State of the clinical modelling program and international CKM

nd regards Heather Leslie Dr Heather Leslie MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD, FIAHSI M +61 418 966 670 Skype: heatherleslie Twitter: @atomicainfo, @clinicalmodels & @omowizard www.atomicainformatics.com [cid:image001.jpg@01D50422.91F688B0] ___ openEHR-cl

RE: Problem orientation in OpenEHR

Great discussion. I think there are semantic issues at play here as well – the POMR use of ‘problem’ vs the ‘Problem<>Diagnosis continuum’ that is used as part of the conclusion to a consult etc. Problems are problematic! Add in Contsys and then we start to get into tricky territory. In

RE: Choosing appropriate composition archetypes for recording smoking and drinking summary

Hi Dileep, The Lifestyle factors COMPOSITION is the one that has been built to carry smoking and alcohol data, plus other lifestyle related data such as physical exercise, nutrition etc – see https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/archetypes/1013.1.1648 The intent for COMPOSITION design is to build ones

RE: Downloading previous versions of archetypes from CKM

Hi all A welcome discussion. CKM is the public face of much of the openEHR community’s work but it is not the only solution required for seamless archetype management from design through to system development. At present each vendor is managing their own archetype repository individually, as

Genomics archetype reviews kick off today!

. It would be great to get broad participation, including across standards organisations. Regards Heather Leslie Dr Heather Leslie MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD M +61 418 966 670 Skype: heatherleslie Twitter: @atomicainfo, @clinicalmodels & @omowizard www.atomicainformatics.com [ci

RE: Archetype modelling pattern for Physical examination findings

on the recommended pattern so we can test it further. Thanks Heather From: openEHR-implementers On Behalf Of Heather Leslie Sent: Thursday, 7 March 2019 3:33 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions ; For openEHR implementation discussions ; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: Archetype

RE: transfer/move archetype?

Have you seen the 'Transfer of care' COMPOSITION? https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.1970 It's designed to cover the broadest sense of transfer of care (and responsibility). One use case not mentioned is actual clinician to clinician handover within a hospital settling eg nurses

Archetype modelling pattern for Physical examination findings

a page on the wiki to try to explain our proposal and provide some examples - https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/healthmod/pages/380993560/Proposal+-+Physical+examination+findings+pattern Comments welcome, probably best if you add them to the wiki page, please. Regards Heather Dr Heather

Christmas greetings from the CKM team

as the year draws to a close, we wish you all a great celebration with family and friends, and especially a restful holiday break - we need you to be in good shape for all the work we anticipate for 2019. Best regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD M +61 418 9

RE: Christmas cleaning of the openEHR wiki...

Hi everyone, I’d love to see a tidy up and update of all this material. I suggest that we need an area for each of the Foundation programs, which should be the responsibility of the programs themselves to manage and maintain content. This would simplify at least the initial navigation from a

RE: Question about: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.microscopy_breast_carcinoma.v1

Hi Thérèse, Sorry for the delay in response. There was a large project carried out here in Australia in 2010-2011, so quite a few years ago. Templates were created for reporting for a number of cancers from a few countries. I vividly remember Ian McNicoll, who carried out most of the work,

Seeking clarification regarding Assumed value

and should never be assumed - True or False? Thanks Heather Dr Heather Leslie MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD M +61 418 966 670 Skype: heatherleslie Twitter: @atomicainfo, @clinicalmodels & @omowizard www.atomicainformatics.com [cid:image001.jpg@01D

RE: MEDINFO 2019, Lyon, France.

assessment Hope these information can be useful. Best Regards Xudong 在 2018年9月18日，15:21，Heather Leslie mailto:heather.les...@atomicainformatics.com>> 写道： Hi everyone, I've just been talking with Silje about our plans for Medinfo from the clinical modelling program. We'd like to sha

RE: MEDINFO 2019, Lyon, France.

the contents about openEHR, but I guess "developers workshop' might be an insurance to pass reviews. Regards, Shinji Kobayashi 2018年9月18日(火) 16:21 Heather Leslie : > > Hi everyone, > > > > I've just been talking with Silje about our plans for Medinfo from the >

RE: MEDINFO 2019, Lyon, France.

Hi everyone, I've just been talking with Silje about our plans for Medinfo from the clinical modelling program. We'd like to share our current thinking and ideas for some broader openEHR engagement. 1. 3 Panels: * Clinical modelling panel - focus on community engagement,

RE: SV: ECG archetype advice required

OK, thanks everyone. It seems like there are zero voices supporting the {H.B} or {beats} variations. So I'll send out a new review on the latest version of the ECG archetype. Please adopt the archetype if you'd like to participate in the review and we'll add you in... See

ECG archetype advice required

before further reviews. Kind regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD M +61 418 966 670 Skype: heatherleslie Twitter: @atomicainfo, @clinicalmodels & @omowizard www.atomicainformatics.com [cid:image001.jpg@01D4452E.A2F11DF0] (f

RE: Topics of the openehr-clinical list

at 4:25 AM, Heather Leslie mailto:heather.les...@atomicainformatics.com>> wrote: Hi Pablo, To be fair these recent discussions may have been about clinical modelling issues but most have not been engaging with clinicians. It would be really nice to receive feedback from more clinical mo

RE: Topics of the openehr-clinical list

Hi Pablo, To be fair these recent discussions may have been about clinical modelling issues but most have not been engaging with clinicians. The description of the list is: This list is for discussions about any clinical aspect of the EHR, including clinical design of archetypes. I’d

A clinical modelling conversation...

way beyond the openEHR international community but to other standards organisations and digital health in the broadest sense. Kind regards Silje Ljosland Bakke and Heather Leslie Clinical Knowledge Administrators for the openEHR CKM Dr Heather Leslie MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD M +61 418 966 670

RE: How to define transitions in the ISM

Hi Pablo, Every archetype ideally needs to be designed for the maximal dataset and universal use case. The ACTION archetypes are no different. But you have picked up on a major gap in our tooling at present – the modellers need the ability to be able to constrain the ACTION archetypes in

RE: Machine Learning , some thoughts

I totally endorse what Thomas is saying here. Let's be realistic here! CKM is not some automagic process. There is no archetype fairy. We need candidate archetypes proposed by openEHR members and we need the process to be modestly funded. What we have achieved with largely volunteer labour

RE: Machine Learning , some thoughts

Hi Bert, I’d really like to be careful about the terms we use here. “But if flexibility is slowed down by years of review, discussing and consensus over the whole world for a set of archetypes, then there is not much flexibility left.” At present, the slow part is lack of editorial resources

ECG test result archetype review

heather.les...@atomicainformatics.com<mailto:heather.les...@atomicainformatics.com> and we'll coordinate reviewing the latest version before starting the next review round. Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD M +61 418 966 670 Skype: heatherleslie Twitter: @atomi

Visual acuity test result archetype

. Many thanks Heather Dr Heather Leslie MB BS, FRACGP, FACHI, GAICD M +61 418 966 670 Skype: heatherleslie Twitter: @atomicainfo, @clinicalmodels & @omowizard www.atomicainformatics.com [cid:image001.jpg@01D3DBCB.42BA0E50] ___ openEHR-clinical mai

RE: Setting thresholds

Hi all, Also consider differentiating between actual vs ideal ranges. All are intended to flag outliers via decision support and which may trigger clinical actions. The reference range for a lab test result is very specific - at least for that lab, machine and methodology and in some cases it

RE: Modeling generic concepts, considerations for querying

Hi Pablo, The modeller’s dilemma! If you make clinical synopsis more specific then how many variations will there be in the end? We will end up with zillions of variations of all the generic archetypes which will be an absolute governance nightmare. I would prefer to see the queryable filter

RE: design description of lab archetypes

of these names. The LOINC or SNOMED codes can still be included in bindings. how does this sound? - thomas On 13/07/2017 03:46, Heather Leslie wrote: Hi Thomas, This might help you: https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/healthmod/pages/91139266/Implementing+Laboratory+Tests+in+openEHR Heather

RE: design description of lab archetypes

Hi Thomas, This might help you: https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/healthmod/pages/91139266/Implementing+Laboratory+Tests+in+openEHR Heather From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2017 1:22 AM To: For

RE: Some persistent compos are event in the CKM

org> Subject: Re: Some persistent compos are event in the CKM Shouldn't that be two separate archetypes? one event and one persistent? That is a solution independent from the RM constraints. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Heather Leslie <heather.les...@oceanhealthsystems.com<mailto

RE: Some persistent compos are event in the CKM

Hi Pablo, This is a longstanding issue and workaround. See the last paragraph in 'Use' for each of the COMPOSITIONS that theoretically should be persistent but have been modelled as an event: "This archetype is usually managed as a persistent list, however there are situations where the list

RE: Questionnaires

useful for exchanging the questions and answers, and does not allow re-use of data". This is not 'next to useless for interoperability', just not fit for any wider purpose Grahame On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Heather Leslie <heather.les...@oceanhealthsystems.com<mailto:heather.les.

Questionnaires

Following Thomas’ suggestion re a separate thread: I wrote a blog post in 2014 which still reflects our current thinking re questionnaires: https://omowizard.wordpress.com/2014/02/21/the-questionnaire-challenge/ Our experience is that the data is the priority and so we want to focus on

RE: Z scores

Hi Ian, I’ve just uploaded the Child Growth archetype to CKM a couple of hours ago - http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.2741 - as it covers some of the data required for the archetype proposal – see RP 43 in the openEHR CKM. However there is a question whether a Z-score should be

New Clinical Knowledge Manager user interface

Please take a look... https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/healthmod/New+CKM+User+interface Kind regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI CCIO, Ocean Informatics<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Clinical Programme Lead, openEHR Foundation<http://www.openehr.org/>

RE: openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 56, Issue 3

inical-ow...@lists.openehr.org> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of openEHR-clinical digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: Missing lab test archetypes from CKM (Heather Leslie) -

RE: Missing lab test archetypes from CKM

Hi Pablo, These archetypes were unpublished archetypes that have been rejected according to the openEHR policy and for valid reasons around patterns and design, still led by Ian. See specs here: http://www.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/docs/Identification/Identification.html#_lifecycle_model.

Medications and Parenteral fluids archetypes

following these instructions - https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/healthmod/Adopt+an+archetype The review is due to close in the next few days, so your timely response would be much appreciated. Regards Heather Leslie (EDITOR) Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI CCIO, Ocean Inform

RE: Archetype for pain scale (VAS)

Hi Pekka, As per Ian and Silje’s comments the CLUSTER.symptom-pain in the NEHTA CKM (actually the Australian Digital Health Agency now!) is out of date. Pain VAS is now managed within the CLUSTER.symptom_sign archetype that has been reviewed and published. In addition there are a few

RE: HL7 and negation

Hi Thomas, Point 3 is not simply about ‘not applicable’ – it is about the need to assert a clinical statement that the examination could not be done (as opposed to NA or didn’t feel like it), often for medicolegal purposes. It is more than ‘not applicable’ and often needs a reason why to be

Interested in participating in a clinical modelling workshop?

Have registered as a participant in an openEHR CKM; and * Have actively participated in CKM collaborative reviews. Kind regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Informatics Lead, Ocean Informatics<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Clinical Programme Lead, openEHR F

RE: Templates and archetype patterns for PVC usage, emergency wards etc?

Hi Erik, Both the Service request archetype and the Laboratory archetype and their associated families of archetypes are currently under review and therefore it is a bit messy at present. Service request is currently under review and evolving. Request for Procedure has been identified but is

RE: Seeking expertise on addiction medicine...

eekend. Kind regards, Rikard Rikard Lövström Den 18 feb 2016 07:50 skrev "Heather Leslie" <heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com<mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com>>: Hi everyone, The CKM Editorial teams in Norway and the international openEHR CKM are seeking expe

RE: Seeking expertise on addiction medicine...

o use, compared it to the 10 put > > forward by an expert group and finally concluded on the two (!) I > > thought was sufficient. > > > > I can try to find it. By the weekend. > > > > Kind regards, > > Rikard > > > > Rikard L

RE: Seeking expertise on addiction medicine...

18 feb 2016 07:50 skrev "Heather Leslie" <heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com<mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com>>: Hi everyone, The CKM Editorial teams in Norway and the international openEHR CKM are seeking expertise for development of our tobacco, drug and a

Seeking expertise on addiction medicine...

. If you'd like to volunteer your services, please let me know. If you can refer me to someone else who could assist, please do so. Many thanks in anticipation, Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Informatics Lead, Ocean Informatics<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Clinical Programm

RE: Architectural choices: One composition archetype per document type, or not?

Hi Silje, Each admission note will likely have it's own content priorities and level of details, so there will be many templates - maybe not 'hundreds if not thousands' of templates if business logic drives some of the display of each template, but still many - that will be the reality. The

RE: Alive vs Dead

n. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 5 January 2016 at 06:43, Heather Leslie <heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com<mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com>> wrote: Hi everyone, Seeking some advice please. In the context of a data registry or research database to record if a p

RE: Alive vs Dead

R, CDA and HL7 V2 only have one means to do this. Regards Heath _ From: Heather Leslie <heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com<mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com>> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 6:17 pm Subject: RE: Alive vs Dead To: For openEHR cl

RE: Alive vs Dead

roblem - I thought there would be more on the internets :). Any wisdom you can share would be most appreciated. And then I guess we need to think of related data elements that might be grouped with this status. Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Consulting Lead, Ocean Informatic

Alive vs Dead

of related data elements that might be grouped with this status. Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Consulting Lead, Ocean Informatics<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Clinical Programme Lead, openEHR Foundation<http://www.openehr.org/> p: +61 418 966

RE: Alive vs Dead

Heath On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:20 PM -0800, "Heather Leslie" <heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com<mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com>> wrote: Just talking it through further with Hugh. The notion of a patient being alive is only possible while they are in the room wi

RE: Alive vs Dead

of birth + you are not allowed to know that the patient is deceased without knowing the date I'd think that the fairly ubiquitous HL7 model would have pretty good penetration, and would only be so consistent if it was meeting the requirements. Grahame On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Heath

Medication Order archetype review open

- Jan 18 - to allow plenty of opportunity for participation. Other review round opportunities will follow for those who miss out :) Kind regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Consulting Lead, Ocean Informatics<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Clinical Programme L

Adverse reaction archetype... just published

in the next few days - another extraordinarily complex modelling feat that is currently being coordinated by Ian McNicoll. If you would like to participate please adopt the archetypes you would like to review: http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showProject_1013.30.27 Kind Regards Heather Dr Heather

RE: Memory Clinic / Older Adult Mental Health

clinical software development ecosystem who are starting their archetype journey as well. I have no doubt that Ian McNicoll and our colleagues at Code4Health and Apperta will be resources to help navigate. And myself, from an opposite time zone ☺ Kind regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP

RE: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org> Cc: openehr-clinical@lists.openehr.org Subject: Re: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers Hence my earlier proposal... On 19/10/2015 09:18, David Moner wrote: 2015-10-16 3:22 GMT+02:00 Heather

RE: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

Hi Thomas, See my email from October 9 regarding how this has been resolved. There is now an updated v1 Blood Pressure archetype with addition of the correct units for Tilt added to the node and a note that the previous units are no longer to be used. It has been republished as a non-breaking

RE: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

Regards Heath On 8 Oct 2015, at 6:42 pm, "David Moner" <dam...@gmail.com<mailto:dam...@gmail.com>> wrote: 2015-10-08 1:23 GMT+02:00 Heather Leslie <heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com<mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com>>: It was Sebastian’s suggesti

RE: Nation wide EHR project by openEHR/ISO13606 got fund in Japan.

Congratulations Shinji, You have been working diligently towards this for such a long time. I hope it is a roaring success, but like the others… more information please! Cheers Heather From: openEHR-implementers [mailto:openehr-implementers-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Shinji

RE: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

t;openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org>; For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical@lists.openehr.org> Subject: Re: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers 2015-10-08 1:23 GMT+02:00 Heather Leslie <heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com<mailto:heather.les

RE: Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

chetype, the bits marked as deprecated would be removed (this v2 archetype could be provided as a draft now or later). Cheers Sebastian P.S.: Arguably, a more formal way of deprecating bits and pieces in an archetype, will become quite useful in the future. On 02.10.2015 06:11, Heather Leslie

RE: SV: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)

Hi Erik, Thoughtful insight. We do need to start dating rather than push straight to an arranged marriage, I think, and I suspect we need some from the respective communities to act as marriage brokers. The top down approach has not worked despite a number of attempts by well-intentioned

Archetype publication question - implications for implementers

n 3: Promote the new candidate archetype to the public trunk, run formal content reviews on it and plan to re-publish as v2 Please, your thoughts? Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Consulting Lead, Ocean Informatics<http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Clinical Progr

RE: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)

definitely like to see more collaboration - the end result could be a powerful disruption for the 'little data'. It would also be good to hear that people inside IHTSDO are agitating for more engagement with openEHR. Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Consulting Lead, Ocean

FW: Archetype Industry Sprint update

From: Heather Leslie Sent: Sunday, 28 June 2015 7:03 PM To: openEHR clinical discussions (openehr-clini...@openehr.org); openehr-implement...@lists.openehr.org Subject: Archetype Industry Sprint update Hi everyone, Just a quick update to let you know the wiki pages for the archetype sprint

Examination archetypes

aligned with the pattern and the proposed granularity required to enable examination modelling that represents the fractal and complex requirements that we have identified out in 'the real world'. Kind Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Consulting Lead, Ocean Informaticshttp

Pre-Easter update RE: More reviews FW: openEHR archetype Sprint reviews for participation

From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Heather Leslie Sent: Friday, 13 March 2015 4:15 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: RE: More reviews FW: openEHR archetype Sprint reviews for participation

openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 35, Issue 21

Hi Grahame, We very much understand that you are being pulled in gazillions of directions at present with the explosion of FHIR on all fronts (excuse the pun - I?m sure you?re used to them now) but we are all trying to respond to the needs of our respective communities. I too would be

Archetype sprint status

)http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.1713 - remains open pending comments from HL7. Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Director/Consulting Lead, Ocean Informaticshttp://www.oceaninformatics.com/ Clinical Programme Lead, openEHR Foundationhttp://www.openehr.org

Medinfo submissions

/MEDINFO+2015+-+Sao+Paulo%2C+Brazil Please feel free to update with your successful proposals, and if you're planning to attend. We will need to start considering what community activities we would like to have... Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Director/Consulting Lead

How to fix CKM biggest issue

Hi y?all, I think there are a couple of conversations happening at different levels. Ian and Silje have both described the CKM tool being involved in a knowledge governance process that is greater than a repository and versioning tool and for a specific task. Core functionality involves the

How to fix CKM biggest issue

Hi Gustavo and the openEHR community, I?m really sad and disappointed if Gustavo?s opinion is mirrored elsewhere in the openEHR community. I?m sure it reflects a frustration with the slow process over past years. But anyone who has bothered to ask me about how I feel about the progress will

More reviews FW: openEHR archetype Sprint reviews for participation

- http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.195 Regards Heather From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Heather Leslie Sent: Friday, 6 March 2015 5:56 PM To: For openEHR technical discussions; For openEHR clinical discussions Subject: More

openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 35, Issue 21

... Today's Topics: 1. RE: More reviews FW: openEHR archetype Sprint reviews for participation (Heather Leslie) 2. Re: openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 35, Issue 18 (WILLIAM R4C) -- Message: 1

More reviews FW: openEHR archetype Sprint reviews for participation

of these, please register, log in and adopt the archetype and the Editors will add you to the review team. Regards Heather From: Heather Leslie Sent: Wednesday, 4 March 2015 3:49 PM To: For openEHR clinical discussions; For openEHR technical discussions Subject: openEHR archetype Sprint reviews

openEHR archetype Sprint reviews for participation

the archetype and the Editors will add you to the review team. Kind Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Director/Consulting Lead, Ocean Informaticshttp://www.oceaninformatics.com/ Clinical Programme Lead, openEHR Foundationhttp://www.openehr.org/ Phone - +61 418 966 670 Skype

[openEHR-announce] Extension of nominations 31 Jan 2015 - and join up now.

/knowledge Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland BCS Primary Health Care www.phcsg.org On 7 January 2015 at 05:52, Heather Leslie heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com wrote: Hi Sam, Can you please clarify what is happening

[openEHR-announce] Extension of nominations 31 Jan 2015 - and join up now.

Hi Sam, Can you please clarify what is happening to the existing Board. Is it dissolving completely or are some members remaining or?? It seems that at least some are renominating. Regards Heather From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of

Archetypes - new meta-data elements for 3rd party copyrights?

. Ian On 13 November 2014 09:10, Heather Leslie heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com wrote: It is actually relevant to have this information in the ?Use? as it is a reasonable place to look to see constraints on use and how it should be implemented in systems. No reason

Archetype Sprint reviews now active

. See further instructions on how to participate in a review here: http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/healthmod/Review+archetype+content Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Director/Consulting Lead, Ocean Informaticshttp://www.oceaninformatics.com/ Clinical Programme Lead

openEHR archetype publication sprint IS GO!

and Reviewing an archetype: http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/healthmod/Clinical+Knowledge+Manager+Video+Tutorials Looking forward to having you involved during the sprint. Please share this email with anyone who you think may be interested. Many thanks Heather Leslie Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP

Intro to openEHR clinical modelling training course, London, September

Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Director/Consulting Lead Ocean Informaticshttp://www.oceaninformatics.com/ Phone - +61 418 966 670 Skype - heatherleslie Twitter - @omowizard [16] [2013 Health-Partner-of-the-Year] -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http

MedInfo 2015 openEHR tutorials

Hi Pablo, We have kept info on Conferences in the wiki: http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/resources/Conferences See Medinfo 2013: http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/resources/MEDINFO+2013+-+Copenhagen,+Denmark. 2 half day sessions were held then - one clinical modelling focussed and the

openEHR at MIE 2014

Just wondering what openEHR presentations/papers/workshops we can expect at MIE in Istanbul next month? It might be good to pull together a web page as a resource alongside previous conference offerings. I will be attending but not presenting Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP

The joint openEHR/FHIR review of Allergy/Intolerance is open

Hi everyone, Just to follow up from yesterday?s announcement by Grahame, the first review invitations for the openEHR/ FHIR Adverse Reaction archetype have just been sent out.

Potential interest in establishment of an academic CKM instance?

at oceaninformatics.commailto:heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com if you have any questions or wish to express interest. I am also planning to attend MIE 2014 in Istanbul next month if anyone wants to discuss this further. Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Director/Consulting Lead Ocean Informaticshttp

Link between goals and other clinical concepts

Hi all, I'm just going to chip in here because we see a lot of discussion about drawbacks of the openEHR ENTRY types, but not a lot of endorsement. After 8 years of modelling archetypes, I find that the ENTRY classes work really well, and this is subsequently borne out in implementation. For

Link between goals and other clinical concepts

Hi Pablo, Is it safe to assume that you've seen the current archetype for Goal? It is here: http://www.openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.124 In it we have a data element that specifically identifies the archetype and path of the specific node that should be used to capture the actual

Meeting at Medinfo?

%20at%20a%20glance Perhaps we could meet after the opening reception on Tuesday night, 20th? What do you think? Regards Heather Dr Heather Leslie MBBS FRACGP FACHI Director/Head of Consulting http://www.oceaninformatics.com/ Ocean Informatics Phone (Aust) +61 418 966 670 Skype

Recording absence of (clinical) information

Totally agree with all your points Ian, including your proposal. But that is some way in the future. I've done quite a bit of work on exclusions for use in Northern Territory recently - updating the openEHR exclusion suite considerably based on implementation experience. There is an admin

Complications in an event

Hi Grahame, The Complications data element is a DV_Text. So it can capture narrative text. It also has a 0..* Links available as a RM attribute, and so it could be used to Link to a formal recording of a Problem or Diagnosis using the specific Problem/Diagnosis archetype, such that it could be

Template for medication records

Hi Jose, The NEHTA archetypes are recent updates by the Australian/NEHTA community, led by Sam as the original openEHR archetype author. So I?d endorse using these as a preferred starting point. The Medication List COMPOSITION is intended for use as ?A persistent and managed list of

Good News! FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

of those who sent emails requesting the tutorial being reinstated. Regards Heather From: Leong Tze Yun [mailto:leon...@nus.edu.sg] Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2013 2:50 PM To: Heather Leslie Cc: spc at medinfo2013.dk Subject: Re: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id

Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

catch: Workshops are free to attend (provided you registered for the conference;-). Tutorials are to be paid for. Jan On 14 mrt. 2013, at 04:17, Heather Leslie heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com wrote: Let's see if they'll reconsider. Worth a try! H From: Heather Leslie

FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

-bounces at lists.openehr.org ] P? vegne av Ian McNicoll Sendt: 14. mars 2013 11:42 Til: For openEHR clinical discussions Emne: Re: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 Thanks Heather, Worth a try :-) Ian On 14 March 2013 03:17, Heather Leslie heather.leslie

FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

Let?s see if they?ll reconsider. Worth a try! H From: Heather Leslie [mailto:heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com] Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 2:17 PM To: 'spc at medinfo2013.dk' Subject: RE: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946 Dear Sir or Madam, Given

openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 11, Issue 18

William, My point was not that 13972 was imposing impossible requirements on archetypes but that a mandatory SHALL statement was possibly inappropriate for all situations and is not clear in its intent. In openEHR we don't use any of these statements: Not For Use (i.e. teaching); Approved

FW: Clinical modelling workshop at Medinfo?

to make clinical workshop only two days before at the last medinfo 2010. Regards, Shinji 2013/1/7 Heather Leslie mailto:heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com: Hi everyone. We're a couple of days away from the deadline. It's almost too

openEHR-clinical Digest, Vol 11, Issue 3

(Heather Leslie) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 14:45:37 +1100 From: Heather Leslie heather.les...@oceaninformatics.com mailto:heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com To: 'For openEHR clinical discussions' openehr-clinical

  1   2   >