Yes, the copy appears to be completed, but I have *not* done a thorough check
(e.g. file by file compare) to verify that. Some of the file metadata (owner,
group, permissions, etc.) is not set. I don't recall what I noticed, but I did
not check thoroughly anyway. It wasn't right, I didn't dig
Alan Hargreaves wrote:
> Ray Clark wrote:
>> What action should I take [1] To bring it to someone's attention, and
>> [2] To get a working system in the near term. I am trying to migrate
>> from Linux to Solaris, and frankly have not figured out they lay of
>> the land yet.
>>
>> 6528189 consis
Ray Clark wrote:
> What action should I take [1] To bring it to someone's attention, and [2] To
> get a working system in the near term. I am trying to migrate from Linux to
> Solaris, and frankly have not figured out they lay of the land yet.
>
> 6528189 consists of a "cp -p" over NFS to a ZFS
This is my own personal opinion, and a recommendation for SUN, The $120 dollar
plan was nice in that it allowed for continued access to the 10 patches and
email support form http://sunsolve.sun.com/ account for one year, it was both
time saving and allowed SUN defrey the support costs, also conv
On Dec 22, 2007, at 1:47 AM, James Carlson wrote:
> Ray Clark writes:
>> I realize that paid support is what pays the bills, but I as a
>> private individual running a server for my family am not going to
>> be paying for support. I don't know what my employer does;
>> hopefully "pays the b
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2007 9:54 AM, Ray Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So your statements to the effect of "No guarantees, but we DO trust it with
>> all of our stuff" creates a perspective that has some meat to it. However
>> an key part of your message
Ray Clark writes:
> I realize that paid support is what pays the bills, but I as a private
> individual running a server for my family am not going to be paying for
> support. I don't know what my employer does; hopefully "pays the bills".
In that case, I'd recommend using an OpenSolaris-based
On Dec 21, 2007 9:54 AM, Ray Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So your statements to the effect of "No guarantees, but we DO trust it with
> all of our stuff" creates a perspective that has some meat to it. However an
> key part of your message as to compare it to "FCS", but I don't know what
I realize that paid support is what pays the bills, but I as a private
individual running a server for my family am not going to be paying for
support. I don't know what my employer does; hopefully "pays the bills".
So your statements to the effect of "No guarantees, but we DO trust it with all
Ray Clark writes:
> I have installed 127729-2 (and about 66 other patches), and now instead of
> saying "Invalid argument", it says "Operation Not Supported". I guess that
> is a better message, but I wish it were more specific. Not sure whether that
> is Linux' doing or Solaris.
I think it's
I have installed 127729-2 (and about 66 other patches), and now instead of
saying "Invalid argument", it says "Operation Not Supported". I guess that is
a better message, but I wish it were more specific. Not sure whether that is
Linux' doing or Solaris.
I found http://www.opensolaris.org/jiv
> For what it's worth, it looks like some other
> customer already did
> that, and the patch came out as 127728-02 for SPARC
> and 127729-02 for
> x86. It was released back in early November.
You can get those from sunsolve.sun.com .
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Ray Clark writes:
> What action should I take [1] To bring it to someone's attention, and [2] To
> get a working system in the near term. I am trying to migrate from Linux to
> Solaris, and frankly have not figured out they lay of the land yet.
>
> 6528189 consists of a "cp -p" over NFS to a ZF
Ray Clark wrote:
> What action should I take [1] To bring it to someone's attention, and [2] To
get a working system in the near term.
For the general case, open a support call with technical support or
upgrade to Solaris Express. That there are bugs in Solaris 10 (or any
other software product
What action should I take [1] To bring it to someone's attention, and [2] To
get a working system in the near term. I am trying to migrate from Linux to
Solaris, and frankly have not figured out they lay of the land yet.
6528189 consists of a "cp -p" over NFS to a ZFS file system failing, givin
Ray Clark wrote:
> Should a bug "fixed" in snv_66 be in S10 u4 (8/07) ?
No. They are two completely different branches of the tree,
and only a subset of the bugs fixed in snv are backported to
S10 updates.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc
Should a bug "fixed" in snv_66 be in S10 u4 (8/07) ?
Specifically I observer 6528189 in u4.
Thanks.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
