09:31:12 +1200
Hi Roger
What
Sent: 29 April 2004 19:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Hi,
So the difference in the data between calls 'before get' and 'after get'
would
be the data conversion (if the app did a get with convert) ?
Or would the be just for timestamping how long the ge
Am Do, den 29.04.2004 schrieb Adiraju, Rao um 23:31:
> If you think by showing all tracing
> reports to every tom, , and Harry and convince them that there messages
> aren't lost - you will have a huge battle ahead. By all this, newbie's will
> confuse and will scare more of the MQ product and
Reconda: QN-StatWatch does it all.
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
re no conversions is done..
Hope this will help,
Pavel
Roger Lacroix
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ALWARE.BIZ> cc:
Sent by: MQSeries Subject: Messa
tancy
won't last long anyway, and I will be looking for somewhere else before it
is too late.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 April 2004 6:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Hi,
I would love to do that but it won't fly
-
From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Hi,
That is what I thought, but when IBM publicly posts information that
differs,
you have to wonder which is correct.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware
CICS applications
> only.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 12:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Message Tracking
>
>
> All,
>
> I'll correct myself. :))
>
> '
croix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
All,
I'll correct myself. :))
'Api Crossing Exit' is the 'Api Exit' that I am referring to. Here is a
quick
explanation about it from IBM:
http://
ome other problem with the application - complex-conditional logic
> errors, errant pointers, "dynamic" static data, and compiler optimization
> errors, just to name four.
>
> Dave A.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sen
the backout and once afterwards.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger
> Lacroix
> Sent: 29 April 2004 16:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Message Tracking
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Hummm, so are you
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.cressida.info
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Scott
Sent: donderdag 29 april 2004 18:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
I wonder why DBAs don't get the same kind of statements
OTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Hi,
I fully agree with you but sadly as the 'Messaging Architect' for one division
I
do not have the authority to request or mandate anything. I can only recommend
things.
I have written WMQ Naming Standards documents and WMQ Programming Standards
d
Roger
Lacroix
Sent: 29 April 2004 16:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Hi,
Hummm, so are you suggesting that under SyncPoint the Api Exit is called
twice:
once for the get and then again for commit (or back).
Hummm, most interesting.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc.
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 April 2004 16:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Hi,
Please see my response to David A.'s email. But basically I say prove it,
and I get a blank look /response and worse they run to their VP and say MQ
is losing their messages. And of course you
Roger,
> >
> >
> > The api crossing exit which comes with WMQ addresses most of your concerns.
> > Have you looked at it ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Bullock, Rebecca
> > (CSC)" To:
&g
You forgot the last response line.
JP: I never had this problem with FTP
From: "Awerbuch, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:08:17 -0400
Roger,
I
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Message Tracking
>
>
> All,
>
> I have tried to talk my current client into buying a message tracking
> product but of course they say they don't have the money!?!?!
&g
log everything they do.
>
> Again all this, IMO.
>
> Cheers
> Kumar
>
> Robert Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 04/29/2004 09:30 AM
> Please respond to MQSeries List
>
>
ot;Bullock, Rebecca
> (CSC)" To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
> >Subject: Re: Message Tracking
> Sent by: MQSeries
>
ist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Message Tracking
> >Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:48:13 -0400
> >
> >All,
> >
> >I have tried to talk my current client into buying a message tracking
> >product
> >but of course th
>
> Joan Hughes
> IT Technical Specialist
> 608-827-3523
>
>
>
> "Benjamin F.
> Zhou"To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
> USA.COM>
u: Holy %^#&$#&*^
>
> Regards,
> Dave A.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 11:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Message Tracking
>
>
> All,
>
> I have tried to ta
Specialist
> Messaging&Integration Supp.
> Mercedes-Benz USA
> x.2474
>
>
>
> Roger Lacroix
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ALWARE.BIZ> cc:
> Sen
04 11:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Message Tracking
>
>
> All,
>
> I have tried to talk my current client into buying a message tracking
> product
> but of course they say they don't have the money!?!?!
>
> The problem is that the client has a lo
Hi,
Do you mean Message Exit? The Api Exit is associated with the queue manager
rather than the channel.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc.
http://www.capitalware.biz
Quoting Gunter Jeschawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I played around with the sample API Exit and installed it for the
> list
Hi,
Hummm, so are you suggesting that under SyncPoint the Api Exit is called twice:
once for the get and then again for commit (or back).
Hummm, most interesting.
Regards,
Roger Lacroix
Capitalware Inc.
http://www.capitalware.biz
Quoting "David C. Partridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The API Ex
Maybe the expiry time.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Message Tracking
All,
I have tried to talk my current client into buying a message tracking
product but of course they say
/29/2004 09:30 AM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Roger.
Isn't there a support pack, SERVER connection only, that does this to some
point (MQMD and 100 bytes of data).
I know a fellow that
ED]cc:
> Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Sent by: MQSeries
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.AC.AT>
04/29/2004 08:49
AM
Series List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Message Tracking
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:48:13 -0400
All,
I have tried to talk my current client into buying a message tracking
product
but of course they say they don't have the money!?!?!
The problem is that the client has a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
USA.COM> Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Sent by: MQSeries
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Message Tracking
All,
I have tried to talk my current client into buying a message tracking
product
but of course they say they don't have the money!?!?!
The problem is that the client has a lot of MQ developm
alist
Messaging&Integration Supp.
Mercedes-Benz USA
x.2474
Roger Lacroix
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ALWARE.BIZ> cc:
Sent by: MQSeries Subject: M
ce of
finding the actual message based on the data itself.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Lacroix [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Message Tracking
All,
I have tried to talk my current client into buying a message tra
I played around with the sample API Exit and installed it for the
listener and I believe you'll get all information needed. It only works
for you if the application use client connection.
This will produce very big log-files so I can't recommend to use it in
an production environment, but in your
The API Exit is invoked at MQCMIT and MQBACK time, but you'll have royal fun
keeping track of what was
committed and backed out it you are logging messages to see what happened.
Dave
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide availabl
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Roger, you can add two more fields, userid and the application name.
That way you will know from where the message came from and where it went.
Roger Lacroix
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To
riginal Message-
From: Arvind Chaudhary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 April 2004 4:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking
Roger, you can add two more fields, userid and the application name.
That way you will know from where the message came from an
Roger, maybe add the remote queue manager name, just to be certain you know
where it is going.
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roger
Lacroix
Sent: Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Message Tracking
All,
I have tried
BIZ> cc: (bcc:
arvind.chaudhary/Polaris)
Sent by: MQSeriesSubject: Message Tracking
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
C.AT>
04/29/04 09:18 AM
All,
I have tried to talk my current client into buying a message tracking product
but of course they say they don't have the money!?!?!
The problem is that the client has a lot of MQ development going on with a lot
of newbie MQ/Java developers. And of course the newbie developers keep te
That Dave Atma, I cann't beleive that bloody
aussie is still in NY!
Next time you talk to him, please say hello to him
from me!
Thanks, Bo-o-o-oo-beee!
Cheers,
Vitaliy
--- Robert Broderick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Phil,
> We are still getting it configured. Look for Dave
> Atma in the dir
o check for the recomendation / tetstament
to PO box 999, Brooklyn NY.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking Software
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:24:37 -0400
That's wh
ROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NE.NET> cc:
Sent by: MQSeriesSubject: Re: Message Tracking Software
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.AC.AT>
ter d.
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking Software
Peter,
Does it use exits (channel or API xing) to obtain the data ? What
mechanism (if you
cc:
Sent by: MQSeriesSubject: Re: Message Tracking Software
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.AC.AT>
07/24/2003 01:16
PM
Pleas
d.
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Larry
Murray
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking Software
Hello,
The Message tracking software...When does it start tracking the
messages?
If we
Hello,
The Message tracking software...When does it start tracking the
messages?
If we have mq clients on a windows server that sends messages to and gets
messages
from a q-mgr on a mainframe...can this software track the message path
from start to finish?
Thanks
Larry Murray
Putnam
b" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Message Tracking Software
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:32:14 -0500
Funny you should ask - I just plugged Reconda's AppWatch for a PQEdit
replacement. As it turns out, we are also
There is also "StatWatch" from Reconda ...
regards, peter
-Original Message-
From: MQSeries List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Message Tracking Software
WMQers,
Besides Bristol
Wyatt,
StatWatch ? Who is the developer ?
"Wyatt, T. Rob"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MERICA.COM> cc:
Sent by: MQSeries Subject: Re:
ad-to-head competitor to Bristol's TV.
-- T.Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Message Tracking Software
WMQers,
Besides Bristol's Transaction Vision, what other m
Sent by: MQSeries Subject: Re: Message Tracking Software
List
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.AC.AT>
07/24/2003 10:55
AM
Please respond to
ond to MQSeries List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Message Tracking Software
WMQers,
Besides Bristol's Transaction Vision, what other message tracking software
is available in the market ?
Thank you for your input !
Phil
This commu
WMQers,
Besides Bristol's Transaction Vision, what other message tracking software
is available in the market ?
Thank you for your input !
Phil
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any fina
94 matches
Mail list logo
