i installed soalris 10 into laptop.. i donwloaded it
from here
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp.. laptop
already contains windows xp and debian sarge.. now i
can't boot into these two.. the bootloader shows only
solaris.. what can i do? plz help
You can read the GRUB
PRINTABLE MANY PAGE SOLARIS MANUAL PROJECT - OPEN FOR BUSINESS
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/pmpsm/
16 February 2007
On the 16th of January, 2007, David Lloyd proposed an OpenSolaris
project to develop and create a number of printable many page Solaris
manuals. The purpose of these
Hi all,
Installed Solaris Express Developer Edition 2/07 yesterday.
It was very keen on being a dhcp-client, so I did a sys-unconfig.
After the reboot I configured the network normally, static IP, no Ipv6, no name
service, specified the router and all went well.
I have moved /etc/nsswitch.dns to
pkginfo -x -d /blabla/spool/pkg BLABLAfirefox-package
If there is no ARCH in the pkginfo's output, then it's the fault of the
packager.
If there is ARCH in the pkginfo's output, and the ARCH is not sparc, then the
old rule applies:
he who can read is has an advantage.
This message posted
A reboot solved this.
If anyone has any ideas how this could happen. please post.
/tony
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, John Brewer wrote:
Does this tool support a function like a /mbr in old dos fdisk?
fdisk(1M):
DESCRIPTION
This command is used to do the following:
[ ... ]
o Install the master boot record that is put in the first
sector of the fixed disk on x86
Andrew Pattison wrote:
I stupidly spent ages this evening wondering why my newly downloaded Firefox
2.0.0.1 wouldn't work, when all along I had dumped the i386 version on my Ultra
10 - doh! pkgadd happily added it to the system without any complaints - is
this a general feature of the way
Thanks UX-admin, I have always respected your opinion around here.
I think your idea is great and I would be behind you 100%.
BUT...
Again, the barriers to entry are huge. Maybe you have a market for your target
as I am way out of touch with enterprise needs and such (cater to really small
Girts Zeltins writes:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug database, will
they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
CDE is still a supported part of the system.
At second I plan soon to write letter to OpenGroup
Tony Albers writes:
I have moved /etc/nsswitch.dns to /etc/nsswitch.conf
'mv' or 'cp'? It should have been 'cp'.
I have made entries in /etc/resolv.conf
I have checked /etc/defaultrouter
What does that mean? Did you check netstat -nr to see what the
kernel was actually using, or just the
James Carlson writes:
It sounds like a problem with nsswitch.conf -- if nslookup works but
regular commands (particularly 'getent hosts') do not work, then the
name service switch isn't using DNS.
Sorry about following up my own message, but ...
The key insight here is that, despite its
Subject: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Solaris on an Ultra 10
I've spotted a CMD 680 based card for £13.00 :
http://www.komplett.co.uk/k/ki.asp?sku=110632
Assuming this reports itself as an IDE card rather than a RAID card, would
the ultra 10 boot from this, or do I need a 649-based
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Log in text mode and run command kdmconfig and then choose XSun and then
configure your Video settings.
Ultra 10 is a SPARC, which only has Xsun in nv_57, and has no
kdmconfig.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug database, will
they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
If they are serious bugs, then they may be fixed. Low priority (P4 P5)
bugs aren't being worked on
ALOM would be wonderful, but probably out-of-price
range, remember its another CPU/ethernet/...
ALOM is a must, especially for a black box appliance. Otherwise, the thing
would only be good as a workstation or a thin client.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Again, the barriers to entry are huge. Maybe you have
a market for your target as I am way out of touch
with enterprise needs and such (cater to really small
biz). But for the SBS audience, to quote a cliche,
you (or anyone who tries to do this really as many
have already) is fighting an
NewSUNW and opensolaris give you so much more
options now.
SPARC is not dead on the desktop!
Only if you're keen on shopping on ebay for old, tired Ultras and the like.
Sun has nothing in the UltraSPARC arena that'd be even remotely able to compete
in price/performance with your regular
Hi all,
I am trying to compile bitkeeper free client on Solaris 10. However I keep
getting the following errors:
bash-3.00# CC=cc
bash-3.00# export CC
bash-3.00# make
cc -O2 -Wall -Wno-parenthesesbkf.c -o bkf
cc: Warning: option -2 passed to ld
cc: illegal option -Wall
make: *** [bkf]
Frank Mash wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to compile bitkeeper free client on Solaris 10. However I keep
getting the following errors:
bash-3.00# CC=cc
bash-3.00# export CC
bash-3.00# make
cc -O2 -Wall -Wno-parenthesesbkf.c -o bkf
cc: Warning: option -2 passed to ld
cc: illegal option
Thanks. Works like a charm.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
off topic, but how did you manage to install the software on the U10.
I just did the same and it would not install any software pass CD1
I go through the install procedure and it install of the packages from CD 1
and
then reports:
Unable to run launcher without Java
following CDs will not be
Tony Albers wrote:
Installed Solaris Express Developer Edition 2/07 yesterday.
It was very keen on being a dhcp-client, so I did a sys-unconfig.
After the reboot I configured the network normally, static IP, no Ipv6, no name
service, specified the router and all went well.
I have moved
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Frank Mash wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to compile bitkeeper free client on Solaris 10. However I keep
getting the following errors:
bash-3.00# CC=cc
bash-3.00# export CC
bash-3.00# make
cc -O2 -Wall -Wno-parenthesesbkf.c -o
Al Hopper wrote:
And now I'm sure that the real linker-saavy experts are going to show us
both a better way to accomplish this. But I've been doing this since I
first started working with Solaris many moons ago... :)
I often use similar nm grepping myself, though the first resort is the
much
We created 10,000 zfs file systems with no data in them yet, and it seems after
we did this our boot up process takes over an hour. This is on a v210 with 1gb
of memory. We've rebooted the machine twice and it still takes an hour, and the
system does have the latest Solaris 10 patches
Al Hopper writes:
for i in /lib/*.so
do
/usr/ccs/bin/nm -Ag $i |grep -v UNDEF |grep gethostbyname
done
Please don't do that. There's no guarantee at all that the symbols
you find with 'nm' are actually supported. If you use that (or, for
that matter, grep over header files), then you can
Andrew Pattison wrote:
I stupidly spent ages this evening wondering why my newly downloaded Firefox
2.0.0.1 wouldn't work, when all along I had dumped the i386 version on my Ultra
10 - doh! pkgadd happily added it to the system without any complaints - is
this a general feature of the way
Bill Moffitt wrote:
So, there's only one question left: what's going to make those five people
sitting around in somebody's garage look around and, instead of coming to the
conclusion that they need a Windows server, come to the obvious and
irrefutable conclusion that they need a Solaris
Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
gethostbyname /var/tmp//ccgyLdOf.o
socket /var/tmp//ccgyLdOf.o
connect
where did you downloaded the package from? Looking
pkginfo of our
UNWfirefox, there is an ARCH field which means pkgadd
should check that
against the platform installing to and should at
least give you warning
if not stop installing.
I've sort of got into the habit with pkgadd of just
For stuff that doesn't distinguish between ARCH's, this is tricky
because the same packages can be used in different contexts:
On a personal workstation, you would expect
pkgadd
to install things in (say) /usr/bin where you can use them
directly in your PATH.
But, what if you run a
Hello,
a successful install of NV57 results in a panic after bootup: error messages as
shown below (painstakingly captured by hand)
ereport.cpu.amd.nb.wdog ena=204cae318e1 detector=[ version=0 scheme=hc
hc-list=[...] ] bank_status=b2070f0f bank-number=4 addr=80180c080
add-valid=0
Jeremy Teo wrote:
a successful install of NV57 results in a panic after bootup: error
messages as shown below (painstakingly captured by hand)
ereport.cpu.amd.nb.wdog ena=204cae318e1 detector=[ version=0
scheme=hc hc-list=[...] ] bank_status=b2070f0f bank-number=4
addr=80180c080
James C. McPherson wrote:
Jeremy Teo wrote:
a successful install of NV57 results in a panic after bootup: error
messages as shown below (painstakingly captured by hand)
ereport.cpu.amd.nb.wdog ena=204cae318e1 detector=[ version=0
scheme=hc hc-list=[...] ] bank_status=b2070f0f
34 matches
Mail list logo
