complains in the current state.
Our docs link to the original wiki page anyway, so a link there isn't
needed anymore (maybe it was at some point). Removed it.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/11/28 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com wrote:
I did a few last edits in Purpose. There is still the red this page
I've made a few small changes here: removing the classical stuff, making
clear that abbreviations of featuring follow the guideline too, and
changing that if they fit into 1 sentence because I had to read it too
many times to understand it and that's a bad sign:
releases specifically, instead of addressing all featurings
only to exclude all but a few in the details section.
Also, if not standardizing abbreviations you should probably rewrite
examples 1-3 to not seem like they are.
2013/12/6 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
I've made
This can move to RFV by now I'd say.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
is ugly,
unwieldy and rarely used, so we standardise to feat. instead.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Pretty much exactly what Freso said, with my style leader hat on. For
further improvements please send a second RFC in a couple days :)
On 14 Dec 2013 15:05, Frederik Freso S. Olesen freso...@gmail.com
wrote:
Den 14-12-2013 13:24, SwissChris skrev:
Sorry for coming in so late, but maybe we
/STYLE-276
Expected RFV date is Jan 3.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Added.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Tom Crocker tomcrockerm...@gmail.comwrote:
It's over two months since this passed and code is in place to convert the
medleys across. Any chance the new attribute can be in place before the New
Year?
Apparently not, since I completely forgot. I've added
Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Stadiums and sports arenas aren't really a venue in the traditional
sense, but plenty of concerts take place in them. Can we add them as a type?
Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-278
Expected RFV date: Jan 8
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
on the recording-work rel anyway.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:49 PM, caller#6
meatbyproduct-musicbra...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 01/02/2014 03:30 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
2014/1/2 Ben Ockmore ben.s...@gmail.com
Concert Hall
Community Building/Religious Building
Stadium
Club
Arena
Outdoor Space
Theatre
Bandstand
and symphony orchestra, but that's a separate issue :) It's
the only place where this kind of info belongs though IMO.
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-276
Expected passing date is Jan 6.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz
Given this isn't a style issue, but a code-dependant schema change, I'm not
sure what the point of an RFC would be :) How to eventually use them maybe,
but that sounds like something to decide once we know how they'll be
implemented...
___
On 5 Jan 2014 14:56, Maurits mfmeulenb...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh ok. I got the impression from the original Jira ticket that this
should be discussed somewhere, and I thought that would be here. Should
I take this somewhere else or just add my thought s to the Jira ticket
and forget about it for
No opposition so this has passed. Will now look into how to actually do it!
:)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Rachel Dwight hibiscuskazen...@gmail.comwrote:
Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-280
Wiki:
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:HibiscusKazeneko/Personal_label_relationship_type
A lot of artists have personal labels that handle the rights to
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
Is haute-contre missing from the vocal tree, or is it there in a
translation I don't recognize?
It's missing, unless you're willing to call it a countertenor.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2014/1/11 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Is haute-contre missing from the vocal tree
Expected RFV date is Jan 22.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
FWIW, Wikipedia considers Buddhist temples places of worship too, which it
defines as a specially designed structure or consecrated space where
individuals or a group of people such as a
congregationhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/congregationcome
to perform acts of devotion, veneration, or
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:14 AM, monxton musicbra...@jordan-maynard.orgwrote:
On 02/01/2014 17:14, Frederik Freso S. Olesen wrote:
Den 02-01-2014 12:30, Frederic Da Vitoria skrev:
I may be wrong, but I don't think a
user will one day need an easy way to select together the cathedrals and
Now that the orchestra attribute is going away (thankfully) we should store
this data where it belongs: on the artists. I would like to add a few new
artist types to more clearly store this kind of info.
As a minimum, I'd like the top level here of orchestra, choir and chamber
ensemble (ideally,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Maurits mfmeulenb...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with this on principle, but wouldn't the chamber orchestra
sub-types become a huge list over time? With all the possible trio's,
quartets, quintets and whatnot for various possible instruments.
Perhaps constrict it
I think this isn't a problem with mini-albums. It probably is with
maxi-singles though, that's certainly true - so adding mini-album only
might be the best option.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style
Aaand these are finally gone! (that took some effort :) )
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
actually are not usually broadcast over the radio these days.
Also: would this be applicable to any spokenword audio track even on
regular albums?
Some of those feel more like poems to me. It would be weird to use this.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:17 PM, monxton musicbra...@jordan-maynard.orgwrote:
On 09/04/2013 13:37, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM, monxton wrote:
We do already have the tribute to relationship for release groups.
So
I think this should use
Also, I'd pick dedication as the name, but of course, I'm coming at this
from a classical POV - dunno how well that fits for non-classical uses of
this.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
There's no consensus for this and I have too many RFCs open already, so
closing this for the time being.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
to be first-level
formats would make more sense than adding a new Download format, so let's
do that.
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-287
Expected RFV date is Jan 27
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Staffan Vilcans lift...@interface1.netwrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren skrev:
Digital Media is effectively Download
Usually yes, but it can also be sent via other methods like e-mail.
Calling it file would perhaps be more universal.
Technically speaking
I'll be sending a new RFC thread for this in a few days, but feel free to
discuss it a bit here first (let's treat it as a pre-RFC :) )
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Staffan Vilcans lift...@interface1.netwrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren skrev:
Digital Media is effectively Download
Usually yes, but it can also be sent via other methods like e-mail.
Calling it file would perhaps be more universal.
Technically
+1
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
But give it a couple more days before going to RFV maybe so more people can
see it :)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 01/20/2014 04:04 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
Digital Media is effectively Download - but having USB and slotMusic
(microSD) under it makes it much less obvious. The current hierarchy
never went through
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 01/20/2014 11:22 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
Under that point of view, they are packagings, not formats, and should
just disappear from the format tree. Which I'd also probably agree with,
myself
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 01/20/2014 11:29 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
Under *that* point of view, they shouldn't necessarily be listed
together just because of it anyway, since those three aren't.
Heh, fair enough.
Maybe
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:56 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote:
2014/1/17 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Maurits mfmeulenb...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with this on principle, but wouldn't the chamber orchestra
sub-types become
too and they just were commenting generally under PoW, please say
so :)
Ticket: http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-278
Expected passing date: Jan 24
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style
Why are you suddenly trying to turn a pretty simple, small scale thing into
a full ontology? I mean, that can be pretty cool I guess, but it's far more
complicated than what I wanted, which is just a way to mark a few of the
most common things...
___
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Kuno Woudt k...@frob.nl wrote:
Hello,
On 01/22/2014 04:33 PM, Mihai Spinei wrote:
Got a couple of +1s for mini-albums, so I'd suggest to add just them for
now, will debate maxi-singles later. RFV
I'm not convinced difference between EP and mini-album is
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Ulrich Klauer ulr...@chirlu.de wrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren:
Now that the orchestra attribute is going away (thankfully) we
should store this data where it belongs: on the artists. I would
like to add a few new
artist types to more clearly store
*all* the wiki
pages yet) so what you have is perfectly fine.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
There has been no opposition, so this has passed.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Hi! I'm out for the weekend and I'm not too sure what to do with this, so I
created a poll to find out what people actually think I should do. Could
everyone (who has an opinion at all) vote on
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Place_types ? Thanks! :)
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
at adding specific improvements
that apply to these two types.
tl;dr: I want to add Orchestra and Choir as artist types.
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-285
Expected passing date is Jan 29
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:45 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't expect an RFV for this, I thought it was a WIP.
While I hope these 2 categories should be mostly harmless, a couple of
things bothers me:
The ticket and the RFV message says different things (also one could
://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Reosarevok/Artist/Type
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-285
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Rachel Dwight
hibiscuskazen...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jan 26, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that the orchestra attribute is going away (thankfully) we should
store this data where it belongs: on the artists. I
Relationship added. Type will be added when the devs are around. Please
update http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Label/Type in the meantime :)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-01-27 Brant Gibbard bgibb...@ca.inter.net
Not meaning to be a wet blanket, but I’ve just managed to located one of
my CDs (Deutsche Gramophon) that does translate Tonmeister into other
languages. The results
On 27 Jan 2014 20:39, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com wrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically
said
he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
and see if he clarifies it :)
Don't proposals
So, any strong opposition to move USB and slotMusic under Other instead?
I'll give it a couple more days (until the 30 or so) and RFV if I have
received at least a +1 for this specific change and no strong opposition :)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:17 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we can find a better wording than claim to be an orchestra? I
think I understand what you mean, but The Oslo Philharmonic claims to be
an orchestra doesn't sound right IMO.
Perhaps. I'm not sure how else to
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:41 PM, lixobix arjtap...@gmail.com wrote:
drsaunde wrote
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
Not really - proposals pass if they're not vetoed. kuno specifically
said
he wasn't vetoing this - I'm not sure about drsaunde so let's wait a bit
and see if he
://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-287
Expected passing date is Feb 2
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Just a reminder that this is ready for RFV.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
/tag/beijing%20opera/work
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-291
Expected RFV date is Feb 6
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:17 AM, drsaunde drsau...@hotmail.com wrote:
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote
You can have a 42 minute, 8 track EP:
http://musicbrainz.org/release/95f94241-8568-4d6f-aeb1-3d8da18e5120
And you can have a 37 minute, 8 track album:
http://musicbrainz.org
There has been no veto so this has passed. Will make a dev make the change
once they have managed to get some post-summit rest :)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-01-29 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:17 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we can find a better wording than claim to be an orchestra? I
think I
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:10 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Frederic, an orchestra can mean a lot of different things.
At least we have to explain what it means to claim to be an orchestra.
I'm certainly open to suggestions, I'm just not too good at definitions.
Any
No opposition so passed and added.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
/tag/beijing%20opera/work
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-291
Expected passing date is Feb 8
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
Sorry, wrong title. I'll re-send it with the correct title.
Heh! Technically there was a change which could have required a new +1, but
since you got it here anyway, RFVing it is fine :D
-11 (skipping the week-end)
Hopefully you mean 2014-02-11 or you'd be skipping lots of weekends ;)
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
Our CompMusic friends are working on adding Chinese opera (which is
opera in the Western sense pretty much in name only) to MusicBrainz, and
have asked if we can add this specific work type (
https
Added. Could you make sure it works fine, and add a couple examples (of
both levels, ideally) that I can link to from the documentation? :)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
Passed; added.
I'm confused about the BUCK-TICK example since it says 1984 but we claim
the band was founded in 1985. So please check that one :)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria davito...@gmail.comwrote:
2014-02-03 Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren reosare...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:10 PM, symphonick symphon...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with Frederic, an orchestra can mean a lot of different things.
At least
Not sure what the state of affairs is here. Should this be going back
to RFC? There was a lot of support in the RFV, but some objections too.
That doesn't seem like it would be reasonable - it's going to be vetoed
with the exact same reasoning.
The proposal process says if the changes would
After the poll, the results were that most people did want the new types,
but there was almost a tie about whether to add them as one type or two.
Nikki pointed out that merging them would be much simpler than splitting
them, so we decided to add them separately for now and if eventually we
decide
no :)
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Christmas_carols
Already has ruaok's approval:
https://chatlogs.musicbrainz.org/musicbrainz-devel/2013/2013-11/2013-11-18.html#T11-27-18-669580
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-294
Expected RFV date is Mar 5
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
as per
http://www0.cpdl.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Are_all_CPDL_scores_legal%3F
Rob has given approval already.
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-249
Expected RFV date is Mar 6
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
their choirs and/or orchestras but not the companies themselves) but I do
feel this kind of information would be useful to have.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http
if in
doubt, don't claim it's a translation sounds reasonable and workable to
me, dunno about others.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo
be
currently linked with orchestras.
Hmm. My Estonian music dictionary thingy does say of singers they were a
soloist for the Estonian Opera from 1930 to 1965 or things like that. But
maybe that's just because, well, there was only one, and it's not common
elsewhere.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:51 PM, SwissChris swissch...@gmail.com wrote:
So if that means an additional line in the guidelines, saying Do only use
if it really is a pretty close translation, otherwise use simply ''version
of'' I could probably +1 this, too - even if I don't believe it will
No vetos so this has passed.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
as per
http://www0.cpdl.org/wiki/index.php/Help:Are_all_CPDL_scores_legal%3F
Rob has given approval already.
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-249
Expected passing date is Mar 9
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing
://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Christmas_carols
Already has ruaok's approval:
https://chatlogs.musicbrainz.org/musicbrainz-devel/2013/2013-11/2013-11-18.html#T11-27-18-669580
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-294
Expected pass date is Mar 9
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
Remember we have that option now for an attribute to be displayed after the
rel, like with member: X (guitar)
On 7 Mar 2014 07:05, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 3/6/2014 10:30 PM, Rachel Dwight wrote:
Though I think it should probably be called maybe (e.g. maybe drums
rather than
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:33 PM, jesus2099 hta3s836gzac...@jetable.orgwrote:
could be called unsure, unverified, etc. I let the english speakers find
the
appropriate work.
for cases like The song is sometimes co-credited to Reginald Connelly
but not only -- for guesses too for instance.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:13 AM, daniel. danber...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry. I'm new to this, and I hadn't seen your reply. I saw on the
ticket that this would require a new RFC, before moving to RFV. Should
I make a whole new one or is it okay like this?
Just start a new thread so that
No opposition so this has passed.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
+1, if it's given Rob's approval of course.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
No vetos so this has passed.
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
+1
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
Since no better definition has come up, I'm thinking I'll just suggest what
Wikipedia do: large instrumental ensemble. That is of course a fuzzy
limit, but that's to be expected since the limit *is* fuzzy in real life.
If we think it should be more clear, adding something like if in doubt,
pick
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
reosare...@gmail.com wrote:
Since no better definition has come up, I'm thinking I'll just suggest
what Wikipedia do: large instrumental ensemble. That is of course a fuzzy
limit, but that's to be expected since the limit *is* fuzzy
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Marko markosults...@gmail.com wrote:
RFV expected expiration date: 2014-03-19.
This proposal is for adding new packaging type named Standard Width
Double Disc Jewel Case
The type name sounds absolutely dumb and way too long for the dropdown, but
if people
Ticket is http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/STYLE-285
Expected pass date is Mar 23.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Daniel Sobey d...@dns.id.au wrote:
Expected expiration date: 4th of May 2014
4th of *May*? :) We usually do a week, two might be reasonable, but over a
month seems like overdoing it. Let's do March 29.
Ticket: STYLE-301
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 3:15 AM, daniel. danber...@gmail.com wrote:
This expired and got no votes. I'm new to this; what am I supposed do?
Wait for a +1. It does seem fairly decent though, so here's your +1 ;) (as
other-dbs for now IMO)
___
but I'd
be happy to have it so +1.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
901 - 1000 of 1072 matches
Mail list logo
