On 13 Dec 2011, at 11:54, Andrew Watkins wrote:
>
> Thanks Chris that solved it.
>
> I had followed that before but I missed the "vfs objects = zfsacl" part.
> Teach me to skip information.
Cool. Have you managed to make your ZFS time-slider snapshots visible us
ba-solaris-10-server-as-a-ms-ad-member&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
>
> http://blog.allanglesit.com/2011/03/solaris-11-join-ad-domain-for-samba/
>
> Any pointers?
Are you using "vfs objects = zfsacl" ?
This
<http://nineproductions.com/technology/14-sun-solaris/65
zation phase and when the crontab or at
command is run. This reduces the overhead of checking for
new or changed files at regularly scheduled intervals.
---
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I, vector processing
extensions?)
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
n about
> what substitutions are available and what they mean?
You're in a maze of twisty little man pages, all alike...
They're in the smf_method man page :-)
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 11/30/10 18:12, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/30/10 02:07 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/29/10 20:00, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/26/10 06:48 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/23/10 18:42, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are
On 11/29/10 20:00, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/26/10 06:48 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/23/10 18:42, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The
upgrade I have just done appears to have completed but when
On 11/23/10 18:42, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The
upgrade I have just done appears to have completed but when booted
show it still on 134b/
No, because that package system doesn't know
instead? No need to recompile
anything if that works for you...
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The upgrade
I have just done appears to have completed but when booted show it still on
134b/
--chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
conf what it should be or has
something changed them?
FWIW just re-running the ldapclient command (with flags) fixes things. I have a
shell script that calls it with all our local values in, which makes things a
little easier.
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:53, Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Oracle
UK wrote:
>
> Chris Ridd wrote:
>> On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> hris Ridd wrote:
>>>> On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:46, Pablo León wrote:
>>>>> And my
On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:21, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Chris Ridd wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:46, Pablo León wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Just upgraded from b134 to Sol11xp.
>>>
>>> And my Spanish keyboard mapping is a m
ell as
S11.
Does this help:
<http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100720182505.html>?
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 16 Nov 2010, at 20:22, Chris Ridd wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2010, at 19:49, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
>> Yes, the messaging could be better here, but it's very difficult to divine
>> the intent of the user here.
>>
>> You'll need to remove amp-dev, all of
On 16 Nov 2010, at 19:49, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 11/16/10 11:37 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
>> NAME (PUBLISHER) VERSION STATE
>> UFOXI
> ...
>> amp-dev 0.5.11-0.111installed
>>
likely to be based on the OpenSolaris
repos - the release repo is updated every 6 months (or so), the support repo is
updated more regularly but only for paying customers. No recommended patches at
all, unless you pay.
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-di
htok_store.so.1
>
> P.S. I also get this when logging in directly from console, except the
> error is associated with login instead of sshd.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks in advance.
No real ideas - pam's a bit of a mystery to me - but could you get dtrace to
help
>> zfs?
>>>
>>>
>> Use the b133 or 134 LiveCD.
>
> dimwitted question: Is that the same as the install ISO?
Yes, it is the same thing.
Remember not to upgrade your zpool versions past the last version supported by
your most recent live CD.
Cheers,
Chri
On 28 Oct 2010, at 20:15, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote:
>> and the forum could be better organized like this one for example
>
> I could not find a forum at openindiana.org at all... Is it exists?
They have mailing lists instead.
Ch
Comstar.
Thanks,
Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
performance and
explain the difference in performance?
Thanks,
Chris
sqlio tests I was running
sqlio -kW -t2 -s120 -dM -o1 -frandom -b64 -BH -LS testfile.dat >>
sqlioResults-opensolaris
sqlio -kW -t4 -s120 -dM -o1 -frandom -b64 -BH -LS testfile.dat >>
sqlioResults-opensolaris
sqlio -
This work is starting now.
Chris
Original Message
Subject:[website-discuss] XWiki Update on Monday Oct 4
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:08:04 +0900
From: Jim Grisanzio
To: website-disc...@opensolaris.org, opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Following the updates
been
rebooted about five or six times since the pool version upgrade. One should
not have to reboot six times! More mystery to this pool upgrade behavior!!
-Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
t; display the true and
updated versions, I'm not convinced that the problem is zdb, as the label
config is almost certainly set by the zpool and/or zfs commands. Somewhere,
something is not happening that is supposed to when initiating a zpool
upgrade, but since I
R
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Chris Mosetick wrote:
>
>> Not sure what the best list to send this to is right now, so I have
>> selected a few, apologies in advance.
>>
>> A couple questions. First I have a physical host (call him bob) that was
>> j
With no moving parts and no local operating system to manage, Sun Ray Clients
provide a cost-effective, highly functional thin client alternative to desktop
and laptop computers and reduce many of the problems associated with
traditional desktop deployments.
http://www.kintek.com.au/";>Web Desi
You need to set permissions on the file system properly. If you just want
everyone to have access:
zfs setsharenfs=name=chris,guestok=true tank/export/chris
for CIFS
zfs setsharesmb=name=chris,guestok=true tank/export/chris
you should also look at idmap for cifs:
read the manual first:
man
o show as version 27 in zdb? Why does zdb
-D rpool give me can't open on the host bob?
Thank you in advance,
-Chris
ch...@weston:~# zdb
rpool:
version: 22
name: 'rpool'
state: 0
txg: 7254
pool_guid: 17616386148370290153
hostid: 8413798
hostname
Greetings,
I am having some issues with ldoms on separate systems, giving out duplicate
mac addresses to ldoms and to vnet ports even. It seems there is some
particular mac in the "freed" mac address table, that the ldom manager keeps
trying to pass out, but that mac is in use on another ldom
On 5 Aug 2010, at 15:51, Rick Ramsey wrote:
> Chris,
>
> The Studio pages were migrated over from SDN with some pretty coarse scripts,
> so we're updating them manually, along with many others. The information on
> those pages is not 100% reliable, yet. For instance
horized" for all SunStudio downloads - for the normal
release and the patched releases needed for building OpenSolaris. Maybe there's
something cached for my account and not yours?
It does however sound like some accidental web breakage rather than a policy
change, which is reassuring. It'll be more reassuring once I can download it
again, of course :-)
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 4 Aug 2010, at 14:43, Andras Barna wrote:
> you can get it from the IPS repo, right?
Yes, but the version in IPS is not the correct version required to build the
open sourced consolidations.
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing l
manent problem?
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
n Hahn or Tim Marsland or Bill Franklin or Vincent
> Murphy or Greg Lavender or someone completely new?
Sorry, but Tim Marsland has been fired on Oracle's behalf and now
works for Apple. Most other Solaris lead designers were "send away" by
Oracle, too.
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@)
m Marsland or Bill Franklin or Vincent
> Murphy or Greg Lavender or someone completely new?
According to his blog, Stephen's no longer at Sun/Oracle.
<http://blogs.sun.com/sch/entry/penultimate>
Cheers,
Chris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
f Solaris and GNU features would make it there, too.
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pickett
|/ IT consultant
===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ut it looks Oracle's
management has already decided on this.
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pickett
|/ IT consultant
===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
sort of package set to be installed.
I agree. Both the ksh93 and the modernisation project it spawned are
excellent work and would be of great benefit of Opensolaris.
But all that work appears to be fruitless if the intentions of Oracle
described in
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/openso
t; visit the Downloads page at
> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/downloads.
I saw that one coming.
Next on this channel: Source code access on a paid subscription level
and you have to pay $$$ per incident if you want to contribute to ON
>;-(
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pick
ack ever
again. TheRegister may post the photos next Monday.
Let's hope that the same won't happen for Opensolaris, although the
chances are slim that this does not happen to lots of our lead
developers.
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pickett
|/ IT consultant
===
thanx!
Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ectory
How can I find the 'aclocal' ? (what is the package name..)
thx
Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nikola M wrote:
> Chris Pickett wrote:
>> Where can I find B135 as LiveCD?
>>
> http://www.genunix.org/ when available.
> 135 Not released yet.
134 is too old - it predates the 'big'ol package rename' and an
attempt to update
Where can I find B135 as LiveCD?
Chris
--
^---^
(@)v(@) Chris Pickett
|/ IT consultant
===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Harry, I get files created with UID & GID set by client. See below (some
names have been altered to protect the innocent, any inconsistencies are due to
that editing)
from mount list:
192.168.0.110:/darkstar/nebulae on /home/chris/osolnfsmount type nfs
(rw,nolock,addr=192.168.0.110)
archives with files and directories in them. It's a lousy
>> workaround, but it should work.
>
> Fortunately, it's only 4 or 5 files for 141858 for each arch (i386, x64)
Unfortunately patch 141858 is only downloadable from sunsolve to those wi
Always check the release announcement.
It's jack and jack.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
SOLVED folks... perseverance is key...:
I added the following envars to my GlassFish SMF one by one comparing manual to
the SMF way and seeing what happens...:
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
And lastly the pargs -e for the openoffice script, when starting manually (not
through SMF), I get:
envp[0]: URE_BOOTSTRAP=file:///opt/openoffice.org3/program/fundamentalrc
envp[1]: _=*20644*/opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin
envp[2]: DISPLAY=192.168.1.10:1.0
envp[3]: HOME=/export/home/gf21
Here below are the environment properties when I run my enable glassfish script:
g...@opensolaris:/opt/gf21$ pargs -e 20482
20482: /usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/bin/java
-Dcom.sun.aas.instanceRoot=/opt/gf21/glass
envp[0]: XFILESEARCHPATH=/usr/dt/app-defaults/%L/Dt
envp[1]: NLSPATH=/usr/dt/lib/nls/
Hello all, I am trying to get my openoffice code to wkr under opensolaris
without a monitor (a.k.a headless), so far I have tried the following
connection string in my Java code (I am using the Java SDK 3.1 kit):
oooCommand = /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice| -nologo -nodefault
-norestore -
[url=http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6902551]Bug #6902551[/url]
was responsible for the audio device issue on SVN_127 (its was always 127 not
125 as I mentioned earlier).
The fix described worked a treat and the box now boots.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Ok. I'm stuck now.
My OS 2009.06 BEs won't boot, at least not within an hour. That includes a
"safe" snapshot turned into a BE.
The SVN_125 boots into console mode. It won't go into multi-user mode, because
svc:/system/device/audio can't be started. Is it possible to remove the audio
depen
The boot log shown was from a boot with -v -m options.
I haven't been able to complete a successful boot today, using -kv -m or normal
options. For some attempts I forgot to start my timer, but they all ran passed
one hour before I rebooted.
However, the SVN_125 boot (to console) did succeed.
By changing the package repository and using the update manager gui.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I'm running OpenSolaris 2009.06.
I've twice tried updating to the development version, the latest being SVN_125.
I've only been able to get it to boot to console - which it does manage in
much less time than 35+ minutes.
I'm haven't figured out what I need to do to get it passed the console.
-
What is a lot?
zfs list reports 773 snapshots. Most of those are from the auto snapshot
service. I have 33 zfs file systems.
The auto snapshot service has been running for a long time. I wouldn't think
there would have been a significant change in the number of snapshots in the
last week.
-
pfexec intrstat
device | cpu0 %tim cpu1 %tim
-+--
ahci#0 | 250 0.2 0 0.0
audiohd#1 | 1 0.0 0 0.0
ehci#0 | 0 0.0 0 0.0
ehci#1 | 1 0.0 0 0.0
hci1394#0
Just in the last week, I've started to experience very slow boot times, upwards
of 35minutes. Looking in the log, I see the following message repeated for
around 30 minutes before the boot finally completes
Nov 30 09:29:14 supernova nwamd[23]: [ID 821790 daemon.warning]
svc:/system/device/loca
Thanks.
The console reported "-m" as an invalid option, but you got me looking in the
right area.
Important changes:
- change console from graphics to text
- delete line containing splash graphic.
Now to try and resolve the actual boot issues.
First, the boot archive didn't math (fix with 'boo
I have a working Open Solaris 2009.06 installation. I've twice now tried the
development build, 118 & 127 and both times after upgrading the box hasn't
completed the boot process.
Where can I look for information about the failed boot?
Is there any way to remove the boot loader screen and see
My impression was that update manager should make a new BE, then run update on
the new BE and set the new BE to be used on the next reboot. This doesn't seem
to happen.
I recently tried updating to the latest development build for 2010.02, feeling
safe that if there were problems I could reve
r.g. I feel your pain.
I'd be careful of that board. I have OpenSolaris installed on a box using a
similar AMD chipset (780G in a Gigabyte MA78GM-S2H). It works fine with
2009.06, but not with either of the two releases prior to that. And not with
the recent development builds of 2010.02.
I
Is you CPU 32bit or 64bit?
This is the performance you get with 32bit CPU.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Check this thread
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=115503&tstart=0
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Home directory in /etc/passwd is /home/chris
Underlying path is on mirrored zfs drives data/home/chris
did not make any automounter modifications. My $HOME variable is /home/chris
which is correct
my home directory originally was /export/home/chris but then moved over the the
mirrored drives
It happened again today. Here is pflags and pstack
# pflags -r top-14186
core 'top-14186' of 14186: top
data model = _LP64 flags = MSACCT|MSFORK
/1:flags = 0
sigmask = 0xbefc,0x cursig = SIGSEGV
%r15 = 0x00450F20 %r14 = 0x004495A0
%r13
is there an opensolaris package out there for python 3? I have search around
but haven't found any.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I did check the /etc/passwd file, that path is correct
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
now that I think about this I think it might have to do with the fact that I
moved the home directory to a different drive. There must be some lingering
reference to the old location that bash uses to determine if its the home
directory and replace it with the tilde.
my $HOME variable is set correc
bash rev:
GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.11)
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
I just tried the same prompt on another account and it worked fine. I am now
thinking that this does not work on my account because this account was created
before I moved the ho
I am using opensolaris 2009.06
In bash I have the prompt set to display the current directory and when I go
back to my home directory I expect it to replace it with ~. The tilde is there
when I first bring up a shell but if I navigate away from my home directory and
then go back it doesn't rep
Thanks.
The funny thing is I run top many times today but never get seg fault anymore.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks. It didn't coredump.
I bearly use top, only when I saw this post and tried it. My system was
originally snv_117, then luupgrade to snv_124 on every release, but as I said,
never tried it before, so I don't know if it only happens to this version.
What other info do you need to help diag
Got it on snv_124 too.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1. Get LSI SAS hba, such as 3042(8 port) or 3041(4port), these are cheap and
work better than marvel based.
You may want to get hotswapable SAS mobile rack that can host 5 SAS/SATA disks
so with LSI 3042, you can connect 10 disks from it, plus 4 onboard SATA, that
gives you 14 disks.
I suggest
I have a box running OpenSolaris 09.06 which I would like to run headless and
access the desktop from a Mac (currently running OSX 10.5.8) on the same LAN.
This used to work under OS 08.05. 09.06 seems more secure and I'm struggling
to locate all the appropriate settings to enable remote login.
, however
that does not seem like a solution to me, more of a workaround.
-chris
On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Ghee Teo wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Chris wrote:
Ben from cuddletech.com said it was in a version of SXCE, because
he wrote about it on his blog. I emailed him and he gave me
Ben from cuddletech.com said it was in a version of SXCE, because he wrote
about it on his blog. I emailed him and he gave me the following info.
Very odd, same behavior on my SX:CE 116 box.
The functionality was added to GNOME-vfs some time ago
(http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/d
How do I get this in OpenSolaris 2009.06?
http://www.alobbs.com/albums/albun26/ZFS_acl_dialog1.jpg
thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>Note that the 'ecccheck.pl' script depends on the 'pcitweak' utility
>which is no longer present in OpenSolaris 2009.06 and Ubuntu 8.10
>because of Xorg changes.
in http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=398536
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
I am getting used to the opensolaris GUI.
The last time I used solaris was with version 1 (SunOS 4), but I am mainly a XP
user these days.
I am still looking for the following bits of information, hopefully with a GUI,
but I can use a prompt if I have to:
- regional setting (to do things like u
> possible...
If you want GNU and FreeBSD features in the Solaris userland look at
the ksh93-integration project. They are adding GNU and FreeBSD
features to the commands in /usr/bin. Just download and install the
binaries from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2009-
Hi Lucas
I'm interested in the Dell T410 myself, did you get any further feedback or
end up trying one of the systems you were investigating here?
Cheers
Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
/docs/doc/819-3194/ghnmu?a=view
is this the most current and best way to join windows ad for authentication and
would this allow me to set ZFS ACLs with my windows user accounts/groups?
thanks
chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
when you had certain packages installed. ;-)
It's not clear to me we got the best outcome. In the long run, I think
/usr/bin/cc
will always point to the latest FCS/stable version of cc. I hope we won't have
to cause
any surprises like this in the future.
--chris
--
This messa
/
--
Chris Gerhard. __o __o __o
Systems TSC Chief Technologist_`\<,`\<,`\<,_
Sun Microsystems Limited (*)/---/---/ (*)
Phone: +44 (0) 1252 426033 (ext 26033) http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg
smime.p7s
De
It's available in blastwave repository.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
it not have any bearing
on this?)
Thanks for your help!
-Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mine works on 2009.06 snv_111a
I have Supermicro X8SAX, but the onboard NIC is Intel 82574L. Onboard NIC and
PCI-X slots are the reasons I chose Supermicro.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-di
I'm trying to find an FC HBA supported by Comstar. The Comstar project states
4Gb qlogic/Emulex, and 2 Gb Emulex coming. Do we have a list of known HBA that
works with Comstar?
Thanks
Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
openso
If anyone were to buy Sun, I'd prefer Fujitsu, Hitachi or Siemens . NOT IBM!
Fujitsu doesn't seem to be hurting as badly as the others.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
thanks all for your answers!
Chris Mahan
chris.ma...@gmail.com
grandcentral (818) 671-1709
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Joerg Schilling <
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> Chris Mahan wrote:
>
> > Question: Does anyone know if it would be possible to run
Question: Does anyone know if it would be possible to run opensolaris on a
laptop (sucha as an Acer Aspire One) and have it continue to run normally
when the lid was closed?
Chris Mahan
chris.ma...@gmail.com
grandcentral (818) 671-1709
as a project name anyways?
--
----
Chris Wood
Storage & Data Management PE
Office: 408-782-2757 (Home Office)
Mobile: 408-218-7313 (Preferred)
Email: chris.w...@sun.com
__
Yes, extremely annoying, happens to me as well(with a Radeon 9800XT). Good to
see that it's a known problem though...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello Everyone,
I have recently jumped onto the OpenSolaris bandwagon coming from FreeBSD,
mainly because FreeBSD's ZFS stability is pretty bad. So a few weeks ago I
rebuilt my BSD NAS to OpenSolaris using ZFS and CIFS. Everything has been
working fine and I'm loving OpenSolaris. I haven't ha
d recent backup would be a
good thing.
It's called disaster recovery, and I think, in light of what's going on, it
would be useful to think about that.
--
Chris Mahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell 818.943.1850
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
LLP in Toronto Canada. ( DWW.com )
dww.com is a trademark and patent lawyer. I have the feeling that this is
what is going on.
We need word from dennis as to why he needs money, and I am sure we can get
the ball rolling.
--
Chris Mahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell 818.943.1850
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo
