Hi,
* Sascha Andres wrote on 04.01.2005 (15:49):
I just list the changes as name has sent them to me:
^^
Sorry, I wrote the text first,
and forgot the name. I inserted
Hi,
David Alpert has enhanced my ftp-tasks with many new
features. You can have a look at his new page[1]. AFAIR all
the changes proposed are included. Personally I think the
task could be a candidate for
0.9 Release.
I just list the changes as name has sent them to me:
--- quoting David
Hi,
* Troy Laurin wrote on 13.07.2004 (09:24):
Sascha Andres wrote:
Added above line. Deleted too much, and don't wanted to use
undo after I wrote all of the text ;)
can be accessed from all tasks. The last function adds a protected
object to the store only readable from a task of the same
Hi,
* Troy Laurin wrote on 13.07.2004 (10:17):
Are you suggesting using the namespace for the class implementing the
task, when referencing the task in the build file? This seems like it
could be excessively verbose, to me.
Well, I always use a short namespace. So I actually don't
thought
Hi,
* Troy Laurin wrote on 13.07.2004 (15:57):
Defining namespace in the class defining the task is an interesting idea
and a possible solution... it's worth comparing this with the other
viable solutions to see what's the best solution, both in terms of
functionality as well as correctness
Hi,
here is a new task. Generally it's a task to measure the
time between two calls of it.
-sa
--
sa at programmers-world dot com http://www.livingit.de
Internet sites:
http://www.not2long.net - Make long links short
Boomarks online: http://www.mobile-bookmarks.info
using System;
using
Hi,
* Martin Aliger wrote on 09.07.2004 (08:40):
I think both are cases of inter-task communication. IMO current nant is
totally missing such communication. errorproperty proposal is very limited
implementation of such communication. I'd rather prefer making something
more robust enabling more
Hi,
* Martin Aliger wrote on 09.07.2004 (13:43):
to pass information from one task to other. Since speed is not main interest
in automated builds (sorry Matt - I still appreciate your optimization
work!) XML should be straightforward solution. But I never think we will
serialize XML on every
Hi,
I did a first hack on the scripting support. The task now
excutes in the following order:
1 upload binary
2 upload ascii
3 download binary
4 download ascii
5 script
A short example:
ftp server=my-ftp.de remotepath=/pub/
up-binary
include name=test.zip /
Hi,
I reworked my ftp-up and ftp-down task. The zip file
containing the code for both tasks is offline. Instead there
is a new file online at
http://www.livingit.de/downloads/ftp-task.zip.
It provides one task ftp capable of up-/downloading
ascii/binary files to an anonymous/authenticated ftp
Hi,
* Gert Driesen wrote on 07.06.2004 (12:37):
Are you using a very recent version of NAnt, as the include element was
only recently added. You might want to try the includes element :
Is 25.05.2005 recent enough? But I tried (and got deprecated
messages). Nothing changed. I've overseen that
Hi,
currently my code looks like this:
// the binaries property
[BuildElement(binaries)]
public FileSet binaries {
get {
return _binaryFileset;
} set {
_binaryFileset = value;
}
} // BinaryFileset
The usage:
if (null != _binaryFileset) {
Hi,
* James Geurts wrote on 05.06.2004 (11:54):
the archives shows that this hasn't been brought up for a
little while. I'm thinking that we should push a 0.85
release out the door. It has been over 5 months since
the last release, and I generally think that a release
would be a good thing.
Hi,
* Sascha Andres wrote on 03.06.2004 (19:24):
I splitted the ftp into ftpdown and ftpup, that made the
start easier. And IMHO two tasks are easier than one task
with a switch.
Now I make a proposal to enhance the tasks and to make them
one. My proposal would be to use two filesets (one
Hi,
for my ftp tasks I try to introduce two fileset attributes,
but had no real success until now. Here's how I tried:
// variable:
private FileSet _binaryFileset = new FileSet();
// property:
[TaskAttribute(binaries)]
public FileSet binaries {
get {
return _binaryFileset;
Hi,
* Gert Driesen wrote on 04.06.2004 (15:43):
[intend]
For now, I named the new option /extension (short name /ext) :
-ext[ension]:textload NAnt extensions from the specified
assembly
Is that ok, or does anybody have a better proposal ?
That's
Hi,
* Gert Driesen wrote on 02.06.2004 (15:59):
Are you using the resgen task standalone, or as you using a compiler task
(eg csc) which takes care of the compilation of resources ?
I use the csc, taking care of the resources. I'll try later
to use resgen, later on including the generated
Hi,
* Am 09.10.2003 (18:18) schrieb Gert Driesen:
There sould be no reason we can't get the licencing change in for the
next release - assuming we can deal with any copyright holder issues.
So now we need to make the official dicision as to which licence. I'm
leaning towards BSD - what are
Hi,
while building on a friends PC, we got an error NAnt could
not delete a directory. We looked, but it *was* deleted
successfully. The user has admin rights. The directory is
located under the temp dir.
I've attached the log.
-sa
--
sa at programmers-world dot com
http://www.livingit.de
Hi,
* Gert Driesen wrote on 17.09.2003 (07:57):
wouldn't it be better to have something similar to the Ant concat task
(http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/concat.html), which allows files to
be concatenated or the tasks inline text be appended (or overwritten) to the
destination file ?
A
License
// along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
// Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
//
// Matthew Mastracci ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
// Sascha Andres ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
using System;
using System.Collections;
using
of the GNU General Public License
// along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
// Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
// Sascha Andres ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
using System;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Xml;
using System.IO;
using
Hi,
after a while looking where the error was, I reworked my
changes, did a few comments and a diff file for patching.
You may want to take a look at it - I did not created a new
AppDomain, but it is functionally on my system now. If this
is correct, it could be submitted to CVS.
-sa
--
sa at
Hi,
* Ian MacLean wrote on 16.09.2003 (01:17):
It would be better if it did load a new appdomain. Otherwise every
assembly loaded will hang around until NAnt terminates. See the
assemblyinfo task ( AssemblyInfoTask.cs) for a simple example of the
spawning app-domain technique.
I'll have a
Hi,
I'm using the following statement in my buildscript:
license input=license.licx licensetarget=start.exe /
This is similar to the help file. But: I _always_ gt an
exception about an invalid path. Before I had an fileset
included with the assemblies to be licensed, but this is
just the same
Hi,
It seems I found two bugs. One is in the licese task itself.
It can happen (actually it does on one of my systems),
thatasmLoaded.Location is either an empty string or null. If
so, Path.GetFullPath(...) throws an exception. The attached
diff files addesses this issue.
The second thing seems
Hi,
* Matthew Mastracci wrote on 14.09.2003 (12:45):
Yet another bug is that the License task loads assemblies (as far as I
can remember) into the main AppDomain. It needs to have code to load
these assemblies in a separate AppDomain, like the NUnit tasks have.
You're right. It does that way.
Hi,
* Ian MacLean wrote on 07.09.2003 (16:04):
Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote:
Maybe it's time to have version 1.0 released ? I believe NAnt is stable
enough now to handle even large projects like mono both on windows and
linux and having production version 1.0 would only make more people
Hi,
this is my first post to the NAnt developers list. When I
first looked at NAnt I wanted to understand how does it
work. So I made my own task - a ngen task. I have not much
time to maintain an ever changing task, but I think there
may be the one or other who could use this task too.
So I
29 matches
Mail list logo
