This all worked fine until I upgraded to snv_134 from 09/06
I was running 3.x version of Vbox. Vbox interface starts OK. I start a VM and
the Solaris kernel panics:
Apr 28 00:09:04 atlantis ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ff00064cbc60:
Apr 28 00:09:04 atlantis genunix: [ID 103648 kern.notice]
On 04/28/11 03:54 AM, Jason Herring wrote:
This all worked fine until I upgraded to snv_134 from 09/06
I was running 3.x version of Vbox. Vbox interface starts OK. I start a VM and
the Solaris kernel panics:
I upgraded to VBox 4.0.4 and then 4.0.6 and got the same result.
Did you remove the
More fun. I NFS mounted the VM from a Linux box and went to start the VM -
this also panicked the *opensolaris* kernel! Maybe this is something to do
with the network stack? Though I see a lot of references to sata/scsi and
si3124 (sata controller card in machine) in the panic:
Apr 28
I was running 3.x version of Vbox
Have you tried to create a new virtual machine in the latest version of
VirtualBox rather than trying to run the buggy instance of older version VM?
This will require to install/configure OpenSolaris though, but this should not
be so hard to do.
--
This
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 18:39, Dmitry G. Kozhinov d...@desktopfay.com wrote:
I was running 3.x version of Vbox
Have you tried to create a new virtual machine in the latest version of
VirtualBox rather than trying to run the buggy instance of older version VM?
he did say that he had the same
On 04/28/11 03:54 AM, Jason Herring wrote:
This all worked fine until I upgraded to snv_134 from 09/06
I was running 3.x version of Vbox. Vbox interface starts OK. I start a VM and
the Solaris kernel panics:
Apr 28 00:09:04 atlantis ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ff00064cbc60:
Apr 28 00:09:04
Haven't received and answer on the virtualbox forum, so thought maybe somebody
here knows.
Using FreeBSD jails on lo1 with 10.0.02, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 /24
Have VirtualBox OSE 3.2.6 installed and have internal networking selected.
Why can a VirtualBox guest with an IP of 10.0.0.5/24 not be able
|
|VB guest with intern net 10.0.0.5/24 |
|---|
|VB guest with intern net 10.0.0.4/24 |
|---|
|FreeBSD jail 10.0.0.3/24 |
|---|
|
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:29 -0700, Gary wrote:
Is it not possible with VirtualBox using internal networking
to be able to communicate with the FreeBSD jails?
I thought I'd replied to you, but the reply must have been lost. The
answer is no; see:
Thanks.
I thought that was going to be the answer. But I appreciate the reply I can
use host-only; I prefer not to use bridged for this.
Will setup host-only.
Thanks again!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
This is well off-topic for this list, but, for the record, I've been following
OpenBSD -current for about a year, running on VirtualBox, without issue. I've
been following the trac notifications since last year, and the only open issue
I've seen is an old one indicating problems with
I'd say someone having a problem on May 30, 2010 makes it a still relevant
problem since they tried VT-x (with/out). There was also a problem in Feb,
2010, same issue.
The post was also more to the point that if OpenSolaris isn't being released
because of bugs, then what is the keeping
Short response: what you've got is inapt comparison, compounded by a lack of
interest in a level of detail that makes for meaningful analysis or tenable
conclusions (e.g. someone updates a long-standing bug ticket, where it isn't
clear that the original issue is a bug in the first instance or
There was plenty of information in the 05/30/2010 VirtualBox ticket. Yet, your
update to the ticket is to have them close it, specifically, when a problem
hasn't been addressed?
That was a real technical update too. Close it. Sheer stupidity on your part.
--
This message posted from
Your characterisation here is just as inapt and indifferent to basic
distinctions as anything else you've had to say on this matter. Anyone who
wants to know about VirtualBox bug reporting guidelines can look here:
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Bugtracker
Anyone who wants to know about the
You had absolutely no basis to update the OpenBSD/VirutalBox ticket. All you
said was close it.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
:...ensures the product always meets professional quality criteria.
That is a misstatement if ever I've heard one. SUN/VirtualBox say OpenBSD IS a
supported guest os. For the longest time I had segmentation faults when trying
to install OpenBSD and finally have succeeded in not having them
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:54:51 -0700, Gary wrote:
Why do they release a newer version of VirtualBox so frequently? Releases
appear faster than the ex-wife could spend money.
The reason given by some for OpenSolaris is there are bugs. Well, if that
is truly the case for not releasing
On 2 Jul 2010, at 18:54, Gary wrote:
The reason given by some for OpenSolaris is there are bugs. Well, if that is
truly the case for not releasing OpenSolaris, then what propels them to
constantly have new versions of VirtualBox instead of having a more stable
and bug-free product?
You
Thank you. I'll post the question in the forum on virtualbox.org.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks Alan.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
I am not sure whether the people that take care of
https://pkg.sun.com/opensolaris/extra/
are hanging on that list, but Id better try.
The VirtualBox that extra serves is 3.1.8, while the version available
from virtualbox.org is 3.2.4
Are there any plans to update extra repo, or it falls
This was asked on the virtualbox list a week ago or so, right after
3.2.2 came out.
The answer was: YES, it will be updated, though not immediately.
The update delay was being driven by factors other than the impending
OpenSolaris release.
(frankly, I suspect that they don't want to push a
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
The update delay was being driven by factors other than the impending
OpenSolaris release.
(frankly, I suspect that they don't want to push a new sub-version each
week, which is the current rate of bugfix releases
Hi,
I am not sure whether the people that take care of
https://pkg.sun.com/opensolaris/extra/
are hanging on that list, but Id better try.
Is OpenOffice still at 3.1 or whatever it was?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
alan pae wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure whether the people that take care of
https://pkg.sun.com/opensolaris/extra/
are hanging on that list, but Id better try.
Is OpenOffice still at 3.1 or whatever it was?
You'd get a faster answer by asking pkg.opensolaris.org than asking the list:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:07 AM, russell str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
On 30/04/2010 22:50, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:06 PM, russell aspinwall
str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk mailto:str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
The latest version of VirtualBox
Hi,
And that is the first Oracle-branded version!
Cheers,
Chavdar
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com wrote:
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 5:07 AM, russell str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
On 30/04/2010 22:50, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:06 PM, russell aspinwall
str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk mailto:str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk
On 30/04/2010 22:50, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:06 PM, russell aspinwall
str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk mailto:str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
The latest version of VirtualBox v3.2.0 Beta is available for
download here
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
From the perspective of running the OSS hoster berlios.de, I know that 99%
if
the reported download problems are caused at the side of the downloader:
Agreed. I worked at an ISP for several years and
On 05/ 1/10 10:33 PM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
I think this is a CDN snafu. I still can't download anymore both from
home and work.
Working fine for me:
--23:14:45--
Hi,
The latest version of VirtualBox v3.2.0 Beta is available for download here
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/3.2.0_BETA1/VirtualBox-3.2.0_BETA1-60785-SunOS.tar.gz
Unfortunately there appears to be a problem at present where you can only
download 6.3MB of the 82MB file. Not being
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:06 PM, russell aspinwall
str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
The latest version of VirtualBox v3.2.0 Beta is available for download here
http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/3.2.0_BETA1/VirtualBox-3.2.0_BETA1-60785-SunOS.tar.gz
Unfortunately there
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:50:07 -0300
Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:06 PM, russell aspinwall
str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
The latest version of VirtualBox v3.2.0 Beta is available for
download here
On Sat, 1 May 2010 13:08:40 +0930
Ty John (sand_man) ty...@eye-of-odin.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:50:07 -0300
Giovanni Tirloni gtirl...@sysdroid.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:06 PM, russell aspinwall
str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
The latest version of
It should be there now as of yesterday.
-- Alan
On 02/23/10 10:46 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Garen Parhamgare...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we be lobbying the VirtualBox folks then? Is there a better venue to do
that?
I'm really eagerly awaiting 3.1 due to
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Alan Steinberg alan.steinb...@sun.com wrote:
It should be there now as of yesterday.
Yeah, I've noticed that two moments after I hit Send. (Learned my lesson)
-- Alan
On 02/23/10 10:46 PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Garen
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Garen Parham gare...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we be lobbying the VirtualBox folks then? Is there a better venue to
do that?
I'm really eagerly awaiting 3.1 due to the improved USB/Audio support for
OpenSolaris.
Any ideas when 3.1.4 will appear in extra repo
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Cyril Plisko cyril.pli...@mountall.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Garen Parham gare...@gmail.com wrote:
Should we be lobbying the VirtualBox folks then? Is there a better venue to
do that?
I'm really eagerly awaiting 3.1 due to the improved
Alan Steinberg wrote:
I'm not in the VirtualBox organization, but I'm not aware of any beta
releases. VirtualBox has been releasing on a cadence of a new version
about every 4 weeks. We've tried to keep the gap between SVR4 package
and IPS availability as small as possible.
They do release
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Alan Steinberg alan.steinb...@sun.com wrote:
I'm not in the VirtualBox organization, but I'm not aware of any beta
releases. VirtualBox has been releasing on a cadence of a new version about
every 4 weeks. We've tried to keep the gap between SVR4 package and IPS
On 01/12/2009 13:13, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Alan Steinbergalan.steinb...@sun.com wrote:
I'm not in the VirtualBox organization, but I'm not aware of any beta
releases. VirtualBox has been releasing on a cadence of a new version about
every 4 weeks. We've tried
Should we be lobbying the VirtualBox folks then? Is there a better venue to do
that?
I'm really eagerly awaiting 3.1 due to the improved USB/Audio support for
OpenSolaris.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
I'm not in the VirtualBox organization, but I'm not aware of any beta
releases. VirtualBox has been releasing on a cadence of a new version
about every 4 weeks. We've tried to keep the gap between SVR4 package
and IPS availability as small as possible.
-- Alan
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
It would also be nice if you would provide your beta releases in IPS
packaging...
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Alan Steinberg wrote:
We hope to have the IPS version up in the next day or so. I don't think you
would want to manually download and install the tarballs from the
virtualbox.org
OK, it is now available! -- Alan
Alan Steinberg wrote:
We hope to have the IPS version up in the next day or so. I don't
think you would want to manually download and install the tarballs
from the virtualbox.org website, since you would first have to
uninstall the IPS version, then uninstall
Allan -
is .10 still available??? all i see is .12 in the IPS
and it broke some things, i need to reinstall .10 ASAP...
rich
Alan Steinberg wrote:
OK, it is now available! -- Alan
Alan Steinberg wrote:
We hope to have the IPS version up in the next day or so. I don't
think you would want
All the previous packages are there, but not displayed in the web
browser by default. You can either find the option in the browser to
display all versions, or you can just specify the 3.0.10 version in the
FMRI when you run the pkg install. It should be able to find it.
-- Alan
Rich
Hi:
I have not been able to upgrade my virtualbox 3.0.12 because the IPS version
has not been made available through the sun extra repository. Is there any way
I can do a manual upgrade from my existing IPS package?
Thanks,
Keith
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
We hope to have the IPS version up in the next day or so. I don't think
you would want to manually download and install the tarballs from the
virtualbox.org website, since you would first have to uninstall the IPS
version, then uninstall the tarball when you switch back to the IPS
version. I
hi,
i install virtual box of osol, but when i try to install linux ubuntu64 or win
xp pro,
i have a same error messsage :
FATAL: No bootable medium found! System halted.
i use an best distribution 64bit but i don't understand.
thanks
philo
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Go to virtualbox.org forum and ask there.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I was successful using FreeBSD 7.2 in VirtualBox 3.0.2 in a non-global zone on
OpenSolaris 0906.
I was partially successful with OpenBSD 4.5 in VirtualBox 3.0.2 in a non-global
zone on OpenSolaris 0906. The usual disk full message and segmentation
faults occurred during installation but the
VirtualBox 3.0.0 fails to startup in a non-global zone just like 2.2.4 and
2.2.2. Only 2.2.0 seems to work in a non-global zone.
Which means I can't run OpenBSD because it gets seg faults and disk full errors
on 2.2.0. Can't run 2.2.4 because something is broken and it doesn't appear
Hello,
just to let you know, since VBox 2.2.4 I'm running OpenBSD 4.5 happily on OS
2009.06. I get no more strange segfaults (like in the past with 1.x-2.2.2 and
OpenBSD 4.3-4.4). Please give it a try and complain on VBox forums if it does
not work for you.
Thanks,
Karel
--
This message posted
For what it's worth: I opened a bug (#4226) on the virtualbox.org site in
bugtracker for the FreeBSD only working with 2.2.0 in a non-global zone and
there hasn't been any movement. There are also a few OpenBSD bugs that address
the disk full and seg fault problems, so opening a new one about
I run VBox only in global zone if you are curious. Having OpenBSD/pf running in
VBox in non-global zone would be nice, indeed.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
With VirtualBox 2.2.2 and 2.2.4 in a non-global zone I am unable to use FreeBSD
as a guest, although FreeBSD works with VirtualBox 2.2.0.
So can SUN verify that FreeBSD works as a guest in VirtualBox 3.0 in a
non-global zone?
Also, is OpenBSD EVER going to work in VirtualBox? If not, then
Gary Bainbridge wrote:
With VirtualBox 2.2.2 and 2.2.4 in a non-global zone I am unable to use FreeBSD
as a guest, although FreeBSD works with VirtualBox 2.2.0.
So can SUN verify that FreeBSD works as a guest in VirtualBox 3.0 in a
non-global zone?
Also, is OpenBSD EVER going to work in
Thanks, but I have already opened a bug ticket (4226) with virtualbox.org and
there was only one response - asking if I followed the documentation - without
regard to reading that 2.2.0 works but not later releases.
I thought since that bug and the OpenBSD full disk and seg faults aren't dealt
Gary Bainbridge wrote:
Thanks, but I have already opened a bug ticket (4226) with virtualbox.org and
there was only one response - asking if I followed the documentation - without
regard to reading that 2.2.0 works but not later releases.
I thought since that bug and the OpenBSD full disk and
All;
I am sorry if this is not the correct place to post this.
I have Open Solaris running @ home.
$ cat /etc/release
OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101b_rc2 X86
Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to
I installed VBox on my test system (PowerEdge 2600), then installed Server 2003
Enterprise. I'm having a ton of issues with the entire system rebooting,
Server 2003 simply losing network or when it isn't crashing or is still on the
network, ping times are erratic. 50ms, 1000ms, 1ms and so on.
I installed VBox on my test system (PowerEdge 2600),
then installed Server 2003 Enterprise. I'm having a
ton of issues with the entire system rebooting,
Server 2003 simply losing network or when it isn't
crashing or is still on the network, ping times are
erratic. 50ms, 1000ms, 1ms and so
2.0.0. I haven't tried the older version at all. I'm testing this out in my
spare time, which hasn't been much. Thanks for helping confirm that I don't
simply have a hardware issue though.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
2.0.0. I haven't tried the older version at all.
I'm testing this out in my spare time, which hasn't
been much. Thanks for helping confirm that I don't
simply have a hardware issue though.
This problem is fixed in 2.0.2, which just came out today:
Just a note to hopefully help someone else out.
I have been running VirtualBox on my sager laptop inside zfs partition with
2Gbytes of ram build 82. Even though I had the Guest OS set to 600Meg.
(WindowsXP) MY memory would keep dropping until I started seeing performance
problems. I added
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 04:37:36AM -0700, Mike DeMarco wrote:
Just a note to hopefully help someone else out.
I have been running VirtualBox on my sager laptop inside zfs partition with
2Gbytes of ram build 82. Even though I had the Guest OS set to 600Meg.
(WindowsXP) MY
In the most recent annual survey by LInux Journal, VirtualBox was almost neck
and neck with VMWare in the virtualization category. For a product that only
came out in 2007, this is really incredible.
If anyone has problem building a vdi image from the upgrade WindowsXP CD,
plse let me know.
I am trying to give VirtualBox a host Interface to
use.
Going over the docs I have:
created a vnic using the vnic_setup.sh script plumbed
the interface and configured with a ip on the same
network as the destination ip.
I set the interface name in the VirtualBox GUI and
booted my
Mike DeMarco writes:
Going over the docs I have:
created a vnic using the vnic_setup.sh script plumbed
the interface and configured with a ip on the same
network as the destination ip.
[...]
If no one can help with this can anyone point me to more resources for
crossbow
I am trying to give VirtualBox a host Interface to use.
Going over the docs I have:
created a vnic using the vnic_setup.sh script plumbed the interface and
configured with a ip on the same network as the destination ip.
I set the interface name in the VirtualBox GUI and booted my virtaul
Alan DuBoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Mike DeMarco wrote:
Took /opt/csw/lib out of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and it now works.
Just one of the many reasons you should never have LD_LIBRARY_PATH
set in your environment, where it will break all
Took /opt/csw/lib out of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and it
now works.
Hi,
Why would you need /opt/csw/lib in your
LD_LIBRARY_PATH
If the csw packages are built correctly then you do
not need it set :-)
I have never set it for csw.
If all your packages are built correctly then you
don't need
New problem:
I have been able to start VirtualBox Still does not
work from the link /usr/bin/VirtualBox -
/opt/VirtualBox/VBox
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown application -
If I change the link to
/usr/bin/VirtualBox - /opt/VirtualBox/VirtualBox
This works
Problem
Mike DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem during install.
/platform/i86pc/kernel/drv/vboxdrv
/platform/i86pc/kernel/drv/vboxdrv.conf
[ verifying class none ]
Modifying /etc/devlink.tab
[ verifying class sed ]
## Executing postinstall script.
Sun xVM VirtualBox - postinstall script
Mike DeMarco writes:
xine, vlc, ogle to name three will not run without somehow knowing about
/opt/csw/lib.
If you need LD_LIBRARY_PATH for *anything*, then file a bug. The
person who compiled and linked that application didn't do it right.
He used -L but forgot to use -R.
For what it's
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike DeMarco writes:
xine, vlc, ogle to name three will not run without somehow knowing about
/opt/csw/lib.
If you need LD_LIBRARY_PATH for *anything*, then file a bug. The
person who compiled and linked that application didn't do it right.
He
New problem:
I have been able to start VirtualBox Still does not
work from the link /usr/bin/VirtualBox -
/opt/VirtualBox/VBox
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown application -
If I change the link to
/usr/bin/VirtualBox - /opt/VirtualBox/VirtualBox
This works
Problem
Has anyone gotten Virtual box up and running?
I have installed the package, but if I try to run it I get:
VirtualBox -help
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown application -
VirtualBox
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown application -
I thought windows had cryptic messages!
This
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Mike DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone gotten Virtual box up and running?
I have installed the package, but if I try to run it I get:
VirtualBox -help
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown application -
VirtualBox
Usage: basename
Has anyone gotten Virtual box up and running?
I have installed the package, but if I try to run it
I get:
VirtualBox -help
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown application -
VirtualBox
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown application -
I thought windows had cryptic
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Mike DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone gotten Virtual box up and running?
I have installed the package, but if I try to run it
I get:
VirtualBox -help
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown application -
VirtualBox
Usage:
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Mike DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone gotten Virtual box up and running?
I have installed the package, but if I try to run it
I get:
VirtualBox -help
Usage: basename string [ suffix ]
Unknown
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Mike DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone gotten Virtual box up and running?
I have installed the package, but if I try to run it
Took /opt/csw/lib out of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and it now works.
Blastwave is great but it often clobbers functionality.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike DeMarco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Took /opt/csw/lib out of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and it now works.
Thou should not have LD_LIBRARY_PATH at all.
Jörg
Oh ye most high. I do think you intended :
Thou shalt not
On Wed, 14 May 2008, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Mike DeMarco wrote:
Took /opt/csw/lib out of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and it now works.
Just one of the many reasons you should never have LD_LIBRARY_PATH
set in your environment, where it will break all programs, and
instead only set it in wrapper
Took /opt/csw/lib out of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH and it
now works.
Blastwave is great but it often clobbers
functionality.
Blastwave doesn't clobber functionality. Unawareness clobbers
functionality. What are you doing with a LD_LIBRARY_PATH on
Solaris.
Here's a good read why LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Tim Scanlon wrote:
I might be a bit more excited if they did a non amd64 Solaris build...
Seriously wtf? It's not rocket science and they did it for every flavor of
linux under the sun...
They have, it's an AMD/Intel build.
Ian
___
I pulled out my build 66 starter kit, installed it and then downloaded the
package and after installing that I made up an windows 2003 virtual machine and
the speed appears to be well within acceptable limits -it's a good sight faster
than qemu is (which I was surprised to find out).
My mind
I believe gentry was referring to 64bit vs 32bit, there's only a 64bit binary
available for download.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
My mind might change on that when I try to do
anything more strenuous than browse the web with it,
of course, but for now it seems really nice
What I've noticed is that it's pretty invasive on the host system. I was trying
to watch a PAL resolution video with mplayer on Solaris while
Indeed, I installed ae by following the instructions in the readme and
have DP2 working in VirtualBox on Mac OS X - should work for other
OpenSolaris distros on other platforms as far as I can see.
I've put an ISO of the ae driver tarball on
Also, I am only able to get 1024x768 screen.
See http://blogs.sun.com/alanbur/entry/kicking_both_tyres_together_virtualbox
for instructions on how to increase the resolution.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
Josh Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VMWare Server is free now. I don't know what features the Workstation has,
but the Server seems to satisfy all my needs.
It soes not satisfy my needs as it does not run on Solaris.
VirtualBox is not yet complete but it runs on Solaris and I have just beeen
Josh Lange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VMWare Server is free now. I don't know what
features the Workstation has,
but the Server seems to satisfy all my needs.
It soes not satisfy my needs as it does not run on
Solaris.
VirtualBox is not yet complete but it runs on Solaris
and I have
VirtualBox is way faster than QEMU, though it shares some of the code. I like
it already. There are a few issues here and there, but other than that, it's
great. Nice product Sun bought there.
Also, obligatory posturing screenshot, showing seamless mode, currently only
working on Xinerama
Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, it should be noted that the Solaris port of VirtualBox is only a
beta, and it came out, AFAIK, only yesterday. I am sure there are many
loose ends that need to be taken care of. Some of the inadequacies are
major, e.g., it does not seem
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
