On Sunday 20 February 2005 04:16 pm, JR wrote:
> From reading up on the net, I followed someones advice of going to the last
> entry in the collection_scan.log. This was an mp3, but it was only 54K, and
> contained less than one second of audio.
>
> I deleted this and performed the scan with no pro
> I compiled this package with debug off, but if you really want to get to
> the bottom of this, I could make you a special package with debug on and
> then help you run it from within gdb so the devs can get a proper backtrace
> on your problem. Let me know if you want to do that.
Thanks Greg,
On Saturday 19 February 2005 03:38 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:14 pm, Dan Gordon wrote:
> > > Please let me know about any problems.
> >
> > Well Greg I have been using this since you released it and so far no
> > problems to report, I'm not using any sql at all and it
On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:14 pm, Dan Gordon wrote:
> > Please let me know about any problems.
>
> Well Greg I have been using this since you released it and so far no
> problems to report, I'm not using any sql at all and it works like a
> charm. Tomorrow I'm going to load my whole list and
On Friday 18 February 2005 03:38 pm, JR wrote:
> Thanks for packaging these. As with every version of Amarok I have tried,
> creating a collection causes the program to crash midway through the
> process. I have reported it, but it has been reported in the past and
> marded as 'fixed'. Another sugg
On Friday 18 February 2005 07:32 am, Glenn wrote:
> On Thu February 17 2005 17:08, Glenn wrote:
> > So far, that seems to have done the trick, Greg. Up to 52% of the
> > collection built so far, and no crash. Thanks.
> >
> > Glenn
>
> Awesome app. And I don't even have to keep futzing with MySQL
On Thursday 17 February 2005 08:14 pm, Dan Gordon wrote:
> On February 13, 2005 12:29 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > For anyone that have been using my beta packages of amaroK, I have
> > test packages up for 1.2 final. I have been testing all morning,
> > and everything seems good, but before 1.2 fina
On Thu February 17 2005 17:08, Glenn wrote:
>
> So far, that seems to have done the trick, Greg. Up to 52% of the
> collection built so far, and no crash. Thanks.
>
> Glenn
Awesome app. And I don't even have to keep futzing with MySQL, since sqlite
is taking all the mp3s I can throw at it. L
On February 13, 2005 12:29 pm, Greg Meyer wrote:
> For anyone that have been using my beta packages of amaroK, I have
> test packages up for 1.2 final. I have been testing all morning,
> and everything seems good, but before 1.2 final is officially
> announced by the amaroK team, they would like t
On Mon February 14 2005 18:05, Greg Meyer wrote:
> Does it work correctly with a new user? If so, you might try removing or
> renaming the following files and directories, which will start over and
> lose all your stats, but might work. Start with removing
>
> ~/.kde/share/config/amarokrc
>
> an
On Monday 14 February 2005 06:18 pm, Glenn wrote:
> > Also, with respect to mysql, you need to create an empty database called
> > amarok first, then load amarok and tell it to use mysql.
>
> I thought sqlite was choking on the amount of mp3s I was asking it to read
> in, so mysql was the alternati
On Sun February 13 2005 10:56, Greg Meyer wrote:
>
> If you are trying to use mysql for the purpose of speed, you may want to
> try the sqlite again. The devs did some major optimizations of the sqlite
> engine and it is very fast now.
>
> Also, with respect to mysql, you need to create an empty
Miark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:19:10 -0500, RickSisler wrote:
>
> > Thx Greg, switched to xine, crossfading is ok, but I can live
> > without it. Kinda wanted to get away from aRts since I don't
> > run KDE.
>
> Amarok itself is a KDE app.
Yeah, thats why I like Mandra
>The guys that developed it have created a really cool
>app that IMHO runs rings around anything else that currently exists.
I think so too. The streamed music is great if you want to hear something
different. I havent listened to music on the radio in ages! I used to use a
combination of player
Greg Meyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sunday 13 February 2005 02:19 pm, RickSisler wrote:
> > Greg Meyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sunday 13 February 2005 01:25 pm, RickSisler wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg, Thx for pkg'ing these, seems to work fine !
> > > >
> > > > What output engine do yo
On Sunday 13 February 2005 02:19 pm, RickSisler wrote:
> Greg Meyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 February 2005 01:25 pm, RickSisler wrote:
> > > Hi Greg, Thx for pkg'ing these, seems to work fine !
> > >
> > > What output engine do you guys recommend ? I have all of my files as
> > >
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:19:10 -0500, RickSisler wrote:
> Thx Greg, switched to xine, crossfading is ok, but I can live
> without it. Kinda wanted to get away from aRts since I don't
> run KDE.
Amarok itself is a KDE app.
> Running Fluxbox actually, and I was using Juk, tho'
> now being a conver
Greg Meyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sunday 13 February 2005 01:25 pm, RickSisler wrote:
> >
> > Hi Greg, Thx for pkg'ing these, seems to work fine !
> >
> > What output engine do you guys recommend ? I have all of my files as
> > mp3. aRts works with no problems, but I was just curious 8)
>
On Sunday 13 February 2005 01:25 pm, RickSisler wrote:
>
> Hi Greg, Thx for pkg'ing these, seems to work fine !
>
> What output engine do you guys recommend ? I have all of my files as
> mp3. aRts works with no problems, but I was just curious 8)
My personal preference is xine because it handles s
Greg Meyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> For anyone that have been using my beta packages of amaroK, I have test
> packages up for 1.2 final. I have been testing all morning, and everything
> seems good, but before 1.2 final is officially announced by the amaroK team,
> they would like to see th
On Sunday 13 February 2005 12:42 pm, Glenn wrote:
> On Sun February 13 2005 10:29, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > For anyone that have been using my beta packages of amaroK, I have test
> > packages up for 1.2 final. I have been testing all morning, and
> > everything seems good, but before 1.2 final is of
On Sun February 13 2005 10:29, Greg Meyer wrote:
> For anyone that have been using my beta packages of amaroK, I have test
> packages up for 1.2 final. I have been testing all morning, and everything
> seems good, but before 1.2 final is officially announced by the amaroK
> team, they would like t
For anyone that have been using my beta packages of amaroK, I have test
packages up for 1.2 final. I have been testing all morning, and everything
seems good, but before 1.2 final is officially announced by the amaroK team,
they would like to see the packages tested more. Since I am the only
23 matches
Mail list logo
