On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:50:03 +1000
Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don Gregory wrote:
>
> >Anybody tried the new 1.0-7167 driver yet?
>
> I successfully installed the 1.0-7167 driver today.
Following your hints, I did too; but for me it wasn't
necessary to edit /etc/inittab: I just opene
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 14 Mar 2005 08:50, Graham wrote:
I successfully installed the 1.0-7167 driver today. My box is:
Could you add this info to the TWiki, on
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/ViDeo under the NVidia section,
please?
Done Anne, hope this works for others
Gr
On Monday 14 Mar 2005 08:50, Graham wrote:
>
> I successfully installed the 1.0-7167 driver today. My box is:
>
I was about to copy your message to the person on the kde list, but then saw
that you had already done so. (I hadn't spotted that it was the same person
asking on both lists :-) ).
Co
Don Gregory wrote:
Anybody tried the new 1.0-7167 driver yet?
I successfully installed the 1.0-7167 driver today. My box is:
Athlon XP2700
512 Mb Ram
GeForce 4 Ti 4600
kernel Mandrake 2.6.10-1mdk
I could not install from the installer as it could not find the sources.
I could not install with th
On Saturday 05 Mar 2005 15:26, Mr. Geek wrote:
> Ian wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 Mar 2005 14:19, et wrote:
> >>On Saturday 05 March 2005 09:13 am, Ian wrote:
> >>>One of my mates is getting really cheesed off with XP ...go figure
> >>>
> >>>:-) I told him how much nicer, safer etc etc Mandrake is
Ian wrote:
On Saturday 05 Mar 2005 14:19, et wrote:
On Saturday 05 March 2005 09:13 am, Ian wrote:
One of my mates is getting really cheesed off with XP ...go figure
:-) I told him how much nicer, safer etc etc Mandrake is. I installed
10.1 official on a partition on his slave drive. Konqueror
On Saturday 05 Mar 2005 14:19, et wrote:
> On Saturday 05 March 2005 09:13 am, Ian wrote:
> > One of my mates is getting really cheesed off with XP ...go figure
> > :-) I told him how much nicer, safer etc etc Mandrake is. I installed
> > 10.1 official on a partition on his slave drive. Konquer
On Saturday 05 March 2005 09:13 am, Ian wrote:
> One of my mates is getting really cheesed off with XP ...go figure :-)
> I told him how much nicer, safer etc etc Mandrake is. I installed 10.1
> official on a partition on his slave drive. Konqueror won't open, and MCC
> is taking ages as well..
One of my mates is getting really cheesed off with XP ...go figure :-)
I told him how much nicer, safer etc etc Mandrake is. I installed 10.1
official on a partition on his slave drive. Konqueror won't open, and MCC is
taking ages as well.yet starting from root is fine. I know I read it
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 10:41 pm, song wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have this in /etc/X11/XF86Config:
>
> Section "Screen"
> Identifier "screen1"
> Device "device1"
> Monitor "monitor1"
> DefaultColorDepth 24
>
> Subsection "Display"
> Depth 8
> Virtual 1280 1024
>
Hi all,
I have this in /etc/X11/XF86Config:
Section "Screen"
Identifier "screen1"
Device "device1"
Monitor "monitor1"
DefaultColorDepth 24
Subsection "Display"
Depth 8
Virtual 1280 1024
EndSubsection
Subsection "Display"
Depth 15
Virtu
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Phinney
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 3:23 PM
> To: newbie@linux-mandrake.com
> Subject: Re: [newbie] Mandrake 10.1 Web Server -
allowing access
>
>
> On Tuesday 15 February 2005 13:00, Ron Hu
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 13:00, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
> On February 15, 2005 09:15, Tango Echo wrote:
> ...
>
> > Install went fine using the "Higher" security level.
> > However, I am unable to ssh into the box even though
> > the service is running. A quick look into the
> > hosts.deny and
On February 15, 2005 09:15, Tango Echo wrote:
...
> Install went fine using the "Higher" security level.
> However, I am unable to ssh into the box even though
> the service is running. A quick look into the
> hosts.deny and it's set for ALL. Changes to this file
> only seem to be reverted back t
On Tuesday 15 February 2005 11:15 am, Tango Echo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After a bit of a break from the Linux world, I'd like
> to start looking into real world implementations again
> =). So here's the senario at the moment. I have an
> old box I'd like use as an experemental intranet
> server. I
Tango Echo wrote:
Hi all,
After a bit of a break from the Linux world, I'd like
to start looking into real world implementations again
=). So here's the senario at the moment. I have an
old box I'd like use as an experemental intranet
server. I installed Mandrake 10.1 w/Apache, ssh, ftp,
and web
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
Tango Echo wrote:
Hi all,
After a bit of a break from the Linux world, I'd like
to start looking into real world implementations again
=). So here's the senario at the moment. I have an
old box I'd like use as an experemental intranet
server. I installed Mandrake 10.1
Tango Echo wrote:
Hi all,
After a bit of a break from the Linux world, I'd like
to start looking into real world implementations again
=). So here's the senario at the moment. I have an
old box I'd like use as an experemental intranet
server. I installed Mandrake 10.1 w/Apache, ssh, ftp,
and web
Hi all,
After a bit of a break from the Linux world, I'd like
to start looking into real world implementations again
=). So here's the senario at the moment. I have an
old box I'd like use as an experemental intranet
server. I installed Mandrake 10.1 w/Apache, ssh, ftp,
and webmin. My goal is
You can get modem cables with both a 25 pin end and a 9 pin end on trhe same
cable
Sorry everyone - forgot the 'reply to' and format.
That's good to know about the cables. Thanks.
About to try download a driver in windows, save to disk and install in
linux. Will give it a go anyway!
Rosema
Aron Smith wrote:
You can get modem cables with both a 25 pin end and a 9 pin end on trhe same
cable
Okay - thanks. I have found a driver for my modem and about to
download in windows, hopefully! - save to disk, and install in linux.
Worth a try anyway!
Rosemary
On Saturday 12 February 2005 07:22 pm, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
> >Should be male, as to the number of pins, depends on how new the MB is. I
> >haven't seen a 25 pin in a while but that doesn't mean that they are not
> > out there. Last serial cable I picked up though, had both 25 and 9 pin
>
Should be male, as to the number of pins, depends on how new the MB is. I
haven't seen a 25 pin in a while but that doesn't mean that they are not out
there. Last serial cable I picked up though, had both 25 and 9 pin
connectors on it.
Thanks. I was concerned because when lent my ol
computer. If it is a desktop, you probably have 2 of them. On older
computers, you may have 1 db9 male and 1 db25 male for serial ports.
The modem probably has a db25 female connector on it.
Yes, my old computer had two, and this one has one. Good to know I
have the backup option.
Tha
On Friday 11 February 2005 04:51, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
> Thanks. Is the com port a nine pinned male connection? I can't
> remember from last computer with external modem.
> Am going to try configure existing modem first though.
Should be male, as to the number of pins, depends on how ne
Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
Yes. The external serial modem will hook up to one of the existing
serial ports on the computer. There should already be com ports and
interrupts set aside for this under Linux, so all you have to do is
tell whatever application you want that com1 is a modem. Th
Yes. The external serial modem will hook up to one of the existing serial
ports on the computer. There should already be com ports and interrupts set
aside for this under Linux, so all you have to do is tell whatever
application you want that com1 is a modem. That has no effect on com3, com
On Friday 11 February 2005 18:31, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
> I checked the modem pages the other day and it seems my winmodem is up
> and running with some linux distros, but I have yet to try to do it.
> However if I decided to buy an external modem for linux can I run it
> alongside my winmo
I checked the modem pages the other day and it seems my winmodem is up
and running with some linux distros, but I have yet to try to do it.
However if I decided to buy an external modem for linux can I run it
alongside my winmodem without conflict?
Thanks
Rosemary
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 10 Feb 2005 05:35, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
>
> The other thing I forgot to say, was that on the first boot after
> install I received a message saying 'Welcome to first boot' but mouse
> wouldn't work. I thought it was detected correc
I didn't have this problem myself, but I know some others have had, and I
think they were cured by adding peripherals back after install. I'm
not sure
whether ohci, uhci and hotplug were all installed at initial
installation, or
whether they had to be added as well. Keep us informed of your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 09 Feb 2005 12:22, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
> Okay thanks Anne - will try that on next boot. Actually - one thing I
> did notice was - boot sort of froze on first install attempts. Then
> when install actualy happened, by accident ii
Okay thanks Anne - will try that on next boot. Actually - one thing I
did notice was - boot sort of froze on first install attempts. Then
when install actualy happened, by accident ii had printer and scanner
disconnected. - install went ahead - seems too co-incidental.
Thanks Rosemary
Anne W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 09 Feb 2005 10:43, Rosemary McGillicuddy wrote:
> Well I am delighted I have an install, but obviously some issue to sort
> out. I am *very* inexperienced re command line etc but have used it
> with explicit instructions!
>
> Problem - bo
Well I am delighted I have an install, but obviously some issue to sort
out. I am *very* inexperienced re command line etc but have used it
with explicit instructions!
Problem - boot to linux and get the usual lines of info about stuff
loading, when I expect/hope/am used a GUI getting lines of
Hello-
I am having some problems getting xawtv to work in Mandrake 10.1
Official (installed using the dvd edition). I can get the zapping and
kdetv applications to work, however they behave unreliably and settings
(from ntsc to pal; from us-cable to some other country setting) often
change
Danesh Daroui wrote:
I tried to install it on a PIII 933 MHz with 192 MB RAM and 30 GB
harddisk. This is not a our server and it is just an old system to test.
Danesh,
I wouldn't give up so soon. I run 10.1CE on a P3 500MHz machine with
256Mb of RAM, and on a P3 900Mhz machine with 128Mb RAM wit
On Thursday 09 December 2004 12:13 am, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> 2. I tried to download Mandrake 10.1 Official from Mandrakesoft web
> site, but the it just forced to be a member in Mandrakeclub which costs.
> I have no problem to pay, but as I know Mandrakesoft used to strongly
> encourage users to b
Użytkownik Danesh Daroui napisał:
Yeah maybe you are right, but this Mandrake 10.1 really put me into
trouble. One time even my system was rendered into totally hanging
situation when I selected all packages to be installed, just after
installation !!! Also, our testing server could work good (n
John Layt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 03:44, Danesh Daroui wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
version 1
Danesh Daroui wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
version 10 more stable ?
I have had no problems with Mandrake 10.1.
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 08:51 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
| On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:38 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
| > Just to let you know, the Community releases are not totally stable.
| > They put them out to allow a much broader spectrum of hardware to test
| > on. Then the comments a bugs fo
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:38 pm, Dennis Myers wrote:
> Just to let you know, the Community releases are not totally stable.
> They put them out to allow a much broader spectrum of hardware to test
> on. Then the comments a bugs found are included in Official release.
> Official had one big upd
Rob Blomquist wrote:
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 10:13 am, Danesh Daroui wrote:
No its Mandrake 10.1 Community, Is Mandrake 10.1 Official more stable ?
Personally, I stopped running the community versions. I only upgrade to the
Official ones. They seem to be more stable and functional.
To
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 10:13 am, Danesh Daroui wrote:
>
> No its Mandrake 10.1 Community, Is Mandrake 10.1 Official more stable ?
Personally, I stopped running the community versions. I only upgrade to the
Official ones. They seem to be more stable and functional.
To me anyway. Ya'll can r
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:07:01 -0500
Todd Slater disseminated the following:
> >What a nice tip ;-)
> >Thanks it helped so much...
>
> Oh, you wanted a *tip*. Sorry, my bad. Here ya go:
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>
> And one more, no charge:
> http://mandrake.v
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 12:23 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
> >dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
> >cra
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 03:44, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
> dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
> crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
> version 10 more stable ?
>
> Tha
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 07:05:08PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
>Todd Slater wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
>
>
>Hi,
>I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
>dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Man
Danesh Daroui wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
version 10 more stable ?
Does it happen with Mand
On Tuesday 07 Dec 2004 18:05, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> Todd Slater wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
> >> dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It a
> No its Mandrake 10.1 Community, Is Mandrake 10.1 Official more stable ?
Then, you should not be so assertive regarding the stability of
Mandrake 10.1. Since Mandrake Official is more recent and "official"
than Mandrake Community, I would expect more stability with Mandrake
Official. However, I a
Paul Smith wrote:
I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
version 10 more stable ?
Does it happen
Todd Slater wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Di
> > I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
> > dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
> > crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
> > version 10 more stable ?
Does it happen with Mandrake 10.1 Official? Or with
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 11:09 am, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> I see... :-)
> Well, I hope so, because Mandrake Linux is at least more userfriendly
> with nice user interface. But you know, the problem is that I can not
> update it at all. It always says that there is problem with contacting
> mirror
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 05:44:56PM +0100, Danesh Daroui wrote:
>Hi,
>I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
>dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
>crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
Danesh Daroui wrote:
I see... :-)
Well, I hope so, because Mandrake Linux is at least more userfriendly
with nice user interface. But you know, the problem is that I can not
update it at all. It always says that there is problem with contacting
mirror sites and last time it says that update agen
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 09:09 am, Danesh Daroui wrote:
> J wrote:
> > Danesh Daroui wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
> >> dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
> >> crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Di
J wrote:
Danesh
Daroui wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
version 10 more stable ?
Than
Danesh Daroui wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
version 10 more stable ?
Thanks,
Danesh Daroui
Hi Danesh.
I c
Hi,
I am migrating from Fedora Core 3 to Mandrake 10.1, but I was jut
dissapointed !!! What a garbage is this Mandrake 10.1 !!! It always
crashes and it is absolutely unstable. Did you have same problem ? Is
version 10 more stable ?
Thanks,
Danesh Daroui
Hi
I have run Mandrake 9.2 before, but Im currently running Fedora Core 2.
Now I want back to Mandrake, but Im considering waiting for the "free" release
of Mandrake 10.1 Official, do you guys have any idea when the ISO's will
be released?
Best regards
Søren
On Saturday 30 October 2004 10:09 pm, Stephen Kühn wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 16:15, Aron Smith wrote:
> > > Seems like something is freezing your system.
> >
> > Seems to be something called Amarokapp using 86 yo 95% of system cpu time
> > how do i kill it?
>
> Geesh...yer a puddle of joy toda
On Saturday 30 October 2004 10:15 pm, Aron Smith wrote:
> On Saturday 30 October 2004 09:40 pm, Stephen Kühn wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 15:42, Aron Smith wrote:
> > > After the last update on my primary system it has started freezing 2
> > > reboots and no joy had to revert to my old system t
On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 16:15, Aron Smith wrote:
> > Seems like something is freezing your system.
> Seems to be something called Amarokapp using 86 yo 95% of system cpu time
> how do i kill it?
Geesh...yer a puddle of joy today, aincha? (g)
Amarok is a media player for KDE - maybe if you uninstal
On Saturday 30 October 2004 09:40 pm, Stephen Kühn wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 15:42, Aron Smith wrote:
> > After the last update on my primary system it has started freezing 2
> > reboots and no joy had to revert to my old system to send message
> > system
> > AMD K6 XP2400
> > 512 Mb RAM
> > G
On Sun, 2004-10-31 at 15:42, Aron Smith wrote:
> After the last update on my primary system it has started freezing 2
> reboots and no joy had to revert to my old system to send message
> system
> AMD K6 XP2400
> 512 Mb RAM
> GQ mobo
> trouble started 12 hours after last update (urpme)
Seems like
After the last update on my primary system it has started freezing 2
reboots and no joy had to revert to my old system to send message
system
AMD K6 XP2400
512 Mb RAM
GQ mobo
trouble started 12 hours after last update (urpme)
Want to buy your P
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 05:31 am, Alexander Ruoff wrote:
> I have a problem with the Iso-Images I have for 10.1. I
> downloaded them with Linux and burned them with K3B. However,
> when updating the 2nd CD failed. First I thought that it must
> be something related to the update from 10.0 to 1
On the off chance that your Linux install is now hosed, there are some md5sum
checkers out there for Windows as well:
Command Line: www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/using_md5sums.html#win
GUI Freeware: http://snipurl.com/9l54
GUI Open Source: http://mandrakeusers.org/index.php?showtopic=16882
The
I have had problems with the second and third cd's also. I had chalked it up
to the new(cheap) DVD burner I had put in. It would be interesting if there
is a problem.
Roly
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 03:31 am, Alexander Ruoff wrote:
> I have a problem with the Iso-Images I have for 10.1. I down
Alexander Ruoff wrote:
> I have a problem with the Iso-Images I have for 10.1. I downloaded them
> with Linux and burned them with K3B. However, when updating the 2nd CD
> failed. First I thought that it must be something related to the update
> from 10.0 to 10.1 and made a clean install but than
I have a problem with the Iso-Images I have for 10.1. I downloaded them
with Linux and burned them with K3B. However, when updating the 2nd CD
failed. First I thought that it must be something related to the update
from 10.0 to 10.1 and made a clean install but than the 2nd as well as
the 3rd CD fa
74 matches
Mail list logo
