Title: AutoAccept for Exchange 2000
You can continue to use the script in Ex2K; it will
still work. However you should look into how to write an event sink; it is far
more efficient.
- Original Message -
From:
Dominick Romano
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent
Title: AutoAccept for Exchange 2000
Hi, we are using an AutoAccept script from Exchangecode to schedule our conference rooms. We have the script for Exchange 5.5 but we are going to convert to Exchange 2000 and Exchangecode does not have a AutoAccept script for it. Can someone tell me where I
ember 26, 2001 1:13 AM
Posted To: NTSysAdmin
Conversation: Exchange 2000 and permissions
Subject: Exchange 2000 and permissions
Single site/single db on win2k/e2k. Where can I add permissions to allow
someone to logon to all mailboxes. I have one exchange server that
somehow bl
Single site/single db on win2k/e2k. Where can I add permissions to allow
someone to logon to all mailboxes. I have one exchange server that
somehow blew up permissions, and not even the ex service acct can get
in. When I bounced the box, it came back, but now I can only get it into
like 3-4 mail
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Andrey Ilichov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 September 2001 08:52
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Question
Try remove full mailbox access rights from SELF.
AD users and computers -> view -> advanced features.
Open prop
12:29 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000 Question
In Exchange 2000 what is the quickest way to prevent a user logging onto
their mailbox while we check out a complaint against them?
In 5.5 I used to just changed the NT Account to my own account so that
logon would fail
Th
In Exchange 2000 what is the quickest way to prevent a user logging onto
their mailbox while we check out a complaint against them?
In 5.5 I used to just changed the NT Account to my own account so that
logon would fail
Thanks
Stu
http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ntsysadmin_list_charter.htm
in IssuesSubject: Re:
Exchange 2000
To go a bit beyond "vanilla", many of them can also be set
up as IMAP servers and have list serv type software as well. All for
free.
K.Borndale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -home
email
Lefkovics, William
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 10:47
PM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
>>Even I-mail, a plain vanilla (boring) email server
isn't farbehind in price!If a client just wants a basic POP/SMTP
server, the price for the productwo
nal Message-
From: Joe L. Casale
To: NT System Admin Issues
Sent: 9/9/01 12:55 AM
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I think 1300.00 bucks Canadian last I checked for E2k?
Expensive?
Considering what you can do w/ it, I think not!
Geesh! Even I-mail, a plain vanilla (boring) email server isn't far
eyes through M$'s
site and look for new OL holes!
Jlc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 3:40 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I've been on systems with Exchange, Groupwise and Not
Hey wait neither is he ;)
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Ok, now you're just toying with me. I'm not the one with over 100
Exchange2000 d
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
..
T: +5 999 736 0309 ext 4537
C: +5 999 563 1845
F: +5 999 733 1259
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Michael L. Callahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 4:27 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I guess I'll h
both. Exchange is now catching on in the collaboration
space, and I look for it to supplant Notes there as well - very soon.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 11:58 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 200
Title: RE: Exchange 2000
I
think that every thread that goes through (or almost every one) has William at
one end or the other... and I would sleep much better at night with him at the
wheel of MY network.
Kudos
as always to William !!
-Original Message-From: Zangara, Jim
riday, September 07, 2001 2:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I had the reformat command all loaded on his server waiting for someone
to press enter for me. Just could not do it.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
ember 07, 2001 2:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I had the reformat command all loaded on his server waiting for someone
to press enter for me. Just could not do it.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:
I had the reformat command all loaded on his server waiting for someone
to press enter for me. Just could not do it.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 4:18 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
You know
at to do, what to do...
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:08 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
W dude.. Settle down there cowboy. You just bad mouthed one of the
best guys we have on this list.
As fa
Well said Kevin !
All I can say is *.csc.com = /dev/null
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:08 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
W dude.. Settle down there cowboy. You just bad mouthed
e "real nice" Yeah
right...
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:14 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Water under the bridge.
Let's move on.
Thanks for the kind words, Kevin.
Yes, I'
Yeah but I dont have my name on the cover an exchange2k book as the
author. : >
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:19 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Ok, now you're just toying
Ok, now you're just toying with me. I'm not the one with over 100
Exchange2000 deployments under my belt!
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 10:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
As yo
As you wish, oh great wise Mr. Lefkovics.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:14 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Water under the bridge.
Let's move on.
Thanks for the kind words,
ea
Senior Manager/Information Technology
Lexitron, Inc
(201) 892-6399
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange 2000
I never said he wasn't a constan
10:15 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Don't really care how your ego was affected by Mr. Lefkovics [1] your
comments were totally unwarranted and unwanted. Of the normal posters to
this list Williams is one pay check that does not depend as much on
Microsoft product
, 2001 12:58 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
I never said he wasn't a constant source of outstanding information.
"William" attacked my suggestions. Therefore, I attacked his inability
to look anywhere but his own paycheck. What did I expect from a
newsg
Forgot this.
If possible don't put E2k on a DC. If you must it's ok but not a best
practice.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Mediger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000
We are looking at im
them.
Thanks. BTW you owe William an apology, a very well written formal,
publicly posted one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Billyboy-
I did a
nversation relating to
NT Systems. And last time I checked, Lotus Domino runs on NT Systems.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/07/2001 12:49:29 PM
Please respond to "NT System Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Inline
-Original Message-
From: Jim Mediger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000
We are looking at implementing Exchange 2000 and I have a few questions, and
wanted advice from people who have had real
iginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:34 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:RE: Exchange 2000
Billyboy-
I did a little research on Holaday before I posted my comments. They
have 100 employees in the heart of M
Title: RE: Exchange 2000
Nathan,
My vote
goes with Williams. He is always there with meaningful solutions. So what, if
he is bit sarcastic?. Whether he reads white papers or yellow papers, one
should agree, he is quite knowledgeable guy on subjects discussed here.
Sorry to
say
ECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:34 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Exchange 2000
Billyboy-
I did a little research on Holaday before I posted my comments. They
have 100 employees in the heart of Minnesota, they manufacture printed
circuit boards, and their web page was cr
Title: RE: Exchange 2000
NATE:
Boy are you EVER OUT OF LINE. William is a constant source of outstanding information, and has been for a long time. Secondly, he's not above looking at non-ms solutions, and has in fact spent a lot of time researching the possibility of implementing a to
Title: RE: Exchange 2000
First positive comments I have ever heard about Lotus.
Had a buddy who tried to implement it at his old site and was fired for the ONLY reason that they hated the client interface.
Personally I find Williams comments insightful and always helpful and calling him
anything. It just means that your job DEPENDS on it.
"Lefkovics, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/07/2001 12:14:46 PM
Please respond to "NT System Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
e-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000
Before you implement anything Exchange, I think it is in your best
interest, (as in that of your company, users, and IT staff) to look into
alternative E-
//www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq.htm
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
co-author Configuring Exchange2000, Syngress Media
-Original Message-
From: Jim Mediger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 6:03 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000
We are looking
Title: FW: Exchange 2000
I agree w/ exploring alternate solution esp. Notes.
Initially we thought it to be a bad decision to launch Notes but it turns out a
choice of many in org. It provides inbuilt archiving, offline/online email
support, since it works seamlessly with any kind of IP
m Admin Issues
Subject: Exchange 2000
We are looking at implementing Exchange 2000 and I have a few questions, and
wanted advice from people who have had real world experience. We are
currently
running NT 4.0 Svr and Wkstn. I have setup a Windows 2000 Domain (still in
testing phase). We have about
Title: FW: Exchange 2000
Yo
Pete - how come all your replies are blank?
-Original Message-From: Pete Karhatsu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001
6:17 AMTo: NT System Admin IssuesSubject: FW: Exchange
2000
-Original Message- From:
[EMAIL
Title: FW: Exchange 2000
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:19 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Exchange 2000
Before you implement anything Exchange, I think it is in your best
interest, (as in
er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/07/2001 09:03:02 AM
Please respond to "NT System Admin Issues"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT System Admin Issues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Exchange 2000
We are looking at implementing Exchange 2000 and I have a
We are looking at implementing Exchange 2000 and I have a few questions, and
wanted advice from people who have had real world experience. We are currently
running NT 4.0 Svr and Wkstn. I have setup a Windows 2000 Domain (still in
testing phase). We have about 100 users.
My Questions:
1. I
46 matches
Mail list logo
