Re: [newbie] fstab + supermount help ..

2005-01-23 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 17:55, RickSisler wrote: Hi All, Somehow I borked my fstab settings with supermount, could someone take a look at this for me ? /dev/hdb1 / ext3 defaults 1 1 /dev/hda5 /home ext3 defaults 1 2 none /mnt/cdrom supermount

Re: [newbie] fstab + supermount help ..

2005-01-23 Thread RickSisler
Anne Wilson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: gpg: CRC error; 68356b - dc3683 gpg: quoted printable character in armor - probably a buggy MTA has been used On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 17:55, RickSisler wrote: Hi All, Somehow I borked my fstab settings with supermount, could someone take a look at this

Re: [newbie] FSTab

2004-10-19 Thread SME Server Admin
Thank you very much for the explanation... Cheers, Elwyn Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com

Re: [newbie] FSTab

2004-10-18 Thread SME Server Admin
On Monday 18 Oct 2004 16:04, SME Server Admin wrote: //sentinel/Primary /mnt/Primary smbfs user,credentials=/etc/samba/auth.sentinel.admin 0 0 I've removed that and it's taken that icon off the desktop... But not sure about the others so have left them... Elwyn

Re: [newbie] FSTab

2004-10-18 Thread bascule
well lets see, On Monday 18 Oct 2004 4:04 pm, SME Server Admin wrote: Can someone tell me of the following entries which are not needed. you definitely need this: /dev/hda1 / ext3 defaults 1 1 i strongly suspect you need the following, its for pseudo terminals, none /dev/pts devpts mode=0620

Re: [newbie] fstab file

2004-06-12 Thread Ronald J. Hall
On Saturday 12 June 2004 11:15 am, OOzy wrote: -If I make changes to fstab. How can I reload it or there is no need for -this? Fast answer, as root do a mount -a. That should do the trick. -- /\

Re: [newbie] FStab lines in M9.1

2004-03-26 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Friday 26 March 2004 14:58, Miark wrote: I used the k3b setup twice, and it'll _never_ happen again. It made an awful mess both times. I don't mess with fstab regularly, but I'd change the hds back to cdrom and cdrom2, and then do a supermount -i enable to turn on supermount and include

Re: [newbie] fstab and lilo

2004-01-12 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:56:45 + John Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lee Wiggers wrote: I have my fstab and lilo pretty much fouled up. Would someone who has a working cdrw and dvd please post theirs so I can figure out where I overused my delete key? Lee This is mine,

Re: [newbie] fstab and lilo

2004-01-11 Thread Johan
On Sunday 11 January 2004 08:14, Lee Wiggers wrote: I have my fstab and lilo pretty much fouled up. Would someone who has a working cdrw and dvd please post theirs so I can figure out where I overused my delete key? Lee * Hi Lee, Depending what editor you where using there

Re: [newbie] fstab and lilo

2004-01-11 Thread John Richard Smith
Lee Wiggers wrote: I have my fstab and lilo pretty much fouled up. Would someone who has a working cdrw and dvd please post theirs so I can figure out where I overused my delete key? Lee This is mine, where, DVD = IDEmaster= /dev/scd0 = /mnt/cdrom Writer= IDEslave = /dev/scd1 = /mnt/cdrom2

Re: [newbie] fstab and lilo

2004-01-10 Thread jason pearl
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:14:48 -0500 Lee Wiggers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have my fstab and lilo pretty much fouled up. Would someone who has a working cdrw and dvd please post theirs so I can figure out where I overused my delete key? Lee for your burner you should have none /mnt/cdrom

Re: [newbie] fstab digits 0 1 2

2003-12-14 Thread Richard Urwin
On Sunday 14 Dec 2003 7:48 pm, Johan wrote: Hi, Please inform me what the last two digits mean in an fstab entry. I have read it somewhere through the years and don't seem to be able to find it again. Thanks man fstab look for the fifth and sixth fields. In short, the fifth field indicates

Re: [newbie] fstab digits 0 1 2

2003-12-14 Thread Jerry Barton
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003 21:48:46 +0200 Johan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Please inform me what the last two digits mean in an fstab entry. I have read it somewhere through the years and don't seem to be able to find it again. Thanks from tuxfiles.org: The 5th column in /etc/fstab is the

Re: [newbie] fstab, windows folders and permissions

2003-08-14 Thread bascule
are they really spaces in the umask? and have you tried without? bascule On Monday 04 Aug 2003 1:59 pm, The Other wrote: 08/04/03 I have uid=501 and umask=0 2 2 for windows folders in fstab. though I get owner as 501 user, permissions are there as 777 instead of 755 as dictated by umask.

Re: [newbie] fstab, windows folders and permissions

2003-08-14 Thread stormjumper
- Original Message - From: L.V.Gandhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 10:11 Subject: Re: [newbie] fstab, windows folders and permissions On Friday 01 Aug 2003 7:23 am, Sharrea wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:02, L.V.Gandhi wrote: I have uid

Re: [newbie] fstab, windows folders and permissions

2003-08-09 Thread L.V.Gandhi
On Monday 04 Aug 2003 6:29 pm, The Other wrote: 08/04/03 I have uid=501 and umask=0 2 2 for windows folders in fstab. though I get owner as 501 user, permissions are there as 777 instead of 755 as dictated by umask. How to go about getting permissions as 755 for windows folders. Try

Re: [newbie] fstab, windows folders and permissions

2003-08-04 Thread The Other
08/04/03 I have uid=501 and umask=0 2 2 for windows folders in fstab. though I get owner as 501 user, permissions are there as 777 instead of 755 as dictated by umask. How to go about getting permissions as 755 for windows folders. Try ..,user,umask=0,auto,... with umask=0 I think permissions

Re: [newbie] fstab, windows folders and permissions

2003-08-03 Thread Sharrea
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 14:11, L.V.Gandhi wrote: On Friday 01 Aug 2003 7:23 am, Sharrea wrote: On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 02:02, L.V.Gandhi wrote: I have uid=501 and umask=0 2 2 for windows folders in fstab. though I get owner as 501 user, permissions are there as 777 instead of 755 as dictated

Re: [newbie] FSTAB mistake

2002-09-11 Thread Frank McKenna
Thanks to all who replied on and off the list. Unfortunately, I encountered additional problems and decided to reinstall LM 8.0 as that appeared to work better with my hardware Frank McKenna True strength lies in gentleness Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to

Re: [newbie] fstab (long post)

2002-07-17 Thread John Richard Smith
Frank McKenna wrote: Hi All, In two previous posts I submitted the following. I only saw the first appear so I am resending both messages as one. Sorry for the long post I decided to put an old Creative DVD 2 X in a Mandrake 8.1 box along with a 32 X CD-ROM. Unfortunately, only

Re: [newbie] fstab problem

2002-02-06 Thread Ric Tibbetts
AFAIK: NTFS support is not turned on in the default configuration. It's still buggy, and dangerous. If you really want it, you'll have to build a kernel with it enabled. Best advice: Don't go there. JMHO-YMMV Ric On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 18:51, Greg Smith wrote: I have successfully configured

Re: [newbie] fstab problem

2002-02-06 Thread Walter Logeman
I have successfully configured the fstab file to mount the vfat partitions that are elswhere on the hard drive, but I can't get the ntfs partition to mount at boot. I think my one mounts at boot. All I need to do is type in the file name with the (long ) path and i am there. Below is my

Re: [newbie] fstab and /mnt/windows

2001-05-19 Thread Ed Kasky
I got it mounted using fstab which is what I wanted. However using the following: /dev/hde1 /mnt/windows ntfs user,exec,umask=0 0 0 it is browsable but read only... Am I missing something to make it writeable?? Ed ~~ At 09:26 PM Friday, 5/18/2001, Dave Sherman wrote -= Yep. Dave On

Re: [newbie] fstab and /mnt/windows

2001-05-19 Thread Dave Sherman
My best suggestion is to 'man fstab', and see what it tells you. I'm not sure if there is anything special about mounting ntfs partitions, but I suspect there might be, because of the permissions used in ntfs which are similar to ext2 in linux. Good luck, Dave On Saturday 19 May 2001 01:37,

Re: [newbie] fstab and /mnt/windows

2001-05-18 Thread Dave Sherman
Try this: /dev/hde1/mnt/windows vfatuser,exec,umask=0 0 0 It should give you full read/write access. Dave On Friday 18 May 2001 10:33, thus spake Ed Kasky: What would be the proper entry in /etc/fstab to automatically mount my windoze partition from hde? I would like to at

Re: [newbie] fstab and /mnt/windows

2001-05-18 Thread Irv Mullins
On Fri, 18 May 2001, you wrote: What would be the proper entry in /etc/fstab to automatically mount my windoze partition from hde? I would like to at least have read access to be able to access files. Is this correct? /dev/hde1/mnt/windows ext2defaults 1 2 I think

Re: [newbie] fstab and /mnt/windows

2001-05-18 Thread Ed Kasky
If it's an ntfs formatted partition do I use ntfs in place of vfat? Ed At 01:20 PM Friday, 5/18/2001, Dave Sherman wrote -= Try this: /dev/hde1/mnt/windows vfatuser,exec,umask=0 0 0 It should give you full read/write access. Dave On Friday 18 May 2001 10:33, thus spake Ed

Re: [newbie] fstab vs mtab

2001-05-09 Thread Randy Kramer
Sam wrote: Hi, I was looking through the files in /etc and realised that /etc/fstab and /etc/mtab have very similar contents. Could anybody enlighten me on what're the differences between these files, e.g. in terms of function? Thanks. fstab lists predefined filesystems which can be

Re: [newbie] fstab vs mtab

2001-05-09 Thread Adrian Smith
hi. i know the answer to this one=) fstab is the file which tells linux which partitions to mount, where to mount them, and how to mount them during boot. this is where you make changes to the mounting procedure. mtab is what actually is mounted, how where it is mounted. *DO NOT* edit

Re: [newbie] fstab vs mtab

2001-05-09 Thread Sam
Wow! Am very overwhelmed by the replies! Thanks guys! :)) On Thursday 10 May 2001 11:38, David E. Fox wrote: /etc/fstab is a boot time file that the system uses to mount your partitions and /etc/mtab is a run-time file showing what's currently mounted. Thus, if you unmount some partition,

Re: [newbie] fstab

2000-11-19 Thread Paul
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, skidley wrote: Ok my fstab ended up majorly screwed somehow and i don't know why. I had to enable supermount again, but the options for the cdrom drive and burner are screwed up, i have like nosuid, noexec, noauto, etc. It worked excellent before on the standard way it was

Re: [newbie] fstab mtab left overs...

2000-10-04 Thread Fraser Kendall
you did what? - Original Message - From: Adrian Smith To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 3:44 PM Subject: [newbie] fstab mtab left overs... okie, here is what i did.in /mnt i had the usual win_cwin_dtype things.i went into fstab

Re: [newbie] fstab mtab left overs...

2000-10-04 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000, you wrote: okie, here is what i did. in /mnt i had the usual win_c win_d type things. i went into fstab changed things about (did this using KDE graphical interface) so that the drives would mount as windoze (win_c) games (win_d) so, that worked. if i go into /mnt

Re: [newbie] fstab mtab left overs...

2000-10-04 Thread Michael
I use ReiserFS for data storage. Some directories have over 100,000 files in them. ext2 worked but a directory listing took about a month to generate. Also on my new server everything but /boot is ReiserFS and the stability due to crashes, power loss, etc is great and everything runs very

Re: [newbie] fstab mtab left overs...

2000-10-04 Thread Larry Marshall
the odd thing is, the win_c win_d are still in /mnt also. if i go into them, they are empty. what up with this?? can i simply delete these as root? or is there some other solution? Yes, and this demonstrates a problem with configuration via GUI tools; you are one step

Re: [newbie] fstab mtab left overs...

2000-10-04 Thread Larry Marshall
Here's 'fstab' line for my Windoze drive. I moved it out of '/mnt/', to a dir named '/c'. I can read/write/exe anything on that Not a bad idea Tom. I just did: ln -s /mnt/windows win with the link in my home directory. Seems to work. Any reason not to do it that way? One of

Re: [newbie] fstab mtab left overs...

2000-10-04 Thread Alan Shoemaker
Adrian Smith wrote: okie, here is what i did. in /mnt i had the usual win_c win_d type things. i went into fstab changed things about (did this using KDE graphical interface) so that the drives would mount as windoze (win_c) games (win_d) so, that worked. if i go into /mnt then go

Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread John Connell
- Original Message - From: Bert Bullough [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 06, 1999 12:17 PM Subject: [newbie] fstab Can someone give me an example of their fstab entry ( preferably one with an entry for mounting a windows partition) so

Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread Ian W Douglas
fstab: (assuming your Windows 95 partition is /dev/hda2:) /dev/hda2 /mnt/win95 vfatdefaults0 0 I'm pretty sure that's what I have set up on my Linux box. I'm booted into Windows right now or I'd double check. Essentially, all you need to do is replace 'vfat' with the

RE: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread Roby, Eric
1st, create a directory to mount to - I use /mnt/dos1. Then create and entry like : /dev/hda1 /mnt/dos1 default msdos default 0 0 Then when rebooting the partition at hda1 will be mounted and available at /mnt/dos1. You could also test it by entering "mount

Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread Doug P
Mine looks likes this. Win95 was installed on the first partition of hda and linux on the second partion (hda5) Hope it helps: /dev/hda5 /ext2defaults1 1 /dev/hda6 /homeext2defaults1 2 /dev/hda7 /usr ext2defaults1 2 /dev/hda8

Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread Manny Styles
- Original Message - From: Ian W Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 06, 1999 1:26 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] fstab fstab: (assuming your Windows 95 partition is /dev/hda2:) /dev/hda2 /mnt/win95 vfat defaults 0 0 snip What does 'defaults 0 0' do? I

Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread John Aldrich
On Fri, 06 Aug 1999, Bert Bullough wrote: Can someone give me an example of their fstab entry ( preferably one with an entry for mounting a windows partition) so that i can see what i am doing wrong. Thanks. Here you go. /dev/hda5 / ext2defaults1

Re: Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread Doug P
This is a snippet taken from the fstab man page. I believe it should answer your question: "The sixth field, (fs_passno), is used by the fsck(8) pro- gram to determine the order in which filesystem checks are done at reboot time. The root filesystem should be speci-

Re: Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread Doug P
Sorry! That last reply was only about the two numbers after "defaults". I'm not sure exactly what the defaults are but I know that you can specify how you want the device to be mounted. For example the line for my floppy drive is this: /dev/fd0/mnt/floppy auto

Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread Cindy Pearce
On Fri, 06 Aug 1999, you wrote: Can someone give me an example of their fstab entry ( preferably one with an entry for mounting a windows partition) so that i can see what i am doing wrong. Thanks. /dev/hda8 /mnt/data vfat exec,dev,suid,rw 1 1 The line

Re: [newbie] fstab

1999-08-06 Thread Brian Erikson
Bert Bullough wrote: Can someone give me an example of their fstab entry ( preferably one with an entry for mounting a windows partition) so that i can see what i am doing wrong. Thanks. Bert, These work for me: /dev/hda2 /mnt/dosc vfat rw,gid=100,umask=2 0 0