Re: OT - Suggestions for using Netgear wifi and extender with Security camera setup

Thanks folks!  I appreciate it. Don K From: Steven Peck To: NT System Admin Issues Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 11:49 AM Subject: Re: OT - Suggestions for using Netgear wifi and extender with Security camera setup I originally had two Linksys 54G WAPs

RE: Virtualization in small office

My bad, I sit corrected! From: Art DeKneef [mailto:art.dekn...@cox.net] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 10:08 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Virtualization in small office Server 2012 Standard comes with TWO VM instances, not four. You're thinking of Server 2008 R2 Enterprise.

RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

. Thanks Webster From: kz2...@googlemail.com [mailto:kz2...@googlemail.com] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:06 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 You will need the XenApp PS extensions loaded and the Policies module as well. I think Web's documentati

Re: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

013 08:50:43 -0800 > *To: *NT System Admin Issues > *ReplyTo: *"NT System Admin Issues" > > *Subject: *Re: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 > > Forgive the seemingly stupid question, but is this intended to be run from > a XenApp server? I was looking for instructions that woul

RE: Virtualization in small office

You don't specify size of office so here is a generalization. This is based on office size of less than 25 users. What I would do is use Server 2012 Standard as the host. Then create 2 VMs. The first VM would run Server 2012 Essentials and the second VM would run Server 2012 Standard. Server 20

RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

, run the V1 script that doesn't use Word. Thanks Webster From: Sean Martin [mailto:seanmarti...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 11:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 Forgive the seemingly stupid question, but is this intended to be run f

RE: Virtualization in small office

Server 2012 Standard comes with TWO VM instances, not four. You're thinking of Server 2008 R2 Enterprise. Art From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:27 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Virtualization in small office I VM even in s

Re: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

IABLY -Original Message- From: Sean Martin Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:50:43 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Re: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 Forgive the seemingly stupid question, but is this intended to be run from a XenApp server? I

Re: OT - Suggestions for using Netgear wifi and extender with Security camera setup

I originally had two Linksys 54G WAPs in the attic doing point to point to a neighbors house until heat killed them. I now have 2 Groove 5Hnof these and some external antenna's doing point to point to a friends house. http://routerboard.com/RBGrooveA5Hn Mine came with PoE injectors so they only h

Re: OT - Suggestions for using Netgear wifi and extender with Security camera setup

Questions: 1. How far away are these buildings? 2. Are both APs indoors? (I don't know if they have an option for external antennas, and if you are using them.) Do you have an option to use outdoor APs? 3. What kind of bandwidth requirements are you anticipating? How much bandwidth is the curr

RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

Would Windows Intune be a possibility for those remote devices? From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:12 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained You could look at direct access As long as the remote

RE: Virtualization in small office

I VM even in single-server environments. If you have a SMB with SQL and are buying Server 2012, you're licensed for four VM's, so you can divorce SQL from the DC .If you have the resources (RAM, disk), I'd run the DC, SQL, and file/print each on different VM's. Or at minimum divorce the DC from

Re: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

ster Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:01:01 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 BTW, someone wrote an excellent script to document the XenApp 5 (PS45) Farm. :) If you want to leave the customer with a document that

RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

/documenting-a-citrix-xenapp-5-farm-with-microsoft-powershell-and-word-version-2/ Thanks Webster From: Greg Sweers [mailto:gswe...@acts360.com] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:47 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 Thank you Sir. That is good info. To get fully up

RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

System Admin Issues Subject: RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 Thank you Sir. That is good info. To get fully up to speed on this, not expert mind you but good enough. What materials would you suggest to read. Greg Sweers CEO ACTS360.com<http://www.acts360.com/> P.O. Box 1193 Brand

Re: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

ly-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 Thank you Sir. That is good info. To get fully up to speed on this, not expert mind you but good enough. What materials would you suggest to read. Greg Sweers CEO ACTS360.com<http://www.acts360.com/>

RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 I have LOTS of customers who run CSG internally. Some require that all traffic is encrypted and they also have a Citrix policy that says ev

Re: 2012 DC in 2008 R2 Forest and Domain

Duh. That's what I get for being too deep in the weeds of day to day work and not thinking clearly. This is the (really!) obvious solution, but I'm already at the remote site. I will just install a 2008 R2 DC since I have no plans to move to 2012 AD terribly soon. Thank you. On Thu, Mar 14, 2

RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

Subject: RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5 Why would you run CSG internally? I run a Xenapp 5 farm with just a web interface for internal users. External users come through a different CSG/WI box in the DMZ. From: Greg Sweers [mailto:gswe...@acts360.com] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:41 PM To: NT

RE: CSG 3.2 and Presenatation 4.5

Why would you run CSG internally? I run a Xenapp 5 farm with just a web interface for internal users. External users come through a different CSG/WI box in the DMZ. From: Greg Sweers [mailto:gswe...@acts360.com] Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 2:41 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: CSG 3.2 and

Re: Meraki

t; > -- > From: gswe...@acts360.com > To: ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com > Subject: RE: Meraki > Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:23:41 + > > > I love the Meraki AP’s. We have 40+ over multiple clients. Easy > management, great pe

Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

> ** ** > > If you really need to hit the metrics you have above (including proving > compliance), you could be devoting almost an entire FTE to the above. > > ** ** > > Cheers > > Ken > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* David Lum [mailto:david

RE: Meraki

unbelt-software.com Subject: RE: Meraki Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:23:41 + I love the Meraki AP’s. We have 40+ over multiple clients. Easy management, great performance. We had have replaced clients that were having horrible issues with Rukus, Firetide, Cisco, etc.. Not because the equ

RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, 15 March 2013 7:24 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained Excellent questions Ken, thanks. Up to date at this point means 1. Current (within 1 day) of anti-virus signatures 2. Have the latest Acrob

Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

t; > Cheers > Ken > > -Original Message- > From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 15 March 2013 6:04 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ > > Section 2.2 says "This is a more se

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

simply subverting the DMZ host doesn't give you any access to anything internally. Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 15 March 2013 6:04 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ Sectio

Re: OT: Happy PI Day!

I'd rather be transcendental... Kurt On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:05 PM, James Edwards wrote: > Remember celebrate Pi Day by being irrational. > > Jim > > > > > On 3/14/13 10:54 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> >> I'm waiting for Tau day: >> >> http://tauday.com/tau-manifesto >> >> Pi are squared? >> >> No

Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

2013 20:23:57 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained Excellent questions Ken, thanks. Up to date at this point means 1. Current (within 1 day) of anti-virus signatures 2. Have the latest Acrobat/Java/Fi

RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

confirm the above Dave From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained I think you need to know what your requirements are. How do you define "up to date"? e.g. - H

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

+1 -Original Message- From: Kennedy, Jim [mailto:kennedy...@elyriaschools.org] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:44 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ Put an SSL reverse proxy in the DMZ and tunnel that to the RDS Gateway -Original

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

id Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:49 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ > > Correct. How does Citrix handle this? Member server in the DMZ yes? > > -Original Message- > From: Webster [

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

: Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ Section 2.2 says "This is a more secure approach because an attacker has to break both firewalls in order to get to the internal network." This is incorrect. All he has

Re: OT: Happy PI Day!

Remember celebrate Pi Day by being irrational. Jim On 3/14/13 10:54 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: I'm waiting for Tau day: http://tauday.com/tau-manifesto Pi are squared? No, cornbread are square, pie are round... Kurt ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

f [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:34 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 AM, David Lum wrote: >> What’s the risk difference between a server in a DMZ

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

Correct. How does Citrix handle this? Member server in the DMZ yes? -Original Message- From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 11:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ And you make swiss cheese of

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

Put an SSL reverse proxy in the DMZ and tunnel that to the RDS Gateway -Original Message- From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ " I'll make anothe

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

And no longer have a DMZ by my definition. You just have another subnet for your domain. -Original Message- From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 2:45 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ And you

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

And you make swiss cheese of your firewall. Thanks Webster > -Original Message- > From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 1:35 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ > >

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

stem Admin Issues Subject: Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 AM, David Lum wrote: > What’s the risk difference between a server in a DMZ (firewalls on > each end) and port forwarding from the Internet to a machine inside a > network perimeter? Sc

Re: OT: Happy PI Day!

I'm waiting for Tau day: http://tauday.com/tau-manifesto Pi are squared? No, cornbread are square, pie are round... Kurt On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife wrote: > In case someone out there didn’t know… > > > > Joe Heaton > > Enterprise Server Support > > CA Department

Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:22 AM, David Lum wrote: > What’s the risk difference between a server in a DMZ (firewalls on each end) > and port forwarding from the Internet to a machine inside a network > perimeter? Scenario : I have PC’s that use port to talk to a management > server, I’m wonder

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ Big difference. If the Management server resides on the internal LAN, and it gets hacked, it has direct access to the LAN. If it resides on a DMZ, and gets hacked, it only has direct access to other machines on the same

RE: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

I will make some assumptions. 1) You have allowed the port forwarding through the firewall ( therefore no inspection into the traffic to truly determine if it is what it proports to be) 2) If I can compromise the box in the DMZ, then I can use this to push into the Internal network

Re: Difference between port forwarding and DMZ

Big difference. If the Management server resides on the internal LAN, and it gets hacked, it has direct access to the LAN. If it resides on a DMZ, and gets hacked, it only has direct access to other machines on the same DMZ subnet, it is isolated from the Internal LAN. Depending on the configur

RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

I think you need to know what your requirements are. How do you define "up to date"? e.g. - How quickly do you need to deploy something (or even have a range of critical/medium/low priority updates)? - And how do you need to report compliance (on demand? At pre-set intervals?

RE: GoToMeeting/GoToWebinar Updates

Typically VPN if it's urgent and can wait until the next maintenance cycle. -sc From: Cameron Cooper [mailto:ccoo...@aurico.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:37 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: GoToMeeting/GoToWebinar Updates So if they're offsite and an up

RE: GoToMeeting/GoToWebinar Updates

rico.com> | www.aurico.com<http://www.aurico.com/> From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:scaes...@caesare.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:25 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: GoToMeeting/GoToWebinar Updates We just ran in to exactly this... and simply built pushed the WebEx client

Re: GoToMeeting/GoToWebinar Updates

You could achieve that with AppSense User Rights Management or Self-Elevation. Failing that, some creative scripting using something like CPAU may help. There may well be other options though Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY -Original Message-

Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:39 AM, David Lum wrote: > Scenario: > > · 550 Windows workstations, with 100+ of them remote. > > · Active Directory (W2K8R2 and W2K3 DCs). > > · Windows 7 and Windows XP. > > · Users are local admins. > > · Some remote users VPN in

Re: Gateway Controls for Wireless

IIRC the Meraki AP will do this. You can get a freebie John W. Cook Network Operations Manager Partnership for Strong Families - Original Message - From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 12:12 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Gateway

RE: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

S. Baker [mailto:asbz...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained Question: How long is it taking now? I'd be surprised if you don't have some sort of benchmark already. Even though you've provided some

Re: Gateway Controls for Wireless

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Greg Sweers wrote: > Anything out there that will just sit > in front of all those devices, hand out DHCP and present a AUP page > requiring them to accept before allowing out to the internet. This is called a "captive portal", FYI. > This is a small applicati

Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

In my experience the "Users are local admins." bullet is going to add to the manpower hours. You probably already know this first hand and unable to change it, but it does add to the manpower requirements. We have roughly the same number of workstations, and our helpdesk breaks down like this 1 FT

Re: Keeping 550+ systems maintained

My guess is that it will come down to Dell/Kace or SCCM 2012, and possibly Altiris IT Management Suite. I've never used one, but from what I have heard Kace might be a better fit for a smaller shop with less requirements than an SCCM installation. But SCCM is more full featured, but requires mo

RE: Another VMWare question: networking

I would think that 'could' be correct depending on the chassis configuration. If each blade is only communicating with another blade in the chassis, then you don't need to trunk that vlan up the chain. If you had another blade chassis or stand alone server that you were vmotion-ing to, you'd h

RE: Meraki

We're looking at Meraki for our two manufacturing facilities.Here at HQ we installed Cisco wireless last year. I've been trying to get Cisco to buy back the equipment so it would be Meraki everywhere. So far no luck - seems like they are pretty much separate companies. I'm still hopeful

Re: apipa scripting?

Yeah - but I haven't ever used that range in production, so I always have to look it up. I always seem to get into my head that it's a /20, or something like that, and I know that's wrong, so I just go look at the RFC to refresh my memory. Kurt On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Andrew S. Baker wr

Re: apipa scripting?

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > >>172.16.0.0/whatever > > Well, it's 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255, so it's a block out of a /16 > network. 172.16.0.0/12 is what Kurt was looking for. I remember it as "Halfway in size between 192.168.0.0/16 and 10.0.0.0/8". -- Ben ~

Re: apipa scripting?

This is seriously desirable, in case that wasn't obvious from everyone else's agreement. *ASB **http://XeeMe.com/AndrewBaker* * **Providing Virtual CIO Services (IT Operations & Information Security) for the SMB market…*** On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Ben

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

il.com<mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com>] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Webster mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com>> wrote: > I thought it was -File "c:\scr

Re: apipa scripting?

I'll add my voice to what everyone else is saying: You want to keep using DHCP. Use DHCP to assign static addresses. It makes so many things so much easier. If you need to renumber your network (and some day, you will), it means you just change the DHCP config. If you change something like a

Re: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

rian Desmond > br...@briandesmond.com > > w - 312.625.1438 | c - 312.731.3132 > > -Original Message- > From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:40 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Running Powershell script

Re: OT: Meraki

Sweet, isn't it? My daughter's Roku was showing up in the dashboard at 25Db (something I'd never have otherwise bothered to look at). Simply by relocating it in her room and checking back against the dashboard I bumped it up to 34Db. Took all of 10mns and most of that was refresh time. On Fri, Ma

Re: apipa scripting?

Three things: 1) DHCP is your best bet for managing addresses - don't get rid of it, use it. Reservations and exclusions are there for good reasons, as well as standard (DNS, and DG assignment) and vendor-defined (VoIP, etc.) options, etc.. APIPA is meant for unmanaged (AKA broken) networks. 2) P

Re: apipa scripting?

:) On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:26 PM, S Powell wrote: > not quite.. it is friday though ne-c'est pas? > > > - > Go team Avatar! > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Richard Stovall wrote: > > Darn. I was hoping it was something to do with APIPA Middleton. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar

Re: apipa scripting?

Do what we do: Continue to use DHCP, but reserve all addresses. --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: S Powell [mailto:powe...@gmail.com] To: NT System Admin Issues [mailto:ntsysadmin@lyris.sunbelt-software.com] Sent: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:07:26 -0800 Subject: Re

Re: apipa scripting?

right I've looked throught the docs and I believe it could be in there, I just can't find it. I've got a script that changes the static ethernet address, but it is finding how to get into the dark corners to change that alternative configuration that is the issue. - Go team Avatar

Re: apipa scripting?

not quite.. it is friday though ne-c'est pas? - Go team Avatar! On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Richard Stovall wrote: > Darn. I was hoping it was something to do with APIPA Middleton. > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, S Powell wrote: >> >> We are running DHCP now, we are

Re: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

t; -Original Message- > From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] > Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 2:54 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 > > And old! > > Thanks > > > Webster >

Re: apipa scripting?

Darn. I was hoping it was something to do with APIPA Middleton. On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, S Powell wrote: > We are running DHCP now, we are just looking to get rid of it as we > change some things around. > We're looking to tie addresses together, so that we have static > ethernet addres

Re: apipa scripting?

We are running DHCP now, we are just looking to get rid of it as we change some things around. We're looking to tie addresses together, so that we have static ethernet addresses on the 192.168.0.x range where x = the machine ID and have the static wifi addresses be in the 192.168.1.x range So if I

Re: apipa scripting?

> We’d like to use apipa to assign a static IP address to the wifi > adapters;  so that we can turn off DHCP in the office, and yet allow > DHCP when not in the office. Why do you not want a DHCP server? --Matt Ross Ephrata School District - Original Message - From: S Powell [mailto:po

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

I'll always be younger than you. -Original Message- From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 2:54 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 And old! Thanks Webster > -Original

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

And old! Thanks Webster > -Original Message- > From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] > Subject: RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 > > Easier to change a BAT than change something in task scheduler. I'm lazy. ~ Finall

Re: Ironic Kaspersky bug

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Andrew S. Baker wrote: > Lots of irony. They didn't respond in a timely fashion, or so the story goes. Their computers kept freezing. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

Easier to change a BAT than change something in task scheduler. I'm lazy. -Original Message- From: Brian Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 2:38 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 R

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

Admin Issues Subject: RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 I always wrap powershell in a BAT and schedule the BAT. -Original Message- From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:34 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Running

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

party any transaction(s) or tax-related matter(s) addressed herein. From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:46 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 If you dig down in task scheduler there are t

Re: OT: ONLC Training

That's where I went for training! Yumm warm cookies! I prefer live classroom training; but it's getting harder and harder to find. On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Roger Wright wrote: > Don, I took an online EX2010 class last fall through Tech Sherpas in > Tampa. The instructor was okay the la

Re: OT: ONLC Training

Don, I took an online EX2010 class last fall through Tech Sherpas in Tampa. The instructor was okay the labs worked pretty well through their portal. I just missed the warm cookies in the afternoon - a Tech Sherpas classroom benefit. You might consider them as well. Roger Roger Wright ___ C

Re: P2V DC/radius server - resolved [incl. troubleshooting steps]

; > **· **Check the controller to see load per AP. This screen shows > which AP’s are on 2.4GHz and 5GHz and was how we realized it was the root > cause > > ** ** > > Sadly, it took a couple of days to get to the last step because we were > concentrating on the RADIUS

RE: P2V DC/radius server - resolved [incl. troubleshooting steps]

· Check the controller to see load per AP. This screen shows which AP’s are on 2.4GHz and 5GHz and was how we realized it was the root cause Sadly, it took a couple of days to get to the last step because we were concentrating on the RADIUS chase, and early on removing/re-adding the profile

Re: Normalizing a disk image

LOL... forgot about that... sync; sync; sync; halt -Original Message- From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 7:51 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: [dkim-failure] Re: Normalizing a disk image On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Webster wrote

Re: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

gt; powershell -file "get-process" > > fails. > > -Original Message- > From: Crawford, Scott [mailto:crawfo...@evangel.edu] > Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 3:04 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fai

RE: Normalizing a disk image

James mentioned pre-fetch which IIRC is a Vista/7 technology that pre-loads frequently used binaries into memory at boot/logon time Cheers Ken From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Friday, 8 March 2013 5:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Normalizing a disk image

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 Total guess coming :) It seems like -Command would be used when you just want to run a one liner by passing the command directly, but -File is used when you want to run a .ps1. That being said

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

get-process): Powershell "c:\scripts\myscript.ps1" Powershell -file "c:\scripts\myscript.ps1" Powershell -command "c:\scripts\myscript.ps1" -Original Message- From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 1:59 PM To: NT S

Re: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Webster wrote: > I thought it was -File "c:\scripts\myscript.ps1". See, this is what's infuriating. Most of the examples I have found say you don't need "-Command" or "-File". Some say "-Command". Some say the 2 are equivalent. So I changed it to "-File", and ma

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

I always wrap powershell in a BAT and schedule the BAT. -Original Message- From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:34 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1 Sorry; this is Win 2008 R2

RE: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

I thought it was -File "c:\scripts\myscript.ps1". Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com -Original Message- From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 2:30 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Running

Re: Running Powershell script as scheduled task fails with 0x1

Sorry; this is Win 2008 R2. On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Michael Leone wrote: > I can't understand why my script is failing. I can run it from a > Powershell prompt (I have to "Run as administrator", because the > script is deleting some files in a backup directory). But it works > perfectly w

RE: Semi-OT: Vsphere shutdown

Funny. ☺ From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 1:43 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Semi-OT: Vsphere shutdown In that case, you will need MBS’ site! ☺ Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com<h

RE: Normalizing a disk image

http://www.CarlWebster.com<http://www.carlwebster.com/> From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 11:07 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Normalizing a disk image http://community.citrix.com/kits/#/kit/1067009 Only because it applies to the pro

Re: Semi-OT: Vsphere shutdown

On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Robert Cato wrote: > > I would not put the hosts in maintenance mode. I always put my hosts into maintenance mode before powering them down. However, I have my vCenter on a physical box - I had problems when the vCenter was a VM on one of the hosts that was being

Re: Powershell advice - matching an AD user to a value in an array

> } > } > > -Original Message- > From: Michael Leone [mailto:oozerd...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 11:15 AM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: Re: Powershell advice - matching an AD user to a value in an array > > On T

RE: Normalizing a disk image

ttp://www.carlwebster.com/> From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 10:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Normalizing a disk image http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/24559-102-647700/XD%20-%20Top%2010%20Mistakes%20Identified%20When%2

Re: Normalizing a disk image

Ah, top stuff, let me have a look at that, cheers! Sent from my Blackberry, which may be an antique but delivers email RELIABLY -Original Message- From: Webster Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:34:22 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: RE: Nor

Re: Normalizing a disk image

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Webster wrote: > I have still not found anything about booting multiple times before sealing > the image. This reminds me of the old Unix superstition, "sync three times before shutting down". -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource

RE: Normalizing a disk image

Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com<http://www.carlwebster.com/> From: Webster [mailto:webs...@carlwebster.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 5:43 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Normalizing a disk image The AV one, yes, that is recommended.

RE: Normalizing a disk image

The AV one, yes, that is recommended. Boot 6 time, never heard of it. BUT I have heard of booting and waiting a long time so .net stuff has time to compile in the background but that was several years ago. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   >