Re: sharepoint and infopath issue

If I understand you, the requirement driving your desire to also save into a database is being able to query and report? If so, I think you might be over architecting. Then again, I'm a believer in KISS, so maybe I'm over simplifying. Why not just use SQL Server Reporting Services to query/repor

RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

lto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:18 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use I think the point is that SharePoint itself doesn't do ticketing. If someone built a custom application on top of SharePoint to do ticketing, then that's a bit differ

RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

o" - .NET doesn't do ticketing. That's not to say you can't build an application using .NET that does. Cheers Ken -Original Message- From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2012 8:22 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Sharepoint for Help

RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

Subject: RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use I could see sharepoint being a nice tool for the IT ops/helpdesk folks to store information, procedures etc etc. As a helpdesk ticketing system not so much.. Z Edward Ziots CISSP, Security +, Network + Security Engineer Lifespan Organization ezi

Re: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

Some help desk products have snap-ins to Share Point, so you could look at current vendor offerings to see if any integrate that way. We use Help Star, and the current version now integrates with Share Point. We are one rev behind so I cannot attest to what sort of integration though. Probabl

RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

ay 23, 2012 5:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use I could see sharepoint being a nice tool for the IT ops/helpdesk folks to store information, procedures etc etc. As a helpdesk ticketing system not so much.. Z Edward Ziots CISSP, Security +, Network + Sec

RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 6:01 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:41 PM, justino garcia wrote: > Are IT OPS / Help Desk shops using Sharepoint, for things like > knowledge base, soultio

RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

I'm sure there are some organisations doing this. However SharePoint is not a dedicated ITSM or KM solution - there are other products out there that are probably more suited to these roles. Cheers Ken From: justino garcia [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 23 May 2012 5:42 AM To

Re: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

System Center Service Manager does all of that IIRC. No point reinventing the wheel in SharePoint ---Blackberried -Original Message- From: justino garcia Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 17:41:47 To: NT System Admin Issues Reply-To: "NT System Admin Issues" Subject: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

RE: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

It Depends [1]. Carl Webster Consultant and Citrix Technology Professional http://www.CarlWebster.com 1. Should be a registered TM of Citrix From: justino garcia [mailto:jgarciaitl...@gmail.com] Subject: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use Hey, Are IT OPS / Help D

Re: Sharepoint for Help Desk Use

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:41 PM, justino garcia wrote: > Are IT OPS / Help Desk shops using Sharepoint, for things like knowledge > base, soultion base, or even ticket system? No. -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

We ran into several issues when one PHB wanted this: File size limitation. Default size limit is 50mb for SharePoint. This can be modified, but we did not. File type exclusion. There is a laundry list of file types that are prohibited from SP by default. This can be modified, and we did allow som

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:16 PM, James Rankin wrote: > Have you ever done a duplicate file find and realised how much redundant > data is stored in old-style file shares? SharePoint's unlikely to fix that. :) -- Ben ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

nks guys, > > ** ** > > I found this too: > > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mikewat/archive/2006/12/09/file-shares-vs-sharepoint.aspx > > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 9:15 AM > >

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

bject: Re: Sharepoint as file storage It's not bad, per se. However, this is a new usage scenario that needs to be taken into account. Your Sharepoint utilization may not be correctly sized for this usage pattern, and require additional resources to make it robust for this usage... O

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

Many companies are moving in that direction. For larger installations, obviously there needs to be significant architecture design up front. There are technologies (including some native to SQL) that can move the BLOB storage outside of SQL. On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM, David Lum wrote: >

RE: Sharepoint as file storage

Thanks guys, I found this too: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mikewat/archive/2006/12/09/file-shares-vs-sharepoint.aspx From: Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 9:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sharepoint as file storage It's not bad, p

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

We're in the process of moving documents to SharePoint. I'm not handling this project, but I have convinced management to purchase more storage as a result. The combination of office 2010 and sharepoint 2010 so far appears to be the ideal combination, especially if you have SharePoint Workspace 201

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM, David Lum wrote: > Last week I found out my director has told her team to put all > files/documents into Sharepoint instead of a network folder – basically stop > using the shared drive and use Sharepoint instead, for ALL MS Office > documents that are to be share

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

Personally I think SharePoint is a better idea for serving files. Allows checking in/out, version control, etc. Have you ever done a duplicate file find and realised how much redundant data is stored in old-style file shares? Not to mention inaccurate or out-of-date stuff. Document management of s

RE: Sharepoint as file storage

I think it's awesome, assuming you have the server horsepower to service it. And I suspect you do since it doesn't take much. Clean easy to use web interface, check in/check outversion history area for notes by each users. What's not to love :) The only thing to watch is bringing back a sin

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

It's not bad, per se. However, this is a new usage scenario that needs to be taken into account. Your Sharepoint utilization may not be correctly sized for this usage pattern, and require additional resources to make it robust for this usage... On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:06 PM, David Lum wro

RE: Sharepoint as file storage

I'm interested in the same. Our president has asked me to look into doing the same thing. One our benefit is to allow part time folks that aren't on campus to have access to forms and documents. From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 12:06 PM To: NT System A

Re: Sharepoint as file storage

Dave, I think that is the reason they designed SharepointSQL is pretty powerful and can handle it. On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:06 AM, David Lum wrote: > Last week I found out my director has told her team to put all > files/documents into Sharepoint instead of a network folder – basically > s

Re: Sharepoint DocID *Solved ??*

uninstall Infopath. frak. Yep, if Infopath is uninstalled the DocID link works. what a great solution. ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~ --- To manage subscriptions click here: http://lyris.sun

Re: Sharepoint DocID

well IE8 on xp-64 same thing. it asks to open in infopath. does not open in the browser. - Who'd you rather be, the Beatles or the Rolling Stones? On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:15, Cameron wrote: > What about IE8? I'd be curious about that actually as I've found IE9 to > have

Re: Sharepoint DocID

What about IE8? I'd be curious about that actually as I've found IE9 to have a couple of issues. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:56 AM, S Powell wrote: > Sharepoint 2010 > > we have DocumentID enabled. > > we've taught users to use the DocID URL for links eg. > http://site/_layouts/DocIdRedir.aspx?

Re: sharepoint 2010

reminders would be good during the day, but most of our staff does not check email out of the office. I'm looking at docs that people check out then abandon if they forget and go home without checking it back in. If someone has it open and is working on it I don't want them kicked out. not going

Re: sharepoint 2010

Just being devils advocate here ... if you don't care about saving their work and they can merge documents later, why are you forcing a checkout? The idea behind checkout is to prevent 2 people from modifying the same file and over writing someone else's changes. FYI, I don't think check in would

Re: sharepoint 2010

oh good idea, workflow, hmm need to look into that. yes, we have this issue all the time. Bob will check out a document then leave for the day, and Alice wants to work on it, and she has to find me to kick Bob out of it. I don't care about saving their work. They can merge the documents later.

Re: sharepoint 2010

Not within Sharepoint natively. There may be 3rd party tools. I haven't considered it, but you could possibly write a work flow to do it. Although, like the admin check in, that would really just clear the "checked out" status, it would not check in (save) the document from the users work station

RE: Sharepoint 2010 Specifications and questions

Thanks Kevin, Z Edward E. Ziots CISSP, Network +, Security + Network Engineer Lifespan Organization Email:ezi...@lifespan.org Cell:401-639-3505 From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 9:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sharepoint

Re: Sharepoint 2010 Specifications and questions

Inline On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Ziots, Edward wrote: > To the list and the Sharepoint Guru’s out there a few questions. > > > > I have been asked to spec hardware for a Sharepoint 2010 site for internal > IS. (Note: I am a sharepoint N00b, so forgive my trivial questions) > > > > 1)

Re: Sharepoint question

This the free version or the paid version? I seem to remember that only the paid allowed or had this type of access but I have not actually seen the product up and running. Jon On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Oliver Marshall < oliver.marsh...@g2support.com> wrote: > Hi Chaps, > > > > Marginal

Re: Sharepoint questions

I would check with your Great Plains consultant to ensure that any third party tools are updated for 2010. Books - the 2010 books are just starting to come out in full force. A few have been out a bit, but remember those were likely based on beta and RC versions. While the GUI has changed quite

Re: Sharepoint questions

2010 most likely since we are not using Share Point otherwise. >>> Kevin Lundy 10/3/2010 7:24 PM >>> Are you going to be using 2007 or 2010? On 10/3/10, Tom Miller wrote: > Hi Folks, > > We have a project here to start Sharepoint. It will start with integration > with Great Plains, then othe

Re: Sharepoint questions

Are you going to be using 2007 or 2010? On 10/3/10, Tom Miller wrote: > Hi Folks, > > We have a project here to start Sharepoint. It will start with integration > with Great Plains, then other items will be integrated. > > Not being a Sharepoint person, but having to become one or at least being

RE: Sharepoint Services question

You need to create an alternate access mapping in SharePoint (so that it responds on the alternate name) I would also consider port translation at your border device (ISA Server or whatever) so that externally users can access port 443, and it is mapped to port 8043 on your internal machine. Ch

Re: Sharepoint Services question

Amen to that. Jon On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Kevin Lundy wrote: > It's been quite a while since I've looked at that, but if I recall, you > would do alternate access within WSS. It should create the site in IIS. > Then go into IIS and create the cert req and later import the cert. > > Sh

Re: Sharepoint Services question

It's been quite a while since I've looked at that, but if I recall, you would do alternate access within WSS. It should create the site in IIS. Then go into IIS and create the cert req and later import the cert. Sharepoint gets unhappy when IIS changes are made directly in IIS. It's a control fr

RE: Sharepoint Services question

Not sure of your infrastructure, but you might also want to consider port forwarding from the external IP with standard SSL ( 443 ) to the internal at port 8043. Don’t know if better than what you plan, but maybe just a different way to attack the same problem. Erik Goldoff IT Consultant Sy

RE: Sharepoint licensing in a DR play

Purrfect. That's the cat's meow of licensing documents. Shook From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:mich...@smithcons.com] Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 3:59 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Sharepoint licensing in a DR play PURr is your friend. Learn it. Love it. Live

RE: Sharepoint licensing in a DR play

PURr is your friend. Learn it. Love it. Live it. http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/about-licensing/product-licensing.aspx I didn't look it up for you, but it'll be in there. :-P Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEssentialExchange.com From: Andy Shook [mailto

RESOLVED: RE: SharePoint

Add/Remove...Windows Components...Application Server check ASP.NET, click OK to have it add that feature. Bizarre, but I guess it makes sense. Dave From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 11:39 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint Tried the

RE: SharePoint

n Desmond [mailto:br...@briandesmond.com] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 11:33 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint Check your trusted sites and ActiveX settings? I have had to tweak these to get this stuff to work on my machine before at customer sites. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...

RE: SharePoint

Check your trusted sites and ActiveX settings? I have had to tweak these to get this stuff to work on my machine before at customer sites. Thanks, Brian Desmond br...@briandesmond.com c - 312.731.3132 From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 12:28 PM To: NT Syste

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

erver backup will work fine. Cheers Ken From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Saturday, 15 May 2010 2:30 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup Yes Using DPM, but I like the extra protection since it is so little disk cost! Can't have too ma

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

Yes Using DPM, but I like the extra protection since it is so little disk cost! Can't have too many backups! From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:22 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup Are you using D

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

Are you using DPM to backup SharePoint? In which case the DB backup LUN is not required. DPM will backup SQL Server DBs and index the content via the SharePoint WFE. Cheers Ken From: Bob Fronk [mailto:b...@btrfronk.com] Sent: Friday, 14 May 2010 9:04 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Share

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

com] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:35 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup "Given the number of disks..." Do you think I don't have enough? I can chain another array with same number of disks and space. (I have the equipment) BF From: E

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

"Given the number of disks..." Do you think I don't have enough? I can chain another array with same number of disks and space. (I have the equipment) BF From: Erik Goldoff [mailto:egold...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:29 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: S

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

[mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup Bob, Given the number of disks you have to work with – that is probably the config I would use. My only ‘concern’ would be performance of the RAID5 for backups

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

I can do basically anything with the disks... For the backups I was looking for redundancy with less disks, rather than speed, but I can use any combination. From: Jim Holmgren [mailto:jholmg...@xlhealth.com] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:21 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

Bob, Given the number of disks you have to work with - that is probably the config I would use. My only 'concern' would be performance of the RAID5 for backups - RAID5 isn't optimal for write-intensive applications. But...unless you can scare up another disk so you can go 0+1 for the b

RE: SharePoint - SQL Backend setup

Not a SQL GURU, but a SharePoint installation has like a dozen DB's under the covers. Depending on usage, you MAY see some value in storing a couple of them (indexing, and I forgettheotherone), on a separate mirror. If I can find the doc we generated here 18 months or so ago, I'll pass more on.

Re: Sharepoint on the fly?

On 9 Feb 2010 at 9:33, Sam Cayze wrote: > > We have the need to collaborate on the Internet on an XLS doc, and we > kinda need it quickly. Is something like Windows Live for Business the > quickest way to get a one-off requests like this going? Tia, Sam Quickest, esp. for a 1-time deal? G

Re: Sharepoint on the fly?

Google Docs ? On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Sam Cayze wrote: > We have the need to collaborate on the Internet on an XLS doc, and we > kinda need it quickly. Is something like Windows Live for Business the > quickest way to get a one-off requests like this going? > > > > Tia, > > Sam > >

RE: Sharepoint on the fly?

Microsoft online has a SharePoint offering, about USD 15 per user per month. There are lots of in-house answers to this question but they involve detailed licensing scenarios. WSS, for example, MIGHT be "free". But it depends. Regards, Michael B. Smith Consultant and Exchange MVP http://TheEs

RE: SharePoint Purchase Order templates

mailto:gsb...@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:02 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SharePoint Purchase Order templates Thanks, I've been search, however no SharePoint PO tempates. Regards, Garfy ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a res

Re: SharePoint Purchase Order templates

I don't have access to my old notes but I seem to remember there was one on the Microsoft site several years ago. Jon On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Jon Harris wrote: > Try item 1 or 2 from this search. > > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=sharepoint+templates+purchase+order&a

Re: SharePoint Purchase Order templates

Try item 1 or 2 from this search. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=sharepoint+templates+purchase+order&aq=0&aql=&aqi=g1&oq=sharepoint+templates+pur Watch for the wrap. Jon On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Gary Babb wrote: > Thanks, > > I've been search, however no SharePoint P

Re: SharePoint Purchase Order templates

Thanks, I've been search, however no SharePoint PO tempates. Regards, Garfy ~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~ ~ ~

Re: SharePoint Purchase Order templates

Look on the Microsoft Sharepoint site. I have also found them by doing a search using sharepoint+templates. They are out there. Jon On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Gary Babb wrote: > Hi, > > We are using Windows SharePoint Services, I was just asked to look for > Purchase Order template for

RE: SharePoint database

David... can you use the 'stsadm' executable to create a backup file from the old site, then use the same executable to import/restore on the new site.. I don't support Sharepoint per se, just the dept that does. Wendell From: David Minich [mailto:dmin

RE: SharePoint database

That sounds good, I would like to look at that. I would need to migrate from a legacy database to a new one. They are on the same server. _ From: Sherry Abercrombie [mailto:saber...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 8:57 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: SharePoint

Re: SharePoint database

And, what I've got is for Sharepoint Services, not portal serverif that makes a difference. There "should" be KB articles on Microsoft's site with that kind of information. On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Sherry Abercrombie wrote: > I've got some documentation on how to migrate the database

Re: SharePoint database

I've got some documentation on how to migrate the database from one server to another which would effectively do what you're asking On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:43 AM, David Minich wrote: > Any ideas on how to extract all the documents from an old SharePoint > companyweb so that I can import t

Re: Sharepoint assistance needed...

Found the fix installed SP3 for Sharepoint 2.0. Thanks! ~Doc~ On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Miller Bonnie L. < mille...@mukilteo.wednet.edu> wrote: > Sounds like that could be an IE zone setting? Has the IP address been > added to their IE Trusted or Local Intranet zone, but the server n

Re: Sharepoint assistance needed...

On another note, installed the service pack 2 for Sharepoint 3 yesterday and it buggered up my main site. On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Eustace "Doc" wrote: > I may be missing something simple, but it's got me bagged. > > >- Sharepoint Server 2.0 >- Only the default site is enabled. >

RE: Sharepoint assistance needed...

Sounds like that could be an IE zone setting? Has the IP address been added to their IE Trusted or Local Intranet zone, but the server name has not been added? -Bonnie From: Eustace "Doc" [mailto:mailed2thew...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:14 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject:

RE: Sharepoint sync question

Late reply I know, but I didn't see any others. I'm not sure what comes with SBS and these are just some ideas. In MOSS 2007 I might try going to the Site (or list), modify site settings, configure audit settings. Check the box to audit checking out or checking in items. Then, after it happe

Re: Sharepoint list

t; definitely. Additional functionally, yes. > > > > Just idle curiosity as to what things you perceive as being 'fixed' in MOSS > vs. WSS 3? > > > > Scott > > > > > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January

RE: Sharepoint list

Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 11:55 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sharepoint list Yes but MOSS is much better in areas I need which is why I coached my statement the way I did. I had 3 up and running but due to the way somethings are done in 3 that are 'fixed" in MOSS make

Re: Sharepoint list

> http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael<http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael> > > I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php > > > > *From:* Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 23, 2009 11:23 AM > >

RE: Sharepoint list

ubject: Re: Sharepoint list Please either correct me or confirm for me but MOSS2007 is the paid version of SharePoint correct? thanks a lot, Jon On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Tim Vander Kooi mailto:tvanderk...@expl.com>> wrote: I'm running MOSS 2007. Still in the process of get

RE: Sharepoint list

lto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 11:23 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sharepoint list My thanks to both of you. I thought I was correct. I am waiting on the version 4 for WSS to come out to see if it is worth the pain of setting it up and testing let alone

Re: Sharepoint list

M > > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* Re: Sharepoint list > > > > Please either correct me or confirm for me but MOSS2007 is the paid version > of SharePoint correct? > > > > thanks a lot, > > > > Jon > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:02

RE: Sharepoint list

s for sharepoint administration, but the team blog is usually pretty good reading http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/default.aspx -troy -Original Message- From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 7:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Sharepoint li

RE: Sharepoint list

Correct, it is the paid version that is tied very tightly to Office 2007. Although it is very functional without it. TVK From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sharepoint list Please either correct me or

RE: Sharepoint list

Correct. Sharepoint Services is included free with Server 2003 R2 (2nd disc), or as a download From: Jon Harris [mailto:jk.har...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 11:15 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sharepoint list Please either correct me or confirm for me but

Re: Sharepoint list

d, but as a whole we love it. > > TVK > > > > *From:* David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] > *Sent:* Friday, January 23, 2009 9:56 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: Sharepoint list > > > > I haven't found any SharePoint resources that a

RE: Sharepoint list

I'm running MOSS 2007. Still in the process of getting the document retention part configured and used, but as a whole we love it. TVK From: David Lum [mailto:david@nwea.org] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 9:56 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: Sharepoint list I haven't

Re: Sharepoint list

cess of moving from SharePoint 2.0 to MOSS2K7. > > *David Lum** **// *SYSTEMS ENGINEER > NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION > (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764 > > *From:* Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, January 23, 2009 6:10 AM > *To:*

RE: Sharepoint list

(Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: Kevin Lundy [mailto:klu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 6:10 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: Re: Sharepoint list There are 2 on Yahoo. Not high volume. http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sharepointdiscussions/ http://tech.groups.yaho

Re: Sharepoint list

There are 2 on Yahoo. Not high volume. http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sharepointdiscussions/ http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/sharepoint/ Only ones I know of. On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Oliver Marshall < oliver.marsh...@g2support.com> wrote: > Anyone know of a good Sharepoint lis

RE: Sharepoint question

Olly, I have never done this, but assuming powershell can see that dav UNC, couldn’t you just use it to copy files that were newer than say one day? Something like: Get-childitem -path "\\server\folder" | where {$_.lastwritetime -gt (get-date).adddays(-1) -and $_.length -ne $null } | copy-it

Re: SharePoint Server

gt; will make a world of difference later. > > -Troy > > > > -Original Message- > From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 12:29 PM > To: NT System Admin Issues > Subject: RE: SharePoint Server > > I have setup a test mac

RE: SharePoint Server

-Original Message- From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 12:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint Server I have setup a test machine... Looks like I need to buy some books or find a hands-on class nearby. Bob From: Steven

RE: SharePoint Server

o: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint Server I have setup a test machine... Looks like I need to buy some books or find a hands-on class nearby. Bob From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subjec

Re: SharePoint Server

9 PM, Bob Fronk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have setup a test machine… Looks like I need to buy some books or find > a hands-on class nearby. > > > > Bob > > > > *From:* Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008

RE: SharePoint Server

008 3:29 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint Server I have setup a test machine. Looks like I need to buy some books or find a hands-on class nearby. Bob From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issue

RE: SharePoint Server

I have setup a test machine... Looks like I need to buy some books or find a hands-on class nearby. Bob From: Steven M. Caesare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 2:40 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint Server We are getting ready to pilot SP

RE: SharePoint Server

We are getting ready to pilot SP for much the same purpose. The potential SQL server size scares me. -sc From: Bob Fronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:16 PM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: SharePoint Server I am gearing up to deploy SharePoint Se

RE: SharePoint Web Server farms (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Isn't that what Shook does? _ From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2008-12-09 8:34 To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint Web Server farms Just follow the bouncing balls? :-P Regards, Mich

Re: SharePoint Web Server farms

INEER > NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION > (Desk) 971.222.1025 *// *(Cell) 503.267.9764 > > > > > > > > *From:* Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:34 AM > *To:* NT System Admin Issues > *Subject:* RE: ShareP

RE: SharePoint Web Server farms

web to get my hands around some of the concepts. David Lum // SYSTEMS ENGINEER NORTHWEST EVALUATION ASSOCIATION (Desk) 971.222.1025 // (Cell) 503.267.9764 From: Michael B. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 5:34 AM To: NT System Admin Issues Subject: RE: SharePoint

RE: SharePoint Web Server farms

Just follow the bouncing balls? :-P Regards, Michael B. Smith, MCITP:SA,EMA/MCSE/Exchange MVP My blog: http://TheEssentialExchange.com/blogs/michael I'll be at TEC'2009! http://www.tec2009.com/vegas/index.php From: Doige, Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09,

Re: Sharepoint Resources

I bought the Mastering book by Callalan. So far I like it. Coming from a web background the different use of terminology is definitely a work in progress. Thanks On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Kevin Lundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Sybex/Wiley "Mastering" book is not bad. Explains the ba

Re: Sharepoint Resources

General information at this point. I am setting up an internal Wiki but am not even sure how users interact, DNS, etc is done yet. I need to read some basic docks. I just downloaded MS' CHM but I was hoping to take something along with me at the moment On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Travis Kramp

Re: Sharepoint Resources

The Sybex/Wiley "Mastering" book is not bad. Explains the basics as well as some advanced topics. Has some labs to walk you through common setup steps. On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:22 PM, mqcarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > General information at this point. I am setting up an internal Wiki but am

  1   2   >