hi,
i just upgrade mysql to newer version 3.23.45 and now the slave that is
just upgraded (the master will be the next to be upgraded but in one
week) return such error:
011206 15:29:41 Slave thread: error connecting to master: Unknown MySQL
Server Host 'hostname' (0) (76), retry in 60 sec
i
If you do ps -ef | grep mysql, I think you'll find that the server is
already running.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 8:03
Subject: mysql-3.23.35
Hi,
I have just install
Hi,
I have just installed mysql-3.23.35 on a linux - mandrake 7.2 box. When I try to run
it in usr/bin/safe_mysql & I get a "mysql process already exist". Please tell me why
this is. I would Appreciate feed back as soon as possible.
MIKE
Hello.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 01:54:19AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> > And if you compile it with a compiler straight from CVS, this is infinite
> > trouble. I am surprised it ran at all... :-)
>
> The guys in debian-devel said the CVS gcc ( unlike the one in Redhat 7.0 )
> will
I have just checked bugs.debian.org .
Debian Bug report logs - #81181
gcc: sig 11, reproducible and not machine-specific
Somebody have file the same problem, with imapd.
not mysql's bug =)
--
Cheng Yuk Pong (SDiZ)
4096/1024 DH/DSS 0xA4C6FAD3
FE28 E6D4 AD21 5D4F F07B EEA6 3C88 5DBB A4C6 FA
> On Thursday 14 June 2001 08:19, SDiZ Cheng wrote:
> > Thanks all..
> > It's up and running now..
> > Seems that is a bug in Debian's CVS version gcc.
> > I can't get older version of kernel compile on it too.
> > I will move this to debian'
On Thursday 14 June 2001 08:19, SDiZ Cheng wrote:
> Thanks all..
> It's up and running now..
> Seems that is a bug in Debian's CVS version gcc.
> I can't get older version of kernel compile on it too.
> I will move this to debian's mailing list =)
Trying to ru
I am using the MySQL offical binary. It's okay now..
Just curious.. what distro and gcc/glibc version MySQL team
use to compile their linux binary?
--
Cheng Yuk Pong (SDiZ)
4096/1024 DH/DSS 0xA4C6FAD3
FE28 E6D4 AD21 5D4F F07B EEA6 3C88 5DBB A4C6 FAD3
---
SDiZ Cheng writes:
> I cannot find the core file.. where is it?
> BTW, system seems somtimes run out of file handles / max processes.
> There is some more information to provide:
>
> mysqld got signal 11;
> The manual section 'Debugging a MySQL server' tells you how to use a
> stack trace and/or
Upgrade to 3.23.39 first ( and make sure to use our binary). 3.23.35 has some
critical bugs.
--
MySQL Development Team
For technical support contracts, go to https://order.mysql.com/
__ ___ ___ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Sasha Pachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /
I cannot find the core file.. where is it?
BTW, system seems somtimes run out of file handles / max processes.
There is some more information to provide:
mysqld got signal 11;
The manual section 'Debugging a MySQL server' tells you how to use a
stack trace and/or the core file to produce a readab
Hi all, I am a new subscriber of this list.
I have a question that have confuse me for a long time.
I am currently running MySQL-3.23.32 on Debian(woody)
with kernel 2.4.x on a i386 box /w 1G Ram..
We are currently runing two different kind of database on the
same server. One of them is a few ta
nization: Obragas Holding N.V.
>MySQL support: none
>Synopsis: configuration problem Source Compiling
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Category: mysql
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: mysql-3.23.35 (Source distribution)
>Environment:
Hi,
I have to run my application under Solaris-2.6 (we cannot upgrade our
web server) and I need some 3.23.x functionality. I tried to compile the
3.23.35 sources but "configure" complained about the compiler.
Could somebody provide me a binary version of 3.23.x (the best would be
of course 35)
Thanks for suggestions, just downgrading now.
Alexander
-
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <
uot;average", because we have more than 30 databases with different
> structure and lot of different kind of sql queries.
> Mysql used for web projects (Queries per second avg: 35.859).
>
> Both mysql-3.23.35 and mysql-3.23.33 comp
an 30 databases with different
structure and lot of different kind of sql queries.
Mysql used for web projects (Queries per second avg: 35.859).
Both mysql-3.23.35 and mysql-3.23.33 compiled from sources using gcc-2.95.2
I downloaded version 3.23.35 from the MySQL web-site with the intention of
trying out transactions. After installation of binary RPMs from the
standard download section, these do not seem to recognise the --dbd-home
option, or allow me to create a BDB type table.
Should I be looking in anothe
An example query and an explanation of what you are trying to do
would be helpful.
Thanks
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Brunella del Sorbo wrote:
> Hi,
> the version mysql that I am using supports the transactions but these
> are not recognized from the DBD.
> How can I resolve the problem?
> Thanks
>
Hi,
the version mysql that I am using supports the transactions but these
are not recognized from the DBD.
How can I resolve the problem?
Thanks
--
Brunella del Sorbo
Officine Digitali Srl
Idee Tecnologie & Soluzioni per il Web
Via Ferrarese 219/7 40128
Bo
Pascal THIVENT writes:
> hi,
>
> i'm triying to install MySQL/3.23.35 on a sparc running Solaris 7
> Here are the steps I follow :
>
> # cd mysql-3.23.35
> # CC=gcc CFLAGS="-O6 -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa"
> # CXX=gcc CXXFLAGS="-O6 -felide-con
hi,
i'm triying to install MySQL/3.23.35 on a sparc running Solaris 7
Here are the steps I follow :
# cd mysql-3.23.35
# CC=gcc CFLAGS="-O6 -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa"
# CXX=gcc CXXFLAGS="-O6 -felide-constructors -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
-mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa&quo
Hello everybody!
I've just switched from version 3.23.29a-gamma to 3.23.35 and noticed
a very high system load increase. As I switched back, everything worked
fine again.
Can anyone agree with this?
As I'm using the replication feature I like to use always
a recent version. This host is a maste
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 02:55:17PM +1200, Quentin Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To be fair to the anonymous writer, the main reason for introducing
> 3.23.25 was
>
> Changes in release 3.23.35
> --
>
>* Fixed newly introduce bug in `ORDER BY'.
>
> Nothing there about 'i
grade or not upgrade' decision.
JM2c
Quentin
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy D. Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 19 March 2001 11:47 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Greg Cope
Subject: Re: MySQL 3.23.35 is released
On Sun, Mar 18,
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 03:31:47PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 17-Mar-2001 Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
>
> >> Er. Is there any way you guys can actually form a stable branch,
> >> and a development branch? It would be nice to get a stable
> >> version of mysql with replication, and that
On 17-Mar-2001 Jeremy D. Zawodny wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:56:34AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> On 17-Mar-2001 Greg Cope wrote:
>> > Michael Widenius wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x
>> >> releas
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:51:39AM +, Peter Skipworth wrote:
> I'd love to see some benchmarks soonish if anyone has/is about to
> compare each of the table handlers for speed and
> stability. Personally I'd love to have row-level locking, but don't
> want to do it if it means lower stability
I'd love to see some benchmarks soonish if anyone has/is about to
compare each of the table handlers for speed and stability. Personally I'd
love to have row-level locking, but don't want to do it if it means
lower stability and/or slower basic select/insert queries.
regards,
P
On Sat, 17 Mar
2
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:53:50PM -0800, Patrick Calkins wrote:
> Hello all;
>
> Sorry to sound a little naive, but what is this new GEMINI thing I
> have been reading about? Is there any FAQ/Docs on it or what is so
> neet about it??
It is a new table handler which is being developed by the fol
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: MySQL 3.23.35 is released
> Michael Widenius wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >
> > Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x
release
> > Greg> may be and when we
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:56:34AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 17-Mar-2001 Greg Cope wrote:
> > Michael Widenius wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>
> >> Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x
> >> release
> >> Greg> may be and when we might see a public 4
On 17-Mar-2001 Greg Cope wrote:
> Michael Widenius wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>> Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x
>> release
>> Greg> may be and when we might see a public 4.x alpha. I know the answer
>> will
>> Greg> probably be "When its ready" but a small
Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Greg> On the off chance any ideas when this (A Gemini THandler) 3.23.x release
> Greg> may be and when we might see a public 4.x alpha. I know the answer will
> Greg> probably be "When its ready" but a small clue would be nice :-)
>
> Lets guess a bit :)
Hi!
> "Greg" == Greg Cope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Greg> Michael Widenius wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The 3.23.35 mainly fixes a critical bug in 3.23.34 with ORDER BY. We
>> don't know how the ORDER BY bug slipped through our testing suite or
>> how fatal it's really is, but as we have got
Michael Widenius wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The 3.23.35 mainly fixes a critical bug in 3.23.34 with ORDER BY. We
> don't know how the ORDER BY bug slipped through our testing suite or
> how fatal it's really is, but as we have got a couple of reports about
> core dumps regarding this, we recommend 3.23
Hi!
The 3.23.35 mainly fixes a critical bug in 3.23.34 with ORDER BY. We
don't know how the ORDER BY bug slipped through our testing suite or
how fatal it's really is, but as we have got a couple of reports about
core dumps regarding this, we recommend 3.23.34 users to
upgrade as soon as possib
37 matches
Mail list logo
