On 8/15/05, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heya,
I don't know much about build environments in the RPM world, but don't
development teams generally base their shared build environments on the
rpmbuild tool and repositories of RPM spec files?
I would imagine they share their
Eric Boutilier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me too, but I think Dennis and Joerg are saying that, in theory, any
build system should be able to generate an exact duplicate of any
binary SUNW packages for which Sun has documented the build parameters
and patches used. (And assuming the original
Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, Compiling OpenSolaris does not produce packages but
8 CPIO archives.
If I install SchilliX and add pkgadd, I still cannot use most
blastwave packages because blastwave packages contein dependencies
to SUNW packages that seem to be missing
Matt Ingenthron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be disappointed if there were a significant amount of further
separation from SUNW packages. I have no ability to influence it, but
iff the community settles on a package framework, I'd rather see a set
of OSOLblah packages or something like that
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
(snip...)
These are the sort of things that we need to address. I am working on
a new Subversion repository for all the software at Blastwave right
now. If we also implement a build system then we can move towards a
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, TJ Yang wrote:
Previously, Eric Boutilier wrote:
The project goal states
... provide OpenSolaris OS a modern package
age management system.
What will be the right wording of above sentence ?
TJ,
First let me backtrack a bit. In my first reply I didn't realize
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Aug 2005, TJ Yang wrote:
Previously, Eric Boutilier wrote:
The project goal states
... provide OpenSolaris OS a modern package
age management system.
What will be the right wording of above sentence ?
TJ,
First let
Hi,
Chris Ricker wrote:
I think it's perhaps more clear, particularly if you're wanting to compare
lots of different systems / cherry-pick from available implementations, to
think of the needed functionality as 3 different things:
* building packages
* installing and removing packages
*
Hi,
TJ Yang wrote:
I read albertw's blog but I failed to understand how to use Solaris'
patch management system to be a modern PMS for OpenSoalris.
I would advocate the use of patches for updating packages. But I would
be very interested in seeing the things that people don't like about
On 8/8/05, Albert White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most of this email snipped
If a consensus develops among the distributions to go with a particular
high level management system then thats great. But its a separate
discussion from whether to use the SVR4 package architecture.
Cheers,
Bob Palowoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is true. If we look at the roadmap the install and
admin tools are scheduled for next year around April/May
timeframe. It's proably better to hold off until than
until the patch management can architectually include
those stable interfaces.
On 8/8/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Palowoda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is true. If we look at the roadmap the install and
admin tools are scheduled for next year around April/May
timeframe. It's proably better to hold off until than
until the patch management
On 8/8/05, Matt Ingenthron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a recent services engagement with a customer, one of the admins was
vi challenged. He was used to Linux where pico was found on many
systems. I helped him get pkg-get on the Solaris 10 system and
proceeded to pkg-get pine, which
snip
TJ,
The project goal states
... provide OpenSolaris OS a modern package
age management system.
It seems to assume that Sun will definitely never
open-source its new
(and evolving) package update system, Sun Update
Connection (which is
based on Sun's patch tools and
Hi,
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/albertw?entry=updaing
_software_in_the_open
Updaing?
ok ok so I didn't spellcheck the title! guilty.
To die up?
huh?
Btw, interesting comments there as well :-)
hmm... not very relavent are they. Deleted.
Thanks Dragan,
~Al
This message posted from
snip
Albert White wrote a nice overview of Sun Update
Connection
technologies (in an OpenSolaris context) on his
blog.
See:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/albertw?entry=updaing
_software_in_the_open
I will read it later.
I read albertw's blog but I failed to understand
To the OpenSolaris.org webmasters,
Is there no Wiki on the opensolaris.org site that we
could use for this
- my only issue with something so core being
discussed off-site is that
it's likely to get lost...
Hmm I pick mediawiki site even I am moinmoin user becuase mediawiki is most
I'd totally vote for moinmoin - my favourite Wiki, but I'm sure everyone
has their own...
Darren.
TJ Yang wrote:
To the OpenSolaris.org webmasters,
Is there no Wiki on the opensolaris.org site that we
could use for this
- my only issue with something so core being
discussed off-site is
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, TJ Yang wrote:
There are many discussions happened recently on the
matter of package
management system on Solaris/OpenSolaris, I am
glad to see many
interests to address the issue of outdated PMS on
Opensolaris.
[...]
TJ,
The project goal states
...
19 matches
Mail list logo
