On Wednesday 09 Feb 2005 1:28 pm, Omar wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this question should not be on this list, but I didn't know
where else to put it. I have around 400 jpeg images and I want to
put 3x2 images on an A4 size document, preferrably in PDF format. Is
there a way to do this in
On Wednesday 09 Feb 2005 1:28 pm, Omar wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this question should not be on this list, but I didn't know
where else to put it. I have around 400 jpeg images and I want to
put 3x2 images on an A4 size document, preferrably in PDF format. Is
there a way to do this in
Slap the new images in a webpage and run html2pdf (I know that exists
somewhere), or perhaps even load them into OO and export that as PDF.
html2pdf turns out to be some program you can buy.
Better then to load the page you make in a browser, print that to a
postscript file and turn that into PDF
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 14:28, Omar wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this question should not be on this list, but I didn't
know where else to put it. I have around 400 jpeg images and I
want to put 3x2 images on an A4 size document, preferrably in PDF
format. Is there a way to do this in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 09 Feb 2005 15:01, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 14:28, Omar wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this question should not be on this list, but I didn't
know where else to put it. I have around 400 jpeg images and I
want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 14 February 2004 12:40, Greyarchive wrote:
I am looking for a graphic card that linux supports its
TV out function, I am trying to link my bedroom linux to
the 21 tv.
I have an ATI 7500 32mb card in there with TV out but
Always when I
On June 30, 2003 07:29 pm, Renier Horne wrote:
Hi there
I am having serious problems with my pc's graphics performance. All
works fine untill you need some 3D. All the games that have 3D and
even the GL screensavers experience serious bottlenecks, so bad you
can't play the game or in the
On Monday 24 Feb 2003 10:04 pm, Jan Wilson wrote:
* Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030224 11:19]:
Though I suppose that if I want to make progressive saves while working
on a picture, then it would be well worth it, but then make the final
save in jpg format again?
Yep, that would be my
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 23:15, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 24 Feb 2003 10:04 pm, Jan Wilson wrote:
* Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030224 11:19]:
Though I suppose that if I want to make progressive saves while working
on a picture, then it would be well worth it, but then make the final
On Tuesday 25 Feb 2003 10:31 am, Michael Adams wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 23:15, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 24 Feb 2003 10:04 pm, Jan Wilson wrote:
* Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030224 11:19]:
Though I suppose that if I want to make progressive saves while
working on a picture,
In reply to Anne's mail, d.d. Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:15:33 +:
I've not come across .xcf. Is this a non-M$ version of a bitmapfile?
XCF is the Gimp's own format. Like the PSD format that is used by Adobe
Photoshop, to preserve all info about layers etc.
Paul
--
I have a theory that it's
On Monday 24 February 2003, Anne Wilson asked about graphic formats but didn't
say what the end use of the file was to be.
I have an Olympus digital camera with options of saving in three different jpg
compressions or tif format. I generally use the best jpg format but sometimes
use the tif.
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:41, Anne Wilson wrote:
I thought that png was a lossless compression - am I wrong?
If I start from a jpg file from my camera, 397 KB, why does saving it as a png
come out at 2.4MB?
Anne
For all intents and purposes, it's probably best to keep them in JPG
format -
On Monday 24 de February 2003 09:41, Anne Wilson wrote:
I thought that png was a lossless compression - am I wrong?
If I start from a jpg file from my camera, 397 KB, why does saving it as a
png come out at 2.4MB?
Anne
Because JPG is lossy compression, based on some weird smoked algorithms
* Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030224 07:00]:
I thought that png was a lossless compression - am I wrong?
No, you are right.
If I start from a jpg file from my camera, 397 KB, why does saving it as a png
come out at 2.4MB?
Because .png IS a lossless compression. Your camera is using a
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:41:29PM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
I thought that png was a lossless compression - am I wrong?
If I start from a jpg file from my camera, 397 KB, why does saving it as a png
come out at 2.4MB?
Anne
As a general rule of thumb, .jpg for photos, .png for
On Monday 24 Feb 2003 1:22 pm, Jan Wilson wrote:
* Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [030224 07:00]:
I thought that png was a lossless compression - am I wrong?
No, you are right.
If I start from a jpg file from my camera, 397 KB, why does saving it as
a png come out at 2.4MB?
Because .png
On Monday 24 Feb 2003 1:43 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:41:29PM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
I thought that png was a lossless compression - am I wrong?
If I start from a jpg file from my camera, 397 KB, why does saving it as
a png come out at 2.4MB?
Anne
As a
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:30:10PM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Monday 24 Feb 2003 1:43 pm, Todd Slater wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 12:41:29PM +, Anne Wilson wrote:
I thought that png was a lossless compression - am I wrong?
If I start from a jpg file from my camera, 397 KB, why
Title: Blank
well, if you wish to try to learn OpenGL go to http://nehe.gamedev.net you would find a many
tutorials related to OpenGL,
Have fun,
Dejan Lozanovic
- Original Message -
From:
amit !!
To: newbie
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 2:04
PM
Subject:
On Monday 27 August 2001 02:53 am, you wrote:
Hi
I personally found that a Geforce 2 MX is the best all round card on
the market. It isn't a high end gaming card, but you can still get 50+
FPS in a game which is nice if you need to unwind. The duel head
support is also very nice in terms of
Hi
I personally found that a Geforce 2 MX is the best all round card on
the market. It isn't a high end gaming card, but you can still get 50+
FPS in a game which is nice if you need to unwind. The duel head
support is also very nice in terms of a do presentations for work, and
so is the TV out.
Brandon:
First, when posting to this list, please turn the HTML off -- it is very
difficult to read in many mail readers.
Now to the point: Give us some more information, please. What version of
Mandrake? What version of XFree? Will your video card do 1024 x 768?
What resolution?
-- cmg
Alan Shoemaker wrote:
A V Flinsch wrote:
Anyone know of a console command to convert a bmp to a
jpg? Situation is as follows:
Windows box on network generating bmp's to a shared linux
directory
I want a cron script to convert the bmp's to jpg's
I could do it manually, via gimp or
On Saturday 31 March 2001 17:40, you wrote:
A V Flinsch wrote:
Anyone know of a console command to convert a bmp to a jpg?
Situation is as follows:
Windows box on network generating bmp's to a shared linux
directory
I want a cron script to convert the bmp's to jpg's
I could do it
Bill Sanders wrote:
about all I know... oh and apparently its model # TCM 1764S according to
the back.
Go with Tom's suggesstion re the monitor that can do.. but also check
and
see if it matches a CTX-brand monitor with same number.
--
ICQ#: 89345394 Mailto: [EMAIL
Bill,
I notice you are using Windows Eudora, if you are in win9.x, then goto My
computer - Properties - Device Manager - Display Adapters - Print -
selected class or device - OK; do the same with monitor. You will get all
the specs; I printed my whole system. HTH
At 04:09 PM 08-11-2000 -0800,
Bill,
I notice you are using Windows Eudora, if you are in win9.x, then goto My
computer - Properties - Device Manager - Display Adapters - Print -
selected class or device - OK; do the same with monitor. You will get all
the specs; I printed my whole system. HTH
Ok tried that... problem
er 08, 2000 9:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Graphics card/monitor not detected correctly
Bill,
I notice you are using Windows Eudora, if you are in win9.x, then goto My
computer - Properties - Device Manager - Display Adapters - Print -
selected class or d
On Tue, 07 Nov 2000, Darryl Gibson wrote:
Hello List,
I'm attempting my third LM 7.0 install, and have run into my first
problem. When I reach the point where I should see the graphics screen,
my monitor isn't in sync. Is there a command I can use at the boot:
prompt to force a text
Hi,
I have a machine similar to yours.
Take a look at Intel site (www.intel.com). There you
will find new win98 drivers and Linux drivers for you
get 1024 X 12?? (I forgot the exact resolution).
Good look,
Claudio H.
--- Jason Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
Just installed Mandrake 7
The way I got my i810 boards to work was to select the intel i740 graphics
cards (supposably 4 meg of video ram), then select the monitor from the
Drak config tool. Click test, then it skips the memory back down to 2 meg
as it's supposed to be, bam, I give you 16x1024x768 without editing
Here's what I had to do for my I810 on LM 7.1 to get 1024x768 at 16 bits:
Edit /etc/X11/XF86Config:
Find the "Device" section that has an ID of Intel 810
Add the following lines to it:
VideoRam 2048
Chipset "i810"
Vendor "Intel"
Find the section "Screen" for "Driver"
As far as the Xwindows goes I'm fine at 1024x768x32. However what I'm looking for is
hardware or openGL accelleration for Quake2. Again the card is a Stealth III extreme
(Savage4 chip)
: [newbie] graphics
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Alan Pitts wrote:
Do I have a similar problem with my nvidia TNT Graphics card ? Could this
be why I cannot achieve the proper resolution on my screen when I have
installed Linux-Mandrake 6.0Does 7.0 support this card ?
No it IS supported should
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Alan Pitts wrote:
Do I have a similar problem with my nvidia TNT Graphics card ? Could this
be why I cannot achieve the proper resolution on my screen when I have
installed Linux-Mandrake 6.0Does 7.0 support this card ?
No it IS supported should work with
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Seth Gibson wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, John Aldrich wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, you wrote:
Dunno. I don't believe that Xfree86 makes an accelerated
server. OTOH, you might go see what cards mesa-gl supports.
www.mesa-3d.org
Actually its www.mesa3d.org. .
Really?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Get a 3dfx voodoo3 it works .
and it's cheap hehe
steven
On Sat, 01 Jan 2000, you wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Seth Gibson wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, John Aldrich wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, you wrote:
Dunno. I don't believe that Xfree86
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, you wrote:
Hmmm, any supported cards that acceleration *is* supported, or is it
something I shouldn't really worry about? I'm just looking for a good PCI
card in the $50-150 US range. I think one card I was looking at (STB
Velocity 4400) supported Direct 3D and
The only accelrated drivers available right now are in a commercial package
for $80.
Here are some options in the price range you're looking for (don't by an STB
product that isn't a Voodoo board. They were bought by 3Dfx and are no longer
providing driver updates for any of their older boards.
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Josh McCaffrey wrote:
John Aldrich wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, you wrote:
I'm shopping around for a good card to run under L-M 6.1. Is it a bad
idea for me to just look at what chipset the card uses and amount of
ram? I'm looking at NVidia Riva TNT cards w/
In addition, the latest version of XFree86 contains an improved driver
for the RivaTNT chip. The new driver was supplied by Nvidia. THE NEW
DRIVER PROVIDES A VERY SUBSTANTIAL PERFORMANCE INCREASE. The latest
version of XFree86 is included in Mandrake 6.1, or can be downloaded
from the Mandrake
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, you wrote:
Has anyone with this card installed 6.0? The list of supported Creative
Logic cards has many graphics blaster variants, all with some (model?)
number, but I can't find anywhere in the documentation that came with my
card a number like any of the available
43 matches
Mail list logo
