as far as I know, no
(don't know why, simply it won't work)
d. (on oc4j, a close relative of orion)
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Per conto di Jose Mena
Inviato: mercoledì 10 aprile 2002 13.20
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: error-page tag in web-xml
I don't know how to do this. It could be possible, but there isn't
documentation yet.
As an alternative you could use SOAP.
For example with GLUE you can use SSL to connect from a Java client to your
EJB.
Have a look at this articles:
http://kb.atlassian.com/content/tutorials/finsiel/ejbsoap.jsp
Hi,
if can
help, I might tell you that oracle oc4j works well with jdk1.4, both in client
& server mode.
For
logging I'd suggest jakarta log4j though.
bye,
d.
(caveat empor: my own experience is quite limited to web apps, with no
ejb / jms etc. )
-Messaggio originale-Da:
yes, I've got!
this snippet of httpd.conf sets up a proxy from apache to a web application
in orion,
so that if you requests http://yoursite/Abr/index.jsp, actually
http://localhost:/Abr/index.jsp is called and the content is
written back to the calling browser as http://yoursite/Abr/index.j
ow doesn't work!
Thanks for the response,
Ed
- Original Message -
From: "Montebove Luciano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:13 AM
Subject: R: Soap with Axis ?
> Why use an alpha-3 code (
Hi Casper,
EJB are not multithreaded but a normal class *is*.
Try putting the stuff in a public class TryMe extends Thread{}
d.
ps. if you need a scheduler the things are tougher.
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Per conto di Casper
Højstrup
Inv
Why use an alpha-3 code (axis) when you can have a fast production quality
soap implementation like GLUE for free?
http://www.themindelectric.com/products/glue/glue.html
http://www.themindelectric.com/products/glue/releases/GLUE-2.0.1/docs/glue/g
uide/hosting/orion.html
Don't be confused from
Dear all,
I've read the below-mentioned message, and it sounds rather cool;
I didn't know that a servlet could write to at any time it
likes; how do you manage that? do you have to set the content size
before you write? or you just need to flush it out at the end
of a chunck?
thanx for sending
Orion-Interest
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 4:50
PM
Subject: R: A nonfatal internal JIT
(3.10.107(x)) error ??
do you use jdk1.2.2?
d.
-Messaggio originale-Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Per
do you
use jdk1.2.2?
d.
-Messaggio originale-Da:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Per conto di David
TunkransInviato: venerdì 22 febbraio 2002 11.51A:
Orion-InterestOggetto: A nonfatal internal JIT (3.10.107(x)) error
??
Anyone know what this could be?
My first CMP entity bean and I have some questions.
I was wondering if it is possible to do a compound search within the O/R
mapping in orion-ejb-jar.xml?
The problem is a field from one table is needed to lookup a field on another
table to get the result.
Example:
Customer has a field
Luca,
http://www.orionserver.com/docs/load-balancer.xml.html
Jeff.
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:00:25 +0200
Davanzo Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Where did you find documentation on how to use/setup loadbalancer? i am
> trying to use it with no success because of no documentation.
> Please
Hi,
Where did you find documentation on how to use/setup loadbalancer? i am
trying to use it with no success because of no documentation.
Please help!!
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Inviato: mercoledì 26 settembre 2001 10.04
> A: Orion-Inter
look to the site
www.orionserversupport.com
there are many useful articles and tips, including one on how to use Apache
as a "proxy" to orionserver ie.e. apache serves the static html, while orion
serves servlets/jsp and manages ejb invocations..
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Lucio Picco
Ciao,
Anch'io ho gli stessi tuoi problemi vedi miei precedenti messaggi..
Non ho scoperto come risolvere la cosa..
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Diego Amicabile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Inviato: mercoledì 5 settembre 2001 15.24
> A: Orion-Interest
> Oggetto: Memory leak using session
Grazie Paolo,
dove sei?
Leonardo
-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Per conto di Montebove
Luciano
Inviato: mercoledì 18 luglio 2001 12.29
A: Orion-Interest
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oggetto: RE: SOAP interface for ejb beans
If I understand your question
'items_type' attribute from your code.
Marcel
- Original Message -
From: "Hamidou DIA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:27 PM
Subject: Advanced O-R Mapping
> Hi,
> I am trying to use the
Hi,
I am trying to use the Orion advanced O-R mapping
features. I have an entity bean "Event" which contains
a Collection of "Attachements". At deployment time,
Orion creates a perfect table for Event but the
Event_Attachements table is created with one column of
type LON
In your code fragment there's no "bean:message" tags. Anyway, I've got the
following line in a jsp that works fine:
You need the following init-param in the ActionServlet configuration
(web.xml):
application
ApplicationResources
and you need, of course, the key "index.so
Vinh Chu Xuan
Vietnam Data Communication Company
Software R&D Department
1E Truong Chinh - Hanoi - Vietnam
http://home.vnn.vn/vdc/index_e.html
Office : +84 4 8699112-307
Cell phone : +84 91 21 6116
- Original Message -
From: Phong Quoc Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Orion-Interest <
Hi kevin,
i dunno if it can help but i had a problem with oracle & streaming & it took
me 3 days before i could find what was going on.
The "Stream already closed" error appears when u are trying to read a stream
from the db & at the same time (with the same connection) u do other
operations on t
It seems to me that Orion does not yet support EJB-QL neither EJB 2.0
many-to-many relationships.
However, if you are interested in EJB 2.0 and finders, you may have a look
at http://www.orionsupport.com/.
Giustino De Vincentiis
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Marc Rabil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Netscape has been the bane of developers for years. I doubt that it will get
better with version 6. How about Opera?
Netscape has been the bane of developers for years. I doubt that it will get
better with version 6. How about Opera?
Netscape has been the bane of developers for years. I doubt that it will get
better with version 6. How about Opera?
ve to endure all of N's flaws.
regards
Johan Fredriksson
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Hodges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: R: Why is Netscape slower with Orion?
*sigh*
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Eric Hodges wrote:
[snipped suggestion to flatten tables for broader browser support]
> Are you sure it's not:
>
> Don't use Netscape.
Sure. And only use English. And require Flash. And ...
A very good way to NOT reach the broadest audience possible.
Great strategy.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: R: Why is Netscape slower with Orion?
> We found that if the table depth was more than 5 or so
:Re: R: Why is Netscape slower with Orion?
This is because netscape's ui is based on parsing XML every
time is has to
render. What a pain in the butt. Who thought of that?
> From: Marco Isella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
ng the slowness
though, it is an issure with the fact that N4.7x simply is not good about
sharing threads and processes... feels like it makes the whole windows box
single threaded.
R
At 02:58 PM 2/9/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>One thing netscape is very very slow at is when it has to render nested
on-Interest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: R: Why is Netscape slower with Orion?
>
> One thing netscape is very very slow at is when it has to render nested
> tables.. i had a page with 4 level nested tables & with netscape it was a
> metter of second before the re
One thing netscape is very very slow at is when it has to render nested
tables.. i had a page with 4 level nested tables & with netscape it was a
metter of second before the rendering was done; i switched to a single table
& the performing was almost acceptable (anyway far slower than ie).
This w
There is an example at http://www.orionsupport.com/articles/vhosts.html
Giustino De Vincentiis
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Henrik Skafsgaard Larsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: martedì 6 febbraio 2001 14.02
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: Virtual hosts
If you have 2 (or more) virtual ho
!
Daniel
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : 5 février, 2001 08:06
À : Orion-Interest
Objet : SV: Re[2]: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
You shouls check out the getConnection implementation on the datasource.
It gets a referen
implements the JDBC
interfaces. The actual implemented classes are serialized and returned to
the client automagically by the JVM?
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 0
.
Klaus
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Jeff Schnitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 5. februar 2001 12:17
Til: Orion-Interest
Emne: RE: Re[2]: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
I'm fully prepared to believe that my understanding of how this works is
wrong, but if so it r
t it)?
Ever curious,
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: Allen Fogleson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 10:46 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: RE: Re[2]: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
>
>
>Uhmmm, I agree, I was confused bec
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rafael Alvarez
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2001 10:24 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: Re[2]: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
Hello Allen,
DataSources gives you one advantage on the client side: Security
Hello Allen,
DataSources gives you one advantage on the client side: Security.
If you use a direct JDBC connection to a Database, your username,
password and URL have to be placed in your class. A Datasource hides
all those details, so if some one decompile your class (even JAXed
classes are not
e you do?
After all maybe I am being dense and missing something. :)
Al
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff Schnitzer
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 12:15 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
Ofcourse if you use this in an Entity bean pls use the EJB connection :)
Sorry just aditional information - forgot this on the first letter :)
Klaus
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 31. januar 2001 16:19
Til: Orion-Interest
Emne: SV: R: R
ception(ex);
}
// .. do some JDBC stuff
conn.close();
Hope this helps you further :=)
Have fun!!
Klaus Myrseth
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Burr Sutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 31. januar 2001 15:21
Til: Orion-Interest
Emne: Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
CTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
Jeff,
I disagree. Part of the benefit of a DataSource is that it can abstract
the actual driver or database being used. If I can ask a DataSource for
a database connection and not have
dynamically
downloading the class files is slow anyways :-) :-) :-)
Jeff
>-Original Message-
>From: Tom Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 6:29 PM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
>
>
>Jeff,
rations, and licensing issues? You know
> you're going to need the classes anyways, package them with the client.
>
> Jeff
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Tom Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:08 AM
> >To: Orio
--
>From: Tom Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 9:08 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: Re: R: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
>
>
>Again, thanks for your replies.
>
>What is curious to me is that the driver performs fine within a jsp
/>
>
> you should lookup "jdbc/HypersonicDS", and you should have the driver
> classes in your /orion/lib directory.
>
> Giustino
>
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Tom Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Inviato: martedì 30 gennaio 2001 12.24
> A:
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Tom Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: martedì 30 gennaio 2001 12.24
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: Re: R: frustrated - jdbc: No suitable driver
Thanks for the reply. That is exactly how I am initializing the context
in my client application:
Hashtabl
Thanks for the reply. That is exactly how I am initializing the context
in my client application:
Hashtable ht = new Hashtable();
ht.put(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,
"com.evermind.server.ApplicationClientInitialContextFactory");
ht.put(Context.PROVIDER_URL, "ormi://192.168.
Try initializing the context this way:
...
Properties props = new Properties();
props.setProperty("java.naming.factory.initial","com.evermind.server.Applica
tionClientInitialContextFactory");
props.setProperty("java.naming.provider.url", "ormi://localhost/app-name");
props.setProperty("java.naming
24, 2001 8:47 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: O/R mapping
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sean P.
> McNamara
> Sent: mardi 23 janvier 2001 20:41
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: O/R mapping
>
>
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sean P.
> McNamara
> Sent: mardi 23 janvier 2001 20:41
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: RE: O/R mapping
>
>
>
> While I agree that the 3-table approach is not necessa
Inserted yesterday in bugzilla as bug #260
Luciano
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Stanislav Bernatsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: mercoledÍ 24 gennaio 2001 11.03
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: EJB 2.0 support in orion 1.4.5
Hello.
It seems that MessageDrivenBeans don't work in orion 1.4
Hi again!
The associative table has its pro and cons. As severel of you pointed out,
the use of a associative table makes the tables a lot cleaner. But as our
complex world seems to be full of multiplicity, I personally would think
twice, when the domain model is large. I did a little test to mea
Title: SV: O/R mapping
That
is, I fully agree that this is important when working with existing
tables.
WR
-Ursprungligt meddelande-Från: Magnus Rydin
Skickat: den 23 januari 2001 23:33Till:
Orion-InterestÄmne: SV: O/R mapping
Daniel, I fully agree with you from
your POV
Title: SV: O/R mapping
Daniel,
I fully agree with you from your POV.
WR
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: Daniel Cardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Skickat: den 23 januari 2001 10:50
> Till: Orion-Interest
> Ämne: RE: O/R mapping
>
>
> I'm a CMP fa
: "Magnus Rydin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 2:51 PM
Subject: SV: O/R mapping
One of the things I like best with EJB is that I dont have to care about how
my objects are stored (Yes, im a CMP fanatic).
So
Me too. Not only are the joins expensive, but it's a lot of extra data,
too. My database is already key-heavy without the extra tables.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Dumitru Sbenghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE
27;s table structure. While this is perhaps not completely
germaine to EJB (I'm not so familiar with the details of the spec,) we
have found value in the 3-table approach in general O/R use.
If you make use of the 3-table method, the table that contains the
row-data is then only specific to the
I'm a CMP fanatic too :) But keep in mind some of us have to deal with
existing models that have been created in the
"traditionnal" RDBMS fashion. It's good to have control on the way CMP
will work with Orion.
We have solved the O-R mapping problem by having a code generato
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Montebove
> Luciano
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 3:31 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R: JMS
>
>
> I have just started a study for integrating sw
Behalf Of Jeff Schnitzer
Sent: 23 January 2001 10:48
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: RE: O/R Mapping
The extra table is definately unnecessary, and hopefully it will go away
in a future version of Orion. Take a look at bug #209 in Bugzilla.
Jeff Schnitzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-Original Mess
Title: SV: O/R mapping
I
care; If you store a 1-m relation in 3 tables, to get the corresponding data
from the third table
for
a PK from the first table, you must join the second table with the third
table;
A join
is slower than a simple select;
If you
store a 1-m relation in only two
Title: SV: O/R mapping
One of the things I like best with EJB is that I dont have to care about how my objects are stored (Yes, im a CMP fanatic).
So my personal contribution to the subject must be:
who cares how many tables are used 'back there' ? :)
> -Ursprungli
À : Orion-Interest
Objet : RE: O/R mapping
Hi Theis,
As much as I can remember, there *is* - definitely - a need for an
intermediate third table to contain the mapping information. By using
this
third table, you eliminate data replication/redundancy in the other two
tables.
To my knowledge this i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 9:14 AM
Subject: O/R Mapping
>
>
> Hi Tony!
>
> Thanks for your quick answer. But I'm still not convinced. Besides many to
> many relation there is, as I see it, no
12:14 AM
>To: Orion-Interest
>Subject: O/R Mapping
>
>
>
>
>Hi Tony!
>
>Thanks for your quick answer. But I'm still not convinced.
>Besides many to
>many relation there is, as I see it, no need for a third table
>(with this
>principle, a many-to-many r
Hi Tony!
Thanks for your quick answer. But I'm still not convinced. Besides many to
many relation there is, as I see it, no need for a third table (with this
principle, a many-to-many relation would result in five tables as you
translate it to two many-to-one, or?). Let me exemplify my concepti
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 January 2001 15:10
To: Orion-Interest
Subject: O/R mapping
Hi!
I have been reading the complex-or example and ploughed through the atm
example. In the complex-or example it is stated that c
Hi!
I have been reading the complex-or example and ploughed through the atm
example. In the complex-or example it is stated that collections are mapped
to an another table and that the reason for this is normalization. The Atm
example is also following this principle.
Is this really correct? I h
I have just started a study for integrating swiftMQ and sonicMQ with Orion.
Up to now I tried only to send messages from servlet/JSP but both the
products provide some form of bridging with other JMS servers, so this way
could be possible to use Message Driven EJB.
More information in a few weeks.
Hi,
Put your oracle jdbc driver (something like classes12_01.zip) in orion/lib
Luciano
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Danut Prisacaru [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: mercoledì 17 gennaio 2001 16.06
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: How to configure Orion to use Oracle
I am trying to use Oracl
Hi everybody!
I'm pretty new to applicationservers and right now I'm exploring the o/r mapping
fascilities in orion. I have read the examples
(atm, complex-or on orion support, etc)
and the mail archive, but there is still lot of things that I don't understand. I
would appreci
Original Message-
> From: Peter Pontbriand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 10:12 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: Re: Complex O/R and EJB 2.0 CMP
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 10:11:41AM -0500, Peter Pontbriand wrote:
> Speaking of Lists, has anyone at all managed to get an Orion list-mapping -
> whether declared in a EAR-contained orion-ejb-jar.xml or in a EJB2.0-style
> ejb-jar.xml - to actually preserve the element order?
With orion-ejb-jar.x
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Schnitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Orion-Interest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: Complex O/R and EJB 2.0 CMP
* SNIP *
> Take a look at the documentation for orion-ejb-jar.xm
ilding
>> more than a few servlets.
>
> What I meant here, is gettin an environment setup and
> working and being productive. Concurrency issues are
> not a big deal to handle when you know what you are
> doing, and you can do object oriented programming with
> servlets/java
>From: Darren Pamatat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>I like the layout of the complex-or example more so
>than the orion-cmp primer, because it is not required
>to jar it up, and classes can just be recompiled, and
>run (if only I could run something against it). Also,
>what is the difference in th
> And it doesn't support container managed relationships
> between dependent
> objects.
>
> Joni
>
It does support dependant objects (EJB->DO) but not
EJB -> DO -> DO. I think this is what you are saying.
I submitted this bug (#185) some time ago but it hasn't
been looked at.
-tim
ou dont plan on building
> more than a few servlets.
What I meant here, is gettin an environment setup and
working and being productive. Concurrency issues are
not a big deal to handle when you know what you are
doing, and you can do object oriented programming with
servlets/java classes/ create you
> From: Konstantin Polyzois
> I think Orion supports Maps and Sets for dependent objects, the EJB2
> (proposed final draft) only mandates support for Sets.
> Orions implementation does not look complete yet (how could
> it be when there
> is no spec?) it lacks EJB-QL, Home-methods and Select-me
t-methods (forgive me
for errors it has been some time since I read the spec).
/korre
-Original Message-
From: Darren Pamatat
To: Orion-Interest
Sent: 2001-01-07 20:27
Subject: Complex O/R and EJB 2.0 CMP
I've been trying to get started with some O/R stuff
with orion, and have gone thru
I've been trying to get started with some O/R stuff
with orion, and have gone thru the orion-cmp primer,
and the complex-or example. A few problems, is that
the orion-cmp primer is very simplistic, and the
complex-or example (from orionsupport, which is
currently down) does not have any exa
Hi Andrew,
I am interested in this topic too. My company has choosed SonicMQ as JMS
server but I can't find a direct way to call a message bean in Orion (the
only way seems to be using, the SonicMQ provided, JMS bridge to make the
two JMS services talk each other).
If you solve the problem ple
Look at
http://www.mail-archive.com/orion-interest@orionserver.com/msg02763.html
Giustino De Vincentiis
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Karsten Beving [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: lunedì 11 dicembre 2000 15.16
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: Distributed EJB's
Hi.
My preferred combination of tools for Orion include:
Structure Builder from WebGain (for EJB design) +
Kawa Professional from Allaire(as IDE for editing and debugging).
Luciano
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Jarek Skreta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Inviato: lunedì 11 dicembre 2
Hi Dag,
>.
>My code is the orion-primer example >
>(http://www.jollem.com/orion-primer/)
>that works inside one machine but fails between two >machines.
It works on two different machines. It works also using resin or others
servlet engine for the web side.
> The
>orion-primer is a ear with
Hi, looking at orion documentation (web.xml configuration file) the syntax
of url-pattern tag is:
/*.thePattern
so try adding the '/'...
Giustino De Vincentiis
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Messaggio originale-
Da: PHiL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: mercoledì 6 dicembre 2000
Hi John,
>I'm trying to set Orion up to run my jsp pages on one box and my beans on
>another box. Where does the jndi.properties file go so that my default
>InitialContext correctly points to the other box? I'm deploying to a
>directory instead of a .war file. I've tried putting under my web-ro
>Just got few imporant questions for you folks :
>
>.
>2. Is the Orion version obtained with license any different from the one
>available for dowload on their site ? I mean to say is there an limitation
>like only 2 concurrent users can access it on a non-licensed version ?
No, it's the full
Hello Alexander,
if you want to use an EJB named Account you should have the following
classes:
- AccountBean (extending EJBUserBean),
- Account (extending EJBUser),
- AccountHome (extending EJBHome, you have to copy all the definitions from
EJBUserHome modifying the return type, and optionally
Substitute
Object boundObject = context.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/HelloHome");
with
Object boundObject = context.lookup("java:comp/env/ejb/Hello");
Luciano
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Santosh Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: mercoledì 22 novembre 2000 1
Hi all,
Solved. The problem was generated putting struts.jar in orion/lib.
Luciano
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Montebove Luciano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: giovedì 9 novembre 2000 16.57
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: Help: struts on Orion 1.4.0
Hi all,
I followed the instructions
>From doc/rmi.xml.html:
"
..
Specifies a remote (point to point) RMI-server to communicate with.
host - Hostname of the remote server.
password - The password to log in with.
port - Port of the remote server, default is 23791.
username - The username to log in with.
..
"
After this
Hi
Leung,
You
should'nt use the '%' symbols in the finder definition, instead you should
attach them to the parameter you pass to the finder method.
i.e.
finder
definition:
finder
calling:
findBy...("%" + description + "%");
Hope
this help
Giustino De Vincentiis
-Messaggio ori
transport-guarantee means only that you can't call that component if you
aren't in a secure (SSL) connection.
Hope this help.
Luciano
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Savotchkin Egor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: lunedi 16 ottobre 2000 15.57
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: transport-gua
Have you defined roles in application.xml?
Luciano
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Ben Z. Tels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Inviato: lunedì 9 ottobre 2000 21.28
A: Orion-Interest
Oggetto: Really basic problem with user authentication
L.S.
I am having the following problem with principals on t
riginal Message-
> From: Montebove Luciano [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 5:16 AM
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: R: Client certificate authentication
>
> Hi Esteban,
>
> I already put the lines you added to your web.xml file (as the user
ept or not the user.
> If you are interested in this "manual" identification I can explain
> you more.
>
> > -Mensaje original-
> > De: Montebove Luciano [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Enviado el: Martes, 03 de Octubre de 2000 04:59 a.m.
> > Para:
I can help you partially. I had the same 403 Forbidden problem and I'm
waiting for a response from official support (5 days).
For the Cert ID use the sample page ssl-user-registration.jsp in demo SSL.
It will show the cert id you are looking for.
If you solve the 403 problem tell me.
¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo