[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Florian Weimer) wrote:
> > As always: Never trust a statistic you have not faked yourself ...
>
> I doubt that DENIC will ever publish the technical part of its bid, so
> this isn't convincing.
Like you already admitted on the DENIC list, this has of course been made
public,
On 4/1/2005 12:34 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> on the other hand I disagree with your example that the US is inventing
> everything,
Nope, didn't say that either.
> Also, look at where implementation of high-speed local access is being
> done, it's not in the US anyway.
Also a reflection
> VoIP is great. VoPI (Voice over Public Internet) is great when it works,
> but I wouldn't bet my life or my business on it.
Who says that you have to disconnect your home phone
just because you use VoIP? In fact, one of the advantages
of DSL over cable, is that the phone line is still there.
> > My guess would be that PtP is a much bigger bandwidth hog than gaming,
> > especially for the people who have high upstream capacity (10meg+).
>
> the seven biggest isps in japan recently cooperated on a really
> good paper measuring a lot about broadband use in japan. it is
> in the most
* Bill Woodcock:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Yes, the selection of criteria could be biased. Or Telcordia compared
> > apples and oranges when it compared Verisign's 100 ms to DENIC's
> > 200 ms (or what the actual numbers where).
>
> Yeah, I was a little c
> > > My guess would be that PtP is a much bigger bandwidth hog than gaming,
> > > especially for the people who have high upstream capacity (10meg+).
> >
> > the seven biggest isps in japan recently cooperated on a really
> > good paper measuring a lot about broadband use in japan. it
> most american PBX's don't have 911 as a dialplan. you have to dial
9-911.
> this isn't a violation of the law as long as there's a warning
labelabout it.
> but go ahead and visit a few large companies and tell me how many such
warning
> labels you see. as an added boon, note that campuses w
This report has been generated at Fri Apr 1 21:44:47 2005 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Fri 01 Apr 2005, 13:33 CEST]:
> Why can't we have VoIP phones with built-in GPS receivers and a
Because GPS doesn't work indoors.
-- Niels.
--
The idle mind is the devil's playground
--- Owen DeLong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't speak for Paul, but, I propose that the
> government stop telling
> me what I do or don't need, and what risks are or
> are not acceptable for
> my family and allow me to make those choices for
> myself.
This belief == libertarianism, no?
I
> > Why can't we have VoIP phones with built-in GPS receivers and a
>
> Because GPS doesn't work indoors.
GPS works anywhere where the satellite signals can be detected.
http://www.u-blox.com/technology/supersense.html
Obviously, signals get weaker when they have to pass through
solid materials
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri 01 Apr 2005, 14:57 CEST]:
>>> Why can't we have VoIP phones with built-in GPS receivers and a
>> Because GPS doesn't work indoors.
>
> GPS works anywhere where the satellite signals can be detected.
> http://www.u-blox.com/technology/supersense.html
> Obviously, signals g
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:58:39 +0100
>
>
> > > Why can't we have VoIP phones with built-in GPS receivers and a
> >
> > Because GPS doesn't work indoors.
>
> GPS works anywhere wh
On Apr 1, 2005, at 1:07 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
I do believe that study is open to peer review?
Telcordia ranking VRSN way ahead does seem to be raising some
hackles here
it is oddly interesting to see the persistent -- one might even say
tenacious
-- clearly bi-modal clustering of assessments
Requirements for Morality Sections in Routing Area Drafts
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4041.txt
Cheers,
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You need more brain power to understand that draft, so I recommend you
quickly get new Google Gulp:
http://www.google.com/googlegulp/
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
Requirements for Morality Sections in Routing Area Drafts
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4041.txt
Cheers
GPS type technology that works indoors
http://www.rosum.com/rosum_tv-gps_indoor_location_technology.html
Roy Engehausen
Robert Bonomi wrote:
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:58:39 +0100
Why c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Barak) writes:
> > sure as hell, we'll see laws requiring every home to have a telephone,
> > to have that telephone in the kitchen or other main room of the home,
> > and to be clearly marked. then the POTS tithe comes back, it'll be
> > with vengeance.
>
> So given th
At 8:48 +0530 3/30/05, someone wrote:
Telcordia ranking VRSN way ahead does seem to be raising some hackles here
Telcordia did not rank VRSN "way ahead" of the rest.
Being that I work for one of the bidding teams (Sentan), I merely
want to point out that the above statement is untrue. Below are t
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Howard, W. Lee wrote:
> Luke Parrish:
> > In this situation we were expecting to be done for the majority of
> > the maintenance window, but yes I see your point. However I block
> > out a 3 hour window for maintenance because the activities I am
> > perfo
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 05:06:00PM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
> I find this to be entertaining, since as a VOIP consumer, I'm reimbursing
> my ISP for the cost of the traffic as part of my monthly tithe. Why
> exactly are networks taking this stance to QoS VOIP traffic, generated by
> their custom
Priceless. ;-)
The Register:
Published Friday 1st April 2005 15:22 GMT
"Cisco Systems and Kraft Foods shocked investors today
with an unlikely mega-acquisition that will see Cisco
buy Kraft's Nabisco unit for $15bn. Perhaps even more
surprising, former RJR Nabisco and IBM CEO Lou Gerstner
has c
At 11:45 AM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
Priceless. ;-)
The Register:
Published Friday 1st April 2005 15:22 GMT
"Cisco Systems and Kraft Foods shocked investors today
with an unlikely mega-acquisition that will see Cisco
buy Kraft's Nabisco unit for $15bn. Perhaps even more
surprising, former RJR Nabisco a
Thus spake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > VoIP is great. VoPI (Voice over Public Internet) is great when
> > it works, but I wouldn't bet my life or my business on it.
>
> Who says that you have to disconnect your home phone
> just because you use VoIP? In fact, one of the advantages
> of DSL over cable
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Roy wrote:
GPS type technology that works indoors
http://www.rosum.com/rosum_tv-gps_indoor_location_technology.html
the massive uhf antenna on your voip phone will be impressive.
Roy Engehausen
Robert Bonomi wrote:
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Bl
> Personally, I'm quite glad for government regulations
> regarding food safety, home inspection, and lots of
> other things which are safety related. There are
> other restrictions which I'm not thrilled about, but I
> have yet to hear a compelling reason (which does not
> inherently boil down t
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
I understand the woes of mixing 911 and VoIP myself, although I'm not a
Vonage user. The VoIP phone on my desk connects 911 calls to the Vancouver,
BC, PSAP (since it's off a PBX at work), but I also know the direct-dial
number for the local Dallas, TX, PS
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Adi Linden wrote:
If VoIP companies are regulated into providing 911 service, minimum
availability standards, etc is one thing. Forcing anyone that might be
transporting VoIP into becoming a Telco is quite another...
At this point, I think it's simply an argument over the interp
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
Brilliant move Cisco! This should give Cisco a keen and unprecedented insight
into the inner workings of the cracker culture which will enable better
network security.
'Network devices are rated by total packet volume, not chassis weight.
Packets may sett
> Frankly, I'm fine with 911 not working on VoIP lines; I have a cell phone
> for that when needed. Now that I think about it, I'm not sure I've ever
> actually dialed 911 from a land line.
You're lying on the floor incapacitated and in agony, suffering from some
acute and life threatening medic
> a.nic.de is with RIPE in Amsterdam
> f.nic.de and z.nic.de are in Frankfurt
> c.de.net. is with Savvis in Santa Clara
> s.de.net is with Deutsche Telekom in Germany
> l.de.net I see over Mediaways/Telefonica DE in London (what a poor
choice, scary)
For what it's worth, a hi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:22 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RFC 4041
>
>
>
>
> Requirements for Morality Sections in Routing Area Drafts
> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.o
> >ICANN Opens Public Comment Forum on .NET Evaluators' Report
> >29 March 2005
/dev/null.
Runts are hereinafter referred to as crumbs.
Hilton
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 11:30:15 2005
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 09:33:16 -0800 (PST)
> From: Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Robert Boyle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Robert Boyle wrote:
>
> > Brillian
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dave Hilton
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 12:44 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
Ru
Not an April 1st lark, from The Register:
"The report that decided ownership of the .net
registry has come under heavy criticism for a
second time this week."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/01/net_report_spat/
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the In
> But my recent post was not "against" (or "for", for that matter)
> Verisign. I am just disappointed that ICANN did not have the integrity
> to select a company that is _truly_ independent to judge the
> applicants.
In the prior round ICANN picked a company doing non-trivial business with
th
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
>> Frankly, I'm fine with 911 not working on VoIP lines; I have a cell phone
>> for that when needed. Now that I think about it, I'm not sure I've ever
>> actually dialed 911 from a land line.
>
>You're lying on the floor incapacitated and in agony, suffering from some
>acute and life threatenin
--- Adi Linden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If VoIP companies are regulated into providing 911
> service, minimum
> availability standards, etc is one thing. Forcing
> anyone that might be
> transporting VoIP into becoming a Telco is quite
> another...
I agree - the former is exactly the direct
At 01:09 PM 4/1/2005, you wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
indigestion.
Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
That would be really bad! You would almost immediately gain 300lbs if you
enabled
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 02 Apr, 2005
--On 01 April 2005 10:05 -0800 Alexander Kiwerski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And for the record, the GPS locators currently in cell phones tend *not*
to work indoors, so even if you are lucky enough to live in an area where
E911 is plugged into your cell phone carrier's locator service, you stil
Must we now redefine "nibbles" & "bytes".
> For what it's worth, a highly scientific measurement from my house in
> Berkeley, the authoritative location for all quantitative evaluation of
> the Internet, using secret proprietary round-trip latency-measurement
> tools...
>
> a.nic.de, 100 packets, 7% packet loss
> round-trip mi
Resellers beware-
New distribution channels will be opened up,
Girl Scouts will soon be seen offering
byte-able cookies in blue-green boxes,
door to door and in unlikely places!
Stale inventory is not expected to become
a problem even with the increased distribution.
On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:15:55 PST, Dave Hilton said:
>
> Must we now redefine "nibbles" & "bytes".
>
Read RFC4042 - they've just been increased 12.5%. Supersize-me! :)
pgpQxtmI8nUVh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Roy wrote:
>
> >
> > GPS type technology that works indoors
> >
> > http://www.rosum.com/rosum_tv-gps_indoor_location_technology.html
>
> the massive uhf antenna on your voip phone will be impressive.
its integreated into the 'hand
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Roy wrote:
GPS type technology that works indoors
http://www.rosum.com/rosum_tv-gps_indoor_location_technology.html
the massive uhf antenna on your voip phone will be impressive.
Its a great excuse to build TV and video into your VOIP phone. OR build
VOIP
"Church, Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
> indigestion.
I wonder how they're going to integrate Chips Ahoy into the existing Cisco
lineup. Nabisco always used to advertise that Chips Ahoy has far more chips
than any of the
While I was poking around on the ICANN and GNSO web
sites, I ran across this report which might be of
interest:
Community Experiences with the InterNIC Whois
Data Problem Reports System
31 March 2005
http://www.icann.org/whois/wdprs-report-final-31mar05.htm
"This Report summarizes ICANN's exp
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:55 -0800
"Dave Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Must we now redefine "nibbles" & "bytes".
Well, I guess remote configs will have to be disabled - from now on the
only permitted access will be via the cereal port ...
Richard
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Steve Sobol wrote:
>
> "Church, Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
> > indigestion.
>
> I wonder how they're going to integrate Chips Ahoy into the existing Cisco
> lineup. Nabisco always used to advert
hello
anyone seeing issues with qwest dropping packets today?
wyatt
Wyatt Smiarli, Esq. Web Network Administrator
RESIST.COM White Point Publishing, LLC.
+ 1 (760) 728-9817
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download
Yes. According to the Keebler elves, who now are 3rd level TAC
engineers...
Chuck Church
Lead Design Engineer
CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
Netco Government Services - Design & Implementation Team
1210 N. Parker Rd.
Greenville, SC 29609
Home office: 864-335-9473
Cell: 703-819-3495
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P
...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be
reading about crackers until this time next year.
-Bill
You mean SNACK engineers, right?
- Andy
> Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:35:11 -0600
> From: "Church, Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Bill Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
>
>
> Yes. According to the Keebler elves, who now are 3rd level TAC
>
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 1 13:19:44 2005
> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 20:18:38 +0100
> From: Richard Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:15:55 -0800
> "Dave Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Must we now r
> ...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
> foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
> little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be
> reading about crackers until this time next year.
fix your mail reader's filters,
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Bill Woodcock wrote:
...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be
reading about crackers until this time next year.
"In
They don't already?
-ejay
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Church, Chuck
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:54 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: Cisco to merge with Nabisco
>
>
> Incorrectly chosen switching path can now res
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> ...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
> foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
> little more backbone in the moderation, please? I don't want to be
> reading about cr
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't we have VoIP phones with built-in GPS receivers and a built-in
911 dialplan that makes the phone transmit your coordinates along with the
emergency call?
are you serious? if you are, why don't you ask for a pony while
you're at it.
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Bill Nash wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
> >
> > Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
> > indigestion.
>
> Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
Yes, but this is only available with the Gastric Bypass fe
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:33:16AM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
> 'Network devices are rated by total packet volume, not chassis weight.
> Packets may settle during shipping.'
No, Bill, that's the VoIP thread. Pay attention.
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:02:06PM -0500, Joe Provo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:45:16AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> > ...the "reformed" NANOG list moderation committee seems to suffer
> > foolishness somewhat more gladly than the old regime. Could we have a
> > little more backbone in
Actually, that's an interesting point...
What if SIP based phones could "know" do the following:
1. If they know where they are, include:
X-Lat: N/S dd:mm:ss.sss
X-Lon: E/W ddd:mm:ss.sss
In the SIP headers.
2. If they do
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:58:50PM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> Given that, certainly some networks might choose to NOT transport VOIP or
> HTTP or BitTorennt across their networks. There are market reasons why
> this will, or could, eventually force them to re-evaluate their practices
>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:56:27PM +1000, Jamie Norwood wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:33:49 -0800, Alexei Roudnev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Heard of a little thing called 'spam'?
> >
> > So what? You can use your car as a weapon; should we prohibit you from car
> > driving?
>
> No, but
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Roy wrote:
GPS type technology that works indoors
http://www.rosum.com/rosum_tv-gps_indoor_location_technology.html
the massive uhf antenna on your voip phone will be impressive.
its integre
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:02:06 -0500
Joe Provo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have as much humour as the next guy, but [insert renewed call for
> nanog-chat or nanog-social or whatever would keep the chitchat in a
> different blasted bucket]. Heck, if this is the general bucket than
and nanog-li
> and nanog-linkexchange :-) Sometimes I think people post links so
> they can incite flame wars without actually looking like a flame war
> participant.
and i think they do it because they don't know how to set up their
own blog so they can tell the grandkids what they read today.
randy
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:45:42AM -0800, David Barak wrote:
> >we're going to have to integrate it into our computers. ("dammit, i
> >need a decent quality USB headset for less than USD $300!") because
> >as long as something looks-like-a-phone, the POTS empire can use the
> >NANP (or local equiv
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:25:27AM -0800, David Barak wrote:
> > most american PBX's don't have 911 as a dialplan.
> > you have to dial 9-911.
>
> We work on different PBXes. The ones on which I work
> are specifically configured to respond to 911 OR 9-911
> to avoid a problem. Would YOU want
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 09:30:19AM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Adi Linden wrote:
> > If VoIP companies are regulated into providing 911 service, minimum
> > availability standards, etc is one thing. Forcing anyone that might be
> > transporting VoIP into becoming a Telco is quite
Does this mean our routers will be edible? :-)
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 04:45:17PM +, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
>
> Priceless. ;-)
>
> The Register:
> Published Friday 1st April 2005 15:22 GMT
>
> "Cisco Systems and Kraft Foods shocked investors today
> with an unlikely mega-acquisit
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:48:08PM +, Paul Vixie wrote:
> but go ahead and visit a few large companies and tell me how many such warning
> labels you see. as an added boon, note that campuses with blocks of 1000 DIDs
> end up using the corporate headquarters or the address of the PBX as the 9
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 10:09:12AM -0800, Bill Nash wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Church, Chuck wrote:
>
> >
> >Incorrectly chosen switching path can now result in lost packets AND
> >indigestion.
> >
>
> Is this mitigated by activating Nabisco Express Forwarding?
. o O ( aka diarrhea? )
-
The "A" in A-GPS does not come from 12,500 miles away, as their web site
asserts.
The "A" is ephemeris and other over-head info, and in this context is
transmitted by the mobile phone network.
GlobalLocate Corp and SIRF both tout receiver designs that incorporate
massively parallel correlator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Jay R. Ashworth") writes:
> There are, as I implied in another post, many unobvious end-to-end
> systemic characteristics that make the PSTN the PSTN that Internet
> Telephony isn't going to be able to fulfill for some time, if ever, due
> to the differing fundamental engineer
--- "Jay R. Ashworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, and I think the distinction is pertinent
> to this discussion,
> if the car has no seatbelts, you can drive it just
> fine -- as long as
> it came that way. You can't *sell* a car without
> seatbelts, anymore.
That may be the rule in
I've been tasked with evaluating cable management software systems for my
employer. I work for a large university with 30-35,000 phones and roughly as
many computers spread across 100+ buildings in 5 campuses, with substantial
copper, coax, and fiber plants.
That said, I'm much more interested
David,
While it's true that you must wear seatbelts in most states *IF THE CAR
HAS SEATBELTS WHEN MANUFACTURED*. As far as I know, no state requires the
installation of belts in a 1929 Ford Roadster or any other car that
predates the use of seat belts.
NOTE: This is NOT going to NANOG.
--
R. Ke
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
> > (speaking of amazon, i found that usb headsets are down to ~$34.94
> > now. yay!)
> if you mean the logitech 980130-0403, $32 at newegg
> why is usb better than the headset/mic jacks?
because integrated or pci audio are often plagued by internal electrica
Oops! Very sorry. (Man, this is embarrassing!)
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634
> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 14:09:08 -0800
> Fro
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Roy wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> GPS type technology that works indoors
> >>>
> >>> http://www.rosum.com/rosum_tv-gps_indoor_lo
> (speaking of amazon, i found that usb headsets are down to ~$34.94
> now. yay!)
if you mean the logitech 980130-0403, $32 at newegg
why is usb better than the headset/mic jacks?
randy
Also, as a former medical professional who has some actual experience
with these scenarios, I'd like to point out that the percentage of times
that people are _NOT_ screwed, even if the location pops up and EMS gets
there as absolutely fast as possible is less than 1%.
That's right... If you are h
Thus spake "David Barak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > most american PBX's don't have 911 as a dialplan.
> > you have to dial 9-911.
>
> We work on different PBXes. The ones on which I work
> are specifically configured to respond to 911 OR 9-911
> to avoid a
Thus spake "Adi Linden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Frankly, I'm fine with 911 not working on VoIP lines; I have a cell
phone
> > for that when needed. Now that I think about it, I'm not sure I've ever
> > actually dialed 911 from a land line.
>
> You're lying on the floor incapacitated and in agony,
> That may be the rule in Florida, but in DC, MD, and UT
> (the states in which I've lived in the past 2
> decades), you can be be ticketed if you are driving a
> car and not wearing a seatbelt.
>
This is true in CA, too. However, the law in CA specifically provides
that if you are driving a ca
USB is better because almost every computer today has USB ports. Not
all of them have headset/mic jacks.
My personal favorite is the Telex H551 implemented as a USB adapter
which provides standard headset/mic jacks.
Owen
--On Friday, April 1, 2005 2:00 PM -0800 Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Owen DeLong
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 7:08 PM
> To: David Barak; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance
>
>
[ SNIP ]
> Email. Why should
> it apply to VOIP? Just because it's
Dear sirs,
My bosses are fascinated with the so-called "sequence reducers" from
Peribit Networks (www.peribit.com). Are their equipments a good
investment? Any opinion will be welcome.
Regards,
Marlon Borba, CISSP.
95 matches
Mail list logo
