Hello,
Will it be based on GNOME 2.18?
Regards,
Girts
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
As soon as Ubuntu supported "click this button to upgrade your entire OS
flawlessly from the internet", that feature became a standard for everyone to
meet.
I take it as a given that Solaris/OpenSolaris will eventually support such a
feature. I hope I am not wrong!
This message posted fr
Manish,
If you use the JDS Common Build Environment with the SFEvim.spec file
you would have
automatically made a package. Since you have just used a "make install",
you pretty much have
to make the package by hand. For instructions on how to do this, search
for "solaris package" on
google.
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=solaris+live+upgrade
>
> Is it really that difficult?
Thanks.
> Flash versus Live Upgrade versus "apt" versus "yum"
> versus a Windows
> Like Upgrade discussions are pointless in and of
> themselves. I'd prefer
> to see more "We like apt because..." or "We t
Hi All,
I downloaded the tarball and it got built in SXDE with any modifications
(using the bundled Sun Studio 11)
It has pretty looking GTK fonts and icons.
Now my question is: how do i make a .pkg out of it?
(it is clear the
vim7.0 has no extra dependencies. a base SXDE install is enough)
T
Hi All,
I wanted to compile KDE4 for Solaris using SunStudio 11
I have used the default Sun tools
Compiler = /usr/bin/cc
make = /usr/ccs/bin/make
I was trying to compile qt-copy with Sun Studio on Solaris Express 11
First i ran ran ./configure with the following options:
./configure -qt-gif -
Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
>Oh? Where can I find the documentation for procedures
>for liveupgrade? It still does not have the
>flexibility of using repositories and why do I have to
>download a bunch of images when it is likely that 90%
>of the stuff would be unchanged?
>
>
>
Where do y
Hi There,
Oh? Where can I find the documentation for procedures
for liveupgrade? It still does not have the
flexibility of using repositories and why do I have to
download a bunch of images when it is likely that 90%
of the stuff would be unchanged?
* http://www.google.com.au/search?q=solari
--- Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That is not my problem. I would not bother about
> this
> > if I was more than happy to drop in a DVD or a
> bunch
> > of CDs to 'upgrade' each box
>
> Except you don't even ha
> I didn't say they were doing a *wrong* thing, I just
> implied it was not as good.
as opposed to none?
>
> Besides, I bet if you talk to people who use
> advocate one of those
> distributions, they would claim their particular
> distribution's update
> management system was better than any ot
On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is not my problem. I would not bother about this
if I was more than happy to drop in a DVD or a bunch
of CDs to 'upgrade' each box
Except you don't even have to do that. All you need is an ISO image,
no dropping DVDs CDs o
On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you. the concept of apt/yum repositories
> seems
> > to be very alien here.
>
> No, it is not. You ju
--- Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you. the concept of apt/yum repositories
> seems
> > to be very alien here.
>
> No, it is not. You just have a hard time believing
> that we don't
> embrace it as the "on
> Sun Connection is very easy to use to manage updates
> and is all you're
> likely to need in a *production* environment. So I
> don't understand
> your compliant. Given that you have never indicated
> actual usage of
> it, I think it is unfair for you to be critical of
> it.
Eh? When did I make
> >They sure are.
> >
> >On my Ultra 5, Solaris 8 box, I could get the
> >documentation online locally...will there be an
> option
> >of tarballs of the documentation in html format?
> >
> >
> Yes, we already have that on OpenSolaris.org,
> http://opensolaris.org/os/downloads/docs
>
> Download
Hi!
Is it possible that bugs.opensolaris.org is loosing bugs (again) ?
I am missing two bug reports:
1. "usr/src/cmd/perl/ build installs Subversion directories (.svn) in
the proto area" (note that this is not the exact title). That one was
filed seveal days ago and since noone f
On 17/04/07, Christopher Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, a html-browsable (like http://docs.python.org/) would be fantastic. This
lets google index them all for easy searching. (I don't search on local pc
(ever))
Google indexes PDFs now, and I have gotten hit results from google
search
Jerry Sutton wrote On 04/17/07 06:00 PM,:
>SXDE docs are there but the suggestion is that they are vintage 2/07 per
> one of the headings. Maybe they are up to date with the latest
>OpenSolaris drop, I don't know.
>
>
Right, docs.sun.com 2/07 is correct, doc sources on OpenSolaris.org
should
On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you. the concept of apt/yum repositories seems
to be very alien here.
No, it is not. You just have a hard time believing that we don't
embrace it as the "one true way" of doing things. I think the point
most people have b
On 17/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Ease of use Now, I know that most of you old
> school UNIX guys
> laugh at this, but usability is important. You've
> tuned me into a cool
> way to do something along the lines of USE flags in
> Solaris, but it sure
> s
>From: Michelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Will do! We're hotly working on a script to go through all the sources
>and create PDFs, so we can just serve them up in one tarball on
>OpenSolaris. Thanks for your time to reply, much appreciated.
Please make them just downloadable as individual pdfs, r
SXDE docs are there but the suggestion is that they are vintage 2/07 per
one of the headings. Maybe they are up to date with the latest
OpenSolaris drop, I don't know.
One thing I find rather annoying about Sun documentation retrieval -
maybe it's just my ignorance - is that the documents ha
Christopher Mahan wrote On 04/17/07 05:48 PM,:
>Chris Mahan
>818.943.1850 cell
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.christophermahan.com/
>
>- Original Message
>From: Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Christopher Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: Michelle Olson <[EMAIL P
- Original Message
From: Michelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Yes, of course, you can get PDF of each document on docs.sun.com, you
>just have to navigate to each book to get to the downloadable PDF option
>and it's painful slow (they say a HW upgrade is coming). But, I don't
>speak for Christo
Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote On 04/17/07 05:41 PM,:
>--- Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Christopher Mahan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Recommendation: Do whatever you have to do to get
>>>
>>>
>>the documentation in PDF as a download option.
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Isn't it all av
Chris Mahan
818.943.1850 cell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.christophermahan.com/
- Original Message
From: Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Christopher Mahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Tue
Hiya Alan,
Yes, of course, you can get PDF of each document on docs.sun.com, you
just have to navigate to each book to get to the downloadable PDF option
and it's painful slow (they say a HW upgrade is coming). But, I don't
speak for Christopher, just my own experience, so maybe I wrongly
assumed
5. luupgrade -u -n second_disk -s /export/install/b60 -j
/export/install/b60osprofile
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> On 17/04/07, shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what it the best way to upgrade from solaris 10
> (update 3/05) to
> > solaris 10 (update 11/06) ?
>
> liveupgrade, or boot from the CD and choose the
> "upgrade" option.
>
> --
> "Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank
> Lloyd Wright
--- Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Mahan wrote:
> > Recommendation: Do whatever you have to do to get
> the documentation in PDF as a download option.
> Thanks.
>
> Isn't it all available in PDF on http://docs.sun.com
> already?
They sure are.
On my Ultra 5, Solaris
Will do! We're hotly working on a script to go through all the sources
and create PDFs, so we can just serve them up in one tarball on
OpenSolaris. Thanks for your time to reply, much appreciated.
-Michelle
Christopher Mahan wrote On 04/17/07 05:23 PM,:
>From: Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christopher Mahan wrote:
Recommendation: Do whatever you have to do to get the documentation in PDF as a download option. Thanks.
Isn't it all available in PDF on http://docs.sun.com already?
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window S
--- Thomas Rampelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
> >> PXE, Anaconda and JumpStart are just parts and
> >> pieces of the puzzle.
> >> My point is, in an environment like that, one
> would
> >> *never* run `apt-get` or
> >> `yum update`. That would be ad-hoc. I
> 2. Ease of use Now, I know that most of you old
> school UNIX guys
> laugh at this, but usability is important. You've
> tuned me into a cool
> way to do something along the lines of USE flags in
> Solaris, but it sure
> sounds like it's not gonna be easy. Using Ubuntu for
> an example,
From: Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>We welcome all of your comments and feedback on documentation on the
>docs-discuss list for OpenSolaris, that is where documentation is at the
>>forefront of discussion and minds. I post to that list the SX manuals that
>change each month, or you can
--- a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Pretty much. Install, copy configs over, reboot.
> >Viola. Minus the thousands of servers claim. And
> of
> >course no Oracle.
>
> Exactly. As soon as you have to "copy config over",
> you're in ad-hoc land.
> That works for maybe up to 100 servers with th
On 17/04/07, shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what it the best way to upgrade from solaris 10 (update 3/05) to
solaris 10 (update 11/06) ?
liveupgrade, or boot from the CD and choose the "upgrade" option.
--
"Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Walker, Software
what it the best way to upgrade from solaris 10 (update 3/05) to
solaris 10 (update 11/06) ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
is it ok to put the replics on the local disks?
that the lun devices will not have metadb at all.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> a b wrote:
> >> 1. Documentation is a major pain in the ass to
> find. Outside of man
> >> pages and the occasional Sun engineer blog entry,
> there seems to be
> >> no decent documentation. In fact, most people
> admit that the "Solaris
> >> 10" books that are currently out, are simply
> Sola
Hi Peter,
I have been trying to contact you - if you dont mind could you please make
contact with me at my email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kind regards,
Matt
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolari
Ben wrote:
We currently use ssh in our system and are investigating ways to fulfill an
Application STIG requirement. Here's the req
APP0530:Session limits do not exist for the application.
Its actually a checklist item to determine if you have a security finding. That's why it looks
As for OpenSolaris, the way to update Solaris Express is to upgrade to the
next release, or depending on your environment, do a BFU (Blindingly Fast
Update). Contrary to all the Joyent propaganda, Sun has never claimed this
to be the production depoyment thing to do, and I wholeheartedly agree
w
a b wrote:
1. Documentation is a major pain in the ass to find. Outside of man
pages and the occasional Sun engineer blog entry, there seems to be
no decent documentation. In fact, most people admit that the "Solaris
10" books that are currently out, are simply Solaris 9 books with a
new cover
We currently use ssh in our system and are investigating ways to fulfill an
Application STIG requirement. Here's the req
APP0530:Session limits do not exist for the application.
Its actually a checklist item to determine if you have a security finding.
That's why it looks like a negat
Derek Cicero wrote:
FYI - SXCE Build 62 has some issues that they need to respin for. The
build will probably be released Friday morning.
I am now being told this won't be released until 4/20. I am not sure of
the exact reasons. I will look into it further.
Derek
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Pretty much. Install, copy configs over, reboot.
Viola. Minus the thousands of servers claim. And of
course no Oracle.
Exactly. As soon as you have to "copy config over", you're in ad-hoc land.
That works for maybe up to 100 servers with three full-time people, but
simply shatters for huge se
Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
PXE, Anaconda and JumpStart are just parts and
pieces of the puzzle.
My point is, in an environment like that, one would
*never* run `apt-get` or
`yum update`. That would be ad-hoc. It would take
all the stability and
reliability out of that environment.
I'm s
Funny, I got the similar results for my mail servers
with anaconda kickstart, pxe, dhcp, tftp and grub save
for certain stuff in /etc. They all run the same
distro base, run the same software packages and
scriipts and don't require someone baby sitting them
during installation or upgrade. Almost
Stephen Lau wrote:
Try cloning it to a local onnv-gate first, and then clone -r from that.
e.g.:
hg clone ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/onnv/onnv-gate
hg clone -r onnv_41 onnv-gate onnv.41
The reason the clone -r directly from opensolaris.org doesn't work is
because hg doesn't implement everythi
UNIX admin wrote:
The problem here is not that Solaris can't deliver or doesn't have the
functionality Linux has. Oh, it has the functionality and then some! In fact,
it had this advanced functionality for years and years and years.
The real problem is, people just don't want to sit down, warm
Try cloning it to a local onnv-gate first, and then clone -r from that.
e.g.:
hg clone ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/onnv/onnv-gate
hg clone -r onnv_41 onnv-gate onnv.41
cheers,
steve
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 07:32:18PM +0530, Manoj Joseph wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was following the instructions on the fo
Hi,
I was following the instructions on the following page to get a onnv
snapshot.
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/hg-build-snapshots/
But I am unable to checkout tag onnv_41.
-bash-3.00$ hg clone -r onnv_41
ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/onnv/onnv-gate
abort: clone -r not supported yet fo
--- a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Funny, I got the similar results for my mail
> servers
> >with anaconda kickstart, pxe, dhcp, tftp and grub
> save
> >for certain stuff in /etc. They all run the same
> >distro base, run the same software packages and
> >scriipts and don't require someone
truss -f -t stat,open /opt/sfw/bin/vncviewer
825:xstat(2, "/opt/sfw/bin/vncviewer", 0x08047A48) = 0
825:open("/var/ld/ld.config", O_RDONLY) = 3
825:xstat(2, "/opt/sfw/lib/libSM.so.6", 0x08047218) Err#2 ENOENT
825:xstat(2, "/usr/lib/libSM.so.6", 0x08047218) = 0
825:
i tried with crle to update lib.
crle -c /var/ld/ld.config -l
/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/sfw/lib:/opt/sfw/lib:/opt/csw/lib
did't help
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, well, a network enabled dist upgrade or
> package
> > upgrade are the two things I would be looking for.
> > Unless there are tools to help maintain hundreds
> of
> > servers which are divided into different groups
> > available...
>
> Yes there
--- UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sun studio just has to be as available so that
> > software developers will hopefully stop using
> gcc/gnu
> > ld specific stuff and an easy to update open
> solaris
> > distribution (nexenta looking pretty much
> there...)
> > being installed everywh
hi friends...
this is vasanth, i installed sol 10. installation u have to fallow somany
instructions. Especially in SATA HDD, if u have any doubt, contact me with my
ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pn:9395389252
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> Yes, well, a network enabled dist upgrade or package
> upgrade are the two things I would be looking for.
> Unless there are tools to help maintain hundreds of
> servers which are divided into different groups
> available...
Yes there are. Commercial tools. And they cost a lot of money. Some com
> Sun studio just has to be as available so that
> software developers will hopefully stop using gcc/gnu
> ld specific stuff and an easy to update open solaris
> distribution (nexenta looking pretty much there...)
> being installed everywhere will hopefully draw the
> attention of those software de
> Since Gentoo is compile based, the USE flags
> generally are directly
> transfered to configure options. For example, if you
> wanted to install
> MySQL with '--with-big-tables' you can simply specify
> the
> USE='big-tables' USE flag and everything's taken care
> of for you. I
> can't imagin
the workaround is to create the metadb only on local disks with short names!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
63 matches
Mail list logo
