? In the LaTeX file
I define the encoding of the file as option of the package inputenc.
If I say utf8 there, mutt can't tell the recipient of the mail the
file is encoded in latin1 or something else.
The easiest way is to compress them first.
The fundamental problem is that text attachments get labeled
Hi,
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out how
to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in the
directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume there's some
option to autodelete these folders?
--
Tim
=- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 10:31:27 +0100 -=
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out
how to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in
the directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume there's
some option to autodelete these folders?
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 04:08:35PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
=- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 10:31:27 +0100 -=
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out
how to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in
the directory in which an attachment is
=- Tim Chown wrote on Tue 23.Sep'08 at 15:57:47 +0100 -=
Scan mutt-dev archive for this topic to understand origin, problems
and workarounds.
Hmm, well the Yahoo view of mtt devs mails doesn't throw up
anything obvious. I think 'folder', 'attachment', 'save' are too
generic a term to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 10:31 AM, quoth Tim Chown:
I didn't get a reply when I asked before, still keen to find out how
to avoid mutt creating/leaving an empty .muttxx fo9lder in the
directory in which an attachment is saved. I assume
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 23 at 05:10 PM, quoth Rado S:
For me it was related to NFS, and it was about tmpdir/tmpfile
generation. Lookout for posts by me, I suggested a patch to revert
the newly introduced behaviour.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:28:33AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
http://dev.mutt.org/trac/changeset/c0e6d2617984/
~Kyle
- --
If an elderly respected expert in a given field tells you that
something can be done he is almost certainly right. If an elderly
respected expert in a given field
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:54:19AM -0400, Jeff Kinz wrote:
And if an elderly respected expert in a given field tells you
RTFM, don't whine about it. RTFM advice is not (usually) an insult
or an attempt to be nasty. Its usually valid and ALWAYS a good
idea.
On the other hand, some people who
Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
complicated in the extreme;
You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
*SCNR*
-Sndr.
--
| Did you hear about the cat that ate a ball of wool? -- It got mittens.
|
* Sander Smeenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-23 19:35]:
Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
complicated in the extreme;
You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
For a change you could have a look at fvwm
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:33:31PM +0200, Sander Smeenk wrote:
Quoting Derek Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
No matter how much I love it, Mutt's configuration is intricate and
complicated in the extreme;
You haven't tried configuring Sendmail, have you? ;-)
As a matter of fact, being a
Hello Michael,
Wednesday, July 2, 2008, 5:26:58 PM, you wrote:
MK On 2 Jul 2008 17:19 +0300, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul -Spawn- Rysevets):
ah.. btw.. when run by cron i've managet to get error-out:
--
Error in /home/webmaster/.muttrc, line 2: header_cache: unknown variable
Hello Mutt-users,
i'm a bit new to linux world, but my current task needs to be
finished though...
okay.. here is the deal:
i need to send html - e-mail from commandline with bunch of
attachments.. every day ..
i've wrote bash-script already..
and when run from console (like direct
BDE9ADA6 *
* ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML mail, proprietary attachments *
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 05:19:39PM +0300, Paul -Spawn- Rysevets wrote:
Hello Mutt-users,
i'm a bit new to linux world, but my current task needs to be
finished though...
okay.. here is the deal:
i need to send html - e-mail from commandline with bunch of
attachments.. every day
=- Peter Münster wrote on Sun 29.Jun'08 at 23:29:37 +0200 -=
How could I get information about not saved attachments in the fcc-copy?
{...}
Is this already possible with mutt?
If no, then please consider this a feature request.
Hook yourself to the proper ticket and raise the relevance
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 12:41:50PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
It could be on your system, or it could be on the one that your system
relays to when it sends the message on to the recipient.
Where you find the configuration depends on what MTA you're using.
If you're using sendmail,
.
--
Michael Kjörling .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .. http://michael.kjorling.se
* . No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings . *
* ENCRYPTED email preferred -- OpenPGP key ID: 0x 758F8749 BDE9ADA6 *
* ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML mail, proprietary attachments *
signature.asc
attachments *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIRR57dY+HSb3praYRAjw9AKCReTA/+F+0szIhi+mrs1+FevAU7QCbB3bf
2YUvPqST2GIEiDl8UZN4BTI=
=8fB0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Blog in Chinese
http://www.awflasher.com/blog/
Blog in English
http
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 06:55:31PM +0800, Awflasher(GuoQirui) wrote:
I use whereis sendmail to find the MTA and it seems to be a file
named exim4. But that's just a file, I did not find anywhere to
review the configuration.
ok, sendmail is just the interface. Its been the first mail server
Can not be...
Am 2008-06-01 16:58:36, schrieb Awflasher(GuoQirui):
Mutt is really great but I cannot get anything when sending a 6M file.
It's ok for sending small files but when i'm trying to send a big
file, it stopped working.
Hope to get some tips, thanks very much!!
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 09:27:35PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Can not be...
Size of mails is a system restriction enforced by your mail server.
Your mail client just sends data to the mail server and somewhere in
the line it may be restricted.
Your server may be configured for 50MB files,
Thanks. But I am using a Linux system, and the file is just about 6M.
I am just curious that where can I find the so-called system restriction ?
Would u please give me some further tips ? Thanks very much in advance!
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Marcus Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Thanks. But I am using a Linux system, and the file is just about 6M.
I am just curious that where can I find the so-called system restriction ?
It could be on your system, or it could be on the one that your system
relays to when it sends the message on to the recipient.
Where you find the
Mutt is really great but I cannot get anything when sending a 6M file.
It's ok for sending small files but when i'm trying to send a big
file, it stopped working.
Hope to get some tips, thanks very much!!
* . No bird soars too high if he soars with his own wings . *
* ENCRYPTED email preferred -- OpenPGP key ID: 0x 758F8749 BDE9ADA6 *
* ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML mail, proprietary attachments *
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
=- Awflasher(GuoQirui) wrote on Sun 1.Jun'08 at 16:58:36 +0800 -=
Mutt is really great but I cannot get anything when sending a 6M file.
That's not a mutt problem, check your sendmail config and your ISP
limitations.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort
. *
* ENCRYPTED email preferred -- OpenPGP key ID: 0x 758F8749 BDE9ADA6 *
* ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML mail, proprietary attachments *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIQof3dY+HSb3praYRAsldAKCcpa/ZKxQJ1dna0Z401AYDpvWOHQCfWtmo
mutt experts -
Is it possible to force 'mutt' to use base64 encoding for all
attachments, irrespective of their real types / file extensions?
if yes, then what do I need to mention in .muttrc file for this to happen?
Please note that, I need this functionality when 'mutt' is invoked
from command
Hi,
I was wondering if there is an easy way to delete attachments from
postponed messages. For email which you receive the procedure is
clear ('v' and afterwards 'd'). In the postponed message menu
the d-key is reserved for descriptions. Perhaps somebody has a quick
solution or a macro defined
* Michael M. Tung [EMAIL PROTECTED] [03-04-08 07:39]:
I was wondering if there is an easy way to delete attachments from
postponed messages. For email which you receive the procedure is
clear ('v' and afterwards 'd'). In the postponed message menu
the d-key is reserved for descriptions
Am 2008-02-07 00:14:02, schrieb Kyle Wheeler:
What if the file had been left as-is, and the line endings had been
recognized as not needing conversion? The receiver would receive a
correctly encoded text/plain attachment, and when saving that
attachment to disk, his MUA would convert the
I think the point that the people on the Postfix mailing list were trying
to make is that the MUA (in this case mutt) should not be sending something
to the MTA that is marked as text/plain, but has CRLF line endings since
text/plain on Unix has just LF line endings.
Me, I don't know what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, February 7 at 12:01 AM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think the point that the people on the Postfix mailing list were trying
to make is that the MUA (in this case mutt) should not be sending
something to the MTA that is marked as
Hello
I am having a problem sending a DOS text file as an attachment. I am
running mutt version 1.5.11 on Linux, my MTA is Postfix.
When I attach a DOS text file the mime type is text/plain and the encoding
is 7bit. When the person at the other end (I get the same results sending
it to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, February 5 at 03:27 PM, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The summary of this is that since I am running on Linux text/plain
MUST have unix line endings rather than DOS and so Mutt should
convert the CRLF to LF before sending the file to the
. *
* ENCRYPTED email preferred -- OpenPGP key ID: 0x(758F8749)BDE9ADA6 *
* ASCII Ribbon Campaign: Against HTML mail, proprietary attachments *
pgpiF7W5ardNe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi you again,
Sometimes I receive msgs with lots of files attached. It's sort of
boring to tag them one by one in order to save them. So I found the link
below:
http://wiki.mutt.org/?action=browsediff=1id=MuttFaq/Attachment
I did exactly as text said, but the thing is that once I get the msg
* Bill on Wednesday, January 16, 2008 at 20:28:33 -0800
How would one go about finding all the emails which have attachments?
With more recent versions of Mutt (than you are using) you can do
limit (bound to l by default) ~X 1-
Is there a way to list them in a unix 'ls' like listing, which
How would one go about finding all the emails which have attachments?
Is there a way to list them in a unix 'ls' like listing, which would show the
size and type of each attachment?
Thanks,
Bill
Hello,
I received a file from a friend starting with '-':
--=_NextPart_000_1cd4_6abd_704a
Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint; name=-Casamento.pps;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=-Casamento.pps;
While saving the attachment, mutt prompted
Hi,
* Luciano Rocha wrote:
I received a file from a friend starting with '-':
--=_NextPart_000_1cd4_6abd_704a
Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint; name=-Casamento.pps;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=-Casamento.pps;
While saving the
On Jan 15, 2008 2:18 PM, Rocco Rutte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
* Luciano Rocha wrote:
I received a file from a friend starting with '-':
--=_NextPart_000_1cd4_6abd_704a
Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint; name=-Casamento.pps;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:18:33PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
Hi,
* Luciano Rocha wrote:
I received a file from a friend starting with '-':
--=_NextPart_000_1cd4_6abd_704a
Content-Type: application/vnd.ms-powerpoint; name=-Casamento.pps;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Hi,
* Luciano Rocha wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:18:33PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
So it's rather undocumented, also see ticket #1719
(http://dev.mutt.org/trac/ticket/1719).
Saving to \-Casamento.pps should work.
Yeah, but as Francis mentioned, mutt should escape all magic
is there a .muttrc setting that will cause attachments to
be forwarded? thx.
Hi Ray!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Ray Stell wrote:
is there a .muttrc setting that will cause attachments to
be forwarded? thx.
Look for the mime_forward setting.
regards,
Christian
--
Congratulations! You are the one-millionth user to log into our system.
If there's anything special we can
be done through a macro. I do something very
similar using a folder-hook to save attachments in a specific
directory by default when in a particular mailbox.
This should replicate the default behavior but prepend ./ to the file
name when saving:
macro attach s save-entrybol./eol
But I agree
Hi,
When I open the email from attachment menu, the colors of message,
quoted text, doesn't show up. How to get this work? Please suggest..
--
Dilip
=- Dilip M wrote on Tue 8.Jan'08 at 18:10:31 +0530 -=
When I open the email from attachment menu, the colors of message,
quoted text, doesn't show up. How to get this work? Please
suggest..
Go back to normal pager mode with quit.
Attachment mode is not meant for this flashy stuff.
--
©
it. (still index-view).
The index-view is sometimes rather slow (because of loading all big
messages) and I use only a 400-800MHz PC (laptop).
How can I stop mutt loading the mails (or only attachments) in
index-view?
Best regards,
Paul
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
=- Paul Puschmann wrote on Fri 4.Jan'08 at 11:26:24 +0100 -=
I know that e-mail is no file-transfer-medium, but others don't ;-)
Each time I open this mailbox this big messages is downloaded to my
client, although I didn't open it. (still index-view).
See wiki faq + muttguide/ useimap.
You
How do I from within mutt apply a command (like scp) to all the attachment in
the current message?
--
- Eric Smith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, November 8 at 10:02 AM, quoth Eric smith:
How do I from within mutt apply a command (like scp) to all the attachment in
the current message?
Well... you can tag them all and pipe them to something, but that's
about it.
~Kyle
- --
Hi users
how can I remove all attachments from a mail? The idea is, if someone
send me a big mail with pictures, I save the images with 'save' and
after, I want to archive the mail-text, whithout the (big) attachments.
The simplest way is a macro in mutt to remove all attachments on the
selected
how can I remove all attachments from a mail? The idea is, if someone
Delete them from the attachments menu. Normally this means pressing 'v'
while viewing the message in index or pager, scrolling to the attachment
you don't want, and pressing 'd'.
When the folder is synced, the attachments
because I run mutt on a Solaris
machine and run viewers for MS attachments remotely on the Linux
box. In your case, this might work:
application/msword; ooffice -view %s
I don't know if that will help, but it's something to try.
Thanks for the response. I tried that openoffice startup
On 2007-09-18, Holger Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm not certain this is the right forum to ask this question.. anyway.
I recently switched Linux distribution (from Debian Sarge to Ubuntu
Feisty) and since that I've the following problem printing mutt
attachments using
0n Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:43:42AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
I need the mutt_rem_bgrun command because I run mutt on a Solaris
machine and run viewers for MS attachments remotely on the Linux
box. In your case, this might work:
Where does one find details on mutt_rem_bgrun
On 2007-09-18, Wilkinson, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0n Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:43:42AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
I need the mutt_rem_bgrun command because I run mutt on a Solaris
machine and run viewers for MS attachments remotely on the Linux
box. In your case
Am 2007-08-24 13:26:29, schrieb Louis-David Mitterrand:
Hi,
When using imap with mutt-1.5.16 is there a way to not automatically
load attachements when viewing the message body?
No, since the attachments ARE the message body.
Ideally when on a low-bandwidth connection I'd like to have
On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 02:00:14AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2007-08-24 13:26:29, schrieb Louis-David Mitterrand:
Hi,
When using imap with mutt-1.5.16 is there a way to not automatically
load attachements when viewing the message body?
No, since the attachments
to not automatically
load attachements when viewing the message body?
No, since the attachments ARE the message body.
This seems to be an oversimplification. Actually, the message body
consists of multiple parts, and IMAP provides mechanisms to selectively
download some of the parts. (It also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2007-08-24 13:26:29, schrieb Louis-David Mitterrand:
When using imap with mutt-1.5.16 is there a way to not
automatically load attachements when viewing the message body?
Unfortunately, no, there isn't. Mutt's imap support is somewhat
Hi,
When using imap with mutt-1.5.16 is there a way to not automatically
load attachements when viewing the message body?
Ideally when on a low-bandwidth connection I'd like to have access to
the message text and select which attachments to download.
I tried running mutt with auto_view
I often get PDF attachments that are mis-labeled. I use ^E in the
attachments menu and replace the mime type, and all is well. I would
like to add a macro to the attachments menu to do that for me in a more
automatic way. But I can't; mutt doesn't accept
:macro attachments
I am
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:25:27AM -0400, Raphael Finkel wrote:
But I can't; mutt doesn't accept
:macro attachments
The menu is named 'attach'.
me
hello,
does anybody know if its possible to cancel the download of large email
attachments or not download the data for the attachment at all unless it
needs to be downloaded to be saved.
It would be really useful to read the content of an email without having
to wait for the attachment
Is there a patch for this, that will show n number of
attachments, each in a line below the main index line.
Thanks
Eric
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:24:24PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
Is there a patch for this, that will show n number of
attachments, each in a line below the main index line.
you can press 'v' on the index view...
--
Javier Rojas
GPG Key ID: 0xA1C57061
pgp6lvrm9UexX.pgp
Description: PGP
* Derek Martin [2007.03.14 19:30]:
I consider this to be utterly and completely
broken, and I'm considering reporting it as a
bug, but I'm waiting to see what other people
think.
From my limited understanding, when a message is
mime-encoded, the *whole body* is a set of
attachments
a message is
mime-encoded, the *whole body* is a set of
attachments, including what you refer to as the
body, which is the part you composed before
sending the message.
It's not the encoding that I care about... it's the behavior of Mutt
as I'm responding to the mail. When READING a mime-encoded
of these could stand to be a
lot clearer... i.e. what the hell does Controls the decoding of
complex MIME messages into text/plain when forwarding a message
actually mean, exactly?] Anyway...
The problem is this: Often, I have mail which consists of a body, and
several text attachments
.. in the
past I've relied on 'b' to bounce the message on to someone when I needed to
preserve the attachments as-is, but this obviously doesn't allow you to
(easily) edit the contents of the message first. At least not in a way
compareable to how other mailers do it.
Ray
.
Definitely interested in hearing the discussion on this one as well.. in the
past I've relied on 'b' to bounce the message on to someone when I needed to
preserve the attachments as-is, but this obviously doesn't allow you to
(easily) edit the contents of the message first. At least
marking it up to
distinguish it from what I've written.
Definitely interested in hearing the discussion on this one as well.. in the
past I've relied on 'b' to bounce the message on to someone when I needed to
preserve the attachments as-is, but this obviously doesn't allow you
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 10:58:10AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Wednesday, January 31 at 04:18 PM, quoth Stefan M??rkl:
I know that officially this isn't possible, but can I make mutt sign
and encrypt messages with attachments inline somehow? One of my
contacts uses broken software so
Hi,
I know that officially this isn't possible, but can I make mutt sign
and encrypt messages with attachments inline somehow? One of my
contacts uses broken software so he can't handle PGP/MIME messages.
Stefan
--
Dipl.-Ing. Stefan Märkl | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institute
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 Stefan Märkl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
I know that officially this isn't possible, but can I make mutt sign
and encrypt messages with attachments inline somehow? One of my
contacts uses broken software so he can't handle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 31 at 04:18 PM, quoth Stefan Märkl:
I know that officially this isn't possible, but can I make mutt sign
and encrypt messages with attachments inline somehow? One of my
contacts uses broken software so he can't handle PGP
with attachments inline somehow?
Yes, see $pgp_autoinline, $pgp_replyinline.
Also adjustable in the pgp menu. (like I did for this message)
That doesn't work for messages with attachments, as he is
requesting.
Oh, I oversaw that, Sorry. Not possible in this case.
Michael
--
Computers are like air
Hello Eric,
Why not use metamail in a macro and pipe the whole message to
it by detaching the whole process?
If I open a pdf attachment, my viewer xpdf is always detached
and i can continue reading my messages while xpdf stay open.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Stefano Sabatini wrote:
# textual session
if [ -z display ]; then
This will never be true. You meant to say the following there.
if [ -z $DISPLAY ]; then
Bob
On date Saturday 2007-01-20 12:20:36 -0700, Bob Proulx muttered:
Stefano Sabatini wrote:
# textual session
if [ -z display ]; then
This will never be true. You meant to say the following there.
if [ -z $DISPLAY ]; then
Yes, you're right, thanks!
--
Stefano
On ons 17 jan 15:34, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
Any suggestions?
I've had the same problem with firefox. I've solved it by hitting enter
twice. Then the first tab will be blank and the second one will have the
html message.
Give it a try. :-)
--
Johannes Martinsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
0736 -
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:12:27PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
image/*; mutt_bgrun xv %s; test=test $TERM != screen RunningX
Is RunningX much like: test -n $DISPLAY
When your
sh -c exec display %s /dev/null 21
Instead of asynchronously forking off a process, you could also use
a
Hi all mutters.
I'm facing this problem (don't remember when it started to issue).
When I try to view a text/html attachment I get from my browser a
similiar message:
File /home/sds/tmp/muttIVsHqg not found.
Check the location of the file and try again.
I checked for the named file and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 17 at 03:34 PM, quoth Stefano Sabatini:
When I try to view a text/html attachment I get from my browser a
similiar message:
File /home/sds/tmp/muttIVsHqg not found.
Check the location of the file and try again.
I checked for
On date Wednesday 2007-01-17 09:55:33 -0500, Kyle Wheeler muttered:
On Wednesday, January 17 at 03:34 PM, quoth Stefano Sabatini:
When I try to view a text/html attachment I get from my browser a
similiar message:
File /home/sds/tmp/muttIVsHqg not found.
Check the location of the file and
Like in other mail clients I just want to press on the selected
attachment and view it and then go down to the next and view it.
So I may open any number of the attachments at one time.
To detach I am using a mailcap recipe of:
image/jpg; sh -c exec display %s /dev/null 21
When I concatenate
On 2007-01-18, Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like in other mail clients I just want to press on the selected
attachment and view it and then go down to the next and view it.
So I may open any number of the attachments at one time.
That's how I have my mutt configured and it works very
attachements tagger
Voila.
Le vendredi 21 mars 2003 à 16:25, Ploum écrivait :
Bonjour,
Comment est-il possible avec mutt de forwarder plusieurs attachments d'un
mail.
En les taggant avec t dans la liste des attach puis en appuyant sur f,
seul l'attachment en dessous du curseur est
When I use uuencode (uuencode somefile somefile2 | mail address) it comes
across as an attachment in outlook but not in mutt. When I send an
attachment from mutt to mutt (or outlook to mutt) it comes in as an
attachment that doesn't require uudecode. I know that I can save the encoded
version from
. With all the headers
and so.
My question is this - can I use
uuencode to send an attachment that mutt will see as an attachment without
requiring the uudecode.
AFAIK no. You should use
mutt -a file
to send attachments from commandline.
HTH HAND
sascha
sorry for my english ;)
--
Fuer
* John Haviland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-19 00:46 (CEST)]
My question is this - can I use uuencode to send an attachment
that mutt will see as an attachment without requiring the
uudecode.
Is there any special reason tu use the 'outdated' uudecode?
Why not using the base64, which seems to
* jochen issing [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-10-2002 13:56]:
I recently received a message with a huge number of pictures attached.
Now I want to store all these (or tagged ones) pics in a specified
folder. Can anybody tell me how to do this? Perhaps a sample?
Currently, mutt asks per file where
jochen issing ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
I recently received a message with a huge number of pictures attached.
Now I want to store all these (or tagged ones) pics in a specified
folder. Can anybody tell me how to do this? Perhaps a sample?
This has become an FAQ. Check the archives.
HTH,
to to the attachments menu with
view-attachments ('v') then you can
tag-entry ('t') all the parts you want
to save and then use the tag-prefix (';')
command before you use save-entry ('s');
mutt will prompt you before saving each
entry (attachment/file/part), and the macro
will add the selected path
[ no cc to fefe ]
Hi,
* Sven Guckes [02-10-09 14:24:56 +0200] wrote:
[...]
wish:add an option to set the favourite
directory for saving attachments in.
Because mutt sucks in this particular sence I made a patch
which is kind of ``works for me''. It's attached.
How
401 - 500 of 918 matches
Mail list logo
