On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey Mark,
>
> On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 00:24 -0500, Mark Sweeney wrote:
> > Actually, I am convinced about the advantages of open source
> > development, it was one of the primary reasons I joined Sun; I thought
> > the fact that my work would be released wo
Hey Mark,
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 00:24 -0500, Mark Sweeney wrote:
> Actually, I am convinced about the advantages of open source
> development, it was one of the primary reasons I joined Sun; I thought
> the fact that my work would be released would be cool. I'm looking
> forward to community subm
Hey Glynn, a New Zealander, awesome, I was there about a year and a half ago,
very beautiful country. I visited the glow worm caves, parachuted, went up the
sky tower at Aukland, saw the fumaroles at Rotorua and so on. :)
Anyhow... in response to your post:
Actually, I am convinced about the a
Hey,
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 17:27 -0500, Mark Sweeney wrote:
> I doubt the majority of people would object to have more code offered
> to them for free after Sun has paid a significant amount of
> money/time/resources developing it. It's like christmas all over
> again!
Okay, I'll bite. Sounds li
ue to other past decisions, I meant to
say that organization is a good justification.
I hope this clears up any misunderstanding.
Mark Sweeney
- Original Message -
From: Eric Schrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:49 pm
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: CIFS gro
I doubt the majority of people would object to have more code offered to them
for free after Sun has paid a significant amount of money/time/resources
developing it. It's like christmas all over again!
As for developing in house, It's just the logistics of getting it done with
quality and quic
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 04:34:57PM -0500, Mark Sweeney wrote:
>
> I want to host a community which already exists, the 'CIFS community',
> on the OpenSolaris website. I want to do this since we have several
> implementations that work on Solaris of CIFS already and especially
> since there is a n
I think it's appropriate at this point to request the creation
of a Storage community, which could be an umbrella for the
various filesystems as well as technologies such as fibre-channel
and scsi/sas.
[Incidentally, the NWS consolidation has moved a huge step closer
to being released under CDD
Eric Shrock,
I want to host a community which already exists, the 'CIFS community', on the
OpenSolaris website. I want to do this since we have several implementations
that work on Solaris of CIFS already and especially since there is a native
OpenSolaris client coming out, which has been want
Eric Schrock wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:54:43PM -0500, Mark Sweeney wrote:
Furthermore, these other FS's have communities, so unless we want to
send the message out that CIFS will be a second class citizen on
Solaris, I think it would be reasonable to match the level of exposure
this get
Mark Sweeney wrote:
Thanks Stephen and Eric.
My intent is to produce a community. The development effort will be in-house, then released as open source once it is
completed.
I'm not sure if this is just confusion stemming from the wording, or if
there are other issues involved. But taken
I also prefer a community, but CIFS goes beyond just the client work we're
doing and opening up. There's client and server-side, both native and
public-domain (like Samba). It's far more than just SMBFS. That's just one
implementation aspect of supporting CIFS on Solaris. Even more broadly, nati
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:54:43PM -0500, Mark Sweeney wrote:
>
> Furthermore, these other FS's have communities, so unless we want to
> send the message out that CIFS will be a second class citizen on
> Solaris, I think it would be reasonable to match the level of exposure
> this gets on the site
Thanks Stephen and Eric.
My intent is to produce a community. The development effort will be in-house,
then released as open source once it is completed.
I have been asked by Stephen Hahn to articulate how a CIFS community is needed,
meaningful, and separate.
It is needed in the sense that, c
> you need to decide whether your efforts require a project
> or a community. If your intent is to produce code or
> a structured best practice document or some other form
> of collaboratively authored product, then I recommend
> that you request a CIFS project, in which case you need
> to send m
Hi Octave,
Yep, it will be supported on x86 and sparc.
Thanks for the interest.
Mark
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
