Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-19 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 09:13:06 Ludovic Rousseau wrote: What version of libassuan are you using? updated it to the latest ubuntu libassuan-dev file: 1.0.0-1build1 Thanks, RAndreas ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-19 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 19:25:22 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: This is the reason why it is bad idea to include it... Alon, I think the libassuan.m4 file is similar to your --disable-nsplugin code: extra code that is not necessary, because you can easily work around. but it makes live easier for some

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-14 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On 14/08/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I added the _CFLAGS variable whever the ltdl.h file is searched so it will be found and added back the libassuan.m4 file, as I think without we will annoy quite a number of users (it hit already two active developer - jpz and me on

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-14 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 8/14/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 14/08/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I added the _CFLAGS variable whever the ltdl.h file is searched so it will be found and added back the libassuan.m4 file, as I think without we will annoy quite a number of

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-14 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 8/14/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks Alon and Ludovic! I added the _CFLAGS variable whever the ltdl.h file is searched so it will be found and added back the libassuan.m4 file, as I think without we will annoy quite a number of users (it hit already two active

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any other comment? No... :) There are just too many weird things in configure... I am afraid to touch... Best Regards, Alon Bar-Lev. ___ opensc-devel mailing list

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Wednesday 08 August 2007 17:44:00 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Hmmm nl use ltdl -#AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS(ltdl) +AC_CHECK_LIB([ltdl],lt_dlopen) Solves this issue. Anyone know why the AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS was used and not AC_CHECK_LIB? would be nice to get this working, but we need to set LTLIBLTDL or

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Thursday 09 August 2007 08:46:53 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: After another quick look... Some thoughts... 1. Rename configure.in into configure.ac fine with me. I think Antti was against it or something. but I don't remember the details, and whatever old plattform had problems with the rename is

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Thursday 09 August 2007 09:27:02 Ludovic Rousseau wrote: 3. Why configure has AM_MAINTAINER_MODE? It is best to go without. I do not agree. AM_MAINTAINER_MODE will prevent make to try to rebuild Makefile.in if it detects Makefile.am is more recent. end-users should not have to have

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: would be nice to get this working, but we need to set LTLIBLTDL or similar (or adjust the autoconf makefiles - I prefer not setting LIBS so we can add -lltdl only where needed and not on a global scale). Attached. also we need to check

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-10 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: 2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4? The should be provided and maintained by the packages installed at your system... I don't want to force people into installing libassuan-dev. they would if we

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-09 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On 09/08/07, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch works for me. Any objection to commit it? After another quick look... Some thoughts... 1. Rename configure.in into configure.ac No objection 2. Why do you store the

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-09 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4? The should be provided and maintained by the packages installed at your system... They should be removed from svn. Exact. I also suggested (and committed) that

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-09 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On 09/08/07, Alon Bar-Lev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3. Why configure has AM_MAINTAINER_MODE? It is best to go without. I do not agree. AM_MAINTAINER_MODE will prevent make to try to rebuild Makefile.in if it detects Makefile.am is more

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-08 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Sunday 05 August 2007 13:33:45 Ludovic Rousseau wrote: The real problem I have is with configure.in. It does _not_ work for me. which version of automake? can you try the older automake packages? (debian has several packages IIRC and one of them works, the other doesn't and I don't know what

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-08 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On 08/08/2007, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 05 August 2007 13:33:45 Ludovic Rousseau wrote: The real problem I have is with configure.in. It does _not_ work for me. which version of automake? can you try the older automake packages? (debian has several packages IIRC

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-08 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 8/8/07, Ludovic Rousseau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have the problem with automake 1.10 $ ./autogen.sh + aclocal -I aclocal + libtoolize --copy --force --automake + autoheader --force + autoconf --force + automake-1.10 --add-missing --copy --force --foreign configure.in:198: required

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-08-05 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
Hello, On 28/07/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 23 July 2007 14:03:42 Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote: I can not run anymore ./bootstrap for any version of opensc-trunk 3204. I'm working with a Fedora Core 6. Installed autoconf is 2.59 and m4 is 1.4.8. Are the changes

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-29 Thread Jean-Pierre Szikora
Andreas Jellinghaus a écrit : On Monday 23 July 2007 14:03:42 Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote: I can not run anymore ./bootstrap for any version of opensc-trunk 3204. I'm working with a Fedora Core 6. Installed autoconf is 2.59 and m4 is 1.4.8. Are the changes introduced in svn 3202-3203-3204

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-23 Thread Jean-Pierre Szikora
Andreas Jellinghaus a écrit : but we also have quite some turnover rate at opensc, everyone of the people that started opensc is no longer interested in it. to keep it maintainable we also have to keep the code small and readable. thus I don't want to blow up the configure code to add every

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-21 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Friday 20 July 2007 22:17:00 Klaus Heinz wrote: This is the same issue I have with openct and the automatic detection of pcsc-lite. If it's possible to use openct without pcsc-lite and this is a supported configuration I prefer to have a switch to explicitly enable/disable this option.

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-21 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 7/21/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 20 July 2007 22:17:00 Klaus Heinz wrote: This is the same issue I have with openct and the automatic detection of pcsc-lite. If it's possible to use openct without pcsc-lite and this is a supported configuration I prefer to

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello Andreas, On 7/17/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OpenSC - new version 0.11.3 In next version, can you please add --enable-plugin so that the plugin will be built/installed only if requested? I don't see many people using it, and the libassuan, pinentry dependency can be

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if you don't have libassuan installed, then opensc should compile fine (and not create the plugin). does that work for you? Yes it does. But if I have gnupg install, I already have libassuan, it does not suggest I want to use it with

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-20 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Friday 20 July 2007 16:15:29 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: Yes it does. ok, good. what happends if you run LIBASSUAN_CONFIG=/bin/false ./configure ? I get an ugly warning from configure output, but it seems to work fine. Thus I can disable libassuan without any need for special options. does it work

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what happends if you run LIBASSUAN_CONFIG=/bin/false ./configure ? Oh... For now, I've used --with-libassuan-prefix=tmp document this hack and good? very few people have the problem you mention so I think it is good enough? No...

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-20 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
On Friday 20 July 2007 20:41:52 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: No... Please explicitly add --enable-nsplugin or something. So that if you add dependency no additional hacks will be nessesery. ok. thanks, commited. sorry, I have little clue about the plugin, I even think I never used it myself nor do

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 20 July 2007 20:41:52 Alon Bar-Lev wrote: No... Please explicitly add --enable-nsplugin or something. So that if you add dependency no additional hacks will be nessesery. ok. thanks, commited. There is another issue... At

Re: [opensc-devel] new versions released

2007-07-20 Thread Klaus Heinz
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: document this hack and good? very few people have the problem you mention so I think it is good enough? This is the same issue I have with openct and the automatic detection of pcsc-lite. If it's possible to use openct without pcsc-lite and this is a supported