Re: tool to parse general log (3.23.55)

2007-01-25 Thread Jake Peavy
On 1/25/07, Sid Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: all, I have been tasked with upgrading a critical 3.23.55 database to 5.0 (.27-ish). short version is it's never been upgraded because authors have moved on and nobody's sure of everything that uses it. I enabled the general lo

tool to parse general log (3.23.55)

2007-01-25 Thread Sid Lane
all, I have been tasked with upgrading a critical 3.23.55 database to 5.0(.27-ish). short version is it's never been upgraded because authors have moved on and nobody's sure of everything that uses it. I enabled the general log a few days ago and have a good body of data with which

server version: 3.23.55-max

2005-06-26 Thread solbeach
I have PERL DBI/DBD installed. What SQL do I issue to obtain list of all tables with PK for a given database? What SQL do I issue to obtain the SQL source to (re)create all indexes for a given database? -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscri

Re: Constraints under 3.23.55-nt

2003-07-31 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
"Morten Gulbrandsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I use Version DBMS MySQL 3.23.55 runing under Windows 2000. > > I have coded this from a textbook; > === > > > C:\mysql\bin>type constraint.sql > USE company; > > DROP TABLE IF EXIS

Constraints under 3.23.55-nt

2003-07-31 Thread Morten Gulbrandsen
Hello programmers: I use Version DBMS MySQL 3.23.55 runing under Windows 2000. I have coded this from a textbook; === C:\mysql\bin>type constraint.sql USE company; DROP TABLE IF EXISTS EMPLOYEE; CREATE TABLE EMPLOYEE ( FNAME VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL, MINIT C

MySQL 3.23.55 compilation errors

2003-07-30 Thread Dennis Francis B. Tutanes
CTED] (BSubject: [50 character or so descriptive subject here (for reference)] (B (BError in compilation of MySQL 3.23.55 (B (B>Description: (B (B (BI was trying to install MySQL 3.23.55 on our HP-UX server. (BThere were errors generated when I tried to compile it. (BError points

RE: schema and Catalog under MySQL 3.23.55

2003-07-28 Thread Victor Pendleton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: schema and Catalog under MySQL 3.23.55 Hi programmers, I try to investigate some of the basics behind schemas and cataloges, Which is part of SQL2 Language this is the error message I get: C:\mysql

schema and Catalog under MySQL 3.23.55

2003-07-28 Thread Morten Gulbrandsen
\g. Your MySQL connection id is 246 to server version: 3.23.55-nt Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the buffer. mysql> create schema company_00 authorization administrator; ERROR 1064: You have an error in your SQL syntax near 'schema company_0

Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-25 Thread Info
Estoy tomando el sol . q -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-25 Thread Info
Estoy tomando el sol . q -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-24 Thread Mikhail Entaltsev
m forwarding this to Sanja. IMHO current behaviour is absolutly correct. Mikhail. - Original Message - From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:43 PM Subject: Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55

Re: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-24 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Message - From: ""Mikhail Entaltsev"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:44 PM Subject: InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13 > --=_NextPart_000_0119_01C351F2.03137C50 > Content-Typ

InnoDB locking: Different behavior on 3.23.55 and 4.0.13

2003-07-24 Thread Mikhail Entaltsev
Hi I have 2 MySQL servers: Server1 is 3.23.55-max-log Server2 is 4.0.13-standard-log Let's assume that we have 2 connections (Conn1 and Conn2) and table test: CREATE TABLE `test` ( `id` int(3) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name`

Re: MySQL 4.0 Slave to 3.23.55 master Replication

2003-06-10 Thread Egor Egorov
Devin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I noticed that my MySQL 4.0.13 Slave Replication server is having > a wierd problem. If you look at the master.info file on the slave > it keeps updating like it is really updating the slave but in > the mysql.err log it shows: > > 030609 16:12:08 Slave I/O t

MySQL 4.0 Slave to 3.23.55 master Replication

2003-06-09 Thread Devin
I noticed that my MySQL 4.0.13 Slave Replication server is having a wierd problem. If you look at the master.info file on the slave it keeps updating like it is really updating the slave but in the mysql.err log it shows: 030609 16:12:08 Slave I/O thread: connected to master '[EMAIL PROTECTED]:3

re: RE: MySQL 3.23.55 is released

2003-04-04 Thread Egor Egorov
On Friday 04 April 2003 11:19, Li Robert wrote: > Does MySQL support Japanese database name and Japanese table name? > How to enable it? Section 6.1.2 Database, Table, Index, Column, and Alias Names: http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Legal_names.html "A name may consist of alphanumeric charact

RE: MySQL 3.23.55 is released

2003-04-04 Thread Li, Robert
Hi, all Does MySQL support Japanese database name and Japanese table name? How to enable it? Thanks and regards Robert -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cannot Restore MySQL 3.23.37 dump to Mysql 3.23.55

2003-03-24 Thread Daniel Kasak
DM wrote: Im trying to restore a database dumb taken from a Sun Cobalt RAQ4 running Mysql 3.23.37 and restore it to a new Dell PowerEdge running Redhat 7.3 with Mysql 3.23.55. I have tried from both the command line and using phpmyadmin With Command line /usr/bin/mysql database -uuser -ppassword

Cannot Restore MySQL 3.23.37 dump to Mysql 3.23.55

2003-03-24 Thread DM
Im trying to restore a database dumb taken from a Sun Cobalt RAQ4 running Mysql 3.23.37 and restore it to a new Dell PowerEdge running Redhat 7.3 with Mysql 3.23.55. I have tried from both the command line and using phpmyadmin With Command line /usr/bin/mysql database -uuser -ppassword < /

Re: How to compile mysql-3.23.55 on Aix 4.3.3.11

2003-03-16 Thread Jose
Thats right. problem resolved. Thanks. set-variable=thread_stack=256k in the [mysqld] portion of you're my.cnf file. HTH -Bart -Original Message- From: Jose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to compile mysql-3.23.

Re: How to compile mysql-3.23.55 on Aix 4.3.3.11

2003-03-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 16), Jose said: > Now i'm trying to compile 3.23.55 version to probe if it works. I use > gcc-3.2.1. I have read installation instructions for aix but i get > this error for "make" process: > > gcc -pipe -mcpu=power -Wa,-many -O3 -DDBUG

RE: How to compile mysql-3.23.55 on Aix 4.3.3.11

2003-03-16 Thread Bart Schaerrer
, March 16, 2003 10:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to compile mysql-3.23.55 on Aix 4.3.3.11 Hi! First of all i had working mysql 3-23-35 on aix 4.3.3.10. After upgrade to 4.3.3.11 it doesn't works. I get: Warning: mysql_select_db() [function.mysql-select-db]: Can't connect t

How to compile mysql-3.23.55 on Aix 4.3.3.11

2003-03-16 Thread Jose
Hi! First of all i had working mysql 3-23-35 on aix 4.3.3.10. After upgrade to 4.3.3.11 it doesn't works. I get: Warning: mysql_select_db() [function.mysql-select-db]: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/tmp/mysql.sock Now i'm trying to compile 3.23.55 ve

Re: Incorrect handling of foreign key constraints in InnoDB tables in MySQL 3.23.55-max run on Windows ME

2003-03-13 Thread Heikki Tuuri
://www.mysql.com sql query - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 11:13 AM Subject: Incorrect handling of foreign key constraints in InnoDB tables in MySQL 3.23.55-max run on Windows ME > Hi, > > If a &qu

Incorrect handling of foreign key constraints in InnoDB tables in MySQL 3.23.55-max run on Windows ME

2003-03-13 Thread mazanek
I hope you can use the following example to repeat the problem and fix this bug Thank you Jan Mazánek [EMAIL PROTECTED] # ======== === # Incorrect handling of foreign key constraints in InnoDB tables in MySQL 3.23.55-max #

Re: BUGs on MyODBC when trying MS DTS MSSQL 2000 to MYSQL 3.23.55

2003-03-07 Thread Karam Chand
I have never tried MS DTS, but SQLyog works great for me in transferring MS SQL Server data to MySQL. --- phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How-To-Repeat: > > > I am tried to use MS DTS to transfer a table from > MSSQL 2000 to MYSQL > 3.23.55, > however th

BUGs on MyODBC when trying MS DTS MSSQL 2000 to MYSQL 3.23.55

2003-03-07 Thread phil
How-To-Repeat: I am tried to use MS DTS to transfer a table from MSSQL 2000 to MYSQL 3.23.55, however there has an error during the transformation on one data type. The error happens when I have a "text" datatype on MSSQL 2000 table, and "text/blob" on MySQL table. T

Problems with Innobase DB support in version 3.23.55

2003-03-03 Thread Carsten Thoene
Hallo, we have downloaded the new 3.23.55 mysql DB from you as Source Download Tarball (tar.gz) and want to build them in our environment for tests under SUN OS. We have tared the downloaded version in our Scource Directory environment. (for example /mysql/src/mysql-3.23.55) After that we

Problems with Berkeley DB support in version 3.23.55

2003-03-03 Thread Carsten Thoene
Hallo, we have downloaded the new 3.23.55 mysql DB from you as Source Download Tarball (tar.gz) and want to build them in our environment for tests under SUN OS. We have tared the downloaded version in our Scource Directory environment. (for example /mysql/src/mysql-3.23.55) After that we want

Installing/Unistalling MySQL-3.23.55-1

2003-02-27 Thread Nick Chorley
Hi, I downloaded the rpm file for this and installed using rpm -i MySQL-3.23.55-1.rpm. It went fine and said I should run mysqladmin to set root password but all I got was 'command not found'. I then tried to uninstall it, without much luck: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Downloads]# rpm -e MyS

table name case in mysql.db for 3.23.55-max

2003-02-26 Thread Brian Blood
>Release: mysql-3.23.55-max (Official MySQL-max binary) >Environment: System: Darwin iMaxSales-Hancock.local. 6.4 Darwin Kernel Version 6.4: Wed Jan 29 18:50:42 PST 2003; root:xnu/xnu-344.26.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc We have tables with mixed case

Re: MYSQL 3.23.55 Install Issues

2003-02-24 Thread miguel solórzano
At 17:43 24/02/2003 +, Simon Tyler wrote: Hi, Hi, I've been trying to get the 3.23.55 version of mysqld-nt.exe working with our product (GMS Mail) and I'm running into install\service related issues. I've read through the various threads on this list and nothing seems to s

MYSQL 3.23.55 Install Issues

2003-02-24 Thread Simon Tyler
Hi, I've been trying to get the 3.23.55 version of mysqld-nt.exe working with our product (GMS Mail) and I'm running into install\service related issues. I've read through the various threads on this list and nothing seems to solve my problem. The situation is that we include

Re: Re: Bug with uppercased database in 3.23.55?

2003-02-21 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
On Thursday 20 February 2003 17:59, you wrote: > > > C:\mysql>mysql -u b R > > > ERROR 1044: Access denied for user: 'b@localhost' to database 'r' > > > > I guess no. In 3.23.55 by default lower_case_table_names=1 on Windows, so > > all

Re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE

2003-02-20 Thread Guilhem Bichot
ichot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jeff Kilbride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:06 PM > Subject: Re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE

Re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE

2003-02-20 Thread Jeff Kilbride
3.x to get rid of this problem? Thanks, --jeff - Original Message - From: "Guilhem Bichot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jeff Kilbride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February

Re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE

2003-02-20 Thread Guilhem Bichot
; The file I was loading was approx. 5MB and none of the data made it to the > slaves. > > Thanks, > --jeff > > - Original Message - > From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: T

Re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE

2003-02-20 Thread Jeff Kilbride
]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:32 AM Subject: re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE > Jeff, Egor, > > Guilhem Bichot just found a bug in replication of LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE in > 4.0. > > Th

re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE

2003-02-20 Thread Heikki Tuuri
selective replication of some tables or databases? If yes, check also that your LOAD DATA INFILE is not excluded by these rules. Regards, Heikki Innobase Oy sql query . Subject: re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE From: Egor Egorov Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:07:02 +0200

re: Bug with uppercased database in 3.23.55?

2003-02-20 Thread Victoria Reznichenko
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 13:19, Juri Shimon wrote: > Is it a bug? > > C:\mysql>mysql -u root > Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. > Your MySQL connection id is 29 to server version: 3.23.55-max-nt > > mysql> create database R; > Quer

re: BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE

2003-02-20 Thread Egor Egorov
On Thursday 20 February 2003 01:04, Jeff Kilbride wrote: > I have one master and two slaves all running 3.23.55-max on RedHat 7.3. > I've had replication up and running smoothly for several days. Today, I > decided to try out LOAD DATA INFILE on the master. After successfully &g

RE: Possibly bug in InnoDB with mysql 3.23.55

2003-02-20 Thread Iago Sineiro
Thansk for the information Fred. Iago Sineiro. > -Mensaje original- > De: Fred van Engen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: jueves, 20 de febrero de 2003 10:37 > Para: Iago Sineiro > CC: MySql Mail List > Asunto: Re: Possibly bug in InnoDB with mysql 3.23.55 >

Re: Possibly bug in InnoDB with mysql 3.23.55

2003-02-20 Thread Fred van Engen
Hi, On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:12:56AM +0100, Iago Sineiro wrote: > I think I detected a bug in InnoDB with MySQL 3.23.55. > > I have a table named ARTICLE_POID of type InnoDB and transaction_isolation > is READ-COMMITTED. AUTOCOMMIT is 1 (default value). > ... > I think thi

Possibly bug in InnoDB with mysql 3.23.55

2003-02-20 Thread Iago Sineiro
Hi. I think I detected a bug in InnoDB with MySQL 3.23.55. I have a table named ARTICLE_POID of type InnoDB and transaction_isolation is READ-COMMITTED. AUTOCOMMIT is 1 (default value). mysql> DESCRIBE ARTICLE_POID; +++--+-+-+---+ | Field | T

BUG? 3.23.55 not replicating LOAD DATA INFILE

2003-02-19 Thread Jeff Kilbride
I have one master and two slaves all running 3.23.55-max on RedHat 7.3. I've had replication up and running smoothly for several days. Today, I decided to try out LOAD DATA INFILE on the master. After successfully loading on the master, I checked both slaves and neither one had the new data.

Bug with uppercased database in 3.23.55?

2003-02-19 Thread Juri Shimon
Hi! Is it a bug? C:\mysql>mysql -u root Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 29 to server version: 3.23.55-max-nt mysql> create database R; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.06 sec) mysql> grant all privileges on `R%`.* to b; Query OK, 0 rows

Access denied 3.23.55

2003-02-18 Thread Juri Shimon
Hi! Is it a bug? C:\mysql>mysql -u root Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 29 to server version: 3.23.55-max-nt mysql> create database R; Query OK, 1 row affected (0.06 sec) mysql> grant all privileges on `R%`.* to b; Query OK, 0 rows

mysql 3.23.55 broken if compiled with -all-static

2003-02-17 Thread Carlos
Hi, Compilation of mysql 3.23.55 fails ONLY when using "--with-mysqld-ldflags=-all-static" results in broken mysqld. Segmentation fault? Resolving stack trace: 0x808f4d4 _Z15handle_segfaulti + 404 0x81bc67a __pthread_sighandler + 122 0x81ceb4d __strtol_internal + 1421

Re: RAND() Problems in mysql version 3.23.54 and 3.23.55 (linux)

2003-02-11 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi! On Feb 05, Tue Tønning wrote: > Hey, > > I have discovered a strange error in the mysql versions mentioned in subj. > > Example. > A table with 10 entries ...i want to draw 3 randomly > => "select fieldName from tableName order by RAND() limit 3" > > this have worked for the last year or so

Re: RedHat 8.0 and MySQL 3.23.55 install problem

2003-02-11 Thread Csongor Fagyal
I get this message back: Failed dependencies: MySQL-DBI-perl-bin is needed by MySQL-bench-3.23.55-1 I know I have this dependency installed, but I think I know where the problem is just not sure how to fix it. Here is what I get when I do a 'rpm -qa | grep DBI-perl': Mysql-DB

RedHat 8.0 and MySQL 3.23.55 install problem

2003-02-11 Thread Wes Hegge
I am having problems installing MySQL 3.23.55 on RedHat 8.0. The version that came with RedHat will not let me remotely login. I found a thread at RedHat that said that this is a known problem. One of the suggestions was to upgrade MySQL. That is what I am attempting to do. This is what

mysql upgrade from 3.23.47 to 3.23.55 on Sun OS 5.8

2003-02-10 Thread Jannie Qu
sql, query. Hi, group, Greetings! I'd like to hear your advice about "what's the best way to upgrade 3.23.47 to 3.23.55 on SunOS 5.8 with less downtime"? Thank you, Jannie _ Add photos to your e-mail with

mysql-3.23.55 libmsyql.c:1348 invalid gethostbyname_r arguments

2003-02-10 Thread Faheem Patel
he compile error shows incorrect arguments supplied to gethostbyname_r. >Submitter-Id: FUF >Originator:root >Organization: >MySQL support: none >Synopsis: mysql-3.23.55 libmysql.c:1348 invalid gethostbyname_r arguments >Severity: serious >Priority: medium

Re: RAND() Problems in mysql version 3.23.54 and 3.23.55 (linux)

2003-02-08 Thread Aman Raheja
"Tue Tønning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:38 PM Subject: RAND() Problems in mysql version 3.23.54 and 3.23.55 (linux) > Hey, > > I have discovered a strange error in the mysql versions mentioned in subj. > > Ex

RAND() Problems in mysql version 3.23.54 and 3.23.55 (linux)

2003-02-06 Thread Tue Tønning
Hey, I have discovered a strange error in the mysql versions mentioned in subj. Example. A table with 10 entries ...i want to draw 3 randomly => "select fieldName from tableName order by RAND() limit 3" this have worked for the last year or so.but after upgrading our redhat 7.2 with mysql ve

re: MySQL 3.23.55-nt on Windows 2000: Trying to Create InnoDB Tables

2003-02-04 Thread Egor Egorov
On Monday 03 February 2003 23:20, Dana Shields wrote: > I've got a beginner's question: I've installed SQL Server, and begun > building tables; when I create a new table, the table type is defaulting to > MyISAM. I wanted to change it to InnoDB, but everytime I save it, it > reverts back to MyISAM.

RE: MySQL 3.23.55-nt on Windows 2000: Trying to Create InnoDB Tables

2003-02-04 Thread Victor Pendleton
, February 03, 2003 3:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MySQL 3.23.55-nt on Windows 2000: Trying to Create InnoDB Tables I've got a beginner's question: I've installed SQL Server, and begun building tables; when I create a new table, the table type is defaulting to MyISAM. I wanted

Re: MySQL 3.23.55-nt on Windows 2000: Trying to Create InnoDB Tables

2003-02-04 Thread Veysel Harun Sahin
Take a look at http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/NT_start.html. And about innodb tables you can read http://www.innodb.com/ibman.html. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a beginner's question: I've installed SQL Server, and begun building tables; when I create a new table, the table type is defaulting

MySQL 3.23.55-nt on Windows 2000: Trying to Create InnoDB Tables

2003-02-04 Thread Dana Shields
I've got a beginner's question: I've installed SQL Server, and begun building tables; when I create a new table, the table type is defaulting to MyISAM. I wanted to change it to InnoDB, but everytime I save it, it reverts back to MyISAM. Is this feature not available in Windows? It appears that "m

Compiling 3.23.55

2003-02-02 Thread Martin Ostlund
Hi. Im trying to compile MySQL 3.23.55 (.tar.gz) on Slackware 8.1 Patched to 9.0-beta. In configure I just used --prefix, and it fails on the make part: libmysql.c: In function `mysql_real_connect': libmysql.c:1349: warning: passing arg 5 of `gethostbyname_r' from incompatible po

Re: MySQL/InnoDB-3.23.55 is released

2003-01-24 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Rogger, - Original Message - From: "Rogger Vasquez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:43 PM Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-3.23.55 is released &

MySQL/InnoDB-3.23.55 is released

2003-01-24 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Hi! InnoDB is a MySQL table type which supports transactions, foreign key constraints, and a non-free hot backup tool. Version 3.23.55 is a bugfix release of the stable 3.23 branch, which is recommended for production use. Users who have had concurrency problems in INSERT INTO ... SELECT

MySQL 3.23.55 is released

2003-01-24 Thread Lenz Grimmer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, MySQL 3.23.55, a new version of the popular Open Source Database, has been released. It is now available in source and binary form for a number of platforms from our download pages at http://www.mysql.com/downloads/ and mirror sites. Note that

3.23.55

2002-12-16 Thread Varshavchick Alexander
Hi people, what is the status of version 3.23.55? It's already available for download from www.mysql.com, but the links on the official download page all points to 3.23.54a... regards Alexander Varshavchick, Metrocom Joint Stock Company Phone: (812)118-3322, 118-311