Any suggestion?
Now we have two CPU at 100% SYS time and other two at 70% SYS time ..
lockstat -kIW -D 20 sleep 30
Profiling interrupt: 11652 events in 30.036 seconds (388 events/sec)
Count indv cuml rcnt nsec Hottest CPU+PILCaller
Hopefully by the time Solaris 11 will be released, it
will be a
professional distribution which has had attention
spent not only on the
technical aspects by the interface in which
administrators interact with
the operating system.
If it's a 'professional' distribution, then we don't need
Hi All,
I am new to this community, recently joined to learn
Solaris 10.
Please clarify me about overlap partition in disk
format utility, means what we can do on slice 2. I
mounted it and created some markable size file but it
is not reflecting file or size. In what way have to
use this
In what way have to use this one(s2).
s2 can be used to back up entire disks, or all slices devoted to Solaris
simultaneously, where s2 doesn't occupy the entire disk. This is usually
performed with the `dd` utility.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
My toshiba notebook now runs slowly,it is terrible.
the following web is my website,pls have a look:
http://www.cntradecity.com/product.asp?Classid=4Nclassid=110
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Dave Miner wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Dave Miner wrote:
... See:
http://blogs.sun.com/dminer/entry/indiana_installer_prototype
This news (which I think is *awesome*, by the way) makes me wonder
now more than ever which install clusters do/don't
i'm trying to install osol b68 but it seems it does not recognize the hdd
attached to the sata controller of my motherboard (chipset via VT8237R).
is there any way to know what's going wrong?
is there any way to know if this chipset is supported?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 03:53 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
Hopefully by the time Solaris 11 will be released, it
will be a
professional distribution which has had attention
spent not only on the
technical aspects by the interface in which
administrators interact with
the operating system.
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 05:00 -0700, jennyfer wrote:
My toshiba notebook now runs slowly,it is terrible.
the following web is my website,pls have a look:
http://www.cntradecity.com/product.asp?Classid=4Nclassid=110
And.
Probably best to give us a little information on the specs etc.
alessioc wrote:
i'm trying to install osol b68 but it seems it does not recognize the hdd
attached to the sata controller of my motherboard (chipset via VT8237R).
is there any way to know what's going wrong?
is there any way to know if this chipset is supported?
maybe the raid mode is not
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 07:24 -0700, alessioc wrote:
i'm trying to install osol b68 but it seems it does not recognize the hdd
attached to the sata controller of my motherboard (chipset via VT8237R).
is there any way to know what's going wrong?
is there any way to know if this chipset is
And you know, the world doesn't revolve around over
paid UNIX admins
with craniums that reach to the ceilings. The vast
majority of companies
out there are small to medium size, less than 100
people with servers
being maintained by someone who has an IT
qualification from their local
it worked by tweaked the bios settings, thank you
(changed sata mode from raid to ide)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 03:53 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
The only thing is getting into the people's skulls that they *don't*
need a desktop, and that the network is the computer.
People who have regular, reliable access to a secure network may not
need a desktop, but for now, the rest of us do...
I have just finished installing Build 68 on a new MSI M675 laptop. During the
install the keyboard was working fine. After the reboot the keyboard does not
respond at all I have tried configuring XSun and Xorg but can not get any key
to work after the grub screen. Strange that now I can not get
Calum Benson wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 03:53 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
The only thing is getting into the people's skulls that they *don't*
need a desktop, and that the network is the computer.
People who have regular, reliable access to a secure network may not
need a desktop, but
Making it easy to install and maintain lowers the
bar, ups the sales by
Sun in both hardware and software - all benefit from
this. Microsoft
didn't grab a huge marketshare because of Bills
sparkling personality -
I can bloody well assure you of that!
If the bar needs to be
People who have regular, reliable access to a secure
network may not
need a desktop, but for now, the rest of us do...
You are quite right - some problems are still present and need to be solved
before thin clients can become mainstream - like the problem of a portable thin
client. Right
The only thing is getting into the people's skulls
that they *don't* need a desktop, and that the
network is the computer.
You need to seriously re-examine that network is the computer chant, and how
well it jives with the world you've described... where you've robbed the
average person of
Plenty but comes unwilling to pay the huge amount -
IT is a cost centre,
it generates no money directly for the company.
I've witnessed a lot os such companies that regarded IT as just a cost center.
Most of them are either long history by now, going bankrupt or otherwise
struggling, all
I have x86 nv-64 installed on a dell precision 670 (installed from downloaded
ISOs), but I cannot install the nv-68 release
When I boot the first nv-68 ISO and select Solaris Express from the menu, it
begins an extraction from the CD (listing a row of dots .), splashes the
disclaimer and
You need to seriously re-examine that network is the
computer chant, and how well it jives with the
world you've described... where you've robbed the
average person of their computing power -- and their
choice -- simply because they're not an expert with
the OS *at hand*. The network is the
* UNIX admin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You need to seriously re-examine that network is the
computer chant, and how well it jives with the
world you've described... where you've robbed the
average person of their computing power -- and their
choice -- simply because they're not an
Just a stupid thing to check, are you sure you did not download the sparc
version?
I
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 11:35 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
Well, why must it be on the Internet?
Can't we have a server that sits in a living room or in a closet or in the
basement, which stores all our data on encrypted disks, centrally, secured by
ZFS?
Who builds and installs that server in the
Hi All
I have a solaris 10 box on SPARC that is multi-homed. Two nics are on
separate subnets.
How would I set a default route on each NIC? Is that even possible? I know
how to setup the default route on the server, but then my 2nd NIC in the
other subnet doesn't work. Can I assign a default
Why are we still slaving to the notion that just
because something is a server, it *must* be on the
internet?
Well, why must it be on the Internet?
Can't we have a server that sits in a living room or
in a closet or in the basement, which stores all our
data on encrypted disks, centrally,
Just list each default route in the /etc/defaultrouter file, 1 ip address
per line. You may also want to read the defaultrouter man page.
On 7/24/07, Anne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
I have a solaris 10 box on SPARC that is multi-homed. Two nics are on
separate subnets.
How would I set
Mike,
Just a stupid thing to check, are you sure you did not download the sparc
version?
Bill's CD does actually boot, and apparently displays a menu and stuff; so
can't be this problem.
Regards... Sean.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi,
we are still facing the same problem.
After some testing we found it is ZFS related.
Now we have a 4 Opteron server with 2 CPU at 99% SYS time.
# lockstat -kIW -D 20 sleep 30
Profiling interrupt: 11652 events in 30.029 seconds (388 events/sec)
Count indv cuml rcnt nsec Hottest CPU+PIL
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Dave Miner wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Dave Miner wrote:
... See:
http://blogs.sun.com/dminer/entry/indiana_installer_prototype
This news (which I think is *awesome*, by the way) makes me wonder
now more than ever which
Thank you
_
From: Nicholas Senedzuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:54 PM
To: Anne
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] default route on 2nd NIC?
Just list each default route in the /etc/defaultrouter file, 1 ip address
per line.
It turns out that I can actually install nv-68 in a VMware virtual machine
from the ISO Cds, so it looks like there's some issue with my
dell precision 670 that causes the system to panic when the
device discovery phase begins ... this does not happen with my
nv-63 installation (sorry, it was
There was a major power outage in SF that affected our servers.
Derek
--
Derek Cicero
Program Manager
Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Can you provide your lockstat output again, this time with the -s flag...
Something like:
lockstat -kIW -s 20 -D 20 sleep 2
The stack traces might help...
Thanks,
-Eric
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
There was a major power outage in SF that affected our servers.
three little letters : U P S
better yet : A P C
get some :-)
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
What are the minimum system requirements for Solaris Express Developer edition,
(default install with Gnome desktop)?
I have an older PC that I would like to put it on but it only has 256Meg RAM.
Would it work?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Here is a check tools:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/install_check.html
Which can tell you whether your system is likely to be able to run the Solaris
256Meg RAM should be OK.
Regards,
-Aubrey
Intel OpenSolaris Team.
On 7/25/07, Andrew Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What are the
* Aubrey Li ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Here is a check tools:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/install_check.html
Which can tell you whether your system is likely to be able to run the Solaris
256Meg RAM should be OK.
Keep in mind, you'll have to do a text install. Pick Solaris Express
OpenSolaris does support SATA controllers, but there are some comments. I am
not familiar with the VT8237R chipset, but I can share with you my experiences
on Intel chipsets.
On the Intel server platform, the IO Bridge (south bridge) integrates the SATA
controller. The SATA controller can be
I think there is something about the current installer needing more RAM than
the OS itself. If I recall correctly, that number is something more than 256mb.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
This month's FROSUG (Front Range OpenSolaris User Group) meeting is on
Thursday, July 26, 2007. Nick Solter will give a presentation on Open High
Availability Cluster, which was recently released on opensolaris.org.
In addition, we will be giving an OpenSolaris Update.
!! FREE OpenSolaris
Wow, I was under the impression it only affected residential areas...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Wow, I was under the impression it only affected residential areas...
I'm guessing netflix, craigslist, typepad and livejournal are not among
your favorite sites :)
-Artem
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Derek Cicero wrote:
There was a major power outage in SF that affected our servers.
Discussion search does not seem to be working.
For example:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/search.jspa?objID=f80q=ZFS
-Manoj
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Dennis Clarke wrote:
There was a major power outage in SF that affected our servers.
three little letters : U P S
better yet : A P C
get some :-)
It should have been part of their B C P ;-)
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Wow, I was under the impression it only affected residential areas...
I'm guessing netflix, craigslist, typepad and livejournal are not among
your favorite sites :)
geez .. I think I looked at one of them once .. maybe.
as for residential areas, I have 6000 VA worth of UPS here at my desk
On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 11:57 -0700, Glenn Lagasse wrote:
* UNIX admin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You need to seriously re-examine that network is the
computer chant, and how well it jives with the
world you've described... where you've robbed the
average person of their computing power
geez .. I think I looked at one of them once .. maybe.
as for residential areas, I have 6000 VA worth of UPS here at my desk ( at
home ) and even my X-Box has a UPS. Never lose a game to power outage!
The Warlock: Why did you bring a cop to my command center?
John McClane: It's a basement!
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 09:56 +0800, Lu, Baolu wrote:
OpenSolaris does support SATA controllers, but there are some comments. I am
not familiar with the VT8237R chipset, but I can share with you my
experiences on Intel chipsets.
On the Intel server platform, the IO Bridge (south bridge)
geez .. I think I looked at one of them once .. maybe.
as for residential areas, I have 6000 VA worth of UPS here at my desk ( at
home ) and even my X-Box has a UPS. Never lose a game to power outage!
The Warlock: Why did you bring a cop to my command center?
John McClane: It's a
Dennis Clarke wrote:
There was a major power outage in SF that affected our servers.
three little letters : U P S
better yet : A P C
get some :-)
Heh, sometimes those three letters can themselves give up on your face:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
There was a major power outage in SF that affected our servers.
three little letters : U P S
better yet : A P C
get some :-)
The whole reason we host in a datacentre is that the datacentre is
supposed to take care of things like UPSs and generators.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
There was a major power outage in SF that affected our servers.
three little letters : U P S
better yet : A P C
get some :-)
Heh, sometimes those three letters can themselves give up on your face:
Ché Kristo wrote:
Wow, I was under the impression it only affected residential areas...
More details at:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/24/web_site_outages/
Particularly sad is the comment in the article that:
Redenvelope continued to be unavailable, the same day PR monkeys
Ché Kristo wrote:
Wow, I was under the impression it only affected residential areas...
More details at:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/24/web_site_outages/
Particularly sad is the comment in the article that:
Redenvelope continued to be unavailable, the same day PR monkeys
It seems that this device cannot handle SCSI modesense commands
well. Sometimes, it returns OK, while in the other time, it
returns failure. I don't understand why this happens.
-minskey
Stefan Parvu 写道:
Hi,
Can you find a system without SCSI disk and try your disk on that
system?
The
correct!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ok, I installed he latest current of ON, and the following occurs:
bash-3.00$ dmesg | grep PS
Jul 25 17:48:36 rachmaninov cpudrv: [ID 684953 kern.notice] NOTICE:
cpu_acpi: _PSS package not found.
Jul 25 17:48:36 rachmaninov cpudrv: [ID 616227 kern.warning] WARNING:
cpu_acpi: error parsing _PSS
59 matches
Mail list logo