On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:18:59 -0500
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Thats a cool site. Actually the first time I'd ever seen it. However,
I couldn't find where you signed up to become a member.
--
Mark
http://spamcop.net/anonsignup.shtml
This should be it. Please not
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:53:00 -0500
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Ralph,
From the way his log file read it sounds as though it's already too
late and he should just do a reload.
--
Mark
I'm not sure Mark, The logs are logging connection attempts, thus not
allowed, but if
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:47:48 +0100
Ralph Slooten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should be it. Please not you HAVE to use your real e-mail address
;-)
Sorry, it should read: Please NOTE you HAVE to use your real e-mail
address
--
http://tuxpower.f2g.net/
http://axljab.homelinux.org:8080/
I
Ralph Slooten wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:37:53 -0500
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph,
have you done the leg work in tracking these connections and reported
to the ISP they're coming from yet? That _should_ be the first place
to begin. If your theory is correct then the sooner
Ralph Slooten wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:10:19 +1100
Trevor Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following is a third of my logfile. Is this not normal for you
folks? Why do so many people get so worried when something shows up.
Why? well just read what I added to almost all your
On Monday 20 Jan 2003 2:11 am, Trevor Rhodes wrote:
Then how would that equate to them telling me I had a score of 0 which is
perfect? Is my security better than perfect or they don't want my
business. hehe
Trust? Who can I trust? I'm liable to pick the wrong person. Story of my
life.
Not me. I know my mail is scanned automatically on the server for
virusses, but I always get a warning, so no, it's not comming though
this side. Are you sure it's the mailing-list that he's sending to?
Greetings
Ralph
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 01:50:00 +1300
John Rye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 23:50, John Rye wrote:
While on the subject of trojans etc
Is anyone else on this list getting repeat mailings from a user who
appears to be using a node on 'cwpanama.net' ?
This mail includes a variety of windows executables with .exe .scr and
.pif extensions
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 21:06, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 20 Jan 2003 2:11 am, Trevor Rhodes wrote:
Then how would that equate to them telling me I had a score of 0 which is
perfect? Is my security better than perfect or they don't want my
business. hehe
Trust? Who can I trust? I'm
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:50:56 +0100
Ralph Slooten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not me. I know my mail is scanned automatically on the server for
virusses, but I always get a warning, so no, it's not comming though
this side. Are you sure it's the mailing-list that he's sending to?
I didn't think
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:59:58 +1300
John Rye [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't think I'd inferred they were coming thru the list. :-)
they're not. This address is only used for maillist traffic, so it was
a thought that maybe others on this list were getting them too.
My ISP service doesn't
Ralph Slooten wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:37:53 -0500
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph,
have you done the leg work in tracking these connections and reported
to the ISP they're coming from yet? That _should_ be the first place
to begin. If your theory is correct then the sooner
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 20:05, John Richard Smith wrote:
OK, so this trojan ain't a uk one, how does one go about detecting it ?
John
Ralph's been using PortSentry on his box - the port under attack on
his box was 635 - and the Portsentry report clearly showed that the
infiltrator was an Aussue
On 19 Jan 2003 10:51:14 +1100
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already contacted the ISP locally here - on both of their
available addresses. Tomorrow (being Monday for us) I'm going to be
in their neighbourhood and will call, and if necessary, stop in with
a printed report.
I
On Sunday 19 January 2003 13:24, Ralph Slooten wrote:
I don't know of course for sure if they are on this list, and scanning
through all my archived mail for an IP-range isn't my amusement for
sundays or any day for that matter ;-) I just took an intelligent guess.
Greetings
Ralph
I just
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 14:37:46 +
H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked my SmoothWall stats, can't find any extraordinary
activity there lately. Not like you're getting, anyway.
That should get the lists off the hook=:o)
Good hunting,
Harm
No connection attemps on port
On Monday 20 Jan 2003 12:51 am, Ralph Slooten wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 14:37:46 +
H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked my SmoothWall stats, can't find any extraordinary
activity there lately. Not like you're getting, anyway.
That should get the lists off the
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:10:19 +1100
Trevor Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following is a third of my logfile. Is this not normal for you
folks? Why do so many people get so worried when something shows up.
Why? well just read what I added to almost all your submitted port
attacks. Sorry
Ralph Slooten wrote:
sundays or any day for that matter ;-) I just took an intelligent guess.
s.w.a.g.
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
--
think green...
save a tree, save a life, save time, save bandwidth, save storage.
send email... text/plain - disable pgp/gpg/geek code
=+=
if you
On Sunday 19 Jan 2003 1:24 pm, Ralph Slooten wrote:
I don't know of course for sure if they are on this list, and scanning
through all my archived mail for an IP-range isn't my amusement for
sundays or any day for that matter ;-) I just took an intelligent guess.
I just wonder if someone is
On Sunday 19 Jan 2003 4:33 pm, Ralph Slooten wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:10:29 +
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, not that one. A couple of selling ones, and one saying something
like 'I found that site at last' - the sort of thing that always makes
me suspicious. I just
On Sunday 19 January 2003 13:51, Ralph Slooten wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 14:37:46 +
H.J.Bathoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked my SmoothWall stats, can't find any extraordinary
activity there lately. Not like you're getting, anyway.
That should get the lists off the
Hi everyone I use this email address just for this list and have never had any spam
I think the span you are getting came from some where else Hope this helps Greg
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jan 2003 4:33 pm, Ralph Slooten wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:10:29 +
On Sunday 19 Jan 2003 7:49 pm, Greg wrote:
Hi everyone I use this email address just for this list and have never
had any spam I think the span you are getting came from some where else
Hope this helps Greg
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 19 Jan 2003 4:33 pm, Ralph
On Sunday 19 January 2003 19:49, Greg wrote:
Hi everyone I use this email address just for this list and have never
had any spam I think the span you are getting came from some where else
Hope this helps Greg
I tend to agree there.
Spam and probes apparently come in waves.
A month back
The following is a third of my logfile. Is this not normal for you
folks? Why do so many people get so worried when something shows up.
Why? well just read what I added to almost all your submitted port
attacks. Sorry to say this, but this is ignorance. You are being probed
from all
On Sunday 19 January 2003 21:18, Trevor Rhodes wrote:
I know I'm about to open up a can of worms here, but can we not let it get
out of control people. Ok, here goes. Is there a 'decent' online security
site that could check my ports? Properly?
Why not do it yourself using nmap(fe) or let
HarM,
Why not do it yourself using nmap(fe) or let somebody you trust do it?
Caus'n I wouldn't know what the hell I was doin!!! :^) Could you explain
nmap(fe) for me? Where? What? etc.
Most of those sites would scare me s**tless if I'd have had a Winders-box.
If you like FUD at it's
Hiya all again,
My webserver is running portsentry, and has, on a daily basis been
blocking and banning all connection attemps from an Australian IP,
running on the connect.com.au network.
-= Reason for the block =-
Port-scanning on port 635
-= What is relevance is Port 635 =-
Name: ADM worm
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 03:34, Ralph Slooten wrote:
Hiya all again,
My webserver is running portsentry, and has, on a daily basis been
blocking and banning all connection attemps from an Australian IP,
running on the connect.com.au network.
Ha! It ain't me! (g)
-= Reason for the block =-
On 19 Jan 2003 07:24:00 +1100
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mate, if YOU don't want to alert them, I'll be more than happy to both
write them and call them (they're in my state - even though they're a
sad ISP - but gives me someone to yell at)...ha!
Thanks dude,
Sent you the reports
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 07:55, Ralph Slooten wrote:
On 19 Jan 2003 07:24:00 +1100
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mate, if YOU don't want to alert them, I'll be more than happy to both
write them and call them (they're in my state - even though they're a
sad ISP - but gives me
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:03, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For any POM's and Yanks that have a whinge, /dev/null
I think I speak for all the americans on the list when I say...HUH???
--
Jason Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 09:51, Jason Guidry wrote:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:03, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For any POM's and Yanks that have a whinge, /dev/null
I think I speak for all the americans on the list when I say...HUH???
Being an American living in Australia, and soon to be an
On 18 Jan 2003 16:51:54 -0600
Jason Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:03, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For any POM's and Yanks that have a whinge, /dev/null
I think I speak for all the americans on the list when I say...HUH???
Hehe, I knew this would happen LOL.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:37:53 -0500
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph,
have you done the leg work in tracking these connections and reported
to the ISP they're coming from yet? That _should_ be the first place
to begin. If your theory is correct then the sooner they know about it
Ralph Slooten wrote:
Hiya all again,
My webserver is running portsentry, and has, on a daily basis been
blocking and banning all connection attemps from an Australian IP,
running on the connect.com.au network.
-= Reason for the block =-
Port-scanning on port 635
-= What is relevance is Port
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 10:37, Mark Weaver wrote:
have you done the leg work in tracking these connections and reported to
the ISP they're coming from yet? That _should_ be the first place to
begin. If your theory is correct then the sooner they know about it the
better for all concerned all
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:43:54 -0500
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralph,
Thats something I've not yet done. Just exactly how does one do that
to an incoming connection. I'd be real interested to learn.
--
Mark
Well, I use portsentry
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 17:01, Ralph Slooten wrote:
On 18 Jan 2003 16:51:54 -0600
Jason Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:03, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For any POM's and Yanks that have a whinge, /dev/null
I think I speak for all the americans on the list when I
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 10:53, Dennis Myers wrote:
Well! I never! Oh, actually I did once but not in public and that was
only with a small audience. There were no repercussions and I did get a
better room and living conditions for all the effort. We Americii's know
how to whine. I was so
Ralph Slooten wrote:
On 18 Jan 2003 16:51:54 -0600
Jason Guidry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:03, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
For any POM's and Yanks that have a whinge, /dev/null
I think I speak for all the americans on the list when I say...HUH???
Hehe, I knew this would
42 matches
Mail list logo
