-Original Message-
From: Lanman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] I'm baaak!
Well Gang ! After a short hiatus while I dumped a
crappy ISP,
I'm back and ready to,..um, ...er,.. read emails,
Welcome
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 01:10, Lanman wrote:
One thing that might be interesting is a larger variety of single
CD versions of Mandrake built for
specific type of installations. For example, a single CD of
Mandrake Server with no more than
two desktop environments, and the most popular services
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 3:59 am, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
But, it's Christmas time, and Lanman is back. That means it's a
great day! I can't think of a better list Christmas present. Or a
funnier one. ;)
Hi, Lanman. I was glad to see you back too - and by the way there are
quite a few Canucks
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 4:33 am, KS wrote:
I, personnally am sick of people that think thay have the right rto
decide what is a good question and what is not.
There are enough people who don't fit into that category. Just ignore
those that do, and get on with life. Let's drop this, for sure
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 5:54 am, Lanman wrote:
Something curious to note here ( at least for me ), is that I find
that most of my clients are eager to
learn when you take the time to teach them a few things, and to
explain something in plain English
instead of Techno-Babble.
In truth, it's
Lanman wrote:
So, to make this easy on Joe, who has obviously become the List Nazi of the day, I will explain.
Istop explanation...
Since I have about 250 clients who rely on me to stay in contact with them, this was a
priority for me, at
least until my DNS server settings were updated with
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 07:44:43 +
Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's drop this, for sure Joe will keep it going as long as anyone responds.
Me??!! Lanman and Lyvim have been slagging me for hours now, and all I did was
question his use of reply-to settings!
For chrissakes, that
On 12/7/2003 at 8:23 AM JoeHill wrote:
Lanman and Lyvim have been slagging me for hours now, and all I
did
was question his use of reply-to settings!
This is fucking ridiculous, I get called bitch, I get
laboriously and
thoroughly flamed, and *I'm* the one who gets criticised.
I've really had
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 10:14:05 -0500
Todd Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Life's too short to get all worked up over a couple of bozos.
Already done. But thanks.
--
JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++
I have the
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 1:27 pm, Lanman wrote:
You might be surprised to learn how many people think computers are
intelligent, simply because
they are so hard to learn ! I get that very often ! Once I explain
that a significant amount of the
complexity is due to the fact that computers are
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 1:23 pm, JoeHill wrote:
I've really had just about enough of this place. I step out of line
an inch and people are all over me. Lanman behaves like a raving
madman and not a fuckin' peep of protest.
Joe, first, you never stop out of line an inch. When you step out it
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 5:54 am, Lanman wrote:
Something curious to note here ( at least for me ), is that I find
that most of my clients are eager to
learn when you take the time to teach them a few things, and to
explain something in plain English
instead of Techno-Babble.
In
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 1:27 pm, Lanman wrote:
You might be surprised to learn how many people think computers are
intelligent, simply because
they are so hard to learn ! I get that very often ! Once I explain
that a significant amount of the
complexity is due to the fact that
On 12/7/2003 at 10:25 PM robin wrote:
Very true, and the problem is that once you've been messing with
Linux
for a while, you tend to forget what is technobabble and what
isn't. As
the semi-official techie for our office, I'm always answering
questions
with lines like Just FTP it to the
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 8:25 pm, robin wrote:
Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 07 Dec 2003 5:54 am, Lanman wrote:
Something curious to note here ( at least for me ), is that I
find that most of my clients are eager to
learn when you take the time to teach them a few things, and to
explain
Eric; Glad to be back. Not to worry about tarnishing. It was
obvious that you were trying to help.
Thanks again.
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/7/2003 at 5:31 PM Eric Huff wrote:
Hey Eric; Thanks for the suggestions, instead of trying to
disprove what's what. I
Hey Lee ! How goes it? Whaddya mean Solve something ? Hell,..I already solved the
square root
of PI ! What else do you want? Grin! Oh, yeah, and I also figured out the meaning of
Life ! It didn't
take quite as long as PI, but I can now cross that off my list of things to do !
Grin!
Lanman
On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 08:12:51 -0500
Lanman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see this as a problem though, since both email addresses are in fact
mine. The reply-to address
is simply an alias which is capable of bypassing the filters. In other
words, I can't use it as my primary
account, only
Not a problem Joe! I stocked up on Tylenol before rejoining the list ! I expect that
within a week or so
most of my contacts will have the new address and all will be solved. In the meantime,
I'll just make
sure that when someone does it to me, I'll use a previous post in the thread to
On Saturday 06 December 2003 07:55 am, JoeHill wrote:
Jo ...and as far as Lyvim, that would be *growing down*... ;-)
Jo
You're just mad 'cause you lost too many arguments to him! grin
--
/\
LOL! LOL!
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/6/2003 at 8:58 AM Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Saturday 06 December 2003 07:55 am, JoeHill wrote:
Jo ...and as far as Lyvim, that would be *growing down*... ;-)
Jo
You're just mad 'cause you lost too many arguments to him! grin
--
Done and Done! Man, you are t funny! I'm putting you into my will !
LOL!
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/6/2003 at 9:00 AM Ronald J. Hall wrote:
On Saturday 06 December 2003 08:18 am, Lanman wrote:
La Hey Lee ! How goes it? Whaddya mean Solve something ? Hell,..I
For starters, could you get rid of the reply-to?
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 08:23:55 -0500
Lanman [EMAIL PROTECTED] top posted:
That's all well and good that *you* don't see it as a problem,
unfortunately it causes headaches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Saturday 06 December 2003 5:43 am, Lanman wrote:
Well Gang ! After a short hiatus while I dumped a crappy ISP, I'm back and
ready to,..um, ...er,.. read emails, answer emails, cause and solve
problems, and all the other things I normally do !
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:26:48 -0800
Eric Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, in all seriousness, the reply-to screws up people on mailingg
lists. If your isp makes you fill it in, is there anyway you could
set it to whatever list you are posting to?
I just communicated with another IStop user,
Whoa... your doing homework... 'some' people are really anal about the
reply-to settings. Deal, I look before I post so should you ;) If the
guy says he can't do it, HE CAN'T DO IT stop harrasing the poor man.
JoeHill wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:26:48 -0800
Eric Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well it's nice to know that some things haven't changed in the short time I've been
away.
There's a whole bunch of great people on this list, and then there's Joe Hill.
There's a bunch of people who know what they're talking about, and then there's Joe
Hill.
There a LOT of people who know
Hey Eric; Thanks for the suggestions, instead of trying to disprove what's what. I
honestly hadn't
thought of that. Seems I was Pre-Occupied with the Joe-man! I'm only waiting for my
new static
IP to be propogated to the main DNS servers, and I think it's almost there.
I'll remove the Reply-To
Hey Carroll; Once again a list member comes thru with an idea, instead of trying to
debase someone.
Good idea. I'll certainly take it under advisement!
Thanks
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/6/2003 at 7:19 PM Carroll Grigsby wrote:
On Saturday 06 December 2003 01:54 pm,
On 12/6/2003 at 7:19 PM Carroll Grigsby wrote:
On Saturday 06 December 2003 01:54 pm, Brandon Erik Bertelsen wrote:
Whoa... your doing homework... 'some' people are really anal about the
reply-to settings. Deal, I look before I post so should you ;) If the
guy says he can't do it, HE CAN'T DO
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 07:21:10PM -0500, Lanman wrote:
Well it's nice to know that some things haven't changed in the short time I've been
away.
Yes, you're still as annoying as ever. I plonked you once, but you got a
new addy!
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
Welcome back Lanman! And a hearty Merry Christmas to you! So good to
see you back on the lists. I do a scan from time to time to see what's
going on, even if RL keeps me away alot here recently. This is one of
those times. :)
Your wit and humor is irreplaceable and always entertaining. Glad
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 13:54, Brandon Erik Bertelsen wrote:
Whoa... your doing homework... 'some' people are really anal about the
reply-to settings. Deal, I look before I post so should you ;) If the
guy says he can't do it, HE CAN'T DO IT stop harrasing the poor man.
Exactly. However
Too bad proper etiquitte couldn't be ' if you don't have any thing
positive or helpful to say, DONT SAY ANYTHING'
Ignorant responses is the reason I am only a viewer anfd not a
participant 99.9 % of the time. :-(
Eric Huff said the following, On 06/12/2003 11:26 AM:
For starters, could you
On 06 Dec 2003 22:59:07 -0500
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't worry about joedill/haywiremac, he's a newb that wants everyone to
think he's an old timer, which he's not; he's just some recently-arrived troll
that has been looking for a home and has managed to keep his fat mouth
On 06 Dec 2003 22:59:07 -0500
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fed up with your crap Joe. The next time you challenge me, you'd
better be ready to dance BITCH! For your
sake your name and number better not be in the phone book Pal. Once
again you made a bad choice. I don't
sit
Big Deal! I'm shaking in my boots! So much for putting your money where your mouth is.
Put your
control fetish back in the closet, and let's get back to what this list is all about.
I'll send you the
phone number for the local authorities in a little while, and we'll see where this
leads to.
So if you don't contribute get of of the newsgroup?
If this is an elite group, let me know and I'm gone.
There is no reason for people respond to messages with 'prick' ish
replys. If you don't want to answer somebody's question, don't..
Somebody who is sympathetic to the individual's
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 07:43, Lanman wrote:
Well Gang ! After a short hiatus while I dumped a crappy ISP, I'm back and ready
to,..um, ...er,..
read emails, answer emails, cause and solve problems, and all the other things I
normally do !
Grin! ! Grin !
Miss me? Hah ! Thought not! But
Bravo Joe,
You do what you have to do.
I, personnally am sick of people that think thay have the right rto
decide what is a good question and what is not. They obviously believe
that they know the base knowledge level is, for a person to be able
to switch from say, wondows linux. Ther eare a lot
Another Canadian on the list eh? Welcome to the fray! Of course, if
you've been here a long time
already please disregard this emai. But still nice to see another
Canuck on board !
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/6/2003 at 11:23 PM KS wrote:
So if you don't contribute
Been watching for a few years, but have never been willing to subject
myself to a public stoning.
I've been checking out Debian and its lists, it seems to be more
friendly. Mandrake, while being a good distro has started to turn me
off with their actions before I was willing to get a CLUB
Not to worry KS ! Guys like you and I are always welcome. Well, you
are anyways! Grin! No elitists
would dare show their mugs on this list for fear of getting flamed
by the Roust-abouts and Scallywags
like myself, of which I suspect there are quite a few.
Still, it is a list of passionate people,
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 23:08, JoeHill wrote:
On 06 Dec 2003 22:59:07 -0500
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fed up with your crap Joe. The next time you challenge me, you'd
better be ready to dance BITCH! For your
sake your name and number better not be in the phone book Pal.
Plonk. Plonk. Fizz. Fizz. O! What a relief it is.
--
_||_ Registered linux user #300600
(o_ Registered linux machine # 185855
//\at
V_/_ http://counter.li.org
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
On 12/6/2003 at 11:54 PM KS wrote:
Been watching for a few years, but have never been willing to
subject
myself to a public stoning.
I've been checking out Debian and its lists, it seems to be more
friendly. Mandrake, while being a good distro has started to turn
me
off with their actions before
Cute! Poetic too ! May I suggest that you Plonk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as well ? It would
make your life a lot simpler.
Just a thought.
Lanman
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 12/6/2003 at 10:11 PM Jerry Barton wrote:
Plonk. Plonk. Fizz. Fizz. O! What a relief it is.
--
_||_
On 12/7/2003 at 12:01 AM Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 23:08, JoeHill wrote:
On 06 Dec 2003 22:59:07 -0500
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fed up with your crap Joe. The next time you challenge
me, you'd
better be ready to dance BITCH! For your
sake your name and
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 00:10, Lanman wrote:
On 12/6/2003 at 11:54 PM KS wrote:
Been watching for a few years, but have never been willing to
subject
myself to a public stoning.
I've been checking out Debian and its lists, it seems to be more
friendly. Mandrake, while being a good distro has
Lanman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/2003 at 12:01 AM Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 23:08, JoeHill wrote:
On 06 Dec 2003 22:59:07 -0500
Lyvim Xaphir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm fed up with your crap Joe. The next time you challenge
me, you'd
better be ready to dance
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 00:27, Lanman wrote:
Lyvim; Sounds like Christmas is coming early this year! Anyway,
before this turns into another mess,
I'd like to suggest that we just ignore him Lyvim. As fed up as I
am, and as much as I'd love to take this
guy down a peg or two, you know what?
On 12/7/2003 at 12:32 AM Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
I agree, Lanman. I have had problems with the decisions that were
made
with rpmdrake, but I've put those differences aside in view of the
whole
distro. I think Mandrake is the best desktop solution available
for
Linux. What's more, Red Hat seems to
One thing that might be interesting is a larger variety of single
CD versions of Mandrake built for
specific type of installations. For example, a single CD of
Mandrake Server with no more than
two desktop environments, and the most popular services on it - ie;
FTP, Apache, Postfix, Bind,
Samba,
53 matches
Mail list logo
